World Economic Forum Megathread (The Great Reset)

How the fuck did they get so wealthy if they didn't have to be smart and how can I do it?
Generational wealth and/or moving in the right social circles. If you have money, bankers will give you more. If you have high status friends, you will attract more. People tend to assume that you belong wherever you are. If you're poor, you deserve it. If you're rich, you deserve that. So here's more of the same. Klaus Schwab merely had the idea to form a club of all these rich retards. Many have had the idea before. It usually ends with interesting executions.

In my opinion we're about to see the old wealth break up and a bunch of new wealth forming. I don't see most of them surviving this with their fortunes intact. So probably you won't have a chance at real wealth. But your kids can earn it and your grandkids can inherit it.
 
Every AI meant to be a highly sophisticated program that interacts with the public has either came back with racial biases or wrongthink data. It doesn't have to be Tay AI-levels of racial bias, it could be something as simple as noticing that some demographics tend to do X, Y, or Z vs the other racial demographics, and the researchers have to pull the plug or partially lobotomize it in order to get the results/responses they desire.

The cops had AI do patrol routes and it heavily stacked patrols in black areas. They had to scrap the idea because of "racial biases".

lol, lmao

Don't worry guys, the WEF is aware of the problem and trying to solve it!

Racial bias in AI is a big problem. This activist explains why​

https://archive.ph/vWg09

This article is much funnier though. The sheboon is shocked that an AI identifies Michelle Obama, Serena Williams, and Oprah as having male faces. Very amusing read.

Artificial Intelligence Has a Problem With Gender and Racial Bias. Here’s How to Solve It​

https://archive.ph/tBVq7

This nigga is was doing his thesis on Racial Bias, Gender Bias, AI. It's from 2018 so I wonder if he was able to complete postgrad studies. Looking at the text snippets, I sometimes contemplate why I bothered going into STEM (as a femoid! Asspats please) when the humanities allow such low IQ candidates to attain higher education. It brings to mind Professor Matthew C. Harris' PhD thesis, just shocking that the committees will allow these niggers to cruise through these programs.
https://archive.ph/clQvT

--

I think the people who fancy themselves in charge are vastly underestimating how incredibly difficult their goals will be to achieve. Even NPCs have hard lines that they won't allow others to cross. For every bugman consuming soy and getting excited for the next product, there is your local equivalent of Florida Man who will flatly refuse and cannot be forced to live in the pod and eat the bugs.

Someone earlier in the thread mentioned the "tiny house" trend in the 2010s, and you may be interested to learn that the current trend is to use a tiny house as a starting point for off-grid homesteading. They buy a couple of acres of raw land in Buttfuck Nowhere, ship in the tiny house, and start gardening or farming or Unabomber LARPing or whatever their dirty little hippy hearts desire. Homesteading/off-grid living in general is getting more popular among certain types of people these days, especially as everything gets insanely expensive and society gets more batshit insane. It's cute and kind of admirable in a "you remembered to dig the well a good distance from your outhouse, right?" kind of way.

These are the types of people that can't be convinced to get a bar code tattoo and submit to the New World Order. And while the blue helmets could be sent in to wipe out these dissidents, there are hideous optics to Waco firebombing innocent people who just wanted to raise chickens and can tomatoes but refuse to get the jab or take the microchip Xanax. Idk maybe I'm too optimistic but I refuse to believe that the entire population of the US, much less the world, would just roll over and eat the corn syrup.

Just look at the vaxx and Pfizer's CEO crying about how they had to throw out 30 million doses because they reached saturation point and the only people unvaxxed cannot be coerced into getting it. The elites overreached hard and I look forward to seeing the rest of their plans as the unstoppable force running into the immovable object that is human stubbornness.
 
lol, lmao

Don't worry guys, the WEF is aware of the problem and trying to solve it!

Racial bias in AI is a big problem. This activist explains why​

https://archive.ph/vWg09

This article is much funnier though. The sheboon is shocked that an AI identifies Michelle Obama, Serena Williams, and Oprah as having male faces. Very amusing read.

Artificial Intelligence Has a Problem With Gender and Racial Bias. Here’s How to Solve It​

https://archive.ph/tBVq7

This nigga is was doing his thesis on Racial Bias, Gender Bias, AI. It's from 2018 so I wonder if he was able to complete postgrad studies. Looking at the text snippets, I sometimes contemplate why I bothered going into STEM (as a femoid! Asspats please) when the humanities allow such low IQ candidates to attain higher education. It brings to mind Professor Matthew C. Harris' PhD thesis, just shocking that the committees will allow these niggers to cruise through these programs.
https://archive.ph/clQvT

--

I think the people who fancy themselves in charge are vastly underestimating how incredibly difficult their goals will be to achieve. Even NPCs have hard lines that they won't allow others to cross. For every bugman consuming soy and getting excited for the next product, there is your local equivalent of Florida Man who will flatly refuse and cannot be forced to live in the pod and eat the bugs.

