Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread

How well is the war this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 249 10.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ I ain't afraid of no Ghost of Kiev

    Votes: 278 11.8%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 796 33.7%
  • ⭐⭐ Stalemate

    Votes: 659 27.9%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 378 16.0%

  • Total voters
    2,360
Status
Not open for further replies.
Um no, it wasn't. There were 4,000 captured alone. There were also at least 4 brigades and the Azov battalion in there, combined this would make around 9,000, already accounting for Eastern Euro incompetence leaving only 2,000 men for each brigade, which should normally be at at least 3,000-5,000, and the Azov Battalion's 1000 men. This doesn't even account for any TDF personnel.

No wonder you came to such a stupid conclusion if you believe there was somehow only 3,500 men there, lol.

A captured troop is different than a captured civilian.
 
You can't argue with him, in his own fantasy world he thinks sieges like the battle of Okinawa are "failed" sieges because the Americans lost more than 20.000 dead.

In his own mind he says to himself : COPE, COPE, EVERY SIEGE NEEDS TO BE LIKE FALLUJAH, IF IT ISN'T LIKE FALLUJAH THEN YOU'RE SHIT AT SIEGE WARFARE.
Pretty sure the multiple sources and the fact that it was a 2 month blitzkrieg tells me enough. I never said it's a failed siege. I said it went terrible.

Cope and seethe, putin cum guzzler.
Pretty sure these (3500ish) + the azov batallion (1000ish) are what Wikipedia accounts for.

I don't see concrete numbers.
 
Pretty sure these (3500ish) + the azov batallion (1000ish) are what Wikipedia accounts for.

I don't see concrete numbers.
Again, how fucking retarded do you have to be to believe 4 brigades and a battalion make up 3,500 people? How would they have ever defended the outskirts of Mariupol (places like Volnovakha included) with 3,500 people? How would they have defended the Ilyich Plant (and have 1,000 to spare to be captured), the port and Azovstal AFTER heavy fighting for the city's residential areas? It's a very big city, and the outskirts saw plenty of fighting as well. The same units were also involved in fighting for Volnovakha (on both sides) for example, which likely claimed up to hundreds of fighters since it was the final city allowing Mariupol to be resupplied, and it being taken essentially trapped everyone inside there.

You're completely delusional if you think anyone would have said "there are exactly 8,213 people defending Mariupol, don't worry guys!". We're already lucky we can get the exact brigades from the horse's mouths without extra research.

I'm forced to come to the conclusion that you're trying really hard to just cope any way you can even in the face of all evidence, including statements from Zelensky himself.
 
putin cum guzzler.
lmao you simp for a kike using nazis for cover you really aren't in a position to call Putin names
1653088288709.png
 
In port, in the US or in a nation heavily partnered with the US. has there ever been documented a case where the US will go full privateer and just grab a tanker on the ocean?
Since when is the US "heavily partnered" with Cambodia? https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/p...olate-us-and-un-sanctions-against-north-korea Turkey isn't exactly tight with the US either is it? https://www.thenationalnews.com/men...nkers-as-talks-over-easing-sanctions-drag-on/ By the way that's just two incidents, the US does this constantly.
 
Again, how fucking retarded do you have to be to believe 4 brigades and a battalion make up 3,500 people? How would they have ever defended the outskirts of Mariupol (places like Volnovakha included) with 3,500 people? It's a very big city, and the outskirts saw plenty of fighting. The same units were also involved in fighting for Volnovakha (on both sides) for example, which likely claimed up to hundreds of fighters since it was the final city allowing Mariupol to be resupplied, and it being taken essentially trapped everyone inside there..

You're completely delusional if you think anyone would have said "there are exactly 8,213 people defending Mariupol, don't worry guys!". We're already lucky we can get the exact brigades from the horse's mouths without extra research.

Russia has a history of taking huge losses against smaller defenders. 200,000 Russians died invading Finland. Finland only had a population of 4 million across the country, Russia had over 100 million. The Russian military being incompetent turboniggers is nothing new
 
Russia has a history of taking huge losses against smaller defenders. 200,000 Russians died invading Finland. Finland only had a population of 4 million across the country, Russia had over 100 million. the Russian military being incompetent is not anything new.
How is this relevant at all? We're talking about Mariupol in 2022 and we're talking about things that can be very easily confirmed with Ukrainian sources.
 
How is this relevant at all? We're talking about Mariupol and we're talking about things that can be very easily confirmed with Ukrainian sources.

Because just like during the winter War, Russia sent in a larger attacking Force then the defenders had and still suffered embarrassing losses,
 
as wounded (and dead) are taken away from the front, their positions are filled by new soldiers instead to keep the numbers of active soldiers on the front somewhat consistent
You're right, but If I'm not mistaken, 14000 was the total number of troops from start to finish, including reinforcement.
 
Because just like during the winter War, Russia sent in a larger attacking Force then the defenders had and still suffered ridiculously heavy losses,
Not only is the winter war completely irrelevant to Mariupol, but even the claimed 6,000 (likely inflated) isn't "ridiculously heavy" considering the 8.000 or so defenders. Stop making retarded comparisons to WW2.
 
Not only is the winter war completely irrelevant to Mariupol, but even the claimed 6,000 (likely inflated) isn't "ridiculously heavy" considering the 8.000 or so defenders. Stop making retarded comparisons to WW2.

A large group of drunken niggers sieged an area and made a small gain after suffering embarrassing losses. Completely relevant.
 
A bunch of drunken niggrers sieged an area and made a small gain after suffering embarrassing losses. Perfectly relevant.
Mariupol, one of Ukraine's main ports, is now a "small gain" and losing 6,000 (likely inflated claim) to 8,000 defenders is now "embarassing losses". Comparing a siege of a city in 2022 is now also "perfectly relevant" to attacking an entire, different, country in 1939.

You type like a retard, have retarded opinions and know nothing about war other than the blurbs you heard on the news. Do us all a favor and stop shitting up the thread with them, or at least compile them into a single post so it takes up less space for better posts.
 
A large group of drunken niggers sieged an area and made a small gain after suffering embarrassing losses. Completely relevant.
These losses aren't embarrassing when using Russian tactics, they understand that munitions are limited, and by fielding more cheap armor and inexperienced soldiers they can win by depleting the enemy. That's why there were Russian police in the 1st waves
 
  • Feels
Reactions: MrJokerRager
Not only is the winter war completely irrelevant to Mariupol, but even the claimed 6,000 (likely inflated) isn't "ridiculously heavy" considering the 8.000 or so defenders. Stop making retarded comparisons to WW2.

lol, you're taking the bait, this is most likely Disheveled Human's twin or even alt account.

The other Zelensky dick rider here is most likely another baiter.
 
These losses aren't embarrassing when using Russian tactics, they understand that munitions are limited, and by fielding more cheap armor and inexperienced soldiers they can win by depleting the enemy. That's why there were Russian police in the 1st waves

Russian munitions are limited because they are a third world shithole and have made no big military gains, ever, without using weapons the USA provided them during a WW2 lend/lease.

The only time Russian military tactics weren't embarrassing was in the early 12th century, the last time Russia modernized its military
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back