- Joined
- Jul 14, 2018
As a person who has happily purchased Criterion Editions of classic films and cherishes gamer passion projects like "Crispy/Chocolate Doom" I just think there's something worthwhile when it comes to preserving the original version. And frankly the more versions I can get the better. Something I cherish in my film collection is my Blu-Ray 30th Anniversay Edition of Blade Runner, which comes with every major version of the film. I also love that my Star Trek TOS Blu-Rays have both the original versions of the show along with the updated special effects from the 2000s. And I love that I can choose between watching The Lord of the Rings Theatrical or Extended Edition.I just started this video but I'm glad Rick is bringing attention to the different versions of the OT.
It's crazy when you realize how many times the OT (and the PT) have been changed over the years. There's no "true" version of the OT, just version with more or less changes. That's why people complaining about not getting the "unaltered" version of the OT on blu ray never made sense to me. Depending on when and where you saw ANH, ESB, and ROTJ, parts of those films are radically different. They just want what they remember from their individual childhoods in an attempt to recapture that feeling that they can never have again.
It's not just that Special Editions changed things so "IT'S BAD." Some of the changes were alright. The problem is that Lucas made changes and additions that were bafflingly STUPID. And there's so many examples, adding Jabba back into ANH was unnecessary since the Greedo scene already tells the viewer what's going on between Han and Jabba. There's the bad cheesy CGI most notable in the Jedi Rocks music number in ROTJ. But what pisses me off the most and fucks the story significantly is how Lucas altered the key scene where Vader talks to the Emperor in ESB.
This fucks up the character of Darth Vader so much, it means that at the start of the film when Vader mentions Skywalker to his underling he didn't know that Luke was his son. Is Skywalker just a generic surname that lots of people have? He didn't put any thought at how peculiar it was that Obi-Wan decided to go into the Death Star with a young force sensitive boy that shared his last name and was the right age to be Vader's biological child? And finally I just hate that how now Vader in the series most emotional setpiece was now copying the words of Palpatine.
Now look I agree, Disney for the time being will never properly release the original theatrical cuts. And fans like me who notice and find significant faults with changes like this are in a vast minority. But don't strawman OT Purists into a silly argument that we're just so mad over additional rocks over R2-D2 and Obi-Wans new scream. Lucas damaged the character of Darth Vader and for no damn reason.
EDIT: I got to the point where this Rick guy tries to rationalize the new Vader/Palpatine scene. He suggests that Vader is feigning ignorance to Palpatine. This is a straight up asspull of an explanation, you shouldn't have to make unconfirmed fan theories especially when the original version is clear cut and straightforward.
Last edited: