🐱 The Makers Of ‘The Genderbread Person’ Announce New Tool To Teach Kids About Sexuality: ‘The Sexualitree’

CatParty



Two activists designed a supplemental learning device called the “Sexualitree” to help students learn about the 45+ components of sexuality, according to a review of the “Sexualitree” website.

The learning tool looks at sexuality on three levels — intimate, relational, and cultural. It includes 45 ways in which individuals reportedly “experience various aspects of sexuality.” Examples include “abortion, fantasy, fetish, masturbation, medical theory, pornography, sex toys, skin hunger,” and more.

Karen Rayne and Sam Killermann, the designers of the “Sexualitree,” created a document for educators to use titled “Using the Sexualitree in the Classroom.” It encourages students to “brainstorm about the ways that their culture tells them sexuality should be” and “brainstorm about the ways that their friends, family, and peers talk about and engage in sexuality.”

Educators are also encouraged to give students notecards and “invite students to decide at which level they think their aspects are most important-relevant to someone’s sexuality.” After students learn about the sexualized tree, educators are called to “turn the dialogue over to the students.”

Questions for students include: “What might this mean to them, to consider sexuality in this way? What can they learn from this as it applies to their personal lives? How might this framework help them in dialogue with their families, friends, and partners?”

Killermann is responsible for the creation of the “Genderbread Person,” a similar learning device that teaches children about the left-wing activist perspective of gender identity and sexuality. Killermann also designed the gender-neutral bathroom signs for gender-neutral restrooms.

The Genderbread Person is reportedly downloaded by “hundreds of millions of people around the world.”


Rayne is a self-described expert in sexuality education, according to the “Sexualitree’s” website.

Nicki Neily, the founder and president of the concerned parent organization Parents Defending Education, told the Daily Caller that she believes this material will be introduced to students who are not “intellectually or emotionally” mature enough to discuss these issues.

“The overview states that ‘there is no minimum level of intimate sexual experience necessary to qualify one as having a legitimate sexuality’ — which many parents would likely contest,” Neily said. “The accompanying advice on ‘using the Sexualitree in the Classroom’ provides guidance on how to introduce this topic to teenagers — underscoring that this lesson encourages the introduction of a number of highly sensitive and personal topics to young people who may or may not be intellectually or emotionally prepared to explore these issues.”
158EEF5C-1234-43D3-9E08-B2F175D15F32.jpeg7A4254B4-C675-4EF3-BF2E-AD0D60EFC014.png
 
Pale cave BEASTS sexualising children again? This is why they should be CULLED for the greater good.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: frozenrunner
Skin hunger? :cringe:

Are they just making up terms on the fly? Sounds like something a serial killer might say.

This whole think reads like a way to pick your underage victim based on what they think about sex. I imagine the more confused they are with this worksheet the more attractive they look to their creepo teachers.
 
View attachment 3326805

Powerlevel: I have had sex. And I do not understand what the fuck this is supposed to mean.

View attachment 3326807

No literally what the fuck. And why would you mention this to a child, ever?

I have no idea and just assumed the squirrel was a voyeur who gets off on watching the interspecies sex the bird at the top is having with it's bee lover.

The mole is practically telling kids to go search for porn.
 
So I bit the bullet and Googled "skin hunger."
It's basically just distress felt by a lack of physical contact. So not quite as "groomery" as it sounds...
I got this far into my life not knowing that term. What's wrong with "lonely" or "needs a hug"? Why do kids, in particular, need all this specific weird vocab?
 
Sadly I googled because wtf. I found these "scholarly" articles and maybe that's what they wanted the kids to see but who the hell knows:

female moles grow nuts
moles fuck indiscriminately and it proves something about the gays

I had no idea. Female moles have balls.

Sorry troons. This doesn't make female moles transwomen. It's just a survival tactic. Same with what goes on in clownfish, hyenas and seahorses.

Mole rats aren't actually moles. But they are weird in lots of ways and seem to be huge perverts. The oldest mole rat alive is Joe. He was born in 1982.

https://www.avclub.com/this-naked-little-benjamin-button-rat-is-gonna-save-us-1846956573

Unfortunately, when I was looking up chimera butterflies all the top results are troon propaganda aimed at the kiddies now. It's a butterfly that has both male and female genetics, likely due to two sperm fertilizing the egg. I was curious if there were any differences that could be spotted at caterpillarhood. Also, wing size in female butterflies tends to be larger and sometimes more elaborately shaped. And chimera butterflies have one male and one female type wing. So I wondered about flying ability. But I'm not clicking on troon propaganda.

Using cool animal facts to get kids comfortable with troons is pretty low. A female mole with balls or a mixed up butterfly is not a choice. It's either a survival tactic (mole) or genetic accident (butterfly). Cutting off your dick is a choice.
 
Back