EA wants to sell itself, Apple, Disney and Amazon are in consideration, nearly merged with NBCUniversal

Will someone buying out EA make things better or worse for us?


  • Total voters
    119

Nguyen Van Phuoc

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
So apparently EA (alongside other companies like Ubisoft) have been in the market to sell themselves. The main source comes from some paid article that I can't really archive because it'll cut off like half the article, so I'll just copy the text here. (don't worry I didn't pay for it I just used my one free article or whatever)

Brian Roberts’ One That Got Away​

For months, the media elite have been wondering what the Comcast impresario might buy to scale up in the content wars. Turns out, Roberts had a plan that almost came together.


For the last four years, "What’s Brian Roberts going to buy" has been a perennial parlor game question among the Sun Valley set. It all started in 2018, when the Comcast-NBCUniversal chief tried and failed to intercept Bob Iger‘s takeover of the Fox entertainment assets and settled for Sky, instead. The question came up again last year, when David Zaslav masterfully executed his stealth merger with WarnerMedia. The former Time Warner media assets, after all, would have been a boon to NBCUniversal, helping them compete more aggressively with Netflix, Disney, et al. And the question came up again this year after Microsoft C.E.O. Satya Nadella agreed to pay $69 billion for Activision Blizzard, an asset that would have provided NBCU with a massive infusion of new I.P. and immediate entry into the highly lucrative gaming space.

Whether Roberts was too cautious, too late, too difficult, or too smart to land any of these is a matter of debate. He tried hard for Fox and is said to have wanted WarnerMedia. Whether or not he wanted to pursue Activision, he certainly never got around to having serious conversations about it. Whatever the case, the question stands, and remains as pressing as ever—especially as Peacock, NBCUniversal’s streaming play, languishes behind its competitors. Though Roberts has said that NBCUniversal doesn’t need mergers and acquisitions to achieve scale, the conventional wisdom among many of his peers and competitors, as well as among a considerable set of investors and analysts, is that, as a matter of fact, everyone does. Moreover, the Roberts family has traditionally been among the most acquisitive in the business.

Back in January, after news of the Microsoft-Activision deal broke, I noted that Roberts had few good options left: ViacomCBS, with a market cap of $21 billion, was too small to deliver meaningful scale to NBCUniversal; and, regardless, any potential acquisition would have required a divestiture of overlapping assets like the CBS broadcast station. The other option, I wrote, was Electronic Arts, the formidable gaming company, which had a $40 billion market cap at the time that has since fallen to $36 billion. While not as big as Activision, the Redwood City-based company would have given NBCUniversal a significant stake in the gaming world. An acquisition of EA would also have created opportunities for synergies between NBCUniversal’s vast catalog of sports rights and Electronic Arts’ popular EA Sports franchise, including Madden.

As it turns out, Roberts saw this logic as well. In the wake of the Microsoft-Activision deal, Roberts approached Electronic Arts C.E.O. Andrew Wilson with a proposal to spin off NBCUniversal and merge the media and gaming giants, four sources with knowledge of the proposal told me. The general terms of the proposal, which lawyers and bankers for both sides negotiated for several weeks, would have seen the Roberts family take majority control of the combined entity. In the configuration most seriously discussed, the company would have been run by Wilson. If the deal went through on those terms, NBCUniversal C.E.O. Jeff Shell would likely have been elevated to another role at Comcast, one source with knowledge of the plans said. Shell was involved in deal discussions, I am told.

The proposal ultimately fell apart within the last month due to disagreements over price and structure. Jennifer Khoury, the chief communications officer for Comcast, declined to comment. Electronic Arts spokesperson John Reseburg said his company would not comment “on rumors and speculation relating to M&A,” and added: “We are proud to be operating from a position of strength and growth, with a portfolio of amazing games, built around powerful IP, made by incredibly talented teams, and a network of more than half a billion players. We see a very bright future ahead.”

In recent years, as media companies have taken greater interest in the rapidly-growing gaming industry, Wilson and Electronic Arts have held talks with a number of different potential suitors, including Disney, Apple and Amazon, sources with knowledge of those talks told me. Several sources familiar with these talks say EA has been persistent in pursuing a sale, and has only grown more emboldened in the wake of the Microsoft-Activision deal. Others say that EA is primarily interested in a merger arrangement that would allow Wilson to remain as chief executive of the combined company. Representatives from Disney, Apple and Amazon all declined to comment.

Meanwhile, another notable idea that has been bandied about among the Sun Valley set in recent years would see Disney spin off ESPN and combine it with Electronic Arts. As I reported last October, Bob Chapek came into his job more open than his predecessor to entertaining an ESPN spin off. There is also some notable history between these two companies. In early 2018, following the sudden resignation of ESPN chief John Skipper, then-Disney C.E.O. Bob Iger tried to recruit Wilson to be head of the sports network. Wilson passed, and the job went to Jimmy Pitaro.

Nevertheless, Wilson continues to eye a Disney tie-up: Electronic Arts approached Disney as recently as March in pursuit of what sources described as “a more meaningful relationship” than licensing deals—though it’s not clear whether that meant an ESPN-EA tie-up, some sort of try-before-you-buy arrangement, or a direct sale. Whatever the case, Disney decided not to pursue those conversations. Indeed, the market seems so focused on Disney+’s subscriber growth, and Chapek has other important items on his grocery list, such as buying the enormously expensive rights to the Indian Premier League, the country’s top cricket league, which is essential to its international strategy, and potentially buying Roberts out of Hulu in a few years.

So what do you guys think? Will any of these companies buying out EA improve things or make things worse? What do you all think about all these companies being bought out by other, larger companies?
 
I don't see this as a good thing for anyone except whoever is involved in the deal directly, aka not me. I detest this age where every major company can just consolidate into each other until very few companies actually exist. I get when smaller-medium sized companies join up and eventually become something major, but its fucking EA + Disney, Amazon, or Apple why the fuck do they need to merge into each other?

So fuck this, even if it somehow improved the games produced (:optimistic: ) I still wouldn't like it purely on principle.
 
This is probably complete bullshit but wow. It really says something if EA OF ALL FUCKING COMPANIES is looking for some sort of consolidating buyout.
I guess them losing the licence to football WAS the massive blow I anticipated.
Maybe having loot boxes, online passes, and regular server closures isn't the best way to run games.
 
Maybe having loot boxes, online passes, and regular server closures isn't the best way to run games.
I mean, I fucking hate that shit but I've known plenty of normies who just don't care.
They've lived through the PS2 era. They know what a real game is. They just don't care and it completely boggles my mind.
 
Still do, but it's difficult to prove that a company is truly a monopoly.

I remember the government blocked AT&T acquiring T-Mobile a while back.
Back in the day Microsoft got sued over just shipping with Internet Explorer since that's somehow a monopoly even if you could still just download Netscape or whatever other dumb shit. That was completely benign and silly when compared to shit companies like Google or Apple get away with these days and it blows my fucking mind.
 
They're doing a lot to avoid giving us a criterion game that isn't Need For Speed. Just give us the source code for Burnout 3 or Black you cucks
 
  • Feels
Reactions: tehpope
Back in the day Microsoft got sued over just shipping with Internet Explorer since that's somehow a monopoly even if you could still just download Netscape or whatever other dumb shit. That was completely benign and silly when compared to shit companies like Google or Apple get away with these days and it blows my fucking mind.
Netscape was partially because they were a giant in their decline who decided to go down swinging, if anything that lawsuit hastened their decline as they spent more on that than keeping up with the competition.
 
Back