World Economic Forum Megathread (The Great Reset)

[Cool Dog]

They’re technically Swiss police and patches are for “morale”:

The “fact check” also links to a page showing all the other WEF patches they’ve used over the years:
View attachment 3317791
Every other police patch on the page is for an actual division (e.g. SWAT, DEA, Riot, K9, etc.) or a town. It doesn’t look like it’s common practice to make “morale” patches for any event except for the WEF.

Right, so why it doesnt simply say "security" then?

 

[CAPTAIN HAPPY]

Right, so why it doesnt simply say "security" then?

I'm guessing because you have to pay for your own security.
Having the cops protect your ass, you can send the tip to the tax payer lol

 

[teriyakiburns]

Right, so why it doesnt simply say "security" then?

Because they are the actual local police, just with an extra patch. The obvious answer is that the police in that part of the country have been coopted by the WEF for years.

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

If they could cover up hunter the crackhead and his laptop then they can easily erase a nigger getting ventilated on their swiss yatchclub from the normalfag part of the web

Give him a go pro.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

The plot twist is that the American and Chinese regimes agree that the American people should be destroyed, and they'll cooperate for that purpose—only.

I'm not saying it's the NWO, guys, but it's obviously the NWO.

I've been digging pretty deep into the transhumanism side of all of this and DARPA's role in it, too.

"It's all so tiresome."

 

[Cool Dog]

Give him a go pro.

They will deleted the footage everywhere with only sites like this having anything, and normalfags dont come here

Any niggers trying to post it on the normalfag net will get instabanned, all the corpos will collude to hide this shit then repent later when all has died down and nobody cares anymore, just like they did with hunter's laptop

 

[Meat Target]

 

[teriyakiburns]

View attachment 3319512View attachment 3319513View attachment 3319514

Who are you gonna believe: Politifact, or your lying eyes?

 

[Meat Target]

Good grief, these are cartoon villains.

 

[Proserpina]

Slight schizo rant, but I keep thinking about that video of Yuval "skekZok" Harari talking about what to do with useless people that went around recently. WEF isn't new to me but I found that clip really disturbing for some reason. Something about it made it sink in that they are just fundamentally, radically different from us. I used to think the WEF were just rich assholes, but at this point, I don't even see them as human.

Everything about transhumanism is insulting, disgusting, anti-Nature (or anti-God, if you prefer), and anti-human. Anyone who would willingly merge with a computer is a soulless reptile. No one wants -- or even thinks about -- immortality. Yet this detached, craven freak of nature casually assumes that we'd all be be fine with becoming eldritch abominations. In fact, he thinks it's something we'd covet. He naturally sees human beings as nothing more than empty biological machines. It's weird.

Meanwhile, Canada seems to be the test run for the next stages and we're moving full steam ahead with the eugenics plans. It's been in the news lately that we're culling the poor and mentally ill through the MAID (Medical Assistance in Dying) program, and some people want children to have access too. Everyone's talking about the WEF pandemic treaty, but tbh it's barely on my radar; I already live in a dystopian hellhole and it makes no difference if they make it official or keep lying about it. I'll run away and either live like a caveman or die in the wilderness, I ain't getting no microchip and I'll never give them the satisfaction of making me kill myself.

 

[Drain Todger]

Good grief, these are cartoon villains.

Yes. Very much so.

https://rumble.com/v15gigr-introducing-the-reset-the-great-reset-docuseries.html

Anyone who would willingly merge with a computer is a soulless reptile. No one wants -- or even thinks about -- immortality. Yet this detached, craven freak of nature casually assumes that we'd all be be fine with becoming eldritch abominations. In fact, he thinks it's something we'd covet. He naturally sees human beings as nothing more than empty biological machines. It's weird.

I did. I once thought merging with a machine and living for thousands of years sounded far better than the normal human living condition of slowly rotting and dying over the course of 70 or 80ish years, one's mental faculties slipping away, one's skin wrinkling and hair turning gray. A lot of these rich, old motherfuckers probably feel exactly the same way. If you're a strict materialist and believe humans have no soul and are just deterministic chemical machines (many of these people do), it stands to reason that the "pile of chemicals" that constitutes a person could be replaced with a better, hand-engineered, longer-lasting "pile of chemicals". That's transhumanism in a nutshell.

