Mass shooting streamed on Twitch - Payton Gendron/jimboboiii - 4chan schizo poltard kills 10 people, names /k/ and /pol/ in his manefisto

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who/What will get most amount of blame? (top 3)

  • 4chan

    Votes: 2,143 47.0%
  • Guns/assualt rifles/NRA

    Votes: 2,303 50.5%
  • Twitch

    Votes: 310 6.8%
  • Violent video games

    Votes: 358 7.8%
  • White people

    Votes: 2,793 61.2%
  • Toxic masculinity

    Votes: 455 10.0%
  • Trump/Republicans

    Votes: 1,715 37.6%
  • Mainstream media

    Votes: 112 2.5%
  • Crtitical Race theory

    Votes: 190 4.2%
  • A fucking leaf

    Votes: 291 6.4%
  • Kyle Rittenhouse

    Votes: 525 11.5%
  • Supreme Court

    Votes: 101 2.2%

  • Total voters
    4,561
Otoya was actually pretty much the Japanese equivalent of this shooter. Brainwashed by autistic political ideology (some theorize by CIA propaganda), did an edgy attack, and ultimately never had kids or contributed to his country. I know Asnuma is largely remembered as a commie cuck, but he had more balls compared to any of the so-called "conservative" politicians in Japan today.

Anyways cringe power level moment over.
The difference is that this shooter killed people. Otoya killed a communist.
 
Otoya was actually pretty much the Japanese equivalent of this shooter. Brainwashed by autistic political ideology (some theorize by CIA propaganda), did an edgy attack, and ultimately never had kids or contributed to his country. I know Asnuma is largely remembered as a commie cuck, but he had more balls compared to any of the so-called "conservative" politicians in Japan today.

Anyways cringe power level moment over.
Asanuma could have ruined the nation.
Assassinating politicians, especially Mao bootlickers is way more beneficial than going after shoppers
 
I think a lot of this psyop speculation misses one very crucial detail: he was 18.

Bad enough that he was 18, he was debilitatingly autistic and had his brain fried by two years of constant computer time.

Think back to how big of a retard you were when you were a teenager. Now imagine you were an autistic teenager with an interest in alt-right schizoid diarrhea boards in 2020. The 18 year old Redditor’s manifesto isn’t watertight? No shit.

The fact some retarded teen reading /pol/ for two years straight, being told the white race is in a state of fucking emergency by the unknown powers that be or whatever three letter agency the board had a hard-on for at the time, decided to pick up a gun and “save the white race” isn’t far-fetched.
 
View attachment 3282201
my peoples lands? he really thinks america was habited by whites only?
- visible replacers- uh black people have been here a long time, there isn't a huge influx of blacks at our borders
Higher fertility rates - the population growth of black people has been much less than Hispanics AFAIK
- strong robust traditions - I don't have to explain that one do I?
- weird that he seems to be praising black culture while hating/ targeting them. Doesn't ring true
- says Jews are the ones pulling the strings but doesn't target them...

Why did he shoot at random blacks and some white people? He's just a retard that wanted to get on the front page of pol or what?
 
Wow the ADL is just straight up lying [A] who could have seen this one coming
Obnoxiously insulting. "Agnostic about Extremism", hah. They could not even write an unbiased title for their op-ed.

I like how ADL gives "criticisms and recommendations" for Twitch, Discord and Telegram, but side-steps criticism or recommendation for KiwiFarms and 4chan; instead threatening them by addressing Cloudflare (as if they have any power over CloudFlare, or that CloudFlare is at fault for this attack). ADL also completely side-steps any counter argument to their claims. They want stricter censorship, that has it's pros and cons, but they do not even mention the counter-point to that: Freedom of Speech. If ADL wanted to be reasonable, nay, realistic they should have done the same for KF and 4chan, and they should have metioned counter-arguments meaningfully.
  • Was this crime commited online? No.
  • Was this crime planned online? Maybe? But if it was, from the information available currently Discord seems primarily to be the source of that.
  • Are KiwiFarms or 4chan terrorist organization? No. (KKK is not a terrorist organization either, if you're curious. Maybe that should change first, but you don't see ADL talking about that. Interesting!)
  • KiwiFarms and 4chan have rules.
  • KiwiFarms and 4chan enforce their rules.
  • KiwiFarms and 4chan adapt to change as new problems arise, be that more/new staff, or more/new tools. Any reasonable organization does this.
  • Are KF or 4chan perfect? No, but neither are Twitch or Discord (or ADL). This isnt the first mass shooter to have mention social websites in a manifesto. Neither is name-dropping a service grounds for that service to be at fault.
So what does this mean?
  • Is KF or 4chan responsible for Payton Gendron's terrorist attack? No, of course not.
  • If a criminal wears branded clothing when performing a crime, is that the brand's fault?
  • If a criminal says they like a product, company or service, is that at fault or the person who commited the crime at fault?
  • If the crime was directly commited by a product/company/service? (e.g. a chef knife used in a stabbing), is the product/company liable for using their product/service in a manner it was not intended for? If that is the case, is that reasonably similar to this situation?
ADL does not even mention Payton Gendron's parents, school system, local police department, or even gun control and mental health screening for firearms or ammunition possession.

