Business Elon Musk Clinches Deal to Take Twitter Private for $44 Billion - The deal marks the close of a dramatic courtship and a sharp change of heart at the social-media network

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
1649933159786.png

The tech billionaire Elon Musk has offered to buy Twitter for $41.4bn.

A regulatory filing showed on Thursday that Musk was offering $54.20 a share – a 38% premium to the closing price of Twitter’s stock on 1 April, the last trading day before the Tesla chief executive’s investment of more than 9% in the company was publicly announced.

More to follow…



1649933831102.png
1649933810146.png






Elon Musk has made a “best and final” offer to buy Twitter Inc., saying the company has extraordinary potential and he is the person to unlock it.

The world’s richest person will offer $54.20 per share in cash, representing a 54% premium over the Jan. 28 closing price and a valuation of about $43 billion. The social media company’s shares soared 18% in pre-market trading.

Musk, 50, announced the offer in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday, after turning down a potential board seat at the company. The billionaire, who also controls Tesla Inc., first disclosed a stake of about 9% on April 4. Tesla shares fell about 1.5% in pre-market trading on the news.

Twitter said that its board would review the proposal and any response would be in the best interests of “all Twitter stockholders.”

1649936433325.png

The bid is the latest saga in Musk’s volatile relationship with Twitter. The executive is one of the platform’s most-watched firebrands, often tweeting out memes and taunts to @elonmusk’s more than 80 million followers. He has been outspoken about changes he’d like to consider imposing at the social media platform, and the company offered him a seat on the board following the announcement of his stake, which made him the largest individual shareholder.

After his stake became public, Musk immediately began appealing to fellow users about prospective moves, from turning Twitter’s San Francisco headquarters into a homeless shelter and adding an edit button for tweets to granting automatic verification marks to premium users. One tweet suggested Twitter might be dying, given that several celebrities with high numbers of followers rarely tweet.

Unsatisfied with the influence that comes with being Twitter’s largest investor, he has now launched a full takeover, one of the few individuals who can afford it outright. He’s currently worth about $260 billion according to the Bloomberg Billionaire’s Index, compared with Twitter’s market valuation of about $37 billion.

In a letter to Twitter’s board, Musk said he believes Twitter “will neither thrive nor serve [its free speech] societal imperative in its current form. Twitter needs to be transformed as a private company”

The takeover is unlikely to be a drawn-out process. “If the deal doesn’t work, given that I don’t have confidence in management nor do I believe I can drive the necessary change in the public market, I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder,” said Musk.

1649936465070.png


Musk informed Twitter’s board over the previous weekend that he thought the company should be taken private, according to today’s statement.

The $54.20 per share offer is “too low” for shareholders or the board to accept, said Vital Knowledge’s Adam Crisafulli in a report, adding that the company’s shares hit $70 less than a year ago.

Although Musk is the world’s richest person, how he will find $43 billion in cash has yet to be revealed.

“This becomes a hostile takeover offer which is going to cost a serious amount of cash,” said Neil Campling, head of TMT research at Mirabaud Equity Research. “He will have to sell a decent piece of Tesla stock to fund it, or a massive loan against it.”

Musk has hired Morgan Stanley as his adviser for the bid. The offer price also includes the number 420, widely recognized as a coded reference to marijuana. He also picked $420 as the share price for possibly taking Tesla private in 2018, a move that brought him scrutiny from the SEC.

“There will be host of questions around financing, regulatory, balancing Musk’s time (Tesla, SpaceX) in the coming days,” said Dan Ives, analyst at Wedbush. “But ultimately based on this filing it is a now or never bid for Twitter to accept.”

