US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
I love when people repost my stuff, it's not a small whitepill either, 50% of Whites in America are above 44 years old so all those babies were born solely to the younger 50% of the White population or about 28% of the US,
So despite being 28% of the U.S., those young Whites had 50% of the children in 2020, and as this graph shows, the birth demographics have actually gotten more favorable to Whites in the past 2 years.
View attachment 3297398
Keep in mind btw, that in 2014 they proudly proclaimed that less than 50% of the infants born were White, now infants are once again majority White in 2020, and if this trend continues, the percentage of White infants is going to keep rising, especially if those infants born now retain their parent's birth rates.

One last thing, most of those groups in the graph (particularly Hispanics) don't have massive elderly populations like White people do, and yet their birthrates are still in the toilet.
I've recently came across the opinion that Great Replacement theory bases itself on several assumptions of demographic trends made by Neoliberal NGOs and the like.

These orgs have generally failed to calculate how fast urbanisation has utterly shredded birthrates across the world, and often apply the "if something's happening it will keep happening" perspective to their projections.

Immigration between Mexico and the US has been from the US to Mexico for the last decade or so, and while there is still plenty surging from central America, if you look at their demographic pyramids, they, like Mexico, are begining to stagnate. Immagration has always been an release valve for third world countries, bleeding off their excess population to maintain stability, but now with slowing population growth, providing there isn't a major crisis, waves of people will likely peak and recede in time.

I don't think people appreciate how quickly urbanisation utterly destroys population growth. There are areas of Nigeria that have fallen below replacement rate purely naturally as a result of economic growth.

Generally by the third generation, Hispanics may be liberalised sure, but their birth rates also collapse by then. Below white replacement rates.

Dow futures heading for a -400 point opening.

"... and here's why that's a good thing"
 
I've recently came across the opinion that Great Replacement theory bases itself on several assumptions of demographic trends made by Neoliberal NGOs and the like.

These orgs have generally failed to calculate how fast urbanisation has utterly shredded birthrates across the world, and often apply the "if something's happening it will keep happening" perspective to their projections.

Immigration between Mexico and the US has been from the US to Mexico for the last decade or so, and while there is still plenty surging from central America, if you look at their demographic pyramids, they, like Mexico, are begining to stagnate. Immagration has always been an release valve for third world countries, bleeding off their excess population to maintain stability, but now with slowing population growth, providing there isn't a major crisis, waves of people will likely peak and recede in time.

I don't think people appreciate how quickly urbanisation utterly destroys population growth. There are areas of Nigeria that have fallen below replacement rate purely naturally as a result of economic growth.

Generally by the third generation, Hispanics may be liberalised sure, but their birth rates also collapse by then. Below white replacement rates.



"... and here's why that's a good thing"
But like I said, judging from the amount of Whites between 15 and 44 having children, White birthrates are actually a lot higher and a lot closer to replacement than the "1.6 per woman" suggests. My estimate is around 2 children per woman right now, while Hispanics are at 1.9 per woman (and declining). The demographic decline of Whites is entirely due to the massive Boomer generation aborting their children, aging into low fertility, and now dying out.

It's not indicative of a long term trend in fact I would say the complete opposite, the liberal Whites in the past 50 years who refused to have children means the majority of the White genepool in 2022 is going to be a lot more genetically predisposed to "Conservative" ideas, the only thing the Great Replacement succeeded at is removing the Liberals from the genepool making Conservatives dominant among Whites and spooking the shit out of everyone in the past week, likely encouraging White conservatives to have even more children moving forward and pushing them straight into Nationalism, I know I'm planning to have at least 3 kids ever since looking into demography.

He looks almost exactly like his dad now, kinda creepy.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 3297225

Coulter, who is a confirmed uniparty controlled opposition op, is now pushing White Replacement into the mainstream.

This can only mean one thing -- it's a poison pill that will harm the right in the midterms.
The libs are pushing the gop voters into accepting the 14. Just wait for the other shoe to fall for the 88.

The libs are playing with fire and are gonna get 3rd degree burns. Where's that meme where it has the summer of love riots on the left and the Nazis on the right. It says how black people and white people riot.
 
I have over 50 posts saved in a folder of jews saying the most psychotic shit about White people.
View attachment 3298217
Wise himself went on CNN and said "white children do not deserve innocence".

Anyone saying children of any race "do not deserve innocence" is seriously fucked up in the head.
 
Wise himself went on CNN and said "white children do not deserve innocence".

Anyone saying children of any race "do not deserve innocence" is seriously fucked up in the head.
 
I've recently came across the opinion that Great Replacement theory bases itself on several assumptions of demographic trends made by Neoliberal NGOs and the like.

These orgs have generally failed to calculate how fast urbanisation has utterly shredded birthrates across the world, and often apply the "if something's happening it will keep happening" perspective to their projections.

Immigration between Mexico and the US has been from the US to Mexico for the last decade or so, and while there is still plenty surging from central America, if you look at their demographic pyramids, they, like Mexico, are begining to stagnate. Immagration has always been an release valve for third world countries, bleeding off their excess population to maintain stability, but now with slowing population growth, providing there isn't a major crisis, waves of people will likely peak and recede in time.

I don't think people appreciate how quickly urbanisation utterly destroys population growth. There are areas of Nigeria that have fallen below replacement rate purely naturally as a result of economic growth.

Generally by the third generation, Hispanics may be liberalised sure, but their birth rates also collapse by then. Below white replacement rates.



"... and here's why that's a good thing"
They also didn't take into account how people generally don't leave their homeland unless it really, really, really fucking sucks. They don't leave if it's good enough. That doesn't mean an American standard of living, it means you've got a place to live, your kids are fed, you don't worry daily about getting killed, and you're not working 14 hours a day, 7 days a week just to stay alive. Your average person just doesn't move a thousand miles from home purely for labor arbitrage.

A while back, I was sitting next to an illegal alien on a plane who was heading back to somewhere in Central America and got to talking. Why was he going back? Wasn't because INS caught him. It was just that he missed his family, he missed the mountains, the money he made as a fruit picker didn't really buy him a nice place to live in CA, and things back home had gotten to the point where he could make enough money to stay where he belonged.
 
For those saying look at California as an example of hispanic democratic power.....


The only hispanic is the insurance comissioner.
Hispanics are the voting footsoldiers that keep the white, progressive power elite in place. Left vs Right in America is two groups of white people struggling for power. "Left" is a self-destructive minority, so they have to import voters to give them power without sharing it.
 
Hispanics are the voting footsoldiers that keep the white, progressive power elite in place. Left vs Right in America is two groups of white people struggling for power. "Left" is a self-destructive minority, so they have to import voters to give them power without sharing it.
Sure. But footsoldiers rebelling is a tale as old as time. Where republicans are messing up is the assumption they will be the vehicle and not some new third party or that the democratics get the wokes back under control.

Look at the shit Romneys family is pulling with the compound in Mexico and the family relations there. There does some to be an undercurrent where the RINOs and the "moderate" Dems want to have a 3rd way position and co opt the hispanics as the foot soldiers for the corporatist party. They really want to live in the corpse of either the republican or democratic party for that.

Pre trump it looked like the Republican party was the planned host for this. But Trump ruined that. So now they are trying to convert the Democratic party to be the host. But the anti family positions in the party are causing friction with the hispanics. Will it be enough? We will see
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back