Off-Topic Whiteknight Containment Thread

I thought it was more of a catphase? Then again maybe it's just optimism that the groypers will grow out of it?
CATPHWASE!

uwu.gif


*paws at the camera like Nick*

i'm abouwt tuw end thiws man's hole caweer
 
Next time you guys try to destroy AF it might be a good idea to come prepared with at least one piece of evidence ready to show. Just my opinion tho.
No one wants to destroy AF, we're here to laugh at them. Hard concept I know, groypers aren't known for having above room temperature (measured in Kelvin) IQs.
Evidence can be obtained with an anal swab on you. There's probably enough there to spin another champion and create in vitro Nicholas J. Fuentes Jr. Mk.II on a petri dish.
 
blows my mind how people can type this and think they are funny mr medicare has ruined an entire generation of men
Questions for the audience:

1) How many vTuber animu girls does @dody secretly simp for while telling himself that Mommy Fuentes will understand because he is so devoted?

2) How many "enemies lists" do you think @dody has written in a "secret" notebook under his mattress?

3) How much loli/shota has his mom found while cleaning his room?

4) What's the over / under on 5+ sweater vests, pleated slacks and short sleeve, white button down shirt ensembles in his closet?

5) How many times have a group of girls at his school giggled and run away when he walked by him?

6) Percentage of the internet that @dody is more familiar than concerning knowledge of the term "41%"?

7) @dody, little buddy do you know whats actually happening in your current pfp?
 
Next time you guys try to destroy AF it might be a good idea to come prepared with at least one piece of evidence ready to show. Just my opinion tho.
When Nick troons out before the decade is over, will you use his preferred pronouns? When he starts identifying as a catkin, will you change the litterbox?
 
Watching nick orbiters use the insult "kiwitrannies" or just 'trannies' in general here seems incredibly ironic to me when this place probably hates them the most. Even /pol/ has the chasers and self hating ones.

calling each other tranny for fun is an old school faggot passtime.... it was only a matter of time before it came back.... its all cyclical i guess
 
Next time you guys try to destroy AF it might be a good idea to come prepared with at least one piece of evidence ready to show. Just my opinion tho.
Eyewitness testimony is evidence brainlet, and much of Jaden's interview would be direct evidence. Good to know af knows as much about the legal system as they do German & Roman history. This is a strong foundation on which to build a new 1000 year Reich; you're doing great.
 
These AF tards act like they are in court
"Where is evidence"
Well if this was court, and i brought in two witness, who corroborated each others stories, that is evidence is it not? You Tards think the Judge would go "there is no evidence in this case cause neither witness provided a tape or a recording of what they said happened, cases dismissed!"
 
Next time you guys try to destroy AF it might be a good idea to come prepared with at least one piece of evidence ready to show. Just my opinion tho.
we all know that nick wasnt born in the US and his family only got accepted as refugees because Nick would have been killed by those catboyphobic mexicans back home.
 
Next time you guys try to destroy AF it might be a good idea to come prepared with at least one piece of evidence ready to show. Just my opinion tho.

How the fuck are we supposed to do that? Are you implying we should break into the Autistic Felines compound in Chicago and do the blacklight investigation on our own?

No thanks, bud.
 
Eyewitness testimony is evidence brainlet, and much of Jaden's interview would be direct evidence. Good to know af knows as much about the legal system as they do German & Roman history. This is a strong foundation on which to build a new 1000 year Reich; you're doing great.

OK, I'll take the bait.

Eyewitness testimony is not nothing but it is not gospel either.
A good example would be to look at Holocaust survivors. There are many cases of eyewitnesses claiming things that were later found to not be true. Thousands of people swore that there were gas chambers at Dachau, something that no one believes anymore. At the Ernst Zundel trial, when put on the stand, many of the "eyewitnesses" admitted that they did not personally see the things they talked about but were merely repeating rumors.

If you are an atheist, the Miracle of the Sun is pretty hard to explain due to the sheer number of eyewitnesses. You either have to accept it as irrefutable that Catholicism as true or you have to say that ten of thousands of people were either lying or wrong about what they saw.

After every mass shooting, there will usually be a handful of eyewitnesses claiming that there were multiple shooters even at events where we know that weren't.

Here would be a more relevant analogy for this particular case:
Think about all of your ex-girlfriends. Would they all be reliable eyewitnesses if asked to explain the demise of your relationship?
 
OK, I'll take the bait.

Eyewitness testimony is not nothing but it is not gospel either.
A good example would be to look at Holocaust survivors. There are many cases of eyewitnesses claiming things that were later found to not be true. Thousands of people swore that there were gas chambers at Dachau, something that no one believes anymore. At the Ernst Zundel trial, when put on the stand, many of the "eyewitnesses" admitted that they did not personally see the things they talked about but were merely repeating rumors.

If you are an atheist, the Miracle of the Sun is pretty hard to explain due to the sheer number of eyewitnesses. You either have to accept it as irrefutable that Catholicism as true or you have to say that ten of thousands of people were either lying or wrong about what they saw.

After every mass shooting, there will usually be a handful of eyewitnesses claiming that there were multiple shooters even at events where we know that weren't.

Here would be a more relevant analogy for this particular case:
Think about all of your ex-girlfriends. Would they all be reliable eyewitnesses if asked to explain the demise of your relationship?
Peak optics from AF as usual.
 
Back