that was in 1930. While I doubt technological advances will turn a failure into a success, surgery was
way shittier back then. So that is one less variable.
exulansic really got to him. It is amazing that this guy spent
10 fucking years identifying as a woman and he didn't get exposed to a single person saying the plainly true things that snapped him out of it.
yes but which thing will kill off the uterus? which thing will kill off the troon? will it be a thing none of us anticipated or the usual suspects of surgical death?
nigga is gonna need a time machine to do that lol, the curling is because one side of the skin tube is getting extremely irritated during healing. irritation leads to scar, and most of the time scar tissue constricts. That is actually better than expansion like keloiding or hypertrophy, if that were the case it would still curl just up instead of down. This is like trying to even out a haircut where one side got a curling iron taken to it already- its not really possible.
"I didn't know I was one of the first patients to get this process" means that this patient didn't give their informed consent to be medically experimented on. Generally you have to explicitly say "THIS IS EXPERIMENTAL" on the forms when that is the case. He is going to have a hard time proving it isn't experimental if this is one of the first patients who had the procedure.
"what I am told will happen in each stage is not what actually happens" means they aren't giving informed consent. What they were told was happening is also explicitly spelled out on the forms, which can be presented in court and contrasted with post operative notes and the 10 million photos.
"I was told 3-4 surgries. I have had 6." means informed consent wasn't given. This can be excused to an extent if there are complications, but from what I have seen the only thing is the rawness on the underside of the neophallus. No other major problem has been noted that can excuse
twice as many procedures as discussed initially.
ambulance chasers need to get in on this type of shit, this surgeon is begging to be sued. You can get away with
one of these for surgeries that are medically necessary or emergency surgeries, but not
all of these for an elective procedure. there is absolutely no excuse for this. And it is the type of fuck up that is so easy to prove in court because its all in writing. I just hope that they kept the forms they signed. This is a good time to remind kiwis to keep their copy of any medical consents they sign related to procedures (the general consent to treat you sign at a hospital at intake or when establishing care at a doctors office is not really worth keeping imo). The stakes are so high that some of them WILL try to pass off a different form as the one you signed. it happens. I am genuinely glad that the confidence people have in doctors has taken a nosedive bc of the pandemic. hopefully more bad doctors will get kicked out of the profession.