War Invasion of Ukraine News Megathread - Thread is only for articles and discussion of articles, general discussion thread is still in Happenings.

Status
Not open for further replies.
President Joe Biden on Tuesday said that the United States will impose sanctions “far beyond” the ones that the United States imposed in 2014 following the annexation of the Crimean peninsula.

“This is the beginning of a Russian invasion of Ukraine,” Biden said in a White House speech, signaling a shift in his administration’s position. “We will continue to escalate sanctions if Russia escalates,” he added.

Russian elites and their family members will also soon face sanctions, Biden said, adding that “Russia will pay an even steeper price” if Moscow decides to push forward into Ukraine. Two Russian banks and Russian sovereign debt will also be sanctioned, he said.

Also in his speech, Biden said he would send more U.S. troops to the Baltic states as a defensive measure to strengthen NATO’s position in the area.

Russia shares a border with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

A day earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops to go into the separatist Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine after a lengthy speech in which he recognized the two regions’ independence.

Western powers decried the move and began to slap sanctions on certain Russian individuals, while Germany announced it would halt plans to go ahead with the Russia-to-Germany Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

At home, Biden is facing bipartisan pressure to take more extensive actions against Russia following Putin’s decision. However, a recent poll showed that a majority of Americans believe that sending troops to Ukraine is a “bad idea,” and a slim minority believes it’s a good one.

All 27 European Union countries unanimously agreed on an initial list of sanctions targeting Russian authorities, said French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, and EU foreign affairs head Josep Borell claimed the package “will hurt Russia … a lot.”

Earlier Tuesday, Borell asserted that Russian troops have already entered the Donbas region, which comprises Donetsk and Lugansk, which are under the control of pro-Russia groups since 2014.

And on Tuesday, the Russian Parliament approved a Putin-back plan to use military force outside of Russia’s borders as Putin further said that Russia confirmed it would recognize the expanded borders of Lugansk and Donetsk.

“We recognized the states,” the Russian president said. “That means we recognized all of their fundamental documents, including the constitution, where it is written that their [borders] are the territories at the time the two regions were part of Ukraine.”

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Putin said that Ukraine is “not interested in peaceful solutions” and that “every day, they are amassing troops in the Donbas.”

Meanwhile, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday morning again downplayed the prospect of a Russian invasion and proclaimed: “There will be no war.”

“There will not be an all-out war against Ukraine, and there will not be a broad escalation from Russia. If there is, then we will put Ukraine on a war footing,” he said in a televised address.

The White House began to signal that they would shift their own position on whether it’s the start of an invasion.

“We think this is, yes, the beginning of an invasion, Russia’s latest invasion into Ukraine,” said Jon Finer, the White House deputy national security adviser in public remarks. “An invasion is an invasion and that is what is underway.”

For weeks, Western governments have been claiming Moscow would invade its neighbor after Russia gathered some 150,000 troops along the countries’ borders. They alleged that the Kremlin would attempt to come up with a pretext to attack, while some officials on Monday said Putin’s speech recognizing the two regions was just that.

But Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters Tuesday that Russia’s “latest invasion” of Ukraine is threatening stability in the region, but he asserted that Putin can “still avoid a full blown, tragic war of choice.”

Article
 
Apples and oranges, learn the difference: Null is posting for informational purposes, the other is doing so in an autistic tardrage because he/xe disagrees with certain posters, and believes it will cause them to tardrage too. In reality all he accomplished was being mocked for posting his gay porno collection.
When Jersh is doing it to prove that nick fuentes is indeed a giant faggot it's informational, but when I post it to prove that the Russian army is full of giant faggots it's no longer informational because it inconveniences your narrative. Got it
 
Apples and oranges, learn the difference: Null is posting for informational purposes, the other is dong so in an autistic tardrage because he/xe disagrees with certain posters, and believes it will cause them to tardrage too. In reality all he accomplished was being mocked for posting his gay porno collection.
You can keep calling him gay but it still doesn't answer why are so many Russian soldiers taking photos of themselves doing homosexual acts.
 
Half the other thread also seems to be into drag since they keep posting that photo of Jewlensky.
was about to point this out, they're absolutely fucking obsessed with posting those photos of Zelensky in drag to prove that Ukraine is an extension of the homosexual west. But god forbid if you dare post photos of Russian soldiers LITERALLY ASSFUCKING EACH OTHER then you're the one who's a faggot. Somehow vatniks don't see the double edging on the sword that they weild
 
When Jersh is doing it to prove that nick fuentes is indeed a giant faggot it's informational, but when I post it to prove that the Russian army is full of giant faggots it's no longer informational because it inconveniences your narrative. Got it
You can keep calling him gay but it still doesn't answer why are so many Russian soldiers taking photos of themselves doing homosexual acts.
was about to point this out, they're absolutely fucking obsessed with posting those photos of Zelensky in drag but if you dare post photos of Russian soldiers LITERALLY ASSFUCKING EACH OTHER then you're the one who's a faggot. Somehow vatniks don't see the double edging on the sword that they weild
I don't keep pictures of gay porn and since I know how to express myself I don't need to post gay porn to make my point.

lmao faggots no rainbow colors on KF for you anymore, this is a fag free zone
 
I don't keep pictures of gay porn and since I know how to express myself I don't need to post gay porn to make my point.
Really? Explain the copious posting of Zelensky in a latex gimp suit then. I mean since you're keeping photos of Zelensky in drag on your computer I guess that makes you a crossdresser doesn't it. This is the same logic libtards use when they imply that anyone who is against homosexuality must secretly like dicks, you do realize that right?
 