I invested in Twitter as I believe in its potential to be the platform for free speech around the globe, and I believe free speech is a societal imperative for a functioning democracy.
However, since making my investment I now realize the company will neither thrive nor serve this societal imperative in its current form. Twitter needs to be transformed as a private company.
As a result, I am offering to buy 100% of Twitter for $54.20 per share in cash, a 54% premium over the day before I began investing in Twitter and a 38% premium over the day before my investment was publicly announced. My offer is my best and final offer and if it is not accepted, I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder.
Twitter has extraordinary potential. I will unlock it.
Elon Musk’s full letter to Twitter’s board





EXCLUSIVE Twitter set to accept Musk's 'best and final' offer-sources​


Twitter Inc (TWTR.N) is nearing a deal to sell itself to Elon Musk for $54.20 per share in cash, the price that he originally offered to the social media company and called his 'best and final', people familiar with the matter said.

Twitter may announce the $43 billion deal later on Monday once its board has met to recommend the transaction to Twitter shareholders, the sources said. It is always possible that the deal collapses at the last minute, the sources added.

Twitter has not been able to secure so far a 'go-shop' provision under its agreement with Musk that would allow it to solicit other bids from potential acquirers once the deal is signed, the sources said. Still, Twitter would be allowed to accept an offer from another party by paying Musk a break-up fee, the sources added.

Twitter and Musk did not immediately respond to requests for comment.




Twitter and Elon Musk Strike Deal for Takeover​

Twitter Inc. TWTR 5.52% on Monday accepted Elon Musk’s bid to take over the company, giving the world’s richest man control over the influential social-media network where he is also among its most powerful users.

The deal marks the close of a dramatic courtship and a sharp change of heart at Twitter, where many executives and board members initially opposed Mr. Musk’s takeover approach. The deal has polarized Twitter employees, users and regulators over the power tech giants wield in determining the parameters of acceptable discourse on the internet and how those companies enforce their rules.

The two sides worked through the night to hash out a deal. Earlier on Monday, The Wall Street Journal reported Twitter and Mr. Musk had reached an agreement to value Twitter at $44 billion.

The takeover, if it goes through, would mark one of the biggest acquisitions in tech history and will likely have global repercussions for years to come related to how billions of people use social media. Mr. Musk, who is also chief executive of Tesla Inc. TSLA -1.30% and Space Exploration Technologies Inc., must find a way to balance his commitment to less moderation with the business needs of a company that has struggled to reconcile free-wheeling conversation with content that appeals to advertisers.

On Monday, after the Journal reported that a deal was close, Mr. Musk tweeted to indicate that he wants the platform to remain a destination for wide-ranging discourse and disagreement.

“I hope that even my worst critics remain on Twitter, because that is what free speech means,” he wrote.

The San Francisco-based social-media company had been expected to rebuff the offer, which Mr. Musk made April 14 without saying how he would pay for it.

Twitter, a day after the unsolicited offer, adopted a so-called poison pill, designed to make it more difficult for Mr. Musk to reach more than a 15% stake in the company.

Twitter changed its posture after Mr. Musk detailed elements of his financing plan for the takeover. On April 21, he said he had $46.5 billion in funding lined up. Twitter shares rose sharply, and company executives opened the door to negotiations.

Twitter shares were ahead more than 5% in afternoon trading on Monday.

The potential turnabout on Twitter’s part comes after Mr. Musk met privately Friday with several shareholders of the company to extol the virtues of his proposal while repeating that the board has a “yes-or-no” decision to make, people familiar with the discussions said.

Mr. Musk, with over 82 million Twitter followers, has long used the platform to pronounce his views on everything from space travel to cryptocurrencies. In January, he began buying Twitter stock, becoming the single-largest individual investor with a more than 9% stake by April.

He has previously used Twitter to escalate a conflict with the Securities and Exchange Commission after the agency opened a probe into some of his recent stock sales, and he often blasts his critics on the social network.

Twitter, at the beginning of the month, invited Mr. Musk to join its board—which would have prevented him from owning more than 14.9% of the company’s stock. Mr. Musk initially agreed and then rejected the offer.