That was, of course, how I was able to so quickly perceive what these monsters were planning to do. I had a pre-existing familiarity with the subject matter. I was so far ahead of the curve, I sounded crazy to people. Guys saw my posts about the Great Reset and transhumanism and thought "no way, bullshit", until Bannon started saying "yes, the globalists are transhumanists", and then clips started surfacing of Yuval Noah Harari saying "humans are hackable annie-mals, now".

I detest what the WEF and their ilk are trying to do. It impinges upon civil liberties and human autonomy in ways that I, and many others, find absolutely unacceptable. They must be exposed, their evil deeds brought to light.

 

[teriyakiburns]

No one wants -- or even thinks about -- immortality

I do. True immortality isn't possible, but I'm firmly convinced that old age and senescence is a disease that will be cured one day. The only reason we age and die is because there's no evolutionary disadvantage to it. There are multiple species that don't "age" in any real sense, but rather only die due to disease or other external effects, so there's no logical reason why we can't also have perpetually youthful bodies until the inevitable happens.

The problem with these people is that they think death itself can be cured, and the think it can be done the same way they think everything else can be fixed: with, as I ranted about before somewhere, magical, do-anything microchips. They're fixated on using computers to control people, because in their ignorance, they think computers are literally magical devices that can do anything you tell them to do, without flaw or complaint, or failure. In their minds, the computer is the ideal state. They want to live forever, so a computer is where they will do it.

 

[Mega Man II Intro - GB]

There are multiple species that don't "age" in any real sense, but rather only die due to disease or other external effects

What species? Anything more complex than a beetle?

 

[teriyakiburns]

What species? Anything more complex than a beetle?

Lobsters. Several species of turtle and tortoise. Greenland sharks have no apparent upper age limit that we've found; the oldest killed was 500 years and as healthy as a young adult. All of them eventually die from something, but it's not ageing and senescence that kills them. No need for computer brains or the technocratic re-ordering of society. Just good genes.

 

[CAPTAIN HAPPY]

Lobsters. Several species of turtle and tortoise. Greenland sharks have no apparent upper age limit that we've found; the oldest killed was 500 years and as healthy as a young adult. All of them eventually die from something, but it's not ageing and senescence that kills them. No need for computer brains or the technocratic re-ordering of society. Just good genes.

I don't think genes work that way and I'm pretty sure your brain activity does take a toll on your body.
What do sharks have to think about anyway?

 

[Super-Chevy454]

We all already know almost all evils of the WEF. American Thinker posted an editorial rant who add more on the table.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/05/the_true_evil_of_the_world_economic_forum.html

May 26, 2022

The True Evil of the World Economic Forum​

By J.B. Shurk

Whenever I listen to Klaus Schwab and his Davos Death Cult buddies openly discuss their plans for world domination, I always think, "Are we really going to let another power-hungry German walk us into global conflagration?" For a while there, I believed that Western allies had endured enough death and slaughter from the first two world wars to forge an informal understanding among themselves that uncontrolled German megalomania invariably leads to malignant outcomes for all. Then came German reunification, and the nation's inevitable economic dominance over all of Europe assured its status as the most powerful member of the European Union. All that effort to constrain the German empire's influence went up in smoke. It turns out that it is far easier to conquer the European continent with flowery promises of "peace," "economic integration," and "international cooperation" than it is to send jackbooted shock troops marching past the Arc de Triomphe and down the Champs-Élysées.

Still, the Americans, Canadians, and Brits would never sit idly by while German powerbrokers remake the world in their image, right? Wrong! Just listen to Joe Biden, Justin Trudeau, and Boris Johnson all parroting that same Build Back Better Boobery in unison, as if they operated under the influence of some nefarious hive mind. At first, hearing world leaders squawk identical World Economic Forum talking points was disconcerting. Then it was nauseating. Now it just makes them sound like walking, talking robots all under the WEF's control. Is it possible that Ol' Klaus already lobotomized the West's putative leadership and replaced their neural CPUs with state-of-the-art, German-made "Great Reset" implants? Curse you, German engineering!

