War Invasion of Ukraine News Megathread - Thread is only for articles and discussion of articles, general discussion thread is still in Happenings.

Status
Not open for further replies.
President Joe Biden on Tuesday said that the United States will impose sanctions “far beyond” the ones that the United States imposed in 2014 following the annexation of the Crimean peninsula.

“This is the beginning of a Russian invasion of Ukraine,” Biden said in a White House speech, signaling a shift in his administration’s position. “We will continue to escalate sanctions if Russia escalates,” he added.

Russian elites and their family members will also soon face sanctions, Biden said, adding that “Russia will pay an even steeper price” if Moscow decides to push forward into Ukraine. Two Russian banks and Russian sovereign debt will also be sanctioned, he said.

Also in his speech, Biden said he would send more U.S. troops to the Baltic states as a defensive measure to strengthen NATO’s position in the area.

Russia shares a border with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

A day earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops to go into the separatist Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine after a lengthy speech in which he recognized the two regions’ independence.

Western powers decried the move and began to slap sanctions on certain Russian individuals, while Germany announced it would halt plans to go ahead with the Russia-to-Germany Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

At home, Biden is facing bipartisan pressure to take more extensive actions against Russia following Putin’s decision. However, a recent poll showed that a majority of Americans believe that sending troops to Ukraine is a “bad idea,” and a slim minority believes it’s a good one.

All 27 European Union countries unanimously agreed on an initial list of sanctions targeting Russian authorities, said French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, and EU foreign affairs head Josep Borell claimed the package “will hurt Russia … a lot.”

Earlier Tuesday, Borell asserted that Russian troops have already entered the Donbas region, which comprises Donetsk and Lugansk, which are under the control of pro-Russia groups since 2014.

And on Tuesday, the Russian Parliament approved a Putin-back plan to use military force outside of Russia’s borders as Putin further said that Russia confirmed it would recognize the expanded borders of Lugansk and Donetsk.

“We recognized the states,” the Russian president said. “That means we recognized all of their fundamental documents, including the constitution, where it is written that their [borders] are the territories at the time the two regions were part of Ukraine.”

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Putin said that Ukraine is “not interested in peaceful solutions” and that “every day, they are amassing troops in the Donbas.”

Meanwhile, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday morning again downplayed the prospect of a Russian invasion and proclaimed: “There will be no war.”

“There will not be an all-out war against Ukraine, and there will not be a broad escalation from Russia. If there is, then we will put Ukraine on a war footing,” he said in a televised address.

The White House began to signal that they would shift their own position on whether it’s the start of an invasion.

“We think this is, yes, the beginning of an invasion, Russia’s latest invasion into Ukraine,” said Jon Finer, the White House deputy national security adviser in public remarks. “An invasion is an invasion and that is what is underway.”

For weeks, Western governments have been claiming Moscow would invade its neighbor after Russia gathered some 150,000 troops along the countries’ borders. They alleged that the Kremlin would attempt to come up with a pretext to attack, while some officials on Monday said Putin’s speech recognizing the two regions was just that.

But Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters Tuesday that Russia’s “latest invasion” of Ukraine is threatening stability in the region, but he asserted that Putin can “still avoid a full blown, tragic war of choice.”

Article
 
all verifiable, I'm assuming. Trustworthy news aggregates like newsweek or the NYpost, or dailymail fill me with confidence.

1654042302570.png

@LORD IMPERATOR - you believe this 100%
 
all verifiable, I'm assuming. Trustworthy news aggregates like newsweek or the NYpost, or dailymail fill me with confidence.
News sources from both the left and the right. I like to vary things up to make sure that they come from different viewpoints. Which means if you can't trust one, you can go look up the others.
 
News sources from both the left and the right. I like to vary things up to make sure that they come from different viewpoints. Which means if you can't trust one, you can go look up the others.
What? If a story isn't true or it's highly unlikely to be true, it doesn't matter if the news agency is right-wing or left-wing.

"The U.S. assessment comes as a Ukrainian defense official earlier on Thursday claimed nearly 30,000 Russian troops had been killed in the invasion. " - https://thehill.com/policy/defense/3503162-pentagon-says-russia-racks-up-personnel-weapons-losses/

Oh, gee, great, that's really fucking reliable.
 
all verifiable, I'm assuming. Trustworthy news aggregates like newsweek or the NYpost, or dailymail fill me with confidence.
If you don't like it, fuck off to the other thread and share telegram posts from intel slava Z, RT, and Russians with attitude. Funny you only mention the rules after your buddies get felted.
 
