Aws sucks shit
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2021
(phone posting missed the quote - someone said we all retard if in thread. Very true)
Hey my reply to the og thread got moved here. It wasn't my fault (though I'm still retarded)
To the thread topic: I'm still confused on how the Portuguese see Ralph. He's obviously a big muffin even compared to NORF vacationers/pentioners, he's 'American' loud, and he is cheap as fuck so basically worthless compared to normal tourists. Not to mention the drugs/degeneracy.
Even though the woman was screaming at the beat down, all women do that. And it was possibly just that when she saw the gunt, she thought Ralph got hit so hard his body rotated 180 degrees.
But regardless, isn't Ralph a cancer or at best a virus? We usually justify very radical steps to eliminate such cancers. Abortion, crusades/modern conflicts (thought Aquinas has slightly stricter means), jail/death penalty, etc.
So in the ethical discussion, I don't think it's quite fair to legalese a backing to Ralph. Legalese speaking generally is meant to prove intent and mental state, but in this case it's laid out for all to see. In fact, it's been laid out for the past x years. Ralph is a cancer. His intent is to sow chaos and degeneration.
We must make the distinction that Ralph has no overt objective other than to cause harm. (Hillbilly voice) Just 'cause.
Therefore, ethically, someone such as cog, who is no less guilty of his own crimes towards the body-politic and body-social, is in fact not acting unethically.
(If this isn't the most posh bullshit I could write drunk. Can't Ralph save the fucking 3k flight money and buy a pelaton?)
Hey my reply to the og thread got moved here. It wasn't my fault (though I'm still retarded)
To the thread topic: I'm still confused on how the Portuguese see Ralph. He's obviously a big muffin even compared to NORF vacationers/pentioners, he's 'American' loud, and he is cheap as fuck so basically worthless compared to normal tourists. Not to mention the drugs/degeneracy.
Even though the woman was screaming at the beat down, all women do that. And it was possibly just that when she saw the gunt, she thought Ralph got hit so hard his body rotated 180 degrees.
But regardless, isn't Ralph a cancer or at best a virus? We usually justify very radical steps to eliminate such cancers. Abortion, crusades/modern conflicts (thought Aquinas has slightly stricter means), jail/death penalty, etc.
So in the ethical discussion, I don't think it's quite fair to legalese a backing to Ralph. Legalese speaking generally is meant to prove intent and mental state, but in this case it's laid out for all to see. In fact, it's been laid out for the past x years. Ralph is a cancer. His intent is to sow chaos and degeneration.
We must make the distinction that Ralph has no overt objective other than to cause harm. (Hillbilly voice) Just 'cause.
Therefore, ethically, someone such as cog, who is no less guilty of his own crimes towards the body-politic and body-social, is in fact not acting unethically.
(If this isn't the most posh bullshit I could write drunk. Can't Ralph save the fucking 3k flight money and buy a pelaton?)