Horrorcow Tommy Tooter / Thomas Wasserberg - Dog-Abusing, Trash-Eating Pedo, Neo-Nazi, Fake Tranny, "1st-Wave Incel", Hounded YouTuber to Suicide

No doubt it was accidental, like when he took that photo of the ducks that happened to put a preteen girl in the centre of the frame.

P sure Facebook has rules about nudity.
Yeah. They've got bots that check for that stuff constantly, and I'm pretty sure it's an instant ban (let alone pictures of naked women that haven't consented). Probably too out of focus for the bot to pick up on, I guess?
 
P sure Facebook has rules about nudity.
The resort has rules about photography.
1653264803451.png
 
A loss of $50-$100 with a net gain of $5 is a remarkable move. If Tom continues like this he'll be the first to start asteroid mining operations, in a joint venture with the space jews.
Man, that Don't Look Up sequel sounds lit.

Provided, of course, it ends the way the movie does, with him dying from the shockwave caused by the asteroid.
 
Incoming transmission from the satellite of love.
View attachment 3305593
View attachment 3305599
Panic over! Tom made another sale, which left him free to watch the band, and grab a creep shot.
View attachment 3308949
View attachment 3308950
The resort has rules about photography.
View attachment 3309180

Lol. 2:35 Tom admits on camera that he shouldn't have a camera running.

I wonder if there's a concerned citizen out there who'll let the people of resort know that this dogfucking kiddy diddler was let into their midst and broke the rules? 🤔

pls no troll Kiwis. Tom is a disgusting pedo, but you'll look more retarded than Tom if you get ousted
 
Panic over! Tom made another sale, which left him free to watch the band, and grab a creep shot.
View attachment 3308949
View attachment 3308950
I also like how aside from visually demonstrating that Tom totally isn't the only one taking photos so he definitely isn't be a creep by doing so, the woman in the background is almost exactly the focal point based upon the rule of 3rds (along with the front lady's thigh):
Tom3rds.png
I know a lot of digital cameras and phones will have an overlay that displays those lines and that Tom fancies himself an amateur photographer so he very likely has said overlay up. Meaning it's basically a 100% guarantee he knew what he was doing.
He saw that chick without a shirt on, and immediately his withered, stoned old mind went into overdrive as to how he could come up with a creepy, sex-offendery way to get as explicit a picture as possible while playing it off as innocent. I could just imagine him there licking his gross diseased old lips as he took his time lining the shot up perfectly.

That one is going into Tom's "Jerk off material (A-grade)" folder. The topless woman is probably a little too old to make it into his S-grade folder.

I wonder if that woman with her breasts exposed in the background of that second picture consented to, or was even aware of Tom photographing her.

Who am I kidding, of course not!
If she consented then it would only be able to go into the C-grade folder.

Although real talk, the only people who actually walk around naked at events like that for the sake of it are old droopy fat 55 year olds.
I can't think of any reason a woman like that would walk around topless unless they enjoyed people staring at their chest, which is a little odd since they'd have to know it's going to be distracting and men are going to feel conflicted because it'll naturally catch their eye even though they know they shouldn't be gawking, and it's going to wind up being sort of uncomfortable. How do you even react to that, exactly what level of acknowledging a stranger's naked tits is acceptable? There isn't really much social convention for that kind of thing.
It's not like the guys are all walking around without shirts off, so it can't even be, like, a feminist thing.

That strikes me as a little weird in its own respect, but thots gonna thot I guess.
 
View attachment 3311587

Tom is leaving the festival with the same amount of gravel that he went there with and the friends similar to that of Chief
>"Company" ... "Magic mushroom edibles"

Those are called drug dealers, Tom. Not really the kind of partners legitimate business owners look for, in my opinion.

Suppose he may have sold the mushrooms he stole from Tester Ranch in order to secure this "partnership"?
 
Back