That's where we are today, as the world's 1% of the 1% celebrate their own magnificence in Davos and plot mankind's future without even the pretense of seeking mankind's consultation, let alone permission. "The future is not just happening," Schwab proclaimed to his SPECTRE-like cabal in Switzerland. "The future is built by us, by a powerful community such as you here in this room." "Good German" Klaus and his merry band of global gentry have decided to take over the planet, and they're so confident in their endeavors that they no longer deign to pretend otherwise. Yep, here are our New World Order master plans! Yes, we know we've called you guys "conspiracy theory nuts" for forty years, but you were right. In hindsight, wasn't it obvious?
So now the world waits in trepidation to discover just what Kaiser Klaus and his new nobility have in store for the rest of us. Will another paralyzing round of viral pandemics bring a return of economic lockdowns, rigid population control, and injection mandates? Will a global cyber-attack cut off the internet for billions and plunge the world into darkness? Will Green New Steal socialism exacerbate global poverty, unleash famine, and trigger mass population die-offs? Whatever happens next, the WEF has already gamed the situation and is ready to profit from the world's pain.

In another era, World Economic Forum attendees would be rounded up and put on trial for undermining the health and security of sovereign nations. Heck, if people properly understood the WEF as an evil engine for driving Marxist totalitarianism around the planet, they might skip the trials and go straight to the sentencing. When so many of today's leaders have already handed over their nation states' keys to the aspiring dictators in Davos, however, ordinary people around the world have a real problem.

Kaiser Klaus does not hide his master plan to destroy national self-determination. It's a simple two-step process. First, you capture political and economic leadership by bringing them into the WEF Club. Then, by hook or by crook, you train those global leaders to "collaborate" for the benefit of the WEF's members, rather than the national populations they ostensibly represent. In my reckoning, that makes every WEF attendee committed to undermining national interests for those of Klaus's Fourth Reich a double-agent and saboteur. No one can serve two masters; those who have pledged allegiance to Schwab's global coalition of the wicked cannot be trusted to serve their homelands, too.

There's an important lesson here for those who properly object to a bunch of unelected oligarchs manipulating world events for their own purposes. When the wealthy and powerful sing the praises of "international cooperation," they are almost always sticking it to ordinary people. Rigorous competition, not cooperation, is the key to keeping power in check and providing ample opportunity for all. Since WWII, the West has been brainwashed into accepting the opposite falsehood — that competition leads to tragedy and that only forced cooperation can foster long-term peace. Nationalism is equated with racism. Patriotism is derided as another civic opiate for the masses. Free markets were long ago buried with byzantine domestic regulations and international trade agreements that protect multinational monopolies at the expense of aspiring start-ups lacking the resources to overtake companies with heavy political clout. Just as American workers can't compete against Chinese slave labor, and oppressively regulated American factories can't compete against scarcely regulated foreign enterprises, American voters can't find representation in Washington, D.C., when that town's bureaucratic army works not for Americans, but rather for the interests of foreign governments, multinational corporate boards, international financial heavyweights, and Western military alliances. As Biden hands the Chinese-aligned World Health Organization power over Americans' health and delivers to the United Nations control over Americans' future use of hydrocarbon energy, an ever-smaller group of global elites assumes greater control over everyone else. As they do so, they glorify their efforts as a victory for a "rules-based international order."

