Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,451 55.8%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 285 11.0%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 609 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,600
Where did he get the idea that comparing women to food items is romantic? Enchiladas, Cheetos.

What's next? "Your skin is smooooth as a sausage. Vienna Sausage 😎"

Luckily for her, Russ isn't a Bong. She'd die laughing if he sidled onto her Insta and uttered a knicker-dropping line such as: "Ooh, I love that orange dress, you're like a sexy Wotsit."
 
1653408139635.png

Hey babe I got my sight on you. Your skin is dark like a refreshing Nogger
and it sure is hot in here, I'd love to lick through into your sweet creamy insides.
 
Jesus Christ, could he possibly have picked a dorkier angle of approach?

I'm sure he followed this up with a series of DMs reading "Hi ❤️ "Hey" "Hey" Hey how are you ❤️" "Hey" "I'm in a band" "Hi"
Excuse me! Russ is NOT in a band! Those are his accommodations who deserve no credit. Russ is a studly song writer who is disabled so you have to fuck him or you're a bigot!
 
Luckily for her, Russ isn't a Bong. She'd die laughing if he sidled onto her Insta and uttered a knicker-dropping line such as: "Ooh, I love that orange dress, you're like a sexy Wotsit."
Imagine if this bird was an Aussie and Russhole tried to translate this compliment. It would end up being along the lines of "Ooh, I love that orange dress, you're like a sexy Twistie".
Food_snacks_Smith's_Twisties_close-up.jpg
 
Yes, I'm not a studly legal expert like Russ, but injunctions STOP you from doing something. I can't bulldoze the house, I can't sell the property, etc until the matter in dispute is resolved.
Courts can issue positive injunctions requiring something be done, but this is considerably more rare than prohibitory injunctions that tend to be put in place to maintain the status quo. When an injunction requires foregoing some kind of profit, the party filing for the injunction will often be required to put up a bond for the amount of harm likely to result, which is then turned over to the adverse party if the expected harm does result (especially if the injunction turns out to have been filed in bad faith or for an improper collateral motive), with any residue returned to the person who put up the bond.
 
Back