So what can we get out of this?
  • Are terrorist attacks good? No, of course not.
  • Is the loss of life, or injury of people or property good? No, of course not.
  • Is there meaningful change that Twitch, Discord or any online site/service can do to stop a terrorist attack? Probably not, and if there is, not much with current technology and government level policy.
  • Could we stop a terrorist attack, with technological innovation? Probably, but that is science-fiction until it not only exists, but is reliably functional and widely available.
  • Could we stop a terrorist attack, with societal change? Probably, but what is being exchanged for the benefits of increased security? A common argument for utopias: yes, of course everyone wants to live in a utopia, but what is the cost of making or maintaining a paradise. What are you willing to sacrifice for that control? Is freedom of speech worth sacrificing, for what? What are you getting in exchange? Are you seriously saying, that Britain has less terrorist attacks, because they ban guns and knives? Would banning violent video games and movies actually affect violence? Was the Soviet Union a better place than the west, because they consolidated power? Is communist China?
What is the ADL really saying here?
 
Last edited:
Obnoxiously insulting. "Agnostic about Extremism", hah. They could not even write an unbiased title for their op-ed.

I like how ADL gives "criticisms and recommendations" for Twitch, Discord and Telegram, but side-steps criticism or recommendation for KiwiFarms and 4chan; instead threatening them by addressing Cloudflare. ADL also completely side-steps any counter argument to their claims. They want stricter censorship, that has it's pros and cons, but they do not even mention the counter-point to that: Freedom of Speech. If ADL wanted to be reasonable, nay, realistic they should have done the same for , and they should have metioned counter-arguments meaningfully.
  • Was this crime commited online? No.
  • Was this crime planned online? Maybe? But if it was, from the information available currently Discord seems primarily to be the source of that.
  • Are KiwiFarms or 4chan terrorist organization? No. (KKK is not a terrorist organization either, if you're curious. Maybe that should change first, but you don't see ADL talking about that. Interesting!)
  • KiwiFarms and 4chan have rules.
  • KiwiFarms and 4chan enforce their rules.
  • KiwiFarms and 4chan adapt to change as new problems arise, be that more/new staff, or more/new tools. Any reasonable organization does this.
  • Are KF or 4chan perfect? No, but neither are Twitch or Discord (or ADL). This isnt the first mass shooter to have mention social websites in a manifesto. Neither is name-dropping a service grounds for that service to be at fault.
So what does this mean?
  • Is KF or 4chan responsible for Payton Gendron's terrorist attack? No, of course not.
  • If a criminal wears branded clothing when performing a crime, is that the brand's fault?
  • If a criminal says they like a product, company or service, is that at fault or the person who commited the crime at fault?
  • If the crime was directly commited by a product/company/service? (e.g. a chef knife used in a stabbing), is the product/company liable for using their product/service in a manner it was not intended for? If that is the case, is that reasonably similar to this situation?
ADL does not even mention Payton Gendron's parents, school system, local police department, or even gun control and mental health screening for firearms or ammunition possession.

So what can we get out of this?
  • Are terrorist attacks good? No, of course not.
  • Is the loss of life, or injury of people or property good? No, of course not.
  • Is there meaningful change that Twitch, Discord or any online site/service can do to stop a terrorist attack? Probably not, and if there is, not much with current technology and government level policy.
  • Could we stop a terrorist attack, with technological innovation? Probably, but that is science-fiction until it not only exists, but is reliably functional and widely available.
  • Could we stop a terrorist attack, with societal change? Probably, but what is being exchanged for the benefits of increased security? A common argument for utopias: yes, of course everyone wants to live in a utopia, but what is the cost of making or maintaining a paradise. What are you willing to sacrifice for that control? Is freedom of speech worth sacrificing, for what? What are you getting in exchange? Are you seriously saying, that Britain has less terrorist attacks, because they ban guns and knives? Would banning violent video games and movies actually affect violence? Was the Soviet Union a better place than the west, because they consolidated power? Is communist China?
What is the ADL really saying here?
They want more control and censorship on the sites they can influence, and the total destruction of the sites they can't influence. That's what I'm seeing, at least.
 
