Last edited:
US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians
- Thread starter SeniorFuckFace
- Start date
- Status
Papa Pizzaria
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2022
Goebbels was genuinely an incredibly intelligent man, everyone should read his roast of "Moralism" and people who wanted to use the Nazis to usher in a theocracy. Everything he says here still rings true today and is very different from how the Nazis are usually taught as stuffy no fun allowed types.
Every revolution has its mistakes, ours too. That is not in itself bad, since they mostly disappear on their own or with time. The important thing is that those in charge keep their eyes open and do not remain silent when they ought to speak out of fear of the public. Obviously, an historic revolution of vast extent brings a mass of nonsense to light along with its enormous benefits.
It becomes dangerous only when the nonsense is left to grow, thus hemming in and strangling the healthy, organic development of the revolution.
It is time today to expose some of this nonsense that has accompanied the National Socialist revolution to the full light of day, to examine it without pity.
That is even more necessary, since otherwise some of this nonsense over time may gradually corrupt the style and nature of our revolution, leaving to posterity an image of our nature and goals that in no way corresponds to National Socialist convictions and views.
Certainly there is need for public regulation of the great moral foundations of our national life. However, some nonsense is also spreading that attempts to reach beyond that to establish a code for the purely personal conduct of individuals.
That leads eventually to a moralism that is everything other than National Socialist.
Peculiar people whose life is either behind them, or have no right to have one ahead of them, preach moralism in the name of our revolution. This moralism often has nothing in common with true morality. They proclaim ethical laws that might be appropriate for a nunnery, but are entirely out of place in a modern cultural state.
An example. In a major central German city an advertising poster for a soap company showed a fresh, attractive girl holding the soap package in her hands. A moral knight who unfortunately had the right to determine the fate of this poster forbade its distribution on the ground that it offended the moral sensibilities of the population, since the woman in the poster was holding the soap in a place “that for moral reasons cannot be described more precisely.”
What is moral about this? The person announcing the ban, who presumes that other people share his dirty fantasies, or the German people and the National Socialist movement, that are rightly upset and in opposition to such a ridiculous action?
Investigating the matter, we find that this wonderful citizen discovered his attraction for National Socialism three months after we took power, which however did not stop him from issuing the ban in the name of National Socialism.
Things have gone so far that this company of moralists does not stop at the borders of private life. They would love to establish purity committees in cities and the countryside that would keep on eye on Müller’s and Schulze’s love and marriage life. It is true that they do not want to go so far as to ban kissing altogehter, as in the familiar operetta, since it is too popular a pastime. If it were up to them, however, they would turn National Socialist Germany into a wasteland of muttering and complaining, a place where denunciation, spying, and extortion were the order of the day.
These same moralists often turn to government offices with the request to ban films, plays, operas, and operettas, since the dancers, stars, etc., apparently represent a grave danger to public decency. If we gave in to their demands, we should soon see only old ladies and men on the screen or the stage. The theaters would be empty, since the public generally does not attend them to see the same people they see in church or old people’s homes.
Save us from these hypocritical creatures who have no genuine strong conception of life, and who in reality preach no honest morality. They generally are life’s losers, protesting life itself. Eternal life and its laws will hardly make way for them; at most, they will hide behind a screen of contemptible hypocrisy and dishonest prudery.
They think that the German woman should not go out alone, she should not sit alone in a restaurant, she should not go out with a boy or even an S.A. man without a chaperone for a Sunday afternoon excursion, she should not smoke, she should not drink, she should not wash up and make herself pretty, in short she should do everything to keep the evil interest of a man away from her. That is, at least, is how these midget moralists think a German woman should behave. And woe to the poor womanly creature who has the misfortune to transgress against one of these laws. Of course, no German woman will have bobbed hair, since only Jewesses and other contemptible creatures do that.
Have these moral trumpeters any idea how they slander and demoralize millions of German women with their preaching, women who bravely and honestly do their duty in life and on the job, who are good comrades to their men and sacrificing mothers for their children?
Don’t they realize that they embarrass National Socialism throughout the world, that they are thirty years too late, or that one must take them to task because they are beginning to be annoying? There are good and bad women, decent and less decent women, some with bobbed hair, some without. Whether or not they powder their noses is not a sign of their inner worth, and if they occasionally smoke a cigarette at home or in society, they do not need to feel rejected or cast out.
In any event, these moralists should not sit in judgment over women, whether they are enemies or even if like all real men they wish women happiness, relaxation, and domestic peace, though their stuffy superiority would keep women from it.