Twitter has already embarked on a turnaround plan after a fight with activist Elliott Management Corp. about two years ago. Twitter said a little over a year ago that it would work to at least double its revenue to $7.5 billion by the end of 2023 and reach at least 315 million so-called monetizable daily active users at that time.

Mr. Musk’s proposed changes for the platform include softening its stance on content moderation, creating an edit feature for tweets, making Twitter’s algorithm open source—which would allow people outside the company to view it and suggest changes—and relying less on advertising, among other ideas.

Mr. Musk, a self-described “free speech absolutist,” said in a recent interview at a TED conference that he sees Twitter as the “de facto town square.”

Twitter should be more cautious when deciding to take down tweets or permanently ban users’ accounts, Mr. Musk said, pointing to temporary suspensions as a better solution.

Mr. Musk said he also wants the platform to be more transparent when it takes action that amplifies or reduces a tweet’s reach. He said he wasn’t certain how some of those ideas would be implemented.

Twitter has spent years advocating for healthier discourse on its platform and adding content moderation, arguing at least in part that it is good for business.

The company also has introduced new features that have been gaining some traction with users, including Twitter Spaces, which allows people to host live audio conversations with each other within the platform.

Mr. Musk has said he wants Twitter to rely less on advertising—which provided roughly 90% of its revenue in 2021—and shift its business model more toward subscriptions. The platform currently offers a subscription-based service called Twitter Blue, which gives customers premium features like “undo tweet” for $2.99 a month. He suggested removing all ads on Twitter as part of the subscription offerings.

Mr. Musk also floated the idea of cutting staff, shuttering the company’s San Francisco headquarters building and not giving the board of directors a salary. The latter could save roughly $3 million a year alone, he said.

His other proposed changes for Twitter include trying to stop spam and scam bots and allowing for longer tweets. The current limit is 280 characters.

On Thursday, Twitter is scheduled to announce its first-quarter earnings.


 

Attachments

Last edited:
But of course the wheel turns and sooner then they would ever imagine they're the bad guys. And all those fancy laws they pushed into being to "protect free speech" are suddenly being used against them. Suddenly hate speech is their speech! And the mechanism of government is being used against them!
1002113362-photo-u1.jpg

Just like the effectiveness of chinkpox shots, twatter went from "there's no spambot problem!" to "you violated your nda for revealing our spambot problem!" in the blink of an eye.
The other side doesn't really know how to deal with a madman. The whole system falls apart if you just casually disregard the rules they can't enforce. Masking would've been over in a week if the people had the power to mock it on twitter. And that's the danger of all this. If regular people could simply make fun of the current narrative they lose almost all of their power to keep the narrative going.

Embracing clownworld and laughing at the totalitarians was always the answer.
 
If Elon is walking away from Twitter it is because his finances have been busted and not because there are a few extra bots laying around unaccounted for. Or it was a ploy the whole time for some other benefit.

I mean; you'd think for 20% the cost of twitter you could build the same platform and bring in the high-yielding content drivers.

Perhaps he and his backers just wanted to see the fundamentals and data behind twitter and were never actually going to proceed.

Anyways, with the latest tech laws passed I Texas and until they are resolved I wouldn't be buying much anyways.
 
Musk is just the front man, there are other investors with him. He has the money, this is a bit of haggling to reduce the price because it is an open secret that Twitter, Reddit, and many other social media sites have a huge number of bots and their MAU counts are totally fraudulent. Had the SEC been a serious organization they would have stepped in back in the late 2ks early 2010s and cracked down on these dubious MAU figures. Twitter is extremely overvalued as is, particularly now that the market is clearly heading towards recession, why buy the high water mark that Twitter will almost never reach again?

That's a great point, and probably the most likely one.

Musk fucks with markets to make himself richer. I mean, Wall Street and all the rich and powerful do it too, but they are just subtle about it. Musk gives no fucks because he knows it's a game, and the game is rigged in favor of rich people like him.

