Homosexuality and the danger of parasitical thoughts. - A schizo rambling

Am I losing it, or does this somewhat make sense?

  • Yes

    Votes: 15 21.7%
  • No

    Votes: 7 10.1%
  • ???

    Votes: 14 20.3%
  • I HATE THE ANTICHRIST!

    Votes: 33 47.8%

  • Total voters
    69
so that kind of amounts to taking their word for it, eh?
i guess that's better than nothing

e: what should we do with the ones who are just faking it?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: BBJ_4_Ever
Homophobia is normal and natural in adolescence when males are insecure and working out their relationship with the opposite sex. If you're over 20 and still haven't reconciled with it, your probably gay yourself or you need a reality check.
And here you have already lost me. Why is it normal, what makes it normal, who decides it is normal? You believe that this is normal, yet your version of normalcy is based on an abnormality. I find it strange how I question something, and the only people who confront me have no argument, they are the ones I am criticizing, and the only thing they can say is "No U". It's pathetic, i've already stated that I realize my thoughts are strange, but I find them more believable than the idea that homosexuality just randomly explodes in popularity.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: BBJ_4_Ever
so that kind of amounts to taking their word for it, eh?
i guess that's better than nothing

e: what should we do with the ones who are just faking it?
There's nothing you can do, it's just another thing to add confusion to the public, another thing to incite rage and group people into smaller cliques, so that they will never unite and fight back against the destruction of morals.

i'm not here to argue, i'm here to learn more
I'm not smart, there's nothing to learn, it's just a phenomena that I decided to dub.
 
I'm think you're on to something. People don't want to entertain the idea because you've presented it like a closet homo schizo, but you're somewhat right about media causing an uptick in these occurences.

The concept of herd or mob mentality seems lost in the modern day and I can promise you that transgenderism and gay "culture" at large would not exist at all without mass media propagation. I do think that if a child sees homosexuality championed over heterosexuality repeatedly through their formative years, it's going to become very confusing when they start puberty and develop attractions. They may wonder why they have no attraction to the same gender the same way a gay person may come to question why they don't feel anything for the opposite. I don't think any of us grew up wondering why we aren't gay in the slightest.

Whether or not it "makes" someone gay is going to come down to a few factors and it isn't a mental virus that gets passed around. It's an idea, and depending on the person who receives the idea, they will either succumb to it and use it as a way to explain their problems and develop it as a coping method, or they will have a strong sense of self and won't be so easily swept away by these doubts. Calling it a cognitohazard or an infohazard would be apt to some degree, but it has to be an entire conceptualization of homosexuality, not just the given epiphany that men can fuck men and you can do it too.
 
Homosexuality is spread through parasitism, since they cannot reproduce. I do not believe the amount of naturally occurring homosexuals would reach this staggeringly high.
you've mentioned that but is there like an organized group or are they just like increasing faster because there's more of them now?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: BBJ_4_Ever
I'm think you're on to something. People don't want to entertain the idea because you've presented it like a closet homo schizo,
Insomnia probably, i'm just trying to stay awake until I can reset my internal clock. I would have tried to describe it better, but I was afraid I would forget about this idea, so I decided to post it. Honestly idc how people view me, I just don't want it to be considered a shitpost.
 
so that kind of amounts to taking their word for it, eh?
i guess that's better than nothing

e: what should we do with the ones who are just faking it?
We end up having to "take your word for it" on many issues in society to protect the people that really are going through these troubles. It's impossible for someone on the outside to make a final determination of someone else's mental state, so yes, we have to take their word for it.

It is troublesome to accept a "level" of degeneracy but homosexuals never hurt anyone but each other. The mental parasitism aspect, or the "trend" dies down over time, as we will see with trannies.
 
you've mentioned that but is there like an organized group or are they just like increasing faster because there's more of them now?
I don't know, there could be someone behind it but i'm not going to just point the finger at jews or the illuminati, or whatever, so I have no clue. it's more like a hivemind, they all have the singular purpose of spreading their ideology far and wide.
 
I really do think that any lifestyle that isn't ultimately directed towards creating and raising the next generation is unnatural and unhealthy. If you are aware of your own mortality, making children and passing on your influence so you can "live on" in future generations is truly the only way to cope. You would have to be a very fucked up person to be able to be satisfied just pleasure-seeking while the days and years count down to oblivion.

That's not to say that I think we should push this through policy, or even rudeness and intolerance, but it's something to be aware of.
 
I don't know, there could be someone behind it but i'm not going to just point the finger at jews or the illuminati, or whatever, so I have no clue. it's more like a hivemind, they all have the singular purpose of spreading their ideology far and wide.
It's important to view these things as a set of convenient coincidences for the powers that exacerbate them for their own gain. We already know very well that the people in power are horribly shortsighted and will do anything to get into power regardless of the consequences. Pushing issues like homosexuality and championing minorities was a Leftist ideal and they did not take into account the consequences of doing this and continue to ignore it, or they are literally demons that foresaw the outcomes of telling everyone that it's better to fuck boys. You can decide which is more likely. I definitely think that especially now, there are evil-minded people who push these ideas with the strict purpose of disturbing the foundations of society. It's useful right now to continue shaking things up to implement all of these reforms.

From the most evil minds, it trickles down to news networks and media companies who believe truly that they are sharing and propagating the best ideals for society.
 
We already know very well that the people in power are horribly shortsighted and will do anything to get into power regardless of the consequences
This is basically because of the principle I explained above, they don't see any meaning in a world that exists after their own death. At least in the extreme version of this, they think fulfilling whatever petty personal ambition they have in their brief time here is the only thing that could possibly matter. This is why I am concerned that Putin might try something stupid, he's an old man with cancer and might care more about having an exciting end to the movie of his life than about anything else (and killing all the characters is the best way to end any drama).
 
This is basically because of the principle I explained above, they don't see any meaning in a world that exists after their own death. At least in the extreme version of this, they think fulfilling whatever petty personal ambition they have in their brief time here is the only thing that could possibly matter. This is why I am concerned that Putin might try something stupid, he's an old man with cancer and might care more about having an exciting end to the movie of his life than about anything else (and killing all the characters is the best way to end any drama).
All the green checkmarks in the world, fren. No one wants to even discuss the potentiality for Putin to press that button but he has every reason in the world as a materialistic oligarch with everything to lose, and no afterlife to reclaim it in.
 
do you think the globohomo agenda would benefit from putin nuking the western world, and if so how?
 
Back