Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

[Miss Misery]

God I wish he would get into vlogging but his emotional frailty and complete and utter defeat by his disability ensures this will never ever happen.

Do you REALLY want to watch videos of Rusty's incoherent speech and copious drooling?

 

[Meat Target]

Do you REALLY want to watch videos of Rusty's incoherent speech and copious drooling?

It'd be more interesting than the endless cycle of speculating whether he's a murderer.

 

[qewretrytuyiuoipop]

His ‘argument’ is so flawed I can’t even begin to respond.

 

[Viridian]

His ‘argument’ is so flawed I can’t even begin to respond.

View attachment 3290659

He builds his entire identity around it, bases all the claims in his lawsuits on it, and he STILL after all these many years cannot spell the name of his condition right.

 

[Kosher Salt]

Does this pretentious piece of offal have the right to refer to himself as a "legal professional"????

He says legal professional, I say crime against nature. And I don't mean the Moebius Syndrome.

The lawyer's opposition filing makes another argument that struck me as bizarre. He's trying to make the point that he's not legally entitled to sex with whoever he wants (even for money), but he ends up asserting that Russell doesn't have "the right to buy women for sex" just because prostitution is explicitly legalized in Nevada. Idiotic phrasing aside, I was under the impression that when something is permitted and regulated by law, you do have the right to engage in it so long as you stay within the limits of the law. He does have the right to pay for sex in Nevada, no? He just doesn't have the right to force anyone to actually do it.

Yeah, that argument fell quite flat for me also. As far as I'm concerned you absolutely do have a right to engage in any legal, valid contract. Of course part of what makes a contract valid is that both parties must agree to it, so consent is integral to the process.

 

[L. Ron Hubbard's Cat]

He says legal professional, I say crime against nature. And I don't mean the Moebius Syndrome.

Yeah, that argument fell quite flat for me also. As far as I'm concerned you absolutely do have a right to engage in any legal, valid contract. Of course part of what makes a contract valid is that both parties must agree to it, so consent is integral to the process.

Oh, I misunderstood that.

I thought what he was saying was that you might have the right to walk into a store and buy ice cream, but you don't have a right to ice cream itself. So while Russ might have the right to patronize a brothel, he doesn't have the right to actually buy a woman -- which, if she's being trafficked as the lawyer (presumably) alleges in his actual case, is effectively what's going on.

This is much simpler. Also much dumber.

 

[Damien Thorne]

Of course he wants to buy a harem of sex slaves who will kneel before him and worship his penis. I think Law & Order SVU could do an episode based off him with some exaggeration for dramatic effect.

 

[RembrandtCourage]

with some exaggeration

That's the thing. They need to exaggerate absolutely nothing. He IS that much of a creep, he IS that desperately horny, he IS that litigious, he IS that stupid and slow, he IS that ugly both inside and out, he IS that entitled, he IS that petty and misogynistic. What facet of him needs exaggeration when he's living proof of it?

 

[Damien Thorne]

That's the thing. They need to exaggerate absolutely nothing. He IS that much of a creep, he IS that desperately horny, he IS that litigious, he IS that stupid and slow, he IS that ugly both inside and out, he IS that entitled, he IS that petty and misogynistic. What facet of him needs exaggeration when he's living proof of it?

Well, he has yet to cross a line that would land him 20 years to life in prison, and we all hate it when people speculate whether or not he is capable of that.

 

[RembrandtCourage]

Well, he has yet to cross a line that would land him 20 years to life in prison, and we all hate it when people speculate whether or not he is capable of that.

No one's speculating anything. He did cross a line several times. It was only due to the family paid lawyer tard wrangling him that he NARROWLY avoided jail time and even then you could see the seethe coming off of him during court.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

No one's speculating anything. He did cross a line several times. It was only due to the family paid lawyer tard wrangling him that he NARROWLY avoided jail time

I must have missed the part where Russ started trying to engage in Human trafficking then.

