Orbiter 🏳️‍🌈🐱 Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

Fuentes and his catbois literally report anyone who disagrees with them for hatespeech and has tagged these organizations multiple times to attack anyone who dissents from his movement. The irony is strong.

View attachment 3332216
What is this spelling? Kindergarten children spell better than this ESL freak. Probably not even White, I'm guessing it's another beaner.
 
A few years back BAP used to feud with a account called Ulysses (/lit/ poster IIRC) who was part of the same bookfag sphere Logo and Kantbot came from.
He disappeared and came back later as a communist catboy.

pottery.jpg
 
Nick is a teenage girl obsessed with twitter. BAP talked shit on twitter.

Ta-da.
This is true about any fued for Nick, if someone ever got a good shot on him he would instantly block them.

If he doesn't like someone, it is because of twitter beef because like his fans he is terminally online as well
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Israellover1234
"Nicholas J. Fuentes is what you call 'a confirmed bachelor.'" --PPP, February 2021
View attachment 3331841
"Is this what happens at America First, they eat Big Macs off young boys' bodies, in some bizarre ritual to Molloch? What else are we supposed to believe? And you know, Nick is inspiring copycats. Young men like Kansas Zoomer."
View attachment 3331842
"How many? How many of these groypers have actually spread their ass cheeks for Nicholas?"
Well definitely kansas zoomer, that boy's never getting laid
FTdSPepXsAEjzqn.jpg
 
Last edited:
Here's the thing about getting fuentes outed as a homo. These kinds of things will continue to happen, there will continue to be revelations, gayops, whatever, and each individual incident will have it's own levels of plausibility to them. All it takes for us though is one single time. Nick only has to fuck up once. Meanwhile, for every single incident that happens like with the recent mrkrabs9000 (still not completely convinced that wasn't nick, but w/e) him and his sycophants have to go out full force like their lives depend on it to discredit/debunk/whatever. Defending nick is not sustainable, and it will continue to have diminishing returns. We just have to watch and wait, and point and laugh.  They have to go full force every time.
 
What's really so amusing is that Fuentes reads every post here...lol! (Like a painful addiction that he can never satiate.)
So Nick...do you think you look older or younger than Metokur? Or the same age? hahahaha

View attachment 3331445

Nick Fuentes going to look like his child-grooming gay hero Matt Gaetz in the next 5 years as the stress and processed junk foods builds up in him

1653841226044.png1653841335510.png
 
Live twitter spaced happening

He's seething rn because the media doesnt attack BAP. He's doing circular reasoning for his cult but cant wrap his head around the fact a guy who writes books and does non-face podcast is able to keep from being attacked vs Fuentes who profits from public appearances.
Also BAP is hard for progressives to internalize, as he is not like the evil right wing stock characters that occupy their minds. Fuentes better matches the progressive archetype of EVIL WHITE RACIST CHRISTIAN MALE, which sets them off to attack on sight, not unlike a mongoose seeing a snake.

So for example, Jason Jorjani, a controversial right wing philosopher, who had to abdicate his teaching position at at technical college, does not have a page on the SPLC website (despite his name bringing up pages of others). He largely gets away with it because his ideology is some kind of futuristic Neiszchian power fantasy based on new age woo and occultism. It goes over most progressives heads. They have a limited range of archetypes that register (notice how leftist memes love using KKK imagery in their memes and propaganda) that BAP and his crew just doesn't instantly set off.

Basically if you don't look like a cobra, or openly and loudly advocate for cobras, the progressive mongooses will largely leave you alone, though there will be some repercussions.
 
Here's the thing about getting fuentes outed as a homo. These kinds of things will continue to happen, there will continue to be revelations, gayops, whatever, and each individual incident will have it's own levels of plausibility to them. All it takes for us though is one single time. Nick only has to fuck up once. Meanwhile, for every single incident that happens like with the recent mrkrabs9000 (still not completely convinced that wasn't nick, but w/e) him and his sycophants have to go out full force like their lives depend on it to discredit/debunk/whatever. Defending nick is not sustainable, and it will continue to have diminishing returns. We just have to watch and wait, and point and laugh.  They have to go full force every time.
In all seriousness, what legitimate basis do you have to even doubt that MrKrabs9000 is Nick? I'm talking legitimate basis, not Groyper smokescreening.
 
In all seriousness, what legitimate basis do you have to even doubt that MrKrabs9000 is Nick? I'm talking legitimate basis, not Groyper smokescreening.
Well I suppose depending on how far you want to go with "legitimate" would change whether or not you find this answer to be satisfactory, but I think the circumstantial evidence suggesting it is him is more straightforward than the circumstantial evidence that suggests it isn't him. I don't want to derail the thread so if you want to keep going with this I'll gladly accept a DM but also this isn't the most important thing in the world to me nor is it any kind of hill I'm willing to die on.

Edit: read you post wrong. I just think the evidence is circumstantial. Not insubstantial, not absolutely worthless, its just not a smoking gun that can be 100% proven either way. Still believe nick is a faggot though, even in the slim chance he can somehow completely rxonerate himself in this specific incident.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Joe Swanson
Well I suppose depending on how far you want to go with "legitimate" would change whether or not you find this answer to be satisfactory, but I think the circumstantial evidence suggesting it is him is more straightforward than the circumstantial evidence that suggests it isn't him. I don't want to derail the thread so if you want to keep going with this I'll gladly accept a DM but also this isn't the most important thing in the world to me nor is it any kind of hill I'm willing to die on.
I am not able to send DMs because KiwiFarms discriminates against Autism. I am just interested in knowing what reasonable doubt exists in a non-Groyper's mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6thRanger
I just think the evidence is circumstantial. Not insubstantial, not absolutely worthless, its just not a smoking gun that can be 100% proven either way. Still believe nick is a faggot though, even in the slim chance he can somehow completely rxonerate himself in this specific incident.
Do you believe that the cum hunting incident happened?
 
Caller asks Nick about his stance on free speech. Nick says that blasphemy should be illegal. Hilarious considering Nick cannot help but to blaspheme whenever he speaks.

edit: and now the caller is talking about how he deals with homosexual urges. these are our average groypers, trannies and homosexuals in denial.
 
Last edited:
I do to. I'm just noticing a pattern where people are skeptical of the tranny porn incident, but not of the cum hunting, despite having actual evidence for the former and only Jaden's word for the latter.
The tranny incident is very much in line with alot of things Nick did over the years when it comes to sussy trans activity. It's not just the CatboyKami date, it's also the old archived tweets and I think Discord messages where he's pretty much flirting with trans people. It's also his love for LGBTQ themed TV shows. It fits very well.

Do we have 100% waterproofed evidence ? No, you'd literally need him being recorded sucking a trannie's dick. And that's pretty much the line of the defense the groypers are going for. They don't care about circumstantial evidence, they won't even be satisfied with most direct evidence.

That's why I think whenever you are arguing with a groyper , you should attach an image of Nick being/looking gay or disgusting.
They don't care for arguments so infect their minds with imagery of Nick looking undeniably gay or ridiculous.

Humans automatically think in an associative way even if it's sometimes faulty. And images are especially powerful. Burn these kind of images into their mind.
And at some point they will start noticing it on their own.


Screenshot 2022-05-28 224139.png

When you see this picture you just can't help but think that Nick is super fucking gay.
 
Last edited:
Back