Disorganised, brainfart post. Sorry, nyu.
Yeah, there should still be a distinct social difference that should be adhered to.
For those who happen to fall outside sex-based roles, they're going to fuck their lives up if they're men. Effeminate men tend to be utter failures in life anyway as this board has shown to prove; nature and tradition dictates 'survival of the fittest' when it comes to men.
Maybe age-old persecution was justified by the fact that these people would have been killed in the first place back in tribal ages.
It seems like women with a gravitation to more masculine interests and traits still generally perform their maternal role in life reasonably decently. I'm not a woman, so I can't really answer this first-hand and to be honest I don't even want to try to because I don't have a first-hand perspective of the picture, only an 'outsider's view'.
The same really applies to transsexual individuals: they only have an outsiders' understanding due to hardwired differences. I guess it's like someone's involvement with a particular interest and in particular the community around it, you have people who simply play retro games, those who do and lurk reddit and maybe /vr/, those who actually post in one or the other, and those who actually contribute important things back to the community. Each person has a completely different perspective, dedication and attitude to the subject in question.
Somewhat relatedly, humans have an inbuilt "repulsive" reaction to seeing a man that is weak that does not exist when they see a "strong" woman: they immediately see them as easy to defeat, hopeless, and unable to fulfil their roles in society whatsoever due to said roles typically involving the requirements of confidence, strength and 'being hard' rather than 'being soft' in terms of behaviour and interests.