So, in true autistic fashion, he's manipulating a broken system to benefit him.

Can't say I wouldn't do the same, to be honest. If you knew something was beyond repair, you may as well abuse it, then get the fuck outta Dodge.

If this works he can A: get a better deal for Twitter; and B: screw with the parasites that own and use Twitter as a propaganda machine. It's a win-win.


Now, this could all be speculation. The real answer could be that he's in over his head and just he doesn't have the capital anymore.


Time will tell.
 
I honestly don't think Musk is motivated by money. Even if Tesla crashes to zero value somehow he will still be massively wealthy. He has enough money to last for 10 lifetimes at a truly elite level.

No, something else drives Musk to tease the bear. Something else makes him prod the other elites, to goad the liberal progressive apparatus, to shit post and taunt the core of liberal power.

He is without a doubt the Shitposter Supreme but why...I do not pretend to guess.

What is the measure of man?
 
(soon-to-be-ex) CEO Parag is trending because he went on a tirade regarding how the site (supposedly) handles bots and spam.
shitskinspam1.jpg
im only archiving with pics. I couldn't find an unroll link and fuck linking every single tweet
shitskinspam2.jpgshitskinspam3.jpgshitskinspam4.jpgshitskinspam5.jpgshitskinspam6.jpg
Ironically if you click on any of his tweets for replies, they are riddled with spambots.
Musk's response was simply this.
shitskinspam7.jpg
 
If the whole plan was to tank Twitter’s value by exposing the fuckery he’s doing a great job. Netflix’s inflated subscriber numbers may bite them in the ass with their investors suing over the stock losing ~70% of its value since they announced their subscriber drop and all of this if gonna make investors take a closer look at other subscription-based sites and social media sites.

I don’t know if this was Musk’s plan all along, pure conincidence or some combination but it’s honestly amazing and I’m loving every second of it.

Also, how funny would it be if Musk tanks the value of Twitter so Trump can buy it and that was the plan all along?
 
Elon Musk is already on the SEC's radar for the shit he's pulled in the last couple of years, I doubt he would do something as risky as pretending to buy Twitter just to tank their price or see the algorithm due to the colossal ass fucking that they would (and are ready to) give him. The SEC has probably been reviewing everything just looking for any reason to nail him.

I'm thinking he knows that Twitter claiming only 5% of users are bots is complete and total bullshit and is going to get a better deal once the true numbers are revealed.
 
I would think the bot percentage is an issue with any advertisers who are paying per-view. While he'll be buying twitter's problems along with the rest of the company, getting this problem out in the open before then suggests he wants to fix it instead of bury it. And if it turns out a bunch of companies overpaid for ads having the new owner get that out ahead of time might incline them to work things out a bit more pleasantly.
 
I would think the bot percentage is an issue with any advertisers who are paying per-view. While he'll be buying twitter's problems along with the rest of the company, getting this problem out in the open before then suggests he wants to fix it instead of bury it. And if it turns out a bunch of companies overpaid for ads having the new owner get that out ahead of time might incline them to work things out a bit more pleasantly.
Isn't lying about user numbers for advertising technically fraud? I'm not sure how corporate liability works at all, so feel free anyone to correct me if I'm wrong, but maybe he's also (other than trying to get the deal at a better cost) trying to avoid culpability for that?
 
Isn't lying about user numbers for advertising technically fraud? I'm not sure how corporate liability works at all, so feel free anyone to correct me if I'm wrong, but maybe he's also (other than trying to get the deal at a better cost) trying to avoid culpability for that?
It could absolutely be a poisoned pen thing - get him to sign on, wait a year or so, then reveal a large pile of bot accounts and blame it on him, and he's trying to sidestep that before anyone even thinks of it.

But I think he just knows that if this number is way bigger than they were expecting (and he has every reason, both politically and practically, to believe they're downplaying it as much as possible), they're super fucked and getting a better offer than his is an absolute pipe dream. He'll have them completely by the testicles.
 
