Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 66 13.9%

  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.3%

  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 116 24.4%

  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 86 18.1%

  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 201 42.3%
  • Total voters
    475
cypher3057 said:
Pretty sure it’s a spam bot or something. Same thing happened to Pippa. She got the same message. Tried to tell nick, but I don’t feel like sending a super chat and normal chat is moving too fast
Click to expand...
TheClappening said:
Is Pippa just doing her usual gaming and shitposting? If she touched on Depp v. Heard then that's fucking suspicious. Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, thrice is enemy action.
Click to expand...
It has nothing to do with Depp v. Heard and more so @theralph as she was making fun of him last night (Gator and @Flamenco had their channels hit at the same time as Pippa). Not gonna derail this further, but I will say if @theralph would be making a huge mistake if he tried this with Nick.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: thhrang and Allanon
I think the scam and spam takes down have nothing to do with amber or the gunt, it is happening everywhere, for example, the watp-dick show crossover had the same issue and that video is unlisted because is a bonus episode. It is just youtube fuckery.
 
Harvey sheckelburg said:
Rackets is no longer the legal king grifter. Its amazing the amount of money people are pulling in on this.
View attachment 3300254
View attachment 3300253
View attachment 3300252
Click to expand...

Potatoherder said:
He has admitted in recent stream his superchat game is trash. Kurt and others have been praising Legalbytes' system so may he can get some pointers. No one wins when you have out of context superchat dumps. It worked when he was smaller and only had the nighttime stream as the viewership was the same night to night.
Click to expand...
Nick isn't even trying. He's actively gone out of his way not to go full grift and let Bytes have it. Plus Bytes and Cali-Karen already had the wine mom Karen audience that already loves this true crime and celeb gossip
5t3n0g0ph3r said:
It has nothing to do with Depp v. Heard and more so @theralph as she was making fun of him last night (Gator and @Flamenco had their channels hit at the same time as Pippa). Not gonna derail this further, but I will say if @theralph would be making a huge mistake if he tried this with Nick.
Click to expand...
It's Heard's team. The Canadian Elf and the Jew were both struck

1653052419152.png

1653052454394.png


https://archive.ph/Y8cRa

1653052374870.png


https://archive.ph/U52B1
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Getting tard comed
Allanon said:
I think Nick should put his superchats back on screen as he did before. It gives people the immediate dopamine for seeing it, can sometimes cause immediate responses, and dodges the downsides of the superchat dump. He should also have another high tier that gets responded to immediately, because there are people who just aren't going to superchat if it means waiting hours or to another stream entirely. He should take notes from the very high superchat traffic people like popular vtubers to see how to handle it. Some have streams that are 100% just getting and immediately answering superchats in between streams where they prioritize whatever they're doing over the superchats.

Yes, I know that he got into hot water with YT over his chat in the past, but somehow every other person on this planet can have their superchats on screen when they get donations, and many have a TTS threshold to ensure they're immediately responded to. At the very least he can blur out superchats in the VODs after the streams. I go back to the fact that the bulk of his support comes from the feeling his viewers get of being able to directly interact with him via those superchats. If he's falling behind other lawtubers - or his own personal records - it's because he's mishandling superchats and nothing else. If people feel like they're sending a superchat and getting ignored, they will be far less likely to continue sending them unless they're throwing simpbux and are intentionally only spending the money to support the person. That goes double if the superchat doesn't even appear on screen so even chat can't see and respond to it.
Click to expand...

Responding to superchats immediately will fuck up the flow of the show. Maybe doing square up streams with lady rackets would help. The incel simps would probably cumb.

The chat autists are too stupid to be trusted. Nick is a wrong thinker with a bullseye on his back. Not worth risking his income stream because some retard says something stupid or some saboteur(s) in the chat posting provocative content to get his channel nuked.

We don't really know he is falling behind other Lawtubers. This type of trial isn't really Nick's thing and from the onset he has been urging the other Lawtubers to be on LegalBytes. Even if he is falling behind in the daytime coverage does it really matter?