 

[The Littlest Shitlord]

That's the thing. They need to exaggerate absolutely nothing. He IS that much of a creep, he IS that desperately horny, he IS that litigious, he IS that stupid and slow, he IS that ugly both inside and out, he IS that entitled, he IS that petty and misogynistic. What facet of him needs exaggeration when he's living proof of it?

If anything, you'd have to dial it down a bit. "Fiction is obligated to be believable; reality is under no such obligation."

 

[Candidae]

He's said in the past they can just close their eyes

I absolutely missed this going through the thread, when did he say this?

 

[Uzumaki]

Does this pretentious piece of offal have the right to refer to himself as a "legal professional"????

Paralegals have all kinds of goofy language, at least in my country, they have to use to show they’re not lawyers. Like they don’t “practice law” they “provide legal services”.

”Legal professional” might be what paralegals are allowed to call themselves instead of attorney or some other word that implies being a lawyer. Then again I don’t think paralegals are regulated over there so god only knows.

 

[moseph.jartelli]

I absolutely missed this going through the thread, when did he say this?

It's in this thread. He posted it years back on Facebook. But, he was JUUUUST being a 'shock jock'

 

[Kosher Salt]

I must have missed the part where Russ started trying to engage in Human trafficking then.

What do you call inviting a model to come live on your couch?

Luckily he's incompetent enough that he'd never be successful.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

What do you call inviting a model to come live on your couch?

There's a difference between being a stupid, creepy incel, and actually doing human rights crimes. Yes, Russ is bad, doesn't mean we need to keep accusing him constantly of human righs violations and international crimes.

 

[Kosher Salt]

There's a difference between being a stupid, creepy incel, and actually doing human rights crimes. Yes, Russ is bad, doesn't mean we need to keep accusing him constantly of human righs violations and international crimes.

He was promising that woman "a better life" with free room and board in the expectation that she comes only to find out that she's basically a sex slave. If he had any legitimate shot at success I'd be hard pressed to call it anything but human trafficking. Luckily he's gross and even the most desperate would-be immigrant will know they could do much better than his idea of "a better life."

Another example. He outright stated that he intended through his lawsuit to sue Taylor Swift into such dire financial straits that she'd have to come fall on her knees and beg him to let her whore herself out for a few bucks at his brothel (which he was definitely going to actually have). No, that's not the exact words he used, but it's a fair representation of what he said.

Like I said, though, he's neither charismatic nor clever enough to actually manage to coerce, cheat, or compel a woman into sexual servitude. We can be grateful for that at least. But he's pretty clearly showed that he'd do it if he had the chance, even though he's tried to walk that back as "I'm just a shock jock!" when confronted. And the plans he's come up with so far have been fanciful imaginations at best.

 

[Disgruntled Pupper]

His ‘argument’ is so flawed I can’t even begin to respond.

View attachment 3290659

When one has nothing, just having something means everything

-Russell Greer, 2022, page 6

 

[Useful_Mistake]

He was promising that woman "a better life" with free room and board in the expectation that she comes only to find out that she's basically a sex slave. If he had any legitimate shot at success I'd be hard pressed to call it anything but human trafficking. Luckily he's gross and even the most desperate would-be immigrant will know they could do much better than his idea of "a better life."

Another example. He outright stated that he intended through his lawsuit to sue Taylor Swift into such dire financial straits that she'd have to come fall on her knees and beg him to let her whore herself out for a few bucks at his brothel (which he was definitely going to actually have). No, that's not the exact words he used, but it's a fair representation of what he said.

Like I said, though, he's neither charismatic nor clever enough to actually manage to coerce, cheat, or compel a woman into sexual servitude. We can be grateful for that at least. But he's pretty clearly showed that he'd do it if he had the chance, even though he's tried to walk that back as "I'm just a shock jock!" when confronted. And the plans he's come up with so far have been fanciful imaginations at best.

I don't want to shit up this thread with arguments about this, so I'll just leave my thoughts and move on.

I disagree. He may be a wanna be rapist, but there's no evidence that I've seen that would suggest he'd would traffic people. He has horrible opinions of women and what it means to be a girlfriend. That does not make him a human trafficker.