I heard ACLJ discussing that this sort of mid-deal wrangling for giant stuff isn't uncommon.
Buyer gets under the hood for due diligence, finds out the oil hadn't been changed in two years (metaphorically), demands seller tweak the price.
It's just that most corporate-types keep it between themselves instead of shitposting about it because lolMusk.
 
I still wonder if this is just Musk's way of bailing from the deal cause of this huge stock losses this week. If he can deal a serious wound to Twatter by forcing them to publicly admit that more then a third of their accounts are fake and at the same time he pulls off his offer to buy...well the stock will never recover.

Plus it's kinda awesome that Musk is using Twatter to destroy Twatter. The irony in that appeals to me
 
I still wonder if this is just Musk's way of bailing from the deal cause of this huge stock losses this week. If he can deal a serious wound to Twatter by forcing them to publicly admit that more then a third of their accounts are fake and at the same time he pulls off his offer to buy...well the stock will never recover.

Plus it's kinda awesome that Musk is using Twatter to destroy Twatter. The irony in that appeals to me
I still hope and think it more likely that Musk will buy Twitter to turn it around for the better. This latest happening will just allow him to save on some dosh and further humiliate the outgoing regime.
 
(soon-to-be-ex) CEO Parag is trending because he went on a tirade regarding how the site (supposedly) handles bots and spam.
View attachment 3289598
im only archiving with pics. I couldn't find an unroll link and fuck linking every single tweet
View attachment 3289603View attachment 3289606View attachment 3289616View attachment 3289617View attachment 3289618
Ironically if you click on any of his tweets for replies, they are riddled with spambots.
Musk's response was simply this.
View attachment 3289625
That is your LITERAL JOB YOU FUCKING STREET SHITTER. If you're not going to quantify shit then stop SHITTING UP EVERYTHING AND LEAVE.

If the whole plan was to tank Twitter’s value by exposing the fuckery he’s doing a great job. Netflix’s inflated subscriber numbers may bite them in the ass with their investors suing over the stock losing ~70% of its value since they announced their subscriber drop and all of this if gonna make investors take a closer look at other subscription-based sites and social media sites.

I don’t know if this was Musk’s plan all along, pure conincidence or some combination but it’s honestly amazing and I’m loving every second of it.

Also, how funny would it be if Musk tanks the value of Twitter so Trump can buy it and that was the plan all along?
And the funny part is they always leave behind a goddamn paper trail (that is now archived) Netflix reported 200k russians at best last year and are now blaming a 700k loss of subscribers on said russians not being a demographic anymore. Lmao.

Elon Musk is already on the SEC's radar for the shit he's pulled in the last couple of years, I doubt he would do something as risky as pretending to buy Twitter just to tank their price or see the algorithm due to the colossal ass fucking that they would (and are ready to) give him. The SEC has probably been reviewing everything just looking for any reason to nail him.

I'm thinking he knows that Twitter claiming only 5% of users are bots is complete and total bullshit and is going to get a better deal once the true numbers are revealed.
The dumbass curry already got nailed to a cross and he didn't notice it.
Notice how the wording changed from bots to spammers - a definition that includes humans using alts, meaning even if 5% of users are bots.........
 
Last edited:
(soon-to-be-ex) CEO Parag is trending because he went on a tirade regarding how the site (supposedly) handles bots and spam.
View attachment 3289598
im only archiving with pics. I couldn't find an unroll link and fuck linking every single tweet
View attachment 3289603View attachment 3289606View attachment 3289616View attachment 3289617View attachment 3289618
Ironically if you click on any of his tweets for replies, they are riddled with spambots.
Musk's response was simply this.
View attachment 3289625
That’s… actually a really good point. If I’m an advertiser paying to reach 10,000 people who don’t know how Adblock works, I want 10,000 people. I’m not going to pay to reach Keffals’ ratio bots.
 
Back