Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

[Cilleystring]

How can these people function on a day to day basis ?

Emotional manipulation of others in order to excuse themselves from life's difficulties

 

[Muh_Soggy_Knee]

 

[BezMemow]

Lefties coping about Gender and sex being the same thing

 

[Amber the Hedgehog]

Honestly? I don’t think women *can* be in charge of society except in a Y the Last Man scenario. Men are more competitive and they will always be angling for control in some manner. Women are more agreeable and since we’re mostly heterosexual, we don’t have the lesbian separatist instinct. Male assertiveness comes at us and we reconfigure ourselves in various ways that just so happen to look *exactly* like they always have throughout human history. I’m not even mad about this, I consider this an inevitability. It’s just the most basic energy of the human race. You have yin and yang and you always will.

So with women the majority or women in charge, which men capitalize upon this? Which men see this as an opportunity? The worst men. The kind of men who cannot compete or succeed with other men. They’re delighted by the lack of competition, because they know females are no competition. We will bend for them, and the ones who won‘t will be ostracized by the ones who do, who will be the majority. The weak men can take over. No normal men around means no competition and they will swiftly move into a controlling role.

Therefore, a female led society in the absence of a science fiction all the males died scenario is actually a Weak Male-led society. It will dissolve quickly because there’s a reason normal men BTFO the weak ones, they’re unfit. And, lbr, at this point probably troons.

I think there are some exemptional people who intrest and are at least some degree capable of leading societies. Most people aren't them, witch is quite natural because there are only so many leading positions to go around compared to people needed to be part of the team. So these people are rare and most of those rare people are men. Masculine tendencies just lend themselves better for being a strong enough to lead and hold on the power. Still some of those capable of being a leader are female. Women have alway needed to lead even if it's not the same degree as men, if nothing else running the household and keeping kids in line. So even all female groups also have their top chickens and female majority jobs have always needed leaders. Sometimes those positions are filled by the rare men on that field or close enough but even more often women have taken the leading roles because they have experience on that job and happen to be type to lead. So some women can turn out be capable leaders and there is no reason not to let them lead.

Just choose the best person on the job, don't let gender play part one way or the other. Don't close women out but don't favor them either. If men on average are more capable, witch the evidence points towards, then we will end up with mostly men witch is just fine. As long as the position is still genuinely open for those rare women who also can lead, overwhelmingly men is the best outcome.

 

[Jonah Hill poster]

Something us Americans can all deal with — the fact that these abortion protests are a huge distraction from the real issues that are going on in the world around us.

I’d also add the fact that rising numbers of massive immigration are increasing on our Southern border and we still have no solution on how to stop it.

 

[The Last Stand]

View attachment 3260831

Something us Americans can all deal with — the fact that these abortion protests are a huge distraction from the real issues that are going on in the world around us.

I’d also add the fact that rising numbers of massive immigration are increasing on our Southern border and we still have no solution on how to stop it.

You forgot increasing crime rates.

 

[Lady Bizness]

Don't care if this was already posted because it's too amazing:
View attachment 3259925

I really enjoyed that movie and find familiarity with the character of Olga as I too am loyal to my fair-haired Norwegian and committed to bearing his offspring. It's the most natural thing in the world. Yet the crowd who hold up distant cousins such as clownfish and seahorses as evidence for the uncanniness of human reproduction ignore that throughout the tree of life countless species are shaped by females choosing the sexiest of males (like Skarsgaard, never mind the embarrassing Jitterbug death-scene in Zoolander) to fertilize their eggs.
In the modern era I'm lucky enough that I can exist in this world as "more than a baby-maker" and pick a mate because "he makes me orgasm laugh" but that doesn't mean somehow we've transcended our genetic heritage where reproduction is no longer the prime directive. Even if you are an asexual eunuch who lives on the internet, your existence, the way you behave, the way your body works, and possibly how you decided to be an asexual eunuch is founded in sexual reproduction.
I'm not a trad-wife - like "cis" it's not a necessary label. I'm just normal.
Anyway, good on Northman for staying focused. I will never stop laughing at the Vikings spinoff for their black lady jarl. Despite the advantages of opening up the gene pool, people in general seem more likely to have children with their own kind. It's not some moral failing, it's just what societies tend to do.

