US OPRF to implement race-based grading system in 2022-23 school year - Last year the same school lowered the score for an "F" to 19 percent

1653992018771.png

Oak Park and River Forest High School administrators will require teachers next school year to adjust their classroom grading scales to account for the skin color or ethnicity of its students.

School board members discussed the plan called “Transformative Education Professional Development & Grading” at a meeting on May 26, presented by Assistant Superintendent for Student Learning Laurie Fiorenza.

In an effort to equalize test scores among racial groups, OPRF will order its teachers to exclude from their grading assessments variables it says disproportionally hurt the grades of black students. They can no longer be docked for missing class, misbehaving in school or failing to turn in their assignments, according to the plan.

“Traditional grading practices perpetuate inequities and intensify the opportunity gap,” reads a slide in the PowerPoint deck outlining its rationale and goals.

It calls for what OPRF leaders describe as “competency-based grading, eliminating zeros from the grade book…encouraging and rewarding growth over time.”

Teachers are being instructed how to measure student “growth” while keeping the school leaders' political ideology in mind.

“Teachers and administrators at OPRFHS will continue the process necessary to make grading improvements that reflect our core beliefs,” the plan states, promising to “consistently integrate equitable assessment and grading practices into all academic and elective courses” by fall 2023.

According to the Illinois State Board of Education, 38 percent of OPRF sophomore students taking the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) failed.

The OPRF failure rate was 77 percent for black students, 49 percent for Hispanics, 27 percent for Asians and 25 percent for whites.

"Signal and reinforce districts’ DEIJ values”

Advocates for so-called "equity based" grading practices, which seek to raise the grade point averages of black students and lower scores of higher-achieving Asian, white and Hispanic ones, say new grading criteria are necessary to further school districts' mission of DEIJ, or "Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Justice."

"By training teachers to remove the non-academic factors from their grading practices and recognize when personal biases manifest, districts can proactively signal a clear commitment toward DEIJ," said Margaret Sullivan, associate director at the Education Advisory Board, which sells consulting services to colleges and universities.

Sullivan calls grading based on traditional classroom testing and homework performance “outdated practices” and foster "unconscious biases."

"Teachers may unintentionally let non-academic factors—like student behavior or whether a student showed up to virtual class—interfere with their final evaluation of students.," she said. “Traditional student grades include non-academic criteria that do not reflect student learning gains—including participation and on-time homework submission."

School districts across the U.S. are "experimenting with getting rid of zero-to-100 point scales and other strategies to keep missed assignments from dramatically bringing down overall grades," according to a March Associated Press report. "Others are allowing students to retake tests and turn work in late. Also coming under scrutiny are extra-credit assignments than can favor students with more advantages."

The report interviewed science teacher Brad Beadell of Santa Clara, Calif., who said he has "stopped giving zeros and deducting points for late work" as well as allowing students "unlimited retakes for quizzes and tests."

Fiorenza called for a switch to race-based grading last August, after issuing a report chronicling a spike in "F" grades by OPRF students in the 2020-21 school year.

"OPRF’s administration will adopt language that makes and keeps the system visible and continues to name racism as a complex interconnected structure," she wrote. "We must recognize the unique challenges faced during the pandemic intensify the need for a systemic approach to confronting the racial and socioeconomic discrepancies often experienced by our underrepresented student population."

Last year, West Cook News reported on an adjusted grade point average scale implemented by OPRF teacher Fiona Hill. It lowered the score for an "F" to 19 percent.

https://westcooknews.com/stories/62...e-based-grading-system-in-2022-23-school-year (A)
 
I suspect the real truth behind this is that it's far easier to have an egghead cook up some dumb shit like this to pretend like you're doing something to address the problem, rather than actually address the problem of black academic failure and its manifold historical and cultural causes (hint: it's not because evil white people are purposefully designing standardized tests to keep the black man down)
 
I can't speak for him specifically, but I think it's more to do with how colleges handle education, especially with progressive politics.

Some professors don't play that way, so it'll be either a harsh lesson with the coddling or the inverse where they will be coddled.
I wouldn't say it's coddling but something adjacent. It's that the professors believe in the destruction of Western society and morals and are thus willing to promote those kids as a tool to do so.
 
I suspect the real truth behind this is that it's far easier to have an egghead cook up some dumb shit like this to pretend like you're doing something to address the problem, rather than actually address the problem of black academic failure and its manifold historical and cultural causes (hint: it's not because evil white people are purposefully designing standardized tests to keep the black man down)

I mean, you're not wrong, but it's still hilarious that we are quickly going back to "Separate but Equal".
 
