Amber Heard v. Johnny Depp Legal Proceedings - "And on my side of the bed was human fecal matter."

Who is the real criminal in this trial?

  • Amber Heard

    Votes: 767 72.0%
  • Johnny Depp

    Votes: 43 4.0%
  • Both

    Votes: 256 24.0%

  • Total voters
    1,066
  • Poll closed .
I can't be partial to Heard or Depp in this case, but I think they're both nuts, and she seems to be one of those women that thrive on the drama, and knows how to push his buttons.
But I think Depp is an alcoholic, and can get verbally and physically abusive over the slightest thing.
Exactly this.
Depp’s wild drunken behavior has been in public eye since the 90’s (Winona Forever=Wino Forever with flowers), and Heard is a crazy bitch.

There are two unreliable narrators here and they’re both incredibly unstable people that apparently can’t handle their own emotions.

This trial is a mess.
 
Exactly this.
Depp’s wild drunken behavior has been in public eye since the 90’s (Winona Forever=Wino Forever with flowers), and Heard is a crazy bitch.

There are two unreliable narrators here and they’re both incredibly unstable people that apparently can’t handle their own emotions.

This trial is a mess.

I think they are both batshit unreliable narrators, but that Heard is more batshit than Depp. Given that I'm siding with Depp, but that doesn't mean I necessarily think he's squeaky clean in all this.

Just cleaner.

This is what happens when two unstable people get into a relationship together. The fallout is never pretty. This one just happens to be playing out in public because both parties have money and fame. But the truth is this relationship happens every day all over the world.

Don't stick your dick in crazy.
Don't let crazy stick it's dick in you.
 
Fun thing about Virginia. Virginia Common law has precedent going back to when we were part of the United Kingdom. Virginia's Defamation Civil action, though updated for the modern era still draws its statutory roots from old England.

Part of the build up to this trial was the analysis of the case in the UK. It's the formal position of Virginia's court that the case in England was neither fair, impartial, nor in keeping with the standards of common law. The transcripts from the trial are allowed into evidence for questioning purposes, but the findings of the UK court were thrown out and Amber Heards lawyers are directly barred from entering into evidence anything the UK trial judge determined.
Quite fuckin right, it was proper bent.
Removed or privated, what was it?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: AmarettoPie
Going back and watching Johnny Depp testify actually makes me like him a little. He seems pretty chill and reasonable, hope he wins this thing. Even if he is a weirdo.

He is nearly guaranteed to lose. He already lost a similar lawsuit in the UK with a much higher burden of proof. This isn’t about who was abused worse, it’s a defamation case about a particular article.

Edit to add: In order for Depp to win he would have to prove that he never acted in an abusive way towards Heard, ever. It doesn’t matter if she was also abusive and it doesn’t matter who was more abusive.
 
Last edited:
Privated dammit
The bastards. What was it of?

Also, I read somewhere about the wife of the UK judge being chummy with the sun newspaper in some way, and the son did an internship or something...I thought I'd seen it here but I can't find it. Anyone seen anything like that?

EDIT- pic of behind the bar in the Australian house the day after the carnage. That phone on the right...isn't that supposed to be wall mounted and smashed into smithereens against the wall next to her head as he was pinning her up by her throat? 🤔
0_Johnny-Depp.jpg
 
Last edited:
He is nearly guaranteed to lose. He already lost a similar lawsuit in the UK with a much higher burden of proof. This isn’t about who was abused worse, it’s a defamation case about a particular article.

Edit to add: In order for Depp to win he would have to prove that he never acted in an abusive way towards Heard, ever. It doesn’t matter if she was also abusive and it doesn’t matter who was more abusive.
On the one hand that is true, but on the other hand there are two significant differences:

1. The UK judge relied almost entirely on Heard's testimony and regarded it as truthful. One of the things that the judge had mentioned that showed that Amber Heard wasn't just a "golddigger", is because she donated the 7 million divorce settlement. A fact that is now proven to be false.
2. Heard's testimony was not public and as such it's hard to compare, but I do not expect the jury to believe her tales told, as the UK judge did. Someone making wild stuff up once can be very convincing, because many people find it hard to believe how easily some people can lie. But having to do so a second time, means that there can be many inconsistencies and cross is going to be an absolute joy to watch next week.

Considering that US lawyers all say he probably won't win, because defamation cases in the US rarely go through, I'll bow to their expertise. But even if he loses the battle, he'll have won the war of both rehabilitating his image through having it be public, and her being absolutely fucked into the ground by her many obvious lies, where even a make-up company takes a shit on her with a tiktok and exposes her lie of the concealer she claimed to use, not even being in production yet at the time.
 
Lots of lesbians become bisexual when they meet wealthy men.
Drexel's Law.
This is some great programming. Absolutely fantastic. He said, she shit the bed!

Amber is a crazy bitch. She is just all over the place. She beat her previous girlfriend. She beat Johnny. Typical crazy ass lesbian. No telling how many other men and women she has assaulted.