 

[Positron]

J. K. Rowling cannot be pro-choice because there is no positive depiction of abortion in her books.

 

[LurkNoMore]

Honestly? I don’t think women *can* be in charge of society except in a Y the Last Man scenario. Men are more competitive and they will always be angling for control in some manner. Women are more agreeable and since we’re mostly heterosexual, we don’t have the lesbian separatist instinct. Male assertiveness comes at us and we reconfigure ourselves in various ways that just so happen to look *exactly* like they always have throughout human history. I’m not even mad about this, I consider this an inevitability. It’s just the most basic energy of the human race. You have yin and yang and you always will.

So with women the majority or women in charge, which men capitalize upon this? Which men see this as an opportunity? The worst men. The kind of men who cannot compete or succeed with other men. They’re delighted by the lack of competition, because they know females are no competition. We will bend for them, and the ones who won‘t will be ostracized by the ones who do, who will be the majority. The weak men can take over. No normal men around means no competition and they will swiftly move into a controlling role.

Therefore, a female led society in the absence of a science fiction all the males died scenario is actually a Weak Male-led society. It will dissolve quickly because there’s a reason normal men BTFO the weak ones, they’re unfit. And, lbr, at this point probably troons.

I disagree with this. Heterosexual women could easily lead society and it not devolve into a weak male lead society. More so than any society founded by lesbian separatists (as if they wouldn't be cowed by male assertiveness).

The main thing is women would have to work at it. Something any regular society as had to do since the beginning of civilization. They couldn't fall into the traps countless men have fallen into. Weather or not modern america produces women or men of such virtue as to put the nation before the self is another matter entirely.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

J. K. Rowling cannot be pro-choice because there is no positive depiction of abortion in her books.
View attachment 3263453

Yes, the Harry Potter books about the magic school for kids that conservatives railed against for over a decade definitely needed an extended plotline with a positive depiction of Hermione getting an abortion so the author could show solidarity with the future troon cult betrayed by her refusal to adhere in lockstep with their revealed doctrine.

 

[Elwood P. Dowd]

J. K. Rowling cannot be pro-choice because there is no positive depiction of abortion in her books.
View attachment 3263453

Murray?

edit: That's her husband's name. Never knew. I guess it is supposed to be an insult that she married a doctor and has stayed married for 20 or so years?

 

[Wallace]

Yes, the Harry Potter books about the magic school for kids that conservatives railed against for over a decade definitely needed an extended plotline with a positive depiction of Hermione getting an abortion so the author could show solidarity with the future troon cult betrayed by her refusal to adhere in lockstep with their revealed doctrine.

Really, it's her own fault for not being able to see the future and not predict the next virtue signal.

 

[Flexo]

I really enjoyed that movie and find familiarity with the character of Olga as I too am loyal to my fair-haired Norwegian and committed to bearing his offspring. It's the most natural thing in the world. Yet the crowd who hold up distant cousins such as clownfish and seahorses as evidence for the uncanniness of human reproduction ignore that throughout the tree of life countless species are shaped by females choosing the sexiest of males (like Skarsgaard, never mind the embarrassing Jitterbug death-scene in Zoolander) to fertilize their eggs.
In the modern era I'm lucky enough that I can exist in this world as "more than a baby-maker" and pick a mate because "he makes me orgasm laugh" but that doesn't mean somehow we've transcended our genetic heritage where reproduction is no longer the prime directive. Even if you are an asexual eunuch who lives on the internet, your existence, the way you behave, the way your body works, and possibly how you decided to be an asexual eunuch is founded in sexual reproduction.
I'm not a trad-wife - like "cis" it's not a necessary label. I'm just normal.
Anyway, good on Northman for staying focused. I will never stop laughing at the Vikings spinoff for their black lady jarl. Despite the advantages of opening up the gene pool, people in general seem more likely to have children with their own kind. It's not some moral failing, it's just what societies tend to do.