Really? Explain the copious posting of Zelensky in a latex gimp suit then
Show my "copius" postings of the comedian in his natural environment.

Edit:I see you edited your post to add:
I mean since you're keeping photos of Zelensky in drag on your computer I guess that makes you a crossdresser doesn't it. This is the same logic libtards use when they imply that anyone who is against homosexuality must secretly like dicks, you do realize that right?
I don't have pictures of him on my PC but I'm still waiting for proof of my "copius" postings you autistic fag.
 
Last edited:
the comedian in his natural environment.
You mean being funny and doing sketches? Yes why that is a comedian's natural environment, congrats on figuring that out 👏👏👏.

(btw no matter how many times you insinuate that I'm gay that doesn't change the fact that Russian soldiers are ass raping each other, keep upping your dosage of copium)
 
Show my "copius" postings of the comedian in his natural environment.

Edit:I see you edited your post to add:

I don't have pictures of him on my PC but I'm still waiting for proof of my "copius" postings you autistic fag.
Why should he engage with you in good faith when all you can do is post "Whats that russians soldiers being gay? that means you're gay, not the russians! XD". Who let the childless wine aunt on /b/ circa 2009?
 
Why should he engage with you in good faith when all you can do is post "Whats that russians soldiers being gay? that means you're gay, not the russians! XD". Who let the childless wine aunt on /b/ circa 2009?
Oh I see, you lie and make baseless claims when you and your pals are trolling but when asked for receipts you start crying about good faith. lmao get some cream for that butthurt
 
Really? Explain the copious posting of Zelensky in a latex gimp suit then. I mean since you're keeping photos of Zelensky in drag on your computer I guess that makes you a crossdresser doesn't it. This is the same logic libtards use when they imply that anyone who is against homosexuality must secretly like dicks, you do realize that right?
+1

all the "homo" pictures can easily be obtained by quick google search, cut/paste

дедовщина сексуальное насилие проституция в армии россии
dedovshina sexual violence prostitution in army of russia

... but keeping the latex vid for reposting requires actual storage. Considering how many times that vid was posted, there is def something of a fetish for these people.


You can keep calling him gay but it still doesn't answer why are so many Russian soldiers taking photos of themselves doing homosexual acts.

this is a good post explaning, unfortunately in Russian by a dude who both did time and served in RF army


1. Tradition of opportune bisexual, homo relationships goes back in the Russian army from Peter I, when common serf soldiers were practically slaves and never left army baracks, nor had money for whores, so alternative means have developed and wasn't stigmatized internally.

2. A lot of RF bases are in bumpfuck nowhere, away from civilization and completely abscent of stigma internally. Very much like prisons, it's not homo to fuck or getting sucked off, but you don't talk about it in civ world.

3. In Russian "faggot" - "pidor" does not exactly equal gay and very little to do with being gay, it's a perjorative toward bottom homos or anyone of lower rank. It's a very common insult indicating lower/lowest status. In a typical Russian conscript service, there is a clear structure where fresh meat recruits graduate to higher ranks of "grandpas" with time spent, higher still being contractors and officers. Alternatively one may raise their status by lowering someone else.

4. It's a source of income for grandpas, NCOs, COs, where lower status members are victimized and threatened with sexual violence, or pimped into service making money. Ultimately kicking back money all the way up.

5. Soviet/Russian conscription is a lot like slavery/prison, especially for the lower classes or poor who could not get an exemption or an attorney to avoid service. So it's basically a crowd of slaves without any rights since any criminal activities are investigated by military tribunals who keep shit under wraps and quiet. Like with any slaves, consequence free, anything goes among bored and isolated group of men.
 
We're up to the variations of "no u" huh?
whataboutism is the vatnik's specialty and has been for half a century, not surprising
4. It's a source of income for grandpas, NCOs, COs, where lower status members are victimized and threatened with sexual violence, or pimped into service making money. Ultimately kicking back money all the way up.
you were good up until this point, iirc the Russian army doesn't have NCOs which is why they have such poor coordination
 
you were good up until this point, iirc the Russian army doesn't have NCOs which is why they have such poor coordination
They have NCOs, they are just the senior concripts or career enlisted that are broken up into 4 ranks with one being First Sgt. Compared to the US where out of 9 enlisted paygrades 5 of them are NCOs with the top 3 being senior NCOs and First sgt being a job title for SNCOs and not a paygrade.

I want to add this is a dysfunctional set up for a modern military, as career enlisted are not empowered to lead squads or seize objectives. Commissioned officers dual hat the duties of officer and NCO in some roles, which over taxes them or leads them to neglect some duties for others.
 
When Jersh is doing it to prove that nick fuentes is indeed a giant faggot it's informational, but when I post it to prove that the Russian army is full of giant faggots it's no longer informational because it inconveniences your narrative. Got it
You can keep calling him gay but it still doesn't answer why are so many Russian soldiers taking photos of themselves doing homosexual acts.
Well, people were asking for pics for the destroyed T-90M as "proof", not accepting the TONS of news sources that reported multiple T-90M losses. God knows some smooth-brain would eventually come around and say that there's no actual proof that the Russian army is full of sexual degenerates, so obviously, someone decided that we needed documented evidence of that. It's not how I would've done it, but it did provide said "evidence" in a very provocative manner.

So, where's the news sources in this supposed news thread?



 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back