In reality, a "rules-based international order" is antithetical to American liberty and independence. It undermines the power and self-determination of ordinary Americans and empowers the technocratic assembly of self-identified "experts." It disregards the democratic interests of Americans generally and imposes the will of the über-1% upon everyone else. It sacrifices American law for international agreements. It substitutes government-approved speech for free speech. It destroys privacy while justifying mass surveillance. It transfers Americans' control over their personal wealth to the intermediary machinations of money-printing central banks. It elevates the power of global governing bodies over the statutory authority of local jurisdictions. It fortifies the intrusive reach of an unelected bureaucracy, while weakening protection for individual rights. It resurrects, in other words, a feudal system where a small number of lords and ladies hoard power over a borderless economic zone whose surviving serfs are expected to "own nothing and be happy" or else.
When "elites" cooperate among themselves, they take what they can, regulate what they can't, and shiv everyone else. That's the World Economic Forum in a nutshell.

 

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

I did. I once thought merging with a machine and living for thousands of years sounded far better than the normal human living condition of slowly rotting and dying over the course of 70 or 80ish years, one's mental faculties slipping away, one's skin wrinkling and hair turning gray. A lot of these rich, old motherfuckers probably feel exactly the same way.

Immortality is one of those many technologies that will guaranteed be used for evil thanks to people like the WEF. I can't wait until I'm required to take my booster shots in the "vaccine against death" (probably whatever repairs the nanomachines in my body) no matter the shitty side effects just so I can eat bugsteaks instead of soylent. It's a dream come true for these control freaks, since an "immortal" would be forced to take some sort of drug to stay alive, and the best part is that as time goes on, the majority of the population would be "immortal" ergo even more control.

I would rather kill myself than accept immortality from these people, because once you accept something like that, you're fucked.

If you're a strict materialist and believe humans have no soul and are just deterministic chemical machines (many of these people do), it stands to reason that the "pile of chemicals" that constitutes a person could be replaced with a better, hand-engineered, longer-lasting "pile of chemicals". That's transhumanism in a nutshell.

I'm not a strict materialist, but isn't this more or less true no matter what belief system you hold to given that inserting pharmaceutical chemicals, pacemakers, etc. into our bodies has increased the life expectancy to around 80 year old?

The problem with these people is that they think death itself can be cured, and the think it can be done the same way they think everything else can be fixed: with, as I ranted about before somewhere, magical, do-anything microchips. They're fixated on using computers to control people, because in their ignorance, they think computers are literally magical devices that can do anything you tell them to do, without flaw or complaint, or failure. In their minds, the computer is the ideal state. They want to live forever, so a computer is where they will do it.

How exactly are they wrong in their thinking? There's no reason your brain couldn't be put onto a computer, or that we couldn't engineer mechanical cells carrying out simple tasks (and "fed" the same way your cells feed themselves).

 

[teriyakiburns]

How exactly are they wrong in their thinking? There's no reason your brain couldn't be put onto a computer, or that we couldn't engineer mechanical cells carrying out simple tasks (and "fed" the same way your cells feed themselves).

On a long enough timescale, yes. One day we will understand enough about how the brain works to be able to simulate it and replicate it in some fashion, either with iterations of today's technology, or more likely with new technologies that have yet to be conceived. That isn't the argument though. The argument is that people like Schwab think that it's possible now, that we have the understanding and technology necessary now to do these things. They're convinced that computers are magic.

The issues are these:

1) as of now, we barely have a functional model of how the brain works. Even as recently as a couple of years ago, there were discoveries of how cells work that turned over decades of established theory. We only have a very surface model of how neurons work.
2) even if we did understand it, current microcircuit technology is orders of magnitude less powerful than required to replicate it, and in many senses might be fundamentally incompatible with the way the brain functions.
3) we tend to analogise the brain in terms of microcomputing because that's the most advanced technology available to us, but the brain isn't a microcomputer. The WEF people are mistaking analogy for equivalence, and as I said, the think that the microchips we have today are magical do-anything machines.
4) getting into metaphysics, the mind is an emergent property of the structure and composition of the brain. It isn't a piece of software that runs "on" the brain's hardware, as people like Bill Gates like to assume, which invalidates every other assumption that follows on from it. In light of (1) to (3), this makes the task impossible with today's understanding and technology.

So in short, bearing in mind that we don't know what makes the brain work, barely know what makes individual cells work, barely have the technology to replicate what we do understand, and are prone to mistaking analogy for equivalence, there is no way that we could use our current understanding to immortalise a person by simulating their mind.