  • Agree
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
So in other words "they haven't learned shit but just pass them anyway so we can meet our quotas and get those tax dollars"? Haven't liberal run inner city schools been doing that for decades already?
Part of why a HS diploma is completely worthless. I remember my grandmother telling me about how back when she was in high school, if you graduated, it meant something, sort of like a college degree basically doesn't today. The standards were simply higher back then and there was always the trades or military or factory work if you didn't want to graduate high school. Now none of that exists without a HS diploma or GED because that only guarantees you have basically a 7-8th grade education at best.

I was an academic advisor for some time at a community college and holy shit, the number of people that we would get in for admissions advising, that could not pass a 6th grade math or English test. Most of them were kangs, but there were a few random huwhites and taconiggers in there too. The vast majority of them were recent HS graduates. It was horrifying.
 
Well Bush is the one who introduced No Child Left Behind.
That was the complete opposite. National standardized testing and common core programs so that school districts couldn't pull shit like this. This grade inflation and elimination of standards fuckery has been around for a long time. That's what NCLB was supposed to stop. Instead it turned into a bunch of dipshit suburban Karens whining because their mongoloid children failed to meet the new standards so they blamed the coursework.
 
Separate AND unequal!

(but it's OK, because it punishes Asians, whites, and Jews, and fuck them, right?)


Honestly, this is a problem that's been known and growing for years (decades, even), under the heading of "grade inflation".

It's been mostly noticed in higher education, and involves a whole host of (rather elaborate and baroque) techniques for giving better grades, for shittier work, for reasons including pressure from administration to over-inflate performance and attract investments and enrollments, expected grade requirements, and my favorite, the fact that so many students are fucking stupid these days, and no teacher wants to be the one single asshole who fails a kid and then gets blamed for "failing to adequately address the student's needs", when in fact they're just being the first teacher to tell the truth.

Refreshing to see grade inflation going younger and being openly racist now, though.

We get what we deserve.
 
I have stated similarly in the past but I do sincerely believe that if these relaxations of educational standards continue the Negro race in America shall continue to devolve into animalistic savagery to the point which they will only be able to interface with modern technology through speech to text functionality as a result of complete illiteracy. We already see this playing out in Baltimore. I am reminded of a Book (Freedom's Sons) written by deceased White Separatist Harold Covington which describes a future in which the major cities of the remaining 40 states of America (Washington, Idaho, Oregon, Wyoming, Montana and part of Alaska were seized by White Seperatists and Arizona, California, New Mexico, Utah by Mexican Seperatists) are converted into open air prisons with names such as Baltimore, New York City, Houston, Miami and more filled to the brim with non-whites who live like tribal savages.
 
Utterly fucked. They are doing the students a disservice. Chances are the black students won't get such a break in college, and won't get a pass when they fuck up on the job.

Also, you cannot "fail" an SAT per se, just get a very low numerical score.
The way things are going, I think many colleges are going to water down their educational standards until even people who graduated from these do nothing high schools can get bachelors as well. After all, if kids from these schools graduate and then suddenly can't handle college coursework, its obviously due to the oppressive white supremacist standards upheld by those colleges. And you wouldn't want to run a racist college, would you?

Seriously though, it's all fucked. My friend works in a Philly high school, according to him it's basically impossible to fail. As in admin makes it a nightmare for teachers to give a final grade of 60, but nobody questions a 61. Teachers grade based on completion way more often than content, you just gotta hand stuff in. The way they calculate the grades, if you get a 90% your first trimester or whatever, you could literally stop showing up to class and still pass. You have kids with good grades on paper completely unprepared for college. This is true even in the Honors courses. If these schools started actually having standards though, then things will get racially uncomfy, so no standards it is

There's a school called Central that's considered the best public high school in Philly. Recently they changed the admission from testing in, to a lottery, because this school wasn't 'diverse enough'. Admin is going to ruin one of the only public high schools with a good reputation and competitive academic environment because of whiny race bullshit. It's all fucked
 
I remember my grandmother telling me about how back when she was in high school, if you graduated, it meant something, sort of like a college degree basically doesn't today. The standards were simply higher back then and there was always the trades or military or factory work if you didn't want to graduate high school.
My mother (who's now in her 80s) worked her entire life after leaving school at 14. She went straight from school to working in a bank, and never looked back. My father got a trade apprenticeship at 15 and never went back to school. It was a simpler time then, and you were assessed on your abilities on the job, rather than having to meet some criteria to get an interview.

This idea of "equity" grading is just going to guarantee that black kids won't get jobs, because there's no way to know if they are functionally retarded.
 
My mother (who's now in her 80s) worked her entire life after leaving school at 14. She went straight from school to working in a bank, and never looked back. My father got a trade apprenticeship at 15 and never went back to school. It was a simpler time then, and you were assessed on your abilities on the job, rather than having to meet some criteria to get an interview.

This idea of "equity" grading is just going to guarantee that black kids won't get jobs, because there's no way to know if they are functionally retarded.
Imagine a 14 or 15 year old responsible enough to want to get a real job now and someone trusting them enough to be patient with them while they learn.
 
Back