Was Prince Albert Gay or Did Queen Victoria Fuck Him To Death?

Tragi-Chan said:
Many people think Tom’s interest in the Victorian era comes from simple nostalgia because that’s when he was born, but he actually only looks that old due to abuse of meth, heroin and cannabis.

The real reason Tom is interested in the Victorian era because of the child prostitution. I can’t believe he’s such a sicko fucking pervert, but that’s the kind of man he is.
Click to expand...
Tom is literally Fagin. A Jewish stereotype seeking to exploit vulnerable children.

The reason Bill Sykes clearly hates him is because he is always trying to fuck Bill’s dog.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: RadioactiveMonkeyMan, Tragi-Chan, Mellow Malevolent and 1 other person
Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg said:
Fuck yeah! Bagged six ponces inside ten minutes.

Click to expand...
Tommie, I cannot reply to the original post, so I will respond to this one.

Firstly, I have no fucking idea where such a ridiculous quote prescribed to queen Victoria would come from.

She did not write or set any laws, just signed them into existence.

I am to lazy to explain, but ultimately the Monarch has only ever had basically a ceremonial power since the restoration.
The UK parliament is responsible for creating laws, so she would never have come up with any reasoning for laws ever. Nor would anyone have asked her such a thing.
She was quite a homophobe and to ask her this would get one the gallows for impertinence.
A shame that this is no longer the case as I am sure the US government would have no issue extraditing you to be executed for general cheekiness and rudeness.

Alberts behavior can be attributed to the fact that he was not a native English speaker, plus as far as could be figured, and as is evidenced by your highly speculative sources, he was always deeply in love with Victoria.

Just cause he didn’t talk to other women did not make him a poofter. He was a Kraut, not a frog.

So again, all you have done is display a series of ignorance found from the usual revisionist sources seeking to claim that key figures in history were homosexual, transsexual or other such highly modern and recent concepts.

Homosexuality did exist of course, but went in and out of tolerance or favor all the time.
The times which it was made illegal was usually down to population issues or association with other issues genuinely damaging to society.
Vice, drug addiction, and systemic abuse mostly.

The claim of it being commonplace and super tolerated before Victoria is utter shit. It was likely just as common as it is today, but as lifestyles, family pressures and above all, very different ways of living were the norm then, the idea of someone being an exclusive practicing homosexual was quite alien.

Revisionist history is commonly attempted to push a modern agenda, the Nazis, Italian fascists and modern day holocaust deniers are well known for it, so it is of no surprise that the trans activists have sought to use it in furtherance of their agenda of eliminating biological women.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Political Sperging
Reactions: Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg, Owlflaps, Tragi-Chan and 4 others
@Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg

It’s very likely the reason for this is that male homosexuality was always more stigmatized in the west.

Even in the Soviet Union which was the most “Progressive” country during its foundation male homosexuality was banned but female homosexuality wasn’t. I’m just guessing that’s the case, I could be entirely wrong about this.

But I think everyone can agree that people who fuck kids, animals, and dead bodies are way grosser than gay males right? Oh wait… I forgot who I was talking to for a second.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Dumb
Reactions: Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg, Mariposa Electrique and RadioactiveMonkeyMan
Alex Krycek said:
@Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg

It’s very likely the reason for this is that male homosexuality was always more stigmatized in the west.

Even in the Soviet Union which was the most “Progressive” country during its foundation male homosexuality was banned but female homosexuality wasn’t. I’m just guessing that’s the case, I could be entirely wrong about this.

But I think everyone can agree that people who fuck kids, animals, and dead bodies are way grossed than gay males right? Oh wait… I forgot who I was talking to for a second.
Click to expand...
There seemed to be a fairly persistent belief that female homosexuality did not exist. It may also have been that sexual activity was not considered “ sex” with no penis involved.

Tommie still deserves to visit Jack Ketch though.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Tragi-Chan, Alex Krycek and BlueArmedDevil
Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg said:
i own you all. you believe utter nonsense about me and discuss it in a pathetic parody of academic discourse. stay stupid, speds.
Click to expand...
Tom, what the fuck are you doing here? I told you to get a Prince Albert and use it to electrocute your dick. Why have you not done it yet? Don’t come back to this thread until you have. That’s an order.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: FinnSven, HIVidaBoheme, DSP's Tax Lawyer and 2 others
All Tommie owns are the memories of his abused childhood and those of the children he himself abused. He's just pouring dirt over his own grave now. Even when it's over, it's never over for the toothless truthless Tommie Troon Tooter.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: DSP's Tax Lawyer
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back