So basically the petri dish creation is against free speech, good to know. None of these grifters have any consistency. You have all the traits now, someone who self-inserts as Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin and attempts to compare himself to Jesus Christ thinks so called Blasphemy should be illegal. As if an omnipotent and omnipresence being would get hurt by blasphemers spouting militant anti-theist bullshit. Nick compared himself to the persecution of Christ twice as well, that's absolutely blasphemous.
Since he constantly compares his righteous abolition from 109 platforms to the persecution of Christ, one can very confidently deduct that he would like to outlaw any form of speech against himself and his worthless movement. The word Blasphemy is nothing but a farce.
Someone should really try and entertain his argument. What is Blasphemy? Are Orthodox and Protestant criticisms of Catholicism Blasphemy? How about biblical disagreements, so called new age religions, where is the line drawn, and what is the punishment of such Blasphemy, how does this differ from China's "separatism speech" or the various "hate speech policies" of Europe?
Once again, the grift right whines about a problem but propose no solutions. We know the solution to the groyper problem is a one-way train ticket to Treblinka times 9000.