The whole thing with the bottle is...just wow. She honestly expects anyone to believe he raped her with a broken bottle and his doctors fixed her? I imagine most women would have bled to death if something similar occurred to them. Let alone get up the next day and make their rapist a cup of coffee. Absolutely crazy lesbian bitch, but I repeat myself. Cross better be brutal. I mean johnny's team better go in fast and hard. Just tear her apart up there on the stand.

Hope Johnny wins. Hope he gets the fifty million. Hope this kills metoo and all associated feminist bullshit. Hope she has a meltdown on the stand during cross.

The one thing this trial has done is shown men can be victims. That women lie and will happily run around town with said lies. I can only hope the major take away is that women are just as shitty as men by the public.
Considering that Amber has hit both men and women she had relations with, I hope the next time she goes crazy on someone that they put her ass into the ground. She's clearly a vile cunt that needs to be taught a lesson.
Watched the Amber testimony. She didn't say that the "square bottle" was broken. In fact. She didn't' feel it.

I'll tell you now, if I had anything stuffed up my snatch that was that uncomfortable or BROKEN, I would feel and remember it, no matter how disassociated I was with the memory. Researched actual victims too.

I don't know if she would have bled to death but the resulting issues would have made some sort of medical effect. Enough that there would have been some medical testimony.

Bitch, don't be so one dimensional. We should absolutely encourage men of domestic violence to speak out. We should encourage and support them. Amber Heard is destroying the actual intent of the METOO movement. The fact that we get actual facts and go from here is so great going forward but we need to remember that facts are kings in this situation.

Here's the black and white. No matter what you believe from either testimony, Johnny gave facts. Building on from that, Amber that so fucking sensationalist, she couldn't even provide tears, let along facts. WUT DOO??
If she really was raped with a broken bottle there would scaring from critical damage to the womb because that shit is fucked up and it would be the first thing people would be taking about when this mess started, speaking about that, the fact that people still believe that is plausible without any evidence goes to show a lot of people are dumb because they don't take Orcham's razor into consideration. Too much emotion and too little common sense.
 
Nick Rekieta’s BFF Drexel claims there are no lesbians because they will get with a man if it suits them or necessary.
Ah, thanks. Yes, the stats agree with this, there are virtually no women that never have sex with men in their life (whereas there is a segment of fags that never have fucked women).
 
Been watching this clusterfuck via various streams, it's been pretty entertaining. At the end of the day I am on Depp's side because despite not being perfect himself, Heard is pretty clearly just a totally psychopathic bitch. He never should have stuck his dick in her.

Realistically though this is what I predict will happen:

>Depp loses
>Hollywood, being a degenerate bizarro world shithole, keeps Depp blacklisted while continuing to give Heard roles
>Depp's image is nevertheless rehabilitated in the eyes of the (non-insane) general public
>Heard is branded a lolcow for the rest of her life with boycotts for whatever she appears in

Would like to be wrong on the first two points, but unfortunately I doubt it.
 
Any gay man would have sex with a woman if it suited him to do so, the only reason it happens less is because it's less financially and socially useful for a man to have sex with a woman than vice versa. It has nothing to do with lesbians being different from gays, or anything else of Drexel's MGTOW nonsense.

While it's obvious that both Heard and Depp are lying because everybody lies, we can actually rely on the fact that Johnny wasn't physically abusive toward Amber, because his exes - even those who were with him when he was on drugs and alcohol - say he never got physical with them. There's also zero evidence pointing to him getting physical with Amber, ever. And while defamation cases are usually hard, they usually don't have the extraordinary amount of evidence or the absolutely nutty defendant that they have here. People say that defamation cases are hard to win, but they totally ignore the reasons why, they just blanket slap it down and get shocked every time it works out for the person suing.
 
Been watching this clusterfuck via various streams, it's been pretty entertaining. At the end of the day I am on Depp's side because despite not being perfect himself, Heard is pretty clearly just a totally psychopathic bitch. He never should have stuck his dick in her.

Realistically though this is what I predict will happen:

>Depp loses
>Hollywood, being a degenerate bizarro world shithole, keeps Depp blacklisted while continuing to give Heard roles
>Depp's image is nevertheless rehabilitated in the eyes of the (non-insane) general public
>Heard is branded a lolcow for the rest of her life with boycotts for whatever she appears in

Would like to be wrong on the first two points, but unfortunately I doubt it.
Heard might end up being blacklisted just to put the women in Hollywood on notice that metoo is over and its time to start sucking producers cocks for roles again instead of just acting like they might.

Depp has probably been rehabilitated enough to do indy movies but current Hollywood would have been trying to exit him anways for being a straight white guy. He may get roles for a movie that wants a big name on a budget and wants the attention casting him will get. If that movie flops financially he's done. If it does well critically but not financially he may not be done.
 
Sorry if this has been addressed already but what's with the fucking endless amount of "JOHNNY DEPP BEING SAVAGE IN COURT 🔥🔥😱" videos clogging up the youtube algorithm? I watched a single video on this topic and now I can't escape them. This has to be manufactured PR gayops right? I've been in the celeb gossip circles before, these type of people are autistic but not that autistic.
 
Back