Crime Gunman at a Texas elementary school kills 19 students and two adults before being fatally shot, officials say - yeehaw

(CNN)A suspect is in custody after a shooting incident at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, left at least two dead and injured 14 people, including students, authorities said.

The Uvalde Consolidated Independent School District (UCISD) posted about an "active shooter" at Robb Elementary at 12:17 p.m. local time and said law enforcement was on site.

The suspect was taken into custody as of 1:06 p.m. local time, according to the Uvalde Police Department.
Two have died after the shooting at Robb Elementary School, a spokesperson from Uvalde Memorial Hospital told CNN.

The hospital received 13 children at their facility who were being treated for varying injuries, he said. Two children were transported to San Antonio and another is pending transfer, Tom Nordwick said.

Additionally, two patients were dead on arrival, he said. Nordwick was not sure of the ages of the two deceased. A man in his 40s was also being treated there, he said.

Nordwick did not have conditions on any of the victims.

This is a developing story and will be updated.

 
yeah, it's sad, but this is why it's not easy to fix gun violence in America.
If you want to fix gun violence, it’s better to address the violence rather than the guns. Guns are a tool. Someone is always behind the gun pulling the trigger. Guns don’t just go off on their own. One way to reduce violence would be to close and enforce the borders. Cartel violence is a big issue in both Mexico and the US. Though, that would mean less cheap labor and the politicians love that. Another way to reduce violence would be training more people to use and carry guns, in addition to getting rid of gun free zones. Police can be unreliable in shooting cases, and shooters obviously don’t care if guns aren’t allowed in some places. If people actually learned how to use them properly and carry them with them, they would be more likely to be able to defend themselves. Carrying pepper spray won’t cut it all the time. It isn’t an easy one-size-fits-all solution, multiple problems would need to be addressed.
 

Attachments

  • 819D3350-1214-4E4F-86C5-4DFFEF1AEB5A.jpeg
    819D3350-1214-4E4F-86C5-4DFFEF1AEB5A.jpeg
    56 KB · Views: 35
So, what do you suggest?
You sure like to critique gun ownership but I want you to tell me, how do you stop people from killing each other?
If it's not guns, it's gonna be explosives, if it's not explosives, it's gonna be poison, if it's not poison, it's gonna be suicide cults...When someone wants to hurt a large number of people, they just find a way.
You're not addressing the root of the problem, nor providing any useful arguments at all. You're just defending your stance on "guns are bad". Have you ever thought in-depth about your stance?
I find it rich when people who on paper want a more egalitarian society try to restrict access to weapons and often get pissy over cars/suburbs. Historically, the more well armed a society is, the less centralized and egalitarian it is. (The same applies to mobility).
 
Texas doesn't have magazine limits
hasn't done a damn thing in states with mag limits.
nor owners licenses or registration you fucking mongoloid.
Murdock v. Pennsylvania: “No state shall convert a liberty into a license, and charge a fee therefore".

I know you hate that pesky Bill of Rights because it gets in the way of your Mugabe mob rule wet dream. If you're so hellbent on ensuring your political foes can be defenseless, call a constitutional convention. Alas, you won't, because you can't, because half the country knows you and your ilk are power-mad Stalinist psychopaths.
Uneducated here again. Are there any countries in the world that actually have full on gun bans? Seems that a lot of ones like England are propped up by liberals as gun free havens but actually have lots of hunting rifles and other guns owned by civilians especially in the countryside. Not even Australia actually took back all of them. Might be really wrong here though
China and North Korea.
 
You’re right. I forgot about all those mass stabbings in the UK that resulted in 20 dead kids.
Replace UK with China and you will see the actual problem. A further hint for you: Britain has a massively lower homicide rate than America in general. You rarely if ever see mass-killings there because the average British person isn't all that homicidal in the first place.
 
Replace UK with China and you will see the actual problem. A further hint for you: Britain has a massively lower homicide rate than America in general. You rarely if ever see mass-killings there because the average British person isn't all that homicidal in the first place.
UK has always had a lower homicide rate than US. This goes back earlier than the 20th century.
 
Probably because no other countries have this problem
Screenshot (17).png

I'm trying to find a video of this guy unloading his gun into some fat lady's back. I used to have it but Hard Drive got rekt and i upgraded to SSD. Anon's on /gif and /pol should still have it. Might ask for it in a wrekt thread if any pops up in that coomer hellhole







 
And he was a radical who went online for it, not your average crazy person. Easier access to guns still leads to more deaths, there is objective proof in other countries around the world, dipshit.
"And he was a radical who went online for it, not your average crazy person."
Kill yourself please.
HE WAS CRAZY but NOT YOUR AVERAGE CRAZY....
 
The common denominator is the age of these mass shooters who target children. They're all around 18 years old. Back in the 50s and 60s, perhaps people matured faster. They went through the crazy age in middle school, and by the time they graduated from High School, they were balanced and dedicated to reach goals. Today, people can be 22 years old and 15 in their head. It may be necessary to raise the age of adulthood to 21 again. America doesn't have a cultural rite of passage for young men like other ethnic groups do. Maybe we need some sort of test of maturity.
 
hasn't done a damn thing in states with mag limits.

Murdock v. Pennsylvania: “No state shall convert a liberty into a license, and charge a fee therefore".

I know you hate that pesky Bill of Rights because it gets in the way of your Mugabe mob rule wet dream. If you're so hellbent on ensuring your political foes can be defenseless, call a constitutional convention. Alas, you won't, because you can't, because half the country knows you and your ilk are power-mad Stalinist psychopaths.

China and North Korea.
Don't you fucking talk to me about Murdock, you who probably wants Voter ID which Southern States would no doubt try and charge for. You and your ilk of low iq wannabe Christian Crusaders can continue to think you are not fucking over the common man.
"And he was a radical who went online for it, not your average crazy person."
Kill yourself please.
HE WAS CRAZY but NOT YOUR AVERAGE CRAZY....
Cry some more, retard. Treating all criminals the same is stupid. Stopping the stupider ones through regulation will lessen crime, not catch the dedicated terrorist types. Or do you honestly see no difference between an angry high schooler from the US and a zealotous Taliban Suicide Bomber?
 
It's not going to be explosives or knives, fucking look at Europe. Knife attacks are bad. But explosives require far more effort. These countries contain millions and millions of people yet how often are explosives used in Germany a la Syria.

And he was a radical who went online for it, not your average crazy person. Easier access to guns still leads to more deaths, there is objective proof in other countries around the world, dipshit.
I'm sorry, you're right, it's going to be acid:
Or maybe some other incident involving chemicals.
I understand your point on how banning guns makes it more unlikely for the mentally ill to get access to guns, but I would argue that's the responsibility of the gun owner, a gun should be locked in a gun safe.
I could go as far as to argue a car could be used as a weapon to end many lives before it is stopped, there are many, many ways for an individual to bring harm to many, many people.
 
The problem is non of those countries have any kind of culture around guns. In the US, our country was created in large part because of everyday citizens using private arms to fight back against the British. This is why the right to have a gun was enshrined as the second amendment, the UK/Australia never had a right to a gun, they had the privilege to have one and that privilege was taken away because of a few nutjobs. Stripping millions of people of a fundamental right isn't close to the same thing.
Right people forget how much America was molded at the barrel of a gun. Our constitution has given us the right to bear arms and to ratify that amendment after centuries of patriotism, rebel flag wavers and god fearin' yokels that think Democrats want to seize all weapons would create anarchy and civil war. The major issue is this country is too strict and too lenient at the same time with guns and most of the public is afraid to teach their children about the history of firearms, how to properly handle them, Educate and don't shelter them first of all. Second of all, we make sure they aren't being exposed to misinformation regarding laws and history. Third, we screen for any issues with their feelings when exposed to firearms to catch early signs of sociopathy, psychosis, etc. In this capitalistic system, these ideas are a good starting point, but they will probably never come to pass.
eff9813b-8067-425a-9911-ddcfc848f96f_text.gif
 
Back