Alternative Hypothesis was something of a one man breadtube wrecking crew back in the day (his response to Shaun's bell curve video is especially good) but he unlisted all his videos during one of Youtube's purges to avoid getting banned and mostly disappeared after that. He recently re-emerged to shill for Señor Catboy Cumhunter Fuentes' cozy.tv website. A rather disappointing character arc, IMO.
part2:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_Om-M_DXWQ
part3:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWQbIdthcNY
part4:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huIjFttMswI
Faulk still posts on his Bitchute channel,
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/thealthype/
He seems to have been offered the place on cozy.tv and said he'd be a fool not to take it since he's been run off nearly every other platform. Maybe he prostrates himself to the catboy, I don't know since I haven't watched any of his streams besides the Liberators documentary one, but he doesn't seem like the type to do that.
His former partner in the Alternative Hypothesis, Sean Last, still uploads on Youtube and I believe does debates, although I doubt any of the larger breadtubers would agree to one since they stand only to lose from the interaction.
This is what an addict sounds like (literally cannot imagine sober life being fun and interesting):
View attachment 3292951
The only way an addict can justify his addictions to himself is by convincing himself that sober people are just as miserable as he is without his addiction.
Hey Emilie, since your entire life is organized around drug abuse and meaningless sex, why don't you try this "torture method": since you're the BDSM slave master of your submissives Doe and Faun, try being really sadistic towards them by withholding all their drugs from them. Just to see how long they last.
What a disgusting character. Notice how he doesn't actually have a response or positive claim in favour of hedonism and just insinuates that if you
don't drink, do drugs, consoom pointless entertainment and have meaningless sex then you're actually just repressed, which could come from the assumption that anyone who is outwardly virtuous must actually be hiding something; he does not believe anybody can actually be good because he does not believe
he is good and projects that on to everyone else. It also lets him dodge the response to what he's actually saying; oh no I didn't actually say you should drink, do drugs, consume pointless media and have meaningless sex you see, so you can't pin me on advocating anything that might be bad. I'm just insinuating you're a prude for
not doing that which is totally different.
He might be outwardly in favour of alcoholism and drug abuse but, if pressed, would probably admit "pointless entertainment" and "meaningless sex" actually are bad things (assuming he admits their existence in the first place), even if that's just because the phrases themselves are loaded ("pointless", "meaningless") and yet he clearly still has a reaction in their defence. A smarter person would probably restrain the impulse to respond like that, or at least have a more original contribution rather than the same tired attack on character most people grow out of making after leaving adolescence but after watching this person's debate with LeoPirate when it happened (I don't know if that was covered here when it happened) he didn't come across as particularly bright then so I'm not surprised now.