They think it is not National Socialist to enjoy life, but rather one should only look at the dark side of human existence. Pessimism and suspicion are the best teachers in our earthly vale of sorrows. A true National Socialist has no cause to protect these miserable creatures. Primitiveness and absolute rejection of pleasure are the only character values to these people. If one has a clean and a dirty collar, one puts the dirty one on to give evidence of his hatred of bourgeois values. A man with a good and a bad suit wears the bad one, particularly for festive occasions, for it shows the astonished world how revolutionary his outlook is. He dislikes joy and laughter; people should have nothing to laugh about.
Are we living in a pietistic state, or in the age of life-affirming National Socialism?
No one can suspect us of wanting to live lives of ostentation or luxury. The Führer and many of his close comrades neither smoke nor drink nor enjoy sumptuous living. Those, however, who want to rob a nation of sixty million of every pleasure and all traces of optimism are contemptible, entirely aside from the fact that their foolish desires would drive countless people into poverty and misery.
Every banned activity makes more people unemployed; if no one can drive a car, the automobile factories will shut down, if no one wears a new suit, the looms and tailors will have nothing more to do; if people no longer attend movies or the theater, hundreds of thousands of stage and film employees will depend on public assistance.
To take joy and pleasure from a people means to make it unfit for its struggle for its daily bread.
He who does that sins against our reconstruction efforts and embarrasses the National Socialist state before the whole world.
The result would be a dreary impoverishment of our public life. That we will not accept.
We do not want to abolish pleasure, but rather to let as many as possible share in it. That is why we encourage people to attend the theater, that is why we give workers the opportunity to dress well for festive occasions. That is the reason behind Kraft durch Freude. That is why we shake off the agents of a prudish hypocrisy, why we do not allow decent, hard-working people who have every reason to need relief from their hard daily labors, who need to reaffirm life, to recover from the weariness, cares, and burdens of every day, to have their necessary pleasures ruined by the eternal chicanery of these pedants.
We need more affirmation of life and less complaining! More morality, but less moralism!
It becomes dangerous only when the nonsense is left to grow, thus hemming in and strangling the healthy, organic development of the revolution.
It is time today to expose some of this nonsense that has accompanied the National Socialist revolution to the full light of day, to examine it without pity.
That is even more necessary, since otherwise some of this nonsense over time may gradually corrupt the style and nature of our revolution, leaving to posterity an image of our nature and goals that in no way corresponds to National Socialist convictions and views.
Certainly there is need for public regulation of the great moral foundations of our national life. However, some nonsense is also spreading that attempts to reach beyond that to establish a code for the purely personal conduct of individuals.
That leads eventually to a moralism that is everything other than National Socialist.
Peculiar people whose life is either behind them, or have no right to have one ahead of them, preach moralism in the name of our revolution. This moralism often has nothing in common with true morality. They proclaim ethical laws that might be appropriate for a nunnery, but are entirely out of place in a modern cultural state.
An example. In a major central German city an advertising poster for a soap company showed a fresh, attractive girl holding the soap package in her hands. A moral knight who unfortunately had the right to determine the fate of this poster forbade its distribution on the ground that it offended the moral sensibilities of the population, since the woman in the poster was holding the soap in a place “that for moral reasons cannot be described more precisely.”
What is moral about this? The person announcing the ban, who presumes that other people share his dirty fantasies, or the German people and the National Socialist movement, that are rightly upset and in opposition to such a ridiculous action?
Investigating the matter, we find that this wonderful citizen discovered his attraction for National Socialism three months after we took power, which however did not stop him from issuing the ban in the name of National Socialism.
Things have gone so far that this company of moralists does not stop at the borders of private life. They would love to establish purity committees in cities and the countryside that would keep on eye on Müller’s and Schulze’s love and marriage life. It is true that they do not want to go so far as to ban kissing altogehter, as in the familiar operetta, since it is too popular a pastime. If it were up to them, however, they would turn National Socialist Germany into a wasteland of muttering and complaining, a place where denunciation, spying, and extortion were the order of the day.
These same moralists often turn to government offices with the request to ban films, plays, operas, and operettas, since the dancers, stars, etc., apparently represent a grave danger to public decency. If we gave in to their demands, we should soon see only old ladies and men on the screen or the stage. The theaters would be empty, since the public generally does not attend them to see the same people they see in church or old people’s homes.
Save us from these hypocritical creatures who have no genuine strong conception of life, and who in reality preach no honest morality. They generally are life’s losers, protesting life itself. Eternal life and its laws will hardly make way for them; at most, they will hide behind a screen of contemptible hypocrisy and dishonest prudery.
They think that the German woman should not go out alone, she should not sit alone in a restaurant, she should not go out with a boy or even an S.A. man without a chaperone for a Sunday afternoon excursion, she should not smoke, she should not drink, she should not wash up and make herself pretty, in short she should do everything to keep the evil interest of a man away from her. That is, at least, is how these midget moralists think a German woman should behave. And woe to the poor womanly creature who has the misfortune to transgress against one of these laws. Of course, no German woman will have bobbed hair, since only Jewesses and other contemptible creatures do that.
Have these moral trumpeters any idea how they slander and demoralize millions of German women with their preaching, women who bravely and honestly do their duty in life and on the job, who are good comrades to their men and sacrificing mothers for their children?
Don’t they realize that they embarrass National Socialism throughout the world, that they are thirty years too late, or that one must take them to task because they are beginning to be annoying? There are good and bad women, decent and less decent women, some with bobbed hair, some without. Whether or not they powder their noses is not a sign of their inner worth, and if they occasionally smoke a cigarette at home or in society, they do not need to feel rejected or cast out.
In any event, these moralists should not sit in judgment over women, whether they are enemies or even if like all real men they wish women happiness, relaxation, and domestic peace, though their stuffy superiority would keep women from it.
They think it is not National Socialist to enjoy life, but rather one should only look at the dark side of human existence. Pessimism and suspicion are the best teachers in our earthly vale of sorrows. A true National Socialist has no cause to protect these miserable creatures. Primitiveness and absolute rejection of pleasure are the only character values to these people. If one has a clean and a dirty collar, one puts the dirty one on to give evidence of his hatred of bourgeois values. A man with a good and a bad suit wears the bad one, particularly for festive occasions, for it shows the astonished world how revolutionary his outlook is. He dislikes joy and laughter; people should have nothing to laugh about.
Are we living in a pietistic state, or in the age of life-affirming National Socialism?
No one can suspect us of wanting to live lives of ostentation or luxury. The Führer and many of his close comrades neither smoke nor drink nor enjoy sumptuous living. Those, however, who want to rob a nation of sixty million of every pleasure and all traces of optimism are contemptible, entirely aside from the fact that their foolish desires would drive countless people into poverty and misery.
Every banned activity makes more people unemployed; if no one can drive a car, the automobile factories will shut down, if no one wears a new suit, the looms and tailors will have nothing more to do; if people no longer attend movies or the theater, hundreds of thousands of stage and film employees will depend on public assistance.
To take joy and pleasure from a people means to make it unfit for its struggle for its daily bread.
He who does that sins against our reconstruction efforts and embarrasses the National Socialist state before the whole world.
The result would be a dreary impoverishment of our public life. That we will not accept.
We do not want to abolish pleasure, but rather to let as many as possible share in it. That is why we encourage people to attend the theater, that is why we give workers the opportunity to dress well for festive occasions. That is the reason behind Kraft durch Freude. That is why we shake off the agents of a prudish hypocrisy, why we do not allow decent, hard-working people who have every reason to need relief from their hard daily labors, who need to reaffirm life, to recover from the weariness, cares, and burdens of every day, to have their necessary pleasures ruined by the eternal chicanery of these pedants.
We need more affirmation of life and less complaining! More morality, but less moralism!
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2021
Do you mean the carousel or the main feed? I see Tucker clips in the main feed that is based off of watch history all the time, but never in the dedicated news carousel that is shown to everyone.
MrJokerRager
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2019
Some memes and in addition Colion did a separate take as well as one other guntuber that I watch time to time.
I believe the problem lies there. People think that Republicans are a real separate entity. They aren't, they are the WCW vs the NWO under the umbrella corporation WWE. They aren't a real separate entity. They are part of the theater act. Don't fall for it.
MrJokerRager
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2019
The problem is civic participation as even though Latinos and Blacks overall hate the kikes.
They also hate the White Race a lot as well.
I am looking at this under a California lens but lets look at Los Angeles.
Niggers are leaving the city and many former nigger infested hoods are now populated by tacos.
And yet almost every politician in the city even if they are a latino themselves, pander to a small decreasing minority of niggers to a disturbing degree over their own.
Even the La Raza faggots cuck to niggers lol.
There is some sort of disconnect or unable to take advantage of their power as almost every "community leader" of every race in California shills hard for the most insane shit that the groups themselves would never engage in.
Like the Asians recently partially cucking on affirmative action where their own elected politicians, went against the wishes of the voters, to try to destroy the California Civil Rights Act.
I believe its the same issue within New York State specifically New York City and that shithole is probably a lost cause at this point to a giant degree.
Papa Pizzaria
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2022
I genuinely cannot fathom spics who hate White people when their entire ethnicity only exists because of Whites fucking their grandmas.
- Joined
- May 2, 2020
Same reason Jews hate Whites; they hate the hand that fed them.
Though anyone who thinks they love niggers is beyond help. Blacks are unfortunately (for them) a political tool, and until they decide that they don't want anyone's handouts and pity, a tool they shall remain and at the mercy of whatever race gains power.
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2020
"Spics" are a diverse group but, generally speaking, they see whitebread whites (not fellow la raza whites) as a big part of why countries south of the US are messed up.
Papa Pizzaria
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2022
Do they see it as a Hispanic vs Anglo thing, as in Franco and other Spaniards would be seen as one of them?
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2020
Papa Pizzaria
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2022
Either way it's still ironic as most Americans are descended from Germanic tribes that Hispanics are also patrillinearly descended from through the Visigoths, like half of the names in Mexico are of Germanic origin.
- Joined
- May 6, 2019
No matter who wins in PA it will be an uphill battle. It was a bitterly contested primary so whoever wins has to convince the other factions in their own party to back them. This will heavily distract and pull from efforts to convince the independents to go for them.
Personally, I think OZ has the edge here actually and I think Posobiec is getting a little too high on his own supply.
LillWeeb
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2021
The problem with the Alt right / 4 Chan right , as well as the hotep/ we waz kings, black nationalist , is they want to turn the USA into Wakanda or copy and past nazi Germany or other European fascist governments meant for single ethnic nation states, which will never gain power in a country like the usa let alone any base of influence. But I am not completely against the concept Third position politics / movements as not as its does NOT promote Godless atheism or Pagan larpy non sense, that promotes genocide or mass murder. But their has been a precedent of multiracial fascism that did gain a large following and influence in brazil in the 30's and 40's, called Integralista. If any sort of right wing third position movement to work in the US it would have to be very similar.
Brazilian Integralism - Wikipedia
Attachments
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2020
Barnette was propped up as a spoiler candidate by people so McCormick can swoop in. It isn't the first time that the GOP have done. This is Karl Rove's calling card. He is trying to do it in Congressional seats in CA where David Giglio, the MAGA candidate, consistantly gets more and more to flood the field to split the vote.
BTW, if your staying up for ballot dumps, I think MSM have stopped reporting for tonight. So expect whatever with that information tomorrow.
So @Gehenna, you would say that Mastriano is going to do better in the general by the amount of vote share he got in the primary? I always get the opinion that he is too controversial to win.
- Joined
- May 6, 2019
Depends on just where PAs independents lie, and whether Democrats sabotage it. He has a demanding lead among Republicans and it is clear where the PA Republicans are leaning. His general viability will then be determined by the PA independents.
I don't have any personal data from PA, but if there is a strong feeing their election was fucky he will get a big boost from that. But in the end he is waiting on his opponents to make a mistake... and this isn't a bad hope. If at any point he gets within 10% of victory in the polling, start looking for the PA Democrats to pull out their double downs just like they did in Virginia. If they do, suddenly his positions being out there matter a lot less.
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2022
Im I the only one thinking its crazy that Dr. Oz, a reality TV show star has a shot at being a US senator? I feel like this is clown world pushing the envelope in another direction.
Papa Pizzaria
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2022
The only country where actual 1930's National Socialism has any future is Germany, for obvious reasons. Germans were actually quite annoyed in the 1930's at Americans using their symbols even though they sympathized with them as German Diaspora (Hitler literally asked German-descended Americans to come home).The problem with the Alt right / 4 Chan right , as well as the hotep/ we waz kings, black nationalist , is they want to turn the USA into Wakanda or copy and past nazi Germany or other European fascist governments meant for single ethnic nation states, which will never gain power in a country like the usa let alone any base of influence. But I am not completely against the concept Third position politics / movements as not as its does NOT promote Godless atheism or Pagan larpy non sense, that promotes genocide or mass murder. But their has been a precedent of multiracial fascism that did gain a large following and influence in brazil in the 30's and 40's, called Integralista. If any sort of right wing third position movement to work in the US it would have to be very similar.
Brazilian Integralism - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
THEY STOLE MY FORESKIN
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2021
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2020
Most non-whites see all pale-skinned people as "white." They don't distinguish ethnicity similar to how many non-orientals lump all of "east asians" together and assume Chinese or Japanese or how all "black people" are just African.
Oz is much more than a reality TV star, just go read his wiki page. I think Trump being president was more far fetched than Oz being a US senator.
That said, I'd rather he didn't but am not surprised he stands a chance.
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2016
That man's face is legitimately causing
me unsettling uncanny valley type panic responses when I see his picture.
- Status