Your aspergers is showing, cunt. The 'white replacement' shit shows a lack of understanding of how the modern world works. Soon enough we'll have no more hard racial lines and the world will be better for it because we'll have to focus on something productive instead. If you don't wanna see that day, just off yourself now.
Oh no. I want to see mutts forced to lick chinamen boot. Antifa cheering the commie flag as the PLA rolls in and shout neeeeeegeer at them. Delicious.
"The Jewish ultra-elites encourage interracial breeding between whites and non-whites, which will help to eliminate the white race, leaving the Jews as the superior race on planet Earth."

View attachment 3297057
And they already did it lol.

Point to above. Shart in the mart, mutt, and give me your shekels.

Oy vey what does gibsmuh mean? The goylem is broken, it can't work. Oy vey...
 
thought i'd pitch in to the current memefest on this guy
unknown (2).png
 
Your aspergers is showing, cunt. The 'white replacement' shit shows a lack of understanding of how the modern world works. Soon enough we'll have no more hard racial lines and the world will be better for it because we'll have to focus on something productive instead. If you don't wanna see that day, just off yourself now.

Your Haredi/Dati/Masorti/Hiloni/Cuck is showing, faggot. Replacement Theory is not entirely outlandish and your 'how the modern world works' schtick ain't fucking washing either. There's a debate to be had about decades of potential brainwashing via media in the main for one. What would you say to the circa 3/4s of Jews who to this day insist on only mixing with other Jews about your modern world race mixing to end racism bullshit? Is Replacement Theory legit? I do not fucking know but I certainly wouldn't flatly rule such a thing out.

*edit - removed edgy comment, can't be fucked with drama. I would also mention that the ancient practice of Prima Noctis is not a fucking myth, the practice of the breeding out of undesirables is as old as the hills.
 
Last edited:
If the discord users in the server really were reviewing and giving suggestions for the shooting could the owners of those accounts be charged as accomplices or for aiding and abetting?
 
Obnoxiously insulting. "Agnostic about Extremism", hah. They could not even write an unbiased title for their op-ed.

I like how ADL gives "criticisms and recommendations" for Twitch, Discord and Telegram, but side-steps criticism or recommendation for KiwiFarms and 4chan; instead threatening them by addressing Cloudflare (as if they have any power over CloudFlare, or that CloudFlare is at fault for this attack). ADL also completely side-steps any counter argument to their claims. They want stricter censorship, that has it's pros and cons, but they do not even mention the counter-point to that: Freedom of Speech. If ADL wanted to be reasonable, nay, realistic they should have done the same for KF and 4chan, and they should have metioned counter-arguments meaningfully.
  • Was this crime commited online? No.
  • Was this crime planned online? Maybe? But if it was, from the information available currently Discord seems primarily to be the source of that.
  • Are KiwiFarms or 4chan terrorist organization? No. (KKK is not a terrorist organization either, if you're curious. Maybe that should change first, but you don't see ADL talking about that. Interesting!)
  • KiwiFarms and 4chan have rules.
  • KiwiFarms and 4chan enforce their rules.
  • KiwiFarms and 4chan adapt to change as new problems arise, be that more/new staff, or more/new tools. Any reasonable organization does this.
  • Are KF or 4chan perfect? No, but neither are Twitch or Discord (or ADL). This isnt the first mass shooter to have mention social websites in a manifesto. Neither is name-dropping a service grounds for that service to be at fault.
So what does this mean?
  • Is KF or 4chan responsible for Payton Gendron's terrorist attack? No, of course not.
  • If a criminal wears branded clothing when performing a crime, is that the brand's fault?
  • If a criminal says they like a product, company or service, is that at fault or the person who commited the crime at fault?
  • If the crime was directly commited by a product/company/service? (e.g. a chef knife used in a stabbing), is the product/company liable for using their product/service in a manner it was not intended for? If that is the case, is that reasonably similar to this situation?
ADL does not even mention Payton Gendron's parents, school system, local police department, or even gun control and mental health screening for firearms or ammunition possession.

