World Economic Forum Megathread (The Great Reset)

[ToroidalBoat]

hahaha

"UN denounces 'wronthinking' reporting on monkeypox spread"?

Everything about transhumanism is insulting, disgusting, anti-Nature (or anti-God, if you prefer), and anti-human.

"Man is the being through and by which the discarding of biology is coming to pass, because he is capable of creating technology and, by dissolving his biological foundation, integrating himself into the world-system. He is able to assume a form perfectly appropriate for dead infinity - that of the machine."

- A Perfect Murder – The Soul of the East

also relevant video: Can You Upload Your Mind & Live Forever? - YouTube
(tl;dw: how consciousness really works isn't fully known so who knows)

I would rather kill myself than accept immortality from these people, because once you accept something like that, you're fucked.

To be imprisoned as an immortal serf in an endless Clown World is like eternal torment in hell.

Also I recall reading that someday, the technology of "quantum archeology" could somehow be used to resurrect people into a "virtual reality" simulation. If such could happen, can you imagine the horrors tyranny and evil could put resurrected "wrongthinkers" in?

Steve Hoffman gave a rather over-excited talk about that at some university in China. And he kind of casually mentioned how others could make your life a digital hell or control you in ways you aren't even aware of. I think I'd pass on becoming a cyborg...

 

[wtfNeedSignUp]

Schizo post, a thing I always wondered is when is the limit where the law can justify killing any one of those monsters. It's like every one of them has confessed to willing to murder people, has the means to do so, and has 100% has already caused the deaths of others. When does our law system consider it's self defence to strike back when it's a billionaire killing people through influence, rather than, for example, a junkie threatening people with a gun?

 

[CAPTAIN HAPPY]

Schizo post, a thing I always wondered is when is the limit where the law can justify killing any one of those monsters. It's like every one of them has confessed to willing to murder people, has the means to do so, and has 100% has already caused the deaths of others. When does our law system consider it's self defence to strike back when it's a billionaire killing people through influence, rather than, for example, a junkie threatening people with a gun?

Never lol
At best, what you can hope for is for 'those people' to slaughter each other, kill themselves, or just one really crafty quiet loner really into fighting globalism to do some shit.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

Never lol

I don't know if the technocratic tyranny will ever be removed from power, maybe barring a total collapse.

Sounds "doomer", but they seem to always have plans to counter challenges to any power they wield.

Occupy? Derailed with woke. "Wrongthink" on the internet? Big Tech censorship. Orange Man? The coof, "peaceful protests"...

 

[CAPTAIN HAPPY]

I don't know if the technocratic tyranny will ever be removed from power, maybe barring a total collapse.

Sounds "doomer", but they seem to always have plans to counter challenges to any power they wield.

Occupy? Derailed with woke. "Wrongthink" on the internet? Big Tech censorship. Orange Man? The coof, "peaceful protests"...

Problem is nobody can really challenge them besides themselves. Kings and Emperors ruled for centuries until their descendants became spoiled parodies of their office, then they got shelves at best, axed at worst.
Problem with these NWO faggot retards is that, unlike Kings and Emperors who'd protect and rule their state,
they have no purpose, only fucking lol amounts of power to waste on their own vanity.
I don't think it'll last, considering they want to play God, which is always a great idea that never ends up in a total horror show.
Us little people, best we can do is hold on to our own as long as we're able and get the fuck out of the dectructicons' way.
Problem with doomers they have too little to care for and no means of becoming something in life. Just the right people the NWO needs though for patsy purposes.

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

Meanwhile on Reddit:
View attachment 3326041

I still don't think this AI revolution is going to go the way the Tech-Fags think it will.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

They recognise that it would require immense amounts of power to create their simulated heaven, even if they don't understand that it's impossible with current technology.

I still don't think this AI revolution is going to go the way the Tech-Fags think it will.

There's the idea that a "matryoshka brain" could be built around the sun that could support a "virtual reality heaven" for eons.

The dream that human effort is going to bring about an amazing utopian future through technology seems to be just that: a dream.

I don't think it'll last

At least one thing history has shown is that tyrannies always fell sooner or later.

 

[Proserpina]

I don't know if the technocratic tyranny will ever be removed from power, maybe barring a total collapse.

Sounds "doomer", but they seem to always have plans to counter challenges to any power they wield.

Problem is nobody can really challenge them besides themselves. Kings and Emperors ruled for centuries until their descendants became spoiled parodies of their office, then they got shelves at best, axed at worst.

Based on what they've