behindyourightnow
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 17, 2021
I’ve noticed none of these fellas are fetishizing the almost-PTSD-like insanity of actually mothering an infant. None of the “oh I can’t wait to lie awake watching their chest rise and fall to reassure myself they’re still alive!” Or “it would be so gender affirming for my baby to have jaundice and both of us be kept or come back daily for blood count checks for my child!” or “I hope I have nightmares about cot death that will wake me, retching and sweating, night after night for the first year or so!”
You almost never see any mention of a child at all, it's all "wanting to be pregnant" "wanting to be a mother." It's always either plain fetishism, or a manifestation of rage that women still have something that they don't.
Birds are dinosaurs in the same way that stem mammals are mammals. You can make a fair argument that they are, you can make a fair argument that they aren't, but they are at least the link from reptiles. Right now the scientists (not the science) says that birds are dinosaurs and that stem mammals aren't mammals. In the past they've said other things, in the future they might say something else, but for now birds are dinosaurs and stem mammals aren't mammals.
View attachment 3276999 pictured: not mammals
It doesn't matter though, because under normal circumstances no one thinks of a crow when you say "dinosaur". And no one thinks of a dimetrodon when you say "mammal", not even the scientists who would insist that it's accurate.
Now, unlike avian dinosaurs being dinosaurs, there is not a good argument for trans women being women. But it's still a good comparison because even if the dinosaur authorities say that birds are 100%, incontrovertibly dinosaurs a dinosaur-obsessed 8-year-old will feel immeasurable disappointment if you promise him a building full of live dinosaurs and then take him to an aviary. He doesn't need to explain, you'll also know exactly why he's unimpressed even if he can't verbalize it. Similarly, no matter how much of an ally he is, a girl-crazy 20-year-old will feel immeasurable disappointment if you promise him a date with a promiscuous woman with big tits and then present him with this View attachment 3277010
The crow says it doesn't care what the guys says, because the crow knows that it is a dinosaur. In reality no one cares what people say, crows aren't actually dinosaurs in a way that means anything. And no gives a fuck what the cunts on twitter are saying, this is not actually a woman in a way that means anything.
Back when I was a teenager I remember an article about a pandemic of teen pregnancy among lesbian and bisexual teen girls that exceeded teen pregnancy among straight girls. The rationale given for this was that they were engaging in risky, unprotected sex with men because of homophobia. This was long before I peaked and before trans shit became nearly as big as it is now (early 2010s), but thinking back on it now I wonder what the reality was, the official explanation seemed like a cope.
Good point. Kind of like the fact that it's impossible to classify "fish" from an evolutionary meaningful, "common ancestor" perspective in a way includes both cartilaginous and bony fishes but doesn't accidentally include mammals, including humans, as well.

But when you say you're eating fish for dinner nobody screams and thinks you're a cannibal.
The only word that's the constant target of this kind of pedantry is "woman," and it's done deliberately, to destabilize the definition and to make it harder for women to define themselves.