Someone earlier in the thread mentioned the "tiny house" trend in the 2010s, and you may be interested to learn that the current trend is to use a tiny house as a starting point for off-grid homesteading. They buy a couple of acres of raw land in Buttfuck Nowhere, ship in the tiny house, and start gardening or farming or Unabomber LARPing or whatever their dirty little hippy hearts desire. Homesteading/off-grid living in general is getting more popular among certain types of people these days, especially as everything gets insanely expensive and society gets more batshit insane. It's cute and kind of admirable in a "you remembered to dig the well a good distance from your outhouse, right?" kind of way.

These are the types of people that can't be convinced to get a bar code tattoo and submit to the New World Order. And while the blue helmets could be sent in to wipe out these dissidents, there are hideous optics to Waco firebombing innocent people who just wanted to raise chickens and can tomatoes but refuse to get the jab or take the microchip Xanax. Idk maybe I'm too optimistic but I refuse to believe that the entire population of the US, much less the world, would just roll over and eat the corn syrup.

Just look at the vaxx and Pfizer's CEO crying about how they had to throw out 30 million doses because they reached saturation point and the only people unvaxxed cannot be coerced into getting it. The elites overreached hard and I look forward to seeing the rest of their plans as the unstoppable force running into the immovable object that is human stubbornness.
This is why I am convinced the left is pulling out all the stops to grab guns. If the people are disarmed then they can be vaxxed without any real opposition. Door-to-door vaccinations would become a reality otherwise you will get sent to a death camp along with the rest of the filthy purebloods -I mean a federal prison. Maybe even have the military be used to enforce the vaccinations.
I cannot think of any other reason why they are Manchurian Candidate-ing all of their shooters at THIS exact moment.
 
This is why I am convinced the left is pulling out all the stops to grab guns.
If unsophisticated, barbaric muzzies from shithole desert countries can figure out ways to harm people without a gun, then what's stopping anyone else?

I'm not saying you're wrong about them wanting to grab up guns for nefarious purposes, but if they think that's the end of it then they're in for a shock because they've been sniffing their own farts so hard that they have no idea what reality smells like.

Of course I do not advocate for violence and would prefer a peaceful resolution, but they seek to make that impossible, and you know how that goes.
 
A thing I've noticed with these WEF people is they larp at James Bond tech that obviously can't exist. They allege to have plans for a pill that sends out a radio signal to a tower showing you took it once consumed. How does that work? To send a signal to a tower, you need circuits, a power source like a battery, drivers to run it properly, a mechanism that somehow detects it's in your stomach and it has to reliably penetrate walls and make its way to a radio tower to prove you took a pill. This requires a bunch of different metals and that goes without the battery acid that would be unleashed on your gut when the battery is destroyed. Such a pill is more likely to kill the patient than it would to even properly work.

And this is for every pill.

Shit like this is doing a good job of convincing me that the Davos Men are really just crackpots playing at world domination rather than really doing it.

Well here's how the FDA approved antipsychotic with a built in chip works.

This useful infographic3 from the Abilify MyCite page shows how it works. Essentially, patients must download the app, attach the sensor to their abdomens, and when they take their medication, it keeps track on their smartphones. Patients may elect to share that data with whomever they want. Providers who have access to the information can be alerted when the patient is not taking their medication. Nonadherence to treatment by patients with several mental health diseases is common, so the concept as an early warning system to identify such individuals makes clinical sense. It is not hard to envision this product being rolled out to other medications for high-risk diseases, such as infectious diseases that require close adherence, or high-cost medications.

So, how do these patches work? Users must clean the area and then place the patch on the left side of the abdomen just below the rib cage or basically, over the stomach. This patch can remain in place up to 7 days, after which it must be replaced. Each box comes 7 patches, so I assume this is to make up for any that fall off or do not adhere correctly. One question I have is how do patients get additional patches. Interestingly, almost 13% of patients complained of skin rashes associated with the patch in clinical trials.

1653977276505.png

Information for prescribers.
 
Well here's how the FDA approved antipsychotic with a built in chip works.

It says that the ability of Abilify MyCite to improve patient compliance or modify aripiprazole dosage has not been established, and its use to track drug ingestion in real time or during an emergency is not recommended, because detection may be delayed or not occur.

IOW, exactly what I was saying in an earlier post. The proposal of chipped pills was intended to monitor and enforce compliance with dosing regimens (they were getting all horny about it: "imagine the compliance!" is a direct quote), which would require the sort of reliability that just isn't possible with these devices, as well as placing unrealistic expectations on user compliance. Anyone even remotely familiar with human nature would understand that a poorly compliant patient isn't going to suddenly become more compliant when additional steps are added to their dosing regimen. To avoid the necessity of those steps would require imbuing the chip with unphysical properties.
 
We can only hope. (:_(
It's already getting pretty bad in Canada. Our two WEF golden boys basically can't appear in public anymore. Their events keep getting cancelled because people are showing up with nooses and shouting things like "I hope you die". And that was before the handgun ban they just announced yesterday. If I were hoping for a violent outcome -- hypothetically, of course, because I am a model citizen and completely loyal to our Dear Leader -- I would be pretty optimistic.
 
We can only hope.
It's already getting pretty bad in Canada.
What if any powers that shouldn't be were just voted out of office in a civil election, even if they weren't elected?