What? If a story isn't true or it's highly unlikely to be true, it doesn't matter if the news agency is right-wing or left-wing.
what reason would we have to believe it isn't true, the ISW reports say the same thing as well genius. Feel free to totally deboonk them by posting sputnik, RT, globaltimes, and other state sponsored tankie rags
 
If you don't like it, fuck off to the other thread and share telegram posts from intel slava Z, RT, and Russians with attitude. Funny you only mention the rules after your buddies get felted.
What rules? The thread is no different from what I remember in the beginning of the war. It's just that I saw some asswhipe of yours talking about posting news in the newsthread, so I asked for news.

what reason would we have to believe it isn't true, the ISW reports say the same thing as well genius. Feel free to totally deboonk them by posting sputnik, RT, globaltimes, and other state sponsored tankie rags
Because believing in a state-sponsered think-tank of one country is somehow better than beleiving the state-sponsered news agencies of another country.
 
What? If a story isn't true or it's highly unlikely to be true, it doesn't matter if the news agency is right-wing or left-wing.

"The U.S. assessment comes as a Ukrainian defense official earlier on Thursday claimed nearly 30,000 Russian troops had been killed in the invasion. " - https://thehill.com/policy/defense/3503162-pentagon-says-russia-racks-up-personnel-weapons-losses/

Oh, gee, great, that's really fucking reliable.
Well, you wanted news articles, you get news articles.

Also, that's more reliable than some yahoo from some random propaganda blog that makes claims left and right. When both the left and the right say the same thing, it's obvious that it's not just some tabloid rumors.
 
Vatniggers coping and seething.

Biden says US sending medium-range rocket systems to Ukraine

1654043733400.png

WASHINGTON — The Biden administration announced on Tuesday that it will send Ukraine a small number of high-tech, medium-range rocket systems, a critical weapon that Ukrainian leaders have been begging for as they struggle to stall Russian progress in the Donbas region.

The rocket systems are part of a new $700 million tranche of security assistance for Ukraine from the U.S. that will include helicopters, Javelin anti-tank weapon systems, tactical vehicles, spare parts and more, according to two senior administration officials. The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to preview the weapons package that will be formally unveiled on Wednesday.
The U.S. decision to provide the advance rocket systems tries to strike a balance between the desire to help Ukraine battle ferocious Russian artillery barrages while not providing arms that could allow Ukraine to hit targets deep inside Russia and trigger an escalation in the war.

In a guest essay published Tuesday evening in The New York Times, Biden confirmed that he’s decided to “provide the Ukrainians with more advanced rocket systems and munitions that will enable them to more precisely strike key targets on the battlefield in Ukraine.”
Biden had said Monday that the U.S. would not send Ukraine “rocket systems that can strike into Russia.” Any weapons system can shoot into Russia if it’s close enough to the border. The aid package expected to be unveiled Wednesday would send what the U.S. considers medium-range rockets — they generally can travel about 45 miles (70 kilometers), the officials said.
The Ukrainians have assured U.S. officials that they will not fire rockets into Russian territory, according to the senior administration officials. One official noted that the advanced rocket systems will give Ukrainian forces greater precision in targeting Russian assets inside Ukraine.

The expectation is that Ukraine could use the rockets in the eastern Donbas region, where they could both intercept Russian artillery and take out Russian positions in towns where fighting is intense, such as Sievierodonetsk.
Sievierodonetsk is important to Russian efforts to capture the Donbas before more Western arms arrive to bolster Ukraine’s defense. The city, which is 90 miles (145 kilometers) south of the Russian border, is in an area that is the last pocket under Ukrainian government control in the Luhansk region of the Donbas.
Biden in his New York Times’ essay added: “We are not encouraging or enabling Ukraine to strike beyond its borders. We do not want to prolong the war just to inflict pain on Russia.”

It’s the 11th package approved so far, and will be the first to tap the $40 billion in security and economic assistance recently passed by Congress. The rocket systems would be part of Pentagon drawdown authority, so would involve taking weapons from U.S. inventory and getting them into Ukraine quickly. Ukrainian troops would also need training on the new systems, which could take at least a week or two.

