𝕏 / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

Conspiracy theory from kavernackle
17541C40-6915-45E8-A1C5-6A54F601898F.jpeg
AF400146-8DF5-450D-BB31-D7B61B9484E8.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Feels
Reactions: Knight of the Rope
Nobody’s going to watch this. You need to post some kind of summary if you actually want anyone to care.
Noted

4E030E67-BC33-4A1B-B8DC-65B675E1309C.jpeg3AFD1FFF-5B46-4A02-80BB-DC2CED4DEDB7.jpeg
a aunt Tammy peddling legit fake news and a authoritarain licking her pussy
link to the AT’s account
9AD0F1BC-C7F3-46CC-9CAC-E870B34F64F4.jpeg

53D1C734-FFA7-449C-808C-95CD5A02BBCA.jpeg

198F9A0B-7168-4A30-9746-02E45C6D5146.jpeg

here is a little tidbit about where she worksC52E5341-E2B6-46F7-9144-B736D942AF13.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Noted

View attachment 3264460View attachment 3264475
a aunt Tammy peddling legit fake news and a authoritarain licking her pussy
link to the AT’s account
View attachment 3264717

View attachment 3264715

View attachment 3264716

here is a little tidbit about where she worksView attachment 3264726
There’s one little problem with this: you need damages to win a lawsuit. The lawsuit didn’t even specify what the damages were. Of course, it’s going to be hard to prove that taking a $54.20/share deal is damaging when the share price is sub $50, there are no dividends in sight, and all of tech is down.
 
There’s one little problem with this: you need damages to win a lawsuit. The lawsuit didn’t even specify what the damages were. Of course, it’s going to be hard to prove that taking a $54.20/share deal is damaging when the share price is sub $50, there are no dividends in site, and all of tech is down.
That is why occupy dems is just a trash outlet
 
There’s one little problem with this: you need damages to win a lawsuit. The lawsuit didn’t even specify what the damages were. Of course, it’s going to be hard to prove that taking a $54.20/share deal is damaging when the share price is sub $50, there are no dividends in sight, and all of tech is down.
I believe one of the holding companies that was holding a big chunk of Twitter had it valued in the $30's.
 
COPE COPE COPE!

Twitter will remain popular for exactly the same reason “free speech alternative” platforms are doomed to irrelevancy: the fact that, at the end of the day, “free speech” is neither a major selling point nor a major detractor for Twitter’s primary user base. And that primary user base most certainly isn’t the 2% of loudmouth retards posting the most widely-shared brainless drivel.

It’s crazy how they’ve actually managed to brainwash themselves into believing that they are an important majority that can tank Twitter if they all left at once.
 
COPE COPE COPE!

Twitter will remain popular for exactly the same reason “free speech alternative” platforms are doomed to irrelevancy: the fact that, at the end of the day, “free speech” is neither a major selling point nor a major detractor for Twitter’s primary user base. And that primary user base most certainly isn’t the 2% of loudmouth retards posting the most widely-shared brainless drivel.

It’s crazy how they’ve actually managed to brainwash themselves into believing that they are an important majority that can tank Twitter if they all left at once.
Blue checks got to their heads
edit ken penders just put his leftist wang into Elon hive
31F13F2E-33CA-4EF9-B33E-7A8E580EB676.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Back