So what can we get out of this?
  • Are terrorist attacks good? No, of course not.
  • Is the loss of life, or injury of people or property good? No, of course not.
  • Is there meaningful change that Twitch, Discord or any online site/service can do to stop a terrorist attack? Probably not, and if there is, not much with current technology and government level policy.
  • Could we stop a terrorist attack, with technological innovation? Probably, but that is science-fiction until it not only exists, but is reliably functional and widely available.
  • Could we stop a terrorist attack, with societal change? Probably, but what is being exchanged for the benefits of increased security? A common argument for utopias: yes, of course everyone wants to live in a utopia, but what is the cost of making or maintaining a paradise. What are you willing to sacrifice for that control? Is freedom of speech worth sacrificing, for what? What are you getting in exchange? Are you seriously saying, that Britain has less terrorist attacks, because they ban guns and knives? Would banning violent video games and movies actually affect violence? Was the Soviet Union a better place than the west, because they consolidated power? Is communist China?
What is the ADL really saying here?
I wish just once that somebody would point out that these sites actually have a lot heavier moderation than Twitter. Child pornography, sex trafficking, and other exploration are much more prevalent in Twitter, with numerous groups reporting content to Twitter only to be unreceived. While dissident websites are usually very quick to respond and cooperate with law enforcement. Also, posting personal information of any kind is quickly banned and deleted for almost any reason on 4chan, while large groups of people, often hundreds of thousands or even millions of people have their PII trafficked openly on Twitter, leading to harassment, fraud, and physical assaults.

Yet, I’m told to believe 4chan is the “wild wild west” because they allow naughty words and memes
 
Otoya was actually pretty much the Japanese equivalent of this shooter. Brainwashed by autistic political ideology (some theorize by CIA propaganda), did an edgy attack, and ultimately never had kids or contributed to his country. I know Asnuma is largely remembered as a commie cuck, but he had more balls compared to any of the so-called "conservative" politicians in Japan today.

Anyways cringe power level moment over.
I wonder why no one like this guy or Tarrant ever bother livestreaming an (attempted) political assassination. They give stupid ass reasons why they "have to" shoot random blacks/Muslims but never target the powers that be. Otoya knew what he was doing, he didn't go to Chinatown Tokyo and stab random Chinks.
 
I wonder why no one like this guy or Tarrant ever bother livestreaming an (attempted) political assassination. They give stupid ass reasons why they "have to" shoot random blacks/Muslims but never target the powers that be. Otoya knew what he was doing, he didn't go to Chinatown Tokyo and stab random Chinks.

He was mighty samurai, not furry.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NateHewspapers
The goyim know! Shut it down!
View attachment 3297527
>mainstream political figures not only acknowledging the great replacement, but are questioning the chosen
/pol/ is always like 5 years ahead of the political mainstream.

Your aspergers is showing, cunt. The 'white replacement' shit shows a lack of understanding of how the modern world works. Soon enough we'll have no more hard racial lines and the world will be better for it because we'll have to focus on something productive instead. If you don't wanna see that day, just off yourself now.
Damn, Brazil is just such a multi-racial paradise.
 
Ok I'm done. Frustration and anxiety of feds kicking in my door has taken over :)

vcvnmvcvnm@icloud.com - His email, if anyone wants a swing at getting in
No thank you, but this account left a review at a pawn shop in Binghamton 7 months ago.
https://www.google.com/maps/contrib/117030264602422665023 (https://archive.ph/ZoEtD)

1652966194514.png

I'm a little confused as to why there's screenshots from two different Jimboboiii discord accounts floating around, unless I missed the explanation. I did search for them but got no results. From what I can tell Jimboboiii#9670 (356560721183506444) is the shooter and Jimboboiii#9366 doesn't exist anymore so was either renamed or deleted >14-30 days ago.

1652966469495.png 1652966478081.png
1652969782314.png

@UmQasaan just to update all of these accounts have been suspended (and Google doc removed) since the archives were made on May 14-15th.
 
Last edited:
I think a lot of this psyop speculation misses one very crucial detail: he was 18.

Bad enough that he was 18, he was debilitatingly autistic and had his brain fried by two years of constant computer time.

Think back to how big of a retard you were when you were a teenager. Now imagine you were an autistic teenager with an interest in alt-right schizoid diarrhea boards in 2020. The 18 year old Redditor’s manifesto isn’t watertight? No shit.

The fact some retarded teen reading /pol/ for two years straight, being told the white race is in a state of fucking emergency by the unknown powers that be or whatever three letter agency the board had a hard-on for at the time, decided to pick up a gun and “save the white race” isn’t far-fetched.
... Except he was not actually right wing, a good chunk of his manifesto was copy and pasted from the Sandy Hook shooter, and he shot down two white people.

If you don't believe me, read the manifesto. It glows harder than a rave party.
 
Back