Officials said the plan is to send Ukraine the High Mobility Artillery Rocket System, or HIMARS, which is mounted on a truck and can carry a container with six rockets. The system can launch a medium-range rocket, which is the current plan, but is also capable of firing a longer-range missile, the Army Tactical Missile System, which has a range of about 190 miles (300 kilometers) and is not part of the plan.
Since the war began in February, the U.S. and its allies have tried to walk a narrow line: send Ukraine weapons needed to fight off Russia, but stop short of providing aid that will inflame Russian President Vladimir Putin and trigger a broader conflict that could spill over into other parts of Europe.

Over time, however, the U.S. and allies have amped up the weaponry going into Ukraine, as the fight has shifted from Russia’s broader campaign to take the capital, Kyiv, and other areas, to more close-contact skirmishes for small pieces of land in the east and south.

To that end, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has been pleading with the West to send multiple launch rocket systems to Ukraine as soon as possible to help stop Russia’s destruction of towns in the Donbas. The rockets have a longer range than the howitzer artillery systems that the U.S. has provided Ukraine. They would allow Ukrainian forces to strike Russian troops from a distance outside the range of Russia’s artillery systems.
“We are fighting for Ukraine to be provided with all the weapons needed to change the nature of the fighting and start moving faster and more confidently toward the expulsion of the occupiers,” Zelenskyy said in a recent address.

Ukraine needs multiple launch rocket systems, said Philip Breedlove, a retired U.S. Air Force general who was NATO’s top commander from 2013 to 2016.

“These are very important capabilities that we have not gotten them yet. And they not only need them, but they have been very vociferous in explaining they want them,” said Breedlove. “We need to get serious about supplying this army so that it can do what the world is asking it to do: fight a world superpower alone on the battlefield.”
U.S. and White House officials had no public comment on the specifics of the aid package.
“We continue to consider a range of systems that have the potential to be effective on the battlefield for our Ukrainian partners. But the point the president made is that we won’t be sending long-range rockets for use beyond the battlefield in Ukraine,” State Department Ned Price said Tuesday. “As the battle has shifted its dynamics, we have also shifted the type of security assistance that we are providing to them, in large part because they have asked us for the various systems that are going to be more effective in places like the Donbas.”

Russia has been making incremental progress in the Donbas, as it tries to take the remaining sections of the region not already controlled by Russian-backed separatists.
Putin has repeatedly warned the West against sending greater firepower to Ukraine. The Kremlin said Putin held an 80-minute telephone call Saturday with the leaders of France and Germany in which he warned against the continued transfers of Western weapons.
Overall, the United States has committed approximately $5 billion in security assistance to Ukraine since the beginning of the Biden administration, including approximately $4.5 billion since the Russia invaded on Feb. 24.
___
AP Diplomatic Writer Matthew Lee and Associated Press writer Aamer Madhani contributed to this report.
 
Yes, I do. Anyone who doesn't lives under a rock believes it.

If Russia really was as strong as you naysayers say, Kiev would have fallen by now, considering how close it is to the Belarusian border. At the very least, they should have taken Kiev and forced the Zelensky government to hold up somewhere in central or western Ukraine, closer to the Polish border. Instead, Russia couldn't take a city that was literally a short drive away from friendly borders. They went from wanting to change the government because it's "run by Nazis" to now just wanting to hang on to the Donbas region and the eastern breakaway territories, and now they're calling up old mothballed tanks and raising the fighting age.

Then again, this is what happens when you run an army, not on professional training, NCOs, and trust, but on ass-rape, corruption, and a total lack of a cohesive strategy. Which is how you get classics like this:

 
When has the ISW ever gotten money from a government entity? They're not radiofreeeurope

FYI - The ISW is Bill Kristol's organization. It's a neocon PR firm disguised as a think tank. If you don't belive me, look at who is on their Board.

That doesn't mean everything they put out is false, but these are the yellow cake uranium crew. These guys literally exist to drum up war for defense contractors, that is their job.

Also, speaking of completely made up bullshit, the Ukrainian Government just fired Lyudmyla Denisova, best known as the chick who made all of the outrageous claims about mass rapes by Russian troops in Bucha and elsewhere, stories often repeated here about them raping kids and all kinds of other crazy shit.

How bad do your lies have to be when even the Ukrainian government couldn't let her keep her bullshit stories going?

Now what are the odds anybody here admits they bought into the bullshit stories and admits they were wrong or lied to?
 
Also, speaking of completely made up bullshit, the Ukrainian Government just fired Lyudmyla Denisova, best known as the chick who made all of the outrageous claims about mass rapes by Russian troops in Bucha and elsewhere, stories often repeated here about them raping kids and all kinds of other crazy shit.
yeah so crazy haha..........
 