Yes, the Harry Potter books about the magic school for kids that conservatives railed against for over a decade definitely needed an extended plotline with a positive depiction of Hermione getting an abortion so the author could show solidarity with the future troon cult betrayed by her refusal to adhere in lockstep with their revealed doctrine.

Never mind that with the existence of - you know - MAGIC, couldn't the wizards conjure artificial wombs or transplant fetuses with ease?

 

[Alessonincrippliningdepre]

https://mobile.twitter.com/selahspades/status/1523167450187018240

This is the first jurassic park and it SHOWS

 

[Wormy]

A little bit of humor

 

[DoubleD]

"I think women should be angrier in general. there's so much to be angry about"

 

[Jet Fuel Johnny]

"We wanted the work we did in the home and with children to be recognized and paid."

Bitch, you WERE PAID.

Do you think that the food, utilities, mortgage, cars, gasoline, clothing, all just appeared on fucking trees, you mouth breathing retard?

Did you think that the money your husband told you that you could spend just magically appeared?

You did your half of the fucking agreement and think he should pay you like a domestic servant and you probably don't even do anal?

Get fucked.

 

[DoubleD]

"We wanted the work we did in the home and with children to be recognized and paid."

Bitch, you WERE PAID.

Do you think that the food, utilities, mortgage, cars, gasoline, clothing, all just appeared on fucking trees, you mouth breathing retard?

Did you think that the money your husband told you that you could spend just magically appeared?

You did your half of the fucking agreement and think he should pay you like a domestic servant and you probably don't even do anal?

Get fucked.

Where is the reaction for 'Mad At The Internet, but also Agree'?

It strains disbelief (despite being taught to believe this myself from an early age) how a woman living a comfortable lifestyle at a man's expense gets conceptualised as oppression for the woman.

There is however a hidden cost to women who pursue this – most of them need to be good-looking (at least initially). And for this reason alone, I see an awful lot of truth behind the stereotype of feminists being fat and ugly.

Also, this Dorothy character saying "We were SO ANGRY as first wave feminists". Bitch, no you weren't. Unless you're over 100 years old, you weren't even born at the time. This is the equivalent to some loser showing up late to a group project and claiming equal credit.

(Then again, first wave feminists were not sort of people you'd want to associate yourself with. So it balances out.)

And this one? Fooking hell mate. You're allowed to be angry, but no one (regardless of gender) is "allowed" to just... not have people call them what they very obviously are.

 

[AnOminous]

Honestly? I don’t think women *can* be in charge of society except in a Y the Last Man scenario. Men are more competitive and they will always be angling for control in some manner. Women are more agreeable and since we’re mostly heterosexual, we don’t have the lesbian separatist instinct.

Gorgo of Sparta managed it, and that was a way more aggressive society than ours. So did Margaret Thatcher. It's rather more rare but it happens. Catherine the Great would be another example, as would Elizabeth I or Victoria. It seems more common for women monarchs to be placeholders in the absence of a male heir, but on occasion you get really good ones.

 

[The Last Stand]

"I think women should be angrier in general. there's so much to be angry about"

View attachment 3264711

View attachment 3264736

Nothing wrong with being angry, but they're encouraging women to act like unhinged Karens.

"We wanted the work we did in the home and with children to be recognized and paid."

Bitch, you WERE PAID.

Do you think that the food, utilities, mortgage, cars, gasoline, clothing, all just appeared on fucking trees, you mouth breathing retard?

Did you think that the money your husband told you that you could spend just magically appeared?

You did your half of the fucking agreement and think he should pay you like a domestic servant and you probably don't even do anal?

Get fucked.

Marriage should be an equal relationship. WIth all due respect, this reeks of "I Love Lucy" conservatism at best, blatant sexism at worst.