If it ain't broke don't fix it. Sure Nick could use a bit more organization on his show but its his show to run how he wants.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Irrational Exuberance
Getting tard comed said:
The man made 32k in a week but he is failing due to one channel focused specifically on celebrity and gossip law stuff out doing him and another channel which every other lawyer in this circle is on every day...

I'm not sure what's going on right now....
Click to expand...
If you're not growing, you're shrinking. Someone eclipsing him in his line of work is a concern because he's already abnormally high for his bracket, and it's easier to course-correct while falling than after you've crashed. You can keep dismissing it with things like 'they're a celeb gossip lawyer channel' but right now what they're covering is what everyone including Nick is covering. Despite the oversaturation they're doing better than Nick, who has more than just the Depp case to pull eyes and dollars with.
feral cat #6385 said:
Responding to superchats immediately will fuck up the flow of the show. Maybe doing square up streams with lady rackets would help. The incel simps would probably cumb.

The chat autists are too stupid to be trusted. Nick is a wrong thinker with a bullseye on his back. Not worth risking his income stream because some retard says something stupid or some saboteur(s) in the chat posting provocative content to get his channel nuked.

We don't really know he is falling behind other Lawtubers. This type of trial isn't really Nick's thing and from the onset he has been urging the other Lawtubers to be on LegalBytes. Even if he is falling behind in the daytime coverage does it really matter?

If it ain't broke don't fix it. Sure Nick could use a bit more organization on his show but its his show to run how he wants.
Click to expand...
I think something like a $50 tier would work for that. Originally he did $20 for that purpose, but it turns out people are more than willing to drop a $20 to say nothing important. $50 interrupting the flow is going to be much less of an issue...and if it is still an issue he's making out like a bandit. However, I do think another good option would just be to have superchat answering streams, with or without Lady Rackets. People really want their superchat read and responded to in a timely manner so that they feel like they're interacting with the youtuber. This wait-and-dump thing is just not working and cannot ever work. Nobody wants to make a le epic cool quip about Amber's face or whatever at 11AM and then have to stick around until 11PM before Nick finally reads and responds to it completely out of context in a large group of other chats.

I will accept not having chat on screen, even though he could just use his large number of mods to police chat, but he really has no excuse for not having superchats on screen during stream. Nick is by far not the person with the most toxic fanbase. There are people who cannot use the TTS function because doing so will just fill up the air with noises or immediately get them banned for using bad words, but they still have superchats on screen. At a minimum he needs to let his dumb chatters see the superchats they're submitting so that if nothing else they get immediate gratification from the chat. His income will only steadily decrease if he doesn't make at least that much effort.

But even if the other channels have only briefly eclipsed him, the numbers look like Nick's personal record is slipping. As I've said before, he's able to do what he does because he makes money extremely far in excess of the actual subscribers and views he gets, and the reason he does so is because of the rare interactivity of his superchat system. While Twitch is infamously different, most YTers in general ignore or barely pay attention to their superchats. Nick's issue is double-jointed because on the one hand he's going to see disinterest in his superchats grow as he continues to handle them poorly, and on the other hand if other lawyers are going to cover mostly the same subjects as him and do the superchat grift better, he'll lose out to those people more and more as the people who aren't loyal to Nick and just want attention move away from him to those. I know that sounds like a good thing because most of the attention whores are annoying, but...you know. Money. Those $100 whiskey bottles and $300 40k novels aren't paying for themselves.
 
  • Agree
  • Autistic
Reactions: Irrational Exuberance and JustWant2PlayVidya
Allanon said:
Despite the oversaturation they're doing better than Nick, who has more than just the Depp case to pull eyes and dollars with.
Click to expand...
There's an oversaturation of bullshit leading people to seek alternate news rather than just the carefully curated nonsense on TV. At least this gets wall to wall coverage enough you can actually watch it unvarnished, but court trials by themselves, even involving the beautiful people, are some dull ass shit most of the time.