Says the piss-soaked catlady from NYC who was attempting to give insight on how rural Americans feel about the conflict a dozen or so pages ago.
>implying that Russian shills don't pretend to be piss soaked cat ladies on the internet
I remember seeing a profile on twitter that was supposedly an old lady from texas and literally all of "her" tweets were about how Crimea and Ukraine are rightful Russian clay. Western media gives way too much creedance to these retards, they're so easy to spot it's barely even a joke :story:
 
Last edited:
That doesn't mean everything they put out is false, but these are the yellow cake uranium crew. These guys literally exist to drum up war for defense contractors, that is their job.
That's ironic, considering that website you link to thinks that more guns equals more deaths. It's the kind of leftist rag that makes the New York Times look positively conservative.
 
https://twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1531793405252096002
More: Admin officials confirmed to reporters tonight that the US will be sending HIMARS w/munitions that have a range of 80 km, or about 49 miles. This is shorter range than what the systems are capable of at their max, but still far greater than anything Ukraine currently has.
Not the long-range fuck you and your specific satellite-identified command vehicle tack driver that ATACMS is, but still pretty damn good. Probably sending them M30 and M31 rockets, which according to Wikipedia fit that range bracket. The M30 is a cluster weapon for anti-area use, the M31 is a GPS guided finger of God with 200 pounds of HE suitable for killing off yet more generals.
1654056682683.png

For your further reading on the submunitions.

EDIT: All those submunitions haven't seen a whole lot of use since the Cold War, and are getting up there in years as a result. Looks like they're finally getting a chance to be used. As @ColtWalker1847 has said, we're shipping out a lot of old stuff that's in the "use it or lose it" category due to age.
 
Last edited:
Says the piss-soaked catlady from NYC who was attempting to give insight on how rural Americans feel about the conflict a dozen or so pages ago.
Still waiting for proof the "copius" posts I made with pictures of Zelensky in latex.

Also, why so mad? Is because your mantra of "Russia running out of tanks, food and ammo, Moscow in two weeks" is just massive cope and seethe you cling to so deperately you attack anyone proving otherwise?

Grass. Touch it, you must.
 
>implying that Russian shills don't pretend to be piss soaked cat ladies on the internet
I remember seeing a profile on twitter that was supposedly an old lady from texas and literally all of "her" tweets were about how Crimea and Ukraine are rightful Ukrainian clay. Western media gives way too much creedance to these retards, they're so easy to spot it's barely even a joke :story:
No she's been around for a while. One of the many demoralized alt-right people that think "based putin" will save them from the troon menace. Sad. She was fun in the Canadian trucker thread when she wasn't going on about Trudeau's adeonochrome injections, WEF globohomo, or whatever other q-tard bullshit. I liked you dammit. But you had to become a low-info vatnik contrarian spouting absolute bullshit in service of fuck knows what. Cheap shitty vodka, I guess.
Still waiting for proof the "copius" posts I made with pictures of Zelensky in latex.

Also, why so mad? Is because your mantra of "Russia running out of tanks, food and ammo, Moscow in two weeks" is just massive cope and seethe you cling to so deperately you attack anyone proving otherwise?

Grass. Touch it, you must.
Ma'am you have me confused for someone else. Take your slap fight to them.

I'm the one who called you out for not knowing what forces Russia comitted to this fight, your "friend" for being a loudmouth idiot, and you trying to shove words into rural American's mouths. I never said shit about any of this stuff except "russia cannot afford this" which is objectively true.
 
Last edited:
No she's been around for a while. One of the many demoralized alt-right people that think "based putin" will save them from the troon menace. Sad. She was fun in the Canadian trucker thread when she wasn't going on about Trudeau's adeonochrome injections, WEF globohomo, or whatever other q-tard bullshit. I liked you dammit. But you had to become a low-info vatnik contrarian spouting absolute bullshit in service of fuck knows what. Cheap shitty vodka, I guess.
Those "Putin will save us from the troon menace" posts are in the same place those Zelensy in latex posts are, or the aderenochromehomo Qtard posts are: in your imagination.

I get that you are so demoralized and raging so hard you have to claim things that never happened to justify your irrational behavior but you and the other tard are seriously giving off incel vibes from being terminaly online. No one else here is so invested in persoanlly attacking me, just you and your gay coomer friend.

Again: touch grass.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back