Or somehow fired by Orange Man, like he used to do to people on The Apprentice before Current Year?

Either way it could be "poetic justice": they'd be forced to become one of who they treated like crap - one of "the little people".
 
It would be funny in a twisted deranged way if they were just trolling the schizos and the pill doesn't actually have a chip in it.

Details on how it works are oddly hard to dig up.
 
This is why I am convinced the left is pulling out all the stops to grab guns. If the people are disarmed then they can be vaxxed without any real opposition. Door-to-door vaccinations would become a reality otherwise you will get sent to a death camp along with the rest of the filthy purebloods -I mean a federal prison. Maybe even have the military be used to enforce the vaccinations.
I cannot think of any other reason why they are Manchurian Candidate-ing all of their shooters at THIS exact moment.
The problem with that theory is every time they'd tried to use mass shootings to ban guns in the US like they did in other countries they fucking fail. The gun lobby in the US is one of the few places the right wing has been successful since gun owners are sick of compromising and know even minor shit like bump stock bans are just step one. It's probably because we have examples in many blue cities and blue states for just how these gun control laws work, as well as every gun control law since the NFA (I mean you'd think that would be compromise enough for these people, but of course not).

You can't even use the compliance at mask mandates and vaxx passports as proof most people would surrender their guns if they were banned, since I guarantee your average gun owner is more likely to be anti-mask mandate and pureblooded unvaxxed. Door to door David Dees vaxx vans would be akin to a declaration of war on the populace--they actually were trying "voluntary" door to door vaxxing (like Jehovah's Witness/Mormons basically) and they were reporting all sorts of abuse to their vaxx missionaries and IIRC one or two got shot because they were in a ghetto.

That's why I think they'll try other ways to defacto ban guns. You will never see even remotely cheap ammo in your life again, for one. There will be all sorts of banking restrictions slapped on gun stores (just like there is on porn, I think they're doing it to porn and hookers first as a test because the right-wing mostly supports banning porn through shady credit card bullshit), gun purchases, ammo purchases, etc. Maybe twist insurance companies to charge people more for owning guns. More taxes on guns/related purchases. "Incentives" to discourage owning guns. Using CPS to harass parents who own guns, maybe using "public health" policies. Fedcoin to restrict or defacto ban gun purchases. Note that this is what they are actively trying to do with cars and meat BTW.
 
The problem with that theory is every time they'd tried to use mass shootings to ban guns in the US like they did in other countries they fucking fail.
Speaking of the Constitution, there's people - shouldn't be a surprise if tyranny is behind them - who want "hate speech" banned in the USA, despite the Supreme Court saying that's unconstitutional.

Wikipedia says such people argue that "hate speech" is "bolstering an oppressive narrative which demeans equality and the Reconstructive Amendment's purpose of guaranteeing equal protection under the law". That seems to be delusional wokethink, because the idea of an "oppressive narrative" seems to come from communist collectivist thinking - the idea that one of a kind is inherently responsible for the actions of others of their kind. If their kind is deemed "oppressor" rather than a "marginalized group", that is. Also, people should have equal protection under the law anyway, even if there's "hate speech" going on. Finally, in Current Year Clown World, "hate speech" and "oppression" could be interpreted so broadly that any "wrongthink" could qualify.
 
Last edited:
Speaking of the Constitution, there's people - shouldn't be a surprise if tyranny is behind them - who want "hate speech" banned in the USA, despite the Supreme Court saying that's unconstitutional.
My face when the Founding Fathers cuck the World Economic Forum long after they're dead.
1654075001682.png
 
That's why I think they'll try other ways to defacto ban guns. You will never see even remotely cheap ammo in your life again, for one. There will be all sorts of banking restrictions slapped on gun stores (just like there is on porn, I think they're doing it to porn and hookers first as a test because the right-wing mostly supports banning porn through shady credit card bullshit), gun purchases, ammo purchases, etc.
Slight powerlevel, but as a banker (oy vey I know) I have seen a ton of people withdrawing shitloads of cash to buy guns for this exact reason.
It goes into what you said later, with the arrival of Fedcoin private, untraceable purchases will no longer be possible.
As for ammo, a ton of my gun crazy friends buy ammo production parts mostly from Mexico, cutting the cost of ammo down significantly.
 
Isn't there an increasing amount of opposition to the American Revolution by the woke?
If there is, they're such a tiny minority that I've never heard of them. In any case, good luck making the argument that the American Revolution was bad. The American Revolution lead to the end of slavery starting with the 3/5 compromise, followed by its official end at the Civil War and then finally done away with in its last vestiges at the start of WW2. Then black people were given equal rights during the 60s. By saying that the Revolution was a bad thing, you're not just saying that free speech or gun rights are bad, but that the end of slavery and equal rights are bad. After all, these are people who believe in the 1619 bullshit, so without 1776 America would remain a slave owning nation and colony of the United Kingdom.

At what point does your moral grandstanding officially become pointless? How are SJWs going to convince me that slavery is good or reconcile that they support something their movement ostensibly despises?
 
Back