This is actually a lolcow trait. We've had many cows with weird, vitriolic hatred of adoption, some of them not even adopted themselves, like Conure Religiousbook of ancient Kiwi lore.
I was being mildly joking, as I do know the distinction is that Catholic doctrine is that a fertilized ovum is ensouled, so you can choose not to reproduce, just not to kill already existing life. Then there's the obsession with onanism which is more common among the snake-handling sorts.
The way the left had gone, lots of people feel then the left had left them. Elon Musk wasn't wrong with that meme.
Abortion clinics have been bombed in the past. You're also talking mostly about various flavors of Christians who don't believe in violence as a solution to societal problems.
You think angry christians who aren't fans of late term abortions and eugenics are bad wait until the muslim niggers get mad. Dearborn, Michigan is a nuclear bomb waiting to go off and those ignoramuses are used as election fortifiers.
The main people who do things like that are people like Scott Roeder, who most certainly was targeting Tiller because of performing late-term abortions, a scenario where the idea that it's killing a baby makes actual sense. There are also outright crazies like Eric Rudolph, but he is a distinct outlier in abortion foes in that he is vehemently not Christian.
Those fences aren't transparent to our democratic proccess and a threat to our democracy
Indeed, however the MSM will do everything to hide that detail.
Fair enough but the concept that you have to commit violence equivalent to what atrocities you're criticizing in order to be taken seriously is a bit much. The flipside would be "I don't think they actually believe it's about women's rights or bodily autonomy because pro-choicers aren't firebombing churches".
It’s called NFP and has been allowed virtually firever. Pulling out is explicitly banned in the Catholic and Orthodox churches.
I give people making this argument enough credit to think that if they knew for a fact a child was being murdered right next door, they'd do something about it more than waving around a sign. Only a monster or a coward would allow that. Accusing them instead of engaging in more than a bit of rhetorical excess is, in my mind, a much less insulting accusation.
That's actually my favorite conspiratard theory about the leak, that it isn't the obvious suspect of a disgruntled leftist law clerk (quite likely one of Breyer's), but instead, some accelerationist nutcase law clerk leaking it to cause riots.
Which is what I'm saying is true of the reverse position, if people really thought this was going to bring about the christian version of a handmaid's tale (or whatever that book's called) why aren't we seeing firebombings? Clearly they don't believe in it. /s
The first rule of the religion of most of the folks who are pro-life is quite literally "thou shalt not kill". Essentially they're not doing so because they lack conviction but ostensibly because they view human life as sacrosanct. What you're saying would make more sense if it were a secular movement but we're talking about, as I said, various flavors of christian who view the problem - I think correctly given their worldview - that the system and the law are responsible, not merely the people committing the act.
Maybe he is one of them who likes the left’s riots from 2020 and wants it do it again I mean the dates nearly line up
