Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

tst.jpg

I don't mean to sound like one of them there origami makin' types on /po/, but I think these people kind of hate the whites.

When they say "Whiteness" it's really means "Western Judeo-Christian based Democracy" it's like a Communist dog whistle.
 
Last edited:
A "well regulated militia" is one that is schooled in the use of arms.
There's a federal law still on the books that states anyone between like 18 and 55 are subject to being called for militia service. I figured being codified into federal law fit the definition of well regulated.
 
I'm starting to think the average social justice warrior must think they live in an anime world like Neon Genesis Evangelion. They probably believe that once instrumentality happens (it won't), they'll go through some "journey of self-discovery" and somehow "save the world" or some shit. Fuck it all, they probably think they'll "talk-no-jutsu" their way out of it.

ANIME. WAS. A. MISTAKE! :story:
It's worse than that......

If SJW types believe the world is NGE, they are SEELE, the (((elite))) who want to become Gods and see Instrumentality and the Evangelion "robots" as a means to turn themselves into Titan-like giants with all sorts of Godlike power, using the lifeforce of the normal non-woke types who they want to slaughter to fuel their ascension into Godhood so they can leave the Earth (which is a fucked up wasteland) and fuck around in space and use their new "robot" body to fuck around without any consequences due to the powers it gives them,
 
There's a federal law still on the books that states anyone between like 18 and 55 are subject to being called for militia service. I figured being codified into federal law fit the definition of well regulated.
You're right! According to 10 U.S. Code 246, any able-bodied men between 17 and 45 can be called up for militia service. Here are additional clauses on the same issue.
 
Why is it okay to bluntly say you want some sort of untouchables caste?
It's always ok when they do it.

I also don't get why they say its a nationalist thing when relying on immigrants to do shitty jobs has been a left wing argument since before the term social justice warrior was even coined. Even as a kid who had no issue with immigration I remember thinking this was a terrible argument, literally admitting you want them here to take advantage of the cheap labour while trying to make themselves look moral for doing so.

Sjws are also the heavy consoomers, and would be the ones crying at the storefront, which is entirely why they want the cheap labour from immigrants in the first place. CONSOOOOOOM
 
I'm back near a reliable connection and I'm just catching up, so bear with my late faggotry.
This guy acts like buying a gun is as simple as ordering a coffee. Meanwhile in reality, you have to go through a background check, have verifiable ID that matches your current state of address, and depending on what state you live in, be a resident for a certain amount of time.

Non-Americans are such whiny bitches about guns, it's unreal.
Speaking of retards that apparently have no clue how 4473s, federal background checks, Federal Firearm Licenses, etc., work?

1653685423534.png

1653685471662.png


TLDR - This complete fucking dolt ordered an AR-15 online from Daniel Defense (which is one of the largest privately owned firearms manufacturers in the US), and claims that he didn't have to do any kind of background checks.

Problem - it takes to the 10th of 12 paragraphs to mention that his order doesn't mean he now owns a Daniel's Defense AR-15, it means he's shelled out $1800 or so dollars for one to be shipped from Daniel Defense to a Texas FFL location, after he's gone to that location and completed a 4473 form for his federal background check. The gun won't even be shipped, until the 4473 has been completed, submitted, approved, returned to the FFL location, and then sent to Daniel Defense, to prove that he can legally take possession of the firearm.

Larger problem - He live in New York state, where the gun he ordered is 100% illegal to possess, and he ordered it to a Texas FFL location, so we have 1 of 2 outcomes: he lied about where he lives, which is "lying on a federal form", or he had someone else listed to get a Texas address, which is a straw purchase, which is definitely illegal.

Either way, his malding and coping in his 2nd reply is bullshit, I only caught 2 references to the legal process required to purchase a gun, and they were paragraphs 10 & 12, of 12, while having a clickbait headline.
Thought I would post this here. This guy is Haydur Nation adjecent but he is so stupid and uncomfortable explaining this it is RIDICULOUS.

View attachment 3304702

View attachment 3304703
His chat is not better either:
View attachment 3304704
People identify it by reproductive organs BECAUSE YOU HAD THEM IN THE PAST. You know biology. XX and XY.
It's not the reproductive organs per se, although that's related.; it's which chromosomes you have, which dictates the potential to produce either small gametes (spermatozoa) or large gametes (ovum). Based on the chromosomes, the apparatus for producing one or the other will be present, excepting the astonishingly rare cases of hermaphroditism, which aren't a separate gender, since those 3 recorded cases have all been infertile, and at no point produced any kind of gamete, let alone a novel 3rd gamete.
So, apparently this Tweet thread is in relation to Depp and Heard. I don't have any dog in their legal issues, but its funny to see some of the extreme reactions people are having over the trial of a bed shitter.

I decided to look him up and why am I not shocked that a male feminist/SJW is also an alleged pedophile.
View attachment 3313673
Their responses to that message:
View attachment 3313677View attachment 3313679
1) There's no appreciable evidence that Depp abused her, unless "trying to leave when she was throwing shit at him, and then her getting into the doorway to prevent his leaving, while taunting him about how no one would ever believe a man was a victim of domestic violence" is now abuse.

2) Noah has repeatedly defended paedophilia and "minor attracted persons."
A play in three acts:
View attachment 3317284View attachment 3317285View attachment 3317286


I knew you agreed with the most rabid social justice warriors when I saw you attached a fucking paragraph to your infographic.
I'm 100% certain that "Dani. G. German" is a troon. Pastel, filtered pfp, pronouns broadcast, troonpride flag, desperate scrambling to claim more victimhood. That said, the other retard is a commie, so they're both losers.
 
Speaking of retards that apparently have no clue how 4473s, federal background checks, Federal Firearm Licenses, etc., work?

TLDR - This complete fucking dolt ordered an AR-15 online from Daniel Defense (which is one of the largest privately owned firearms manufacturers in the US), and claims that he didn't have to do any kind of background checks.

Problem - it takes to the 10th of 12 paragraphs to mention that his order doesn't mean he now owns a Daniel's Defense AR-15, it means he's shelled out $1800 or so dollars for one to be shipped from Daniel Defense to a Texas FFL location, after he's gone to that location and completed a 4473 form for his federal background check. The gun won't even be shipped, until the 4473 has been completed, submitted, approved, returned to the FFL location, and then sent to Daniel Defense, to prove that he can legally take possession of the firearm.

Larger problem - He live in New York state, where the gun he ordered is 100% illegal to possess, and he ordered it to a Texas FFL location, so we have 1 of 2 outcomes: he lied about where he lives, which is "lying on a federal form", or he had someone else listed to get a Texas address, which is a straw purchase, which is definitely illegal.

Either way, his malding and coping in his 2nd reply is bullshit, I only caught 2 references to the legal process required to purchase a gun, and they were paragraphs 10 & 12, of 12, while having a clickbait headline.
So many Twitter "gun experts" have no idea what current law is. They were tons of Blue Checks running around demanding background checks like they don't already exist. I saw a whole bunch of them patting each other on the back for demanding machine guns not be sold to kids as if kids can get BATF licenses.


I'm 100% certain that "Dani. G. German" is a troon. Pastel, filtered pfp, pronouns broadcast, troonpride flag, desperate scrambling to claim more victimhood. That said, the other retard is a commie, so they're both losers.
It's a parody account, insert a space after "Da" and then go to say it out loud.
 
I'm back near a reliable connection and I'm just catching up, so bear with my late faggotry.

Speaking of retards that apparently have no clue how 4473s, federal background checks, Federal Firearm Licenses, etc., work?

View attachment 3327025
View attachment 3327030

TLDR - This complete fucking dolt ordered an AR-15 online from Daniel Defense (which is one of the largest privately owned firearms manufacturers in the US), and claims that he didn't have to do any kind of background checks.

Problem - it takes to the 10th of 12 paragraphs to mention that his order doesn't mean he now owns a Daniel's Defense AR-15, it means he's shelled out $1800 or so dollars for one to be shipped from Daniel Defense to a Texas FFL location, after he's gone to that location and completed a 4473 form for his federal background check. The gun won't even be shipped, until the 4473 has been completed, submitted, approved, returned to the FFL location, and then sent to Daniel Defense, to prove that he can legally take possession of the firearm.

Larger problem - He live in New York state, where the gun he ordered is 100% illegal to possess, and he ordered it to a Texas FFL location, so we have 1 of 2 outcomes: he lied about where he lives, which is "lying on a federal form", or he had someone else listed to get a Texas address, which is a straw purchase, which is definitely illegal.

Either way, his malding and coping in his 2nd reply is bullshit, I only caught 2 references to the legal process required to purchase a gun, and they were paragraphs 10 & 12, of 12, while having a clickbait headline.
87A20889-CE82-4BE0-A34B-55CCCFCE70E6.jpeg


Every single time.
 
Why is it okay to bluntly say you want some sort of untouchables caste?
As the famous saying goes:
1653707111422.png

I also don't get why they say its a nationalist thing when relying on immigrants to do shitty jobs has been a left wing argument since before the term social justice warrior was even coined. Even as a kid who had no issue with immigration I remember thinking this was a terrible argument, literally admitting you want them here to take advantage of the cheap labour while trying to make themselves look moral for doing so.

Sjws are also the heavy consoomers, and would be the ones crying at the storefront, which is entirely why they want the cheap labour from immigrants in the first place. CONSOOOOOOM
Minor history lesson: the reason the Southern Colonies enslaved black people wasn't because they hated them or because white people were evil or whatever the fuck SJWs think. No, the reasoning was a lot more simpler than that: pure unadulterated greed. They felt that importing dark-skinned foreigners to exploit for cheap labor was a "necessary evil" for the economy. They "had" to force the Negroes to farm cotton for them at minimal cost so they could increase their profit margins to make cotton shirts or whatever the fuck they did with all that cotton.

Fast forward past the Civil War, and the former Confederate States become staunchly Democrat. Why? Because Abraham Lincoln was a Republican. They absolutely despised the Republican party for taking away their pet Negroes and forcing them to treat them as equals. And so, these blue states became the birth place for things like the Ku Klux Klan and the Jim Crow Laws, as a twisted form of revenge against the people who reminded them of their humiliation at the hands of the North.

1653708340678.png

Fast forward to today, and now the Democratic Party and their voter base are arguing for why importing dark-skinned foreigners to exploit them for cheap labor is necessary for the economy. So I guess it's true when they say "The more things change, the more they stay the same."
 
Back