They think it's a simple problem, either out of ignorance about how computers work (as is the case with people like Schwab), or ignorance about how everything else works (Gates). In either case, the result is the same: they think that today's technology is capable of impossible feats, and that they will be able to cheat death by "uploading" to immortality if they just have a big enough data centre.

e: and while I think of it: getting that data centre means having a monopoly on energy consumption, which is why they want to deprive everyone else of energy, through various means of control and rationing, and ultimately by population reduction. They recognise that it would require immense amounts of power to create their simulated heaven, even if they don't understand that it's impossible with current technology.

 

[Ser Prize]

Good grief, these are cartoon villains.

View attachment 3320398
View attachment 3320399

The sad truth is they already started. A long time ago.

On a long enough timescale, yes. One day we will understand enough about how the brain works to be able to simulate it and replicate it in some fashion, either with iterations of today's technology, or more likely with new technologies that have yet to be conceived. That isn't the argument though. The argument is that people like Schwab think that it's possible now, that we have the understanding and technology necessary now to do these things. They're convinced that computers are magic.

The issues are these:

1) as of now, we barely have a functional model of how the brain works. Even as recently as a couple of years ago, there were discoveries of how cells work that turned over decades of established theory. We only have a very surface model of how neurons work.
2) even if we did understand it, current microcircuit technology is orders of magnitude less powerful than required to replicate it, and in many senses might be fundamentally incompatible with the way the brain functions.
3) we tend to analogise the brain in terms of microcomputing because that's the most advanced technology available to us, but the brain isn't a microcomputer. The WEF people are mistaking analogy for equivalence, and as I said, the think that the microchips we have today are magical do-anything machines.
4) getting into metaphysics, the mind is an emergent property of the structure and composition of the brain. It isn't a piece of software that runs "on" the brain's hardware, as people like Bill Gates like to assume, which invalidates every other assumption that follows on from it. In light of (1) to (3), this makes the task impossible with today's understanding and technology.

So in short, bearing in mind that we don't know what makes the brain work, barely know what makes individual cells work, barely have the technology to replicate what we do understand, and are prone to mistaking analogy for equivalence, there is no way that we could use our current understanding to immortalise a person by simulating their mind.

They think it's a simple problem, either out of ignorance about how computers work (as is the case with people like Schwab), or ignorance about how everything else works (Gates). In either case, the result is the same: they think that today's technology is capable of impossible feats, and that they will be able to cheat death by "uploading" to immortality if they just have a big enough data centre.

e: and while I think of it: getting that data centre means having a monopoly on energy consumption, which is why they want to deprive everyone else of energy, through various means of control and rationing, and ultimately by population reduction. They recognise that it would require immense amounts of power to create their simulated heaven, even if they don't understand that it's impossible with current technology.

I think if we do reach a state of 'immortality' it will definitely be through working with our bodies, instead of against them. In just the last ten years we've seen great strides in anti-aging efforts through stuff like oxygenation therapy, calorie restrictions, certain vitamins, etc.

 

[Maurice Caine]

Immortality is one of those many technologies that will guaranteed be used for evil thanks to people like the WEF. I can't wait until I'm required to take my booster shots in the "vaccine against death" (probably whatever repairs the nanomachines in my body) no matter the shitty side effects just so I can eat bugsteaks instead of soylent. It's a dream come true for these control freaks, since an "immortal" would be forced to take some sort of drug to stay alive, and the best part is that as time goes on, the majority of the population would be "immortal" ergo even more control.

I would rather kill myself than accept immortality from these people, because once you accept something like that, you're fucked.

I'm not a strict materialist, but isn't this more or less true no matter what belief system you hold to given that inserting pharmaceutical chemicals, pacemakers, etc. into our bodies has increased the life expectancy to around 80 year old?

How exactly are they wrong in their thinking? There's no reason your brain couldn't be put onto a computer, or that we couldn't engineer mechanical cells carrying out simple tasks (and "fed" the same way your cells feed themselves).

Meanwhile on Reddit: