2022-05-18 - Government of Australia: URGENT class 1 removal notice from the eSafety Commissioner [SEC=OFFICIAL:Sensitive]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wonder if they'll ban youtube. They have a video of terrorists crashing planes into buildings and killing 3,000 people.
The e-terrorists at archive.org actually have a whole section on it! Burgeoning plane hijackers can become radicalized by watching TV footage leading up to, during and after the attack.
Please report this URL to the e-Safety Commissioner https://archive.org/details/911
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Dork Of Ages
emu war.jpg

@Null
I suggest that we formally recognize the independence of the Emu Empire from Australia
emu empire.png

HEIL EMU!
 
Yeah... I don't think censoring the face of rape victim will help them when everyone online knows they were raped
If we operate under the presumption that everyone already knows, then removing the video is pointless for the purposes you want to achieve.
and can watch free porn of it.
You are a sick fuck.

But then again, this discussion is not for this thread
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Bioniclelover
Traveling came across a Dog owned website
Had content I didn't like, decided to flex my might
We come from a land down under
Where Emus rule and Aussies blunder
I said "You don't mind removing this content, do you?"
The Dog just smiled and said "Fuck you"

We come from a land down under
We're incompetent and we blunder
Went back home defeated, with my dick in my hand
Back to our Bogan land
 
What happened to Aus? Last time I was there (which admittedly was nearly fifteen years back) it was populated by decent Bruce types who had a sense of humour and were irreverent. What happened to your country? It’s really bizarre. I lived in NZ for a bit back then as well and while Auckland has always been full of twats, I’m pretty shocked at how things seem to have changed to worship That Bloody Woman and all things woke. What gives, antipodeal friends?
 
But...there's no cp on here right? Please tell me this was about ChristChurch shooting.
New Zealand has very loose definitions of CP likely for the sole purpose of throwing whoever they want in jail for any reason whatsoever. I knew they were a problem YEARS ago when they decided to make Puni Puni Poemy illegal. Whenever I talk about censorship and overreach I always bring up that little nugget. So finding out they wanted to throw NZ Kiwis in jail for spurious CP claims does not surprise me.

(and suddenly I remember when I was looking up BR4 and accidentally found CP of Nagi the Spurious someone made with the Japanese debug tools)
 
The only name easily found on their website is the head of the organization, Julie Inman Grant. Interestingly she seems to have largely worked in DC and then for US tech companies, in "government relations". That's code for either directly lobbying, trying to sell stuff to the government, or keeping the feds happy so they don't pass new laws that affect your business.

View attachment 3295600


So if you're going to direct (legal, non-schizo) complaints to anyone, she is the Commissioner who couldn't be bothered to put her name or signature on that legal demand.
May the horse be with her, all three holes.
 
If we operate under the presumption that everyone already knows, then removing the video is pointless for the purposes you want to achieve.

You are a sick fuck.

But then again, this discussion is not for this thread
No, but really, wouldn't by this logic hosting child porn be legal? Since it's already public and can be used to incriminate the child rapist.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Dork Of Ages
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back