Anyway Nick's core audience is just not really huge on celebrity shit. The main draw it has for his usual audience is the political implications of it. Also Nick's audience probably made up their mind early on who was the obvious nutcase here. Heard completely melting down on the stand shows she can't even voluntarily turn off the batshittery to look sane.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Associate Rick, TexOffender, Rainbow Idiot and 2 others
AnOminous said:
Anyway Nick's core audience is just not really huge on celebrity shit. The main draw it has for his usual audience is the political implications of it.
Click to expand...
I think it's a combination of this trial being more 'mainstream normie celebrity' bullshit that falls firmly into the milquetoast LegalBytes or Emily territory, plus his slippage on chats. I can't say what the proportions are, but I feel that those are the the primary drivers of this slump.

Rackets is just better on violent crime and weird lolcow shit, basically.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: OHenri41412, Harvey sheckelburg, Rainbow Idiot and 3 others
Allanon said:
If you're not growing, you're shrinking. Someone eclipsing him in his line of work is a concern because he's already abnormally high for his bracket, and it's easier to course-correct while falling than after you've crashed. You can keep dismissing it with things like 'they're a celeb gossip lawyer channel' but right now what they're covering is what everyone including Nick is covering. Despite the oversaturation they're doing better than Nick, who has more than just the Depp case to pull eyes and dollars with.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I think this is wrong entirely. But hey, we'll see. When the next big case happens that isn't a huge celebrity case that all social media is paying attention to and Emily + Alita and every other youtube lawyer are beating him I'm views + money ill let you know you were right. Somehow I don't think that will happen.

BTW is 32k in a week shrinkage from any other trial? I can imagine it's less than Rittenhouse but I legit don't know. I have a hard time believing Florida popcorn man + Potter or any other trial had nick making 32k in a week.
 
Emily already had a show equal or bigger than Nick from the moment she started talking about big youtubers suing each other, she does streams filled with cat ladies,wine aunts, and true crime cunts, she was the first lady lawyer to grab them. Her and the nose share little core audience.

I didn't watch the super chat section of the last show, did nick talked about the 100k PLEDGE from keemstar? it sounds like lies to me, you can make the gunt stop talking for 5 years and he still would be unselleable to normies, he not saying faggot or nigger for 6 months and landing a 100k fight sounds like complete horse shit. Even if the sponsors know about the prior acts,they can still shut down the fight regardless and there's not much to do after that.

Is everyone talking about the 100k for not saying nigger-faggot retarded? you don't need to create fan fiction to laugh at the gunt,he will give you content even if it kills him. Am I missing somenthing?
 
Getting tard comed said:
Yeah, I think this is wrong entirely. But hey, we'll see. When the next big case happens that isn't a huge celebrity case that all social media is paying attention to and Emily + Alita and every other youtube lawyer are beating him I'm views + money ill let you know you were right. Somehow I don't think that will happen.

BTW is 32k in a week shrinkage from any other trial? I can imagine it's less than Rittenhouse but I legit don't know. I have a hard time believing Florida popcorn man + Potter or any other trial had nick making 32k in a week.
Click to expand...
The point they seem to be missing is that he doesn't rely on these big daytime shows to drive his superchats. He gets the majority of them from his nitetime spergfests. And you can't copy those.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: feral cat #6385 and Getting tard comed
Getting tard comed said:
BTW is 32k in a week shrinkage from any other trial? I can imagine it's less than Rittenhouse but I legit don't know. I have a hard time believing Florida popcorn man + Potter or any other trial had nick making 32k in a week.
Click to expand...
Its only shrinkage compared to the last week of the Rittenhouse trail. Nick is doing great compared to the other trials he has covered.

When I posted the other lawyers superchat numbers it was in jest that nick was no longer the most super chatted lawyer. I don't know why people take things so seriously.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Kit Marz, Kosher Salt and Getting tard comed
5t3n0g0ph3r said:
It has nothing to do with Depp v. Heard and more so @theralph as she was making fun of him last night (Gator and @Flamenco had their channels hit at the same time as Pippa). Not gonna derail this further, but I will say if @theralph would be making a huge mistake if he tried this with Nick.
Click to expand...
So from what I gather this is just a glitch that has been going around on youtube with livestreams in general.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: holachau, thhrang, 5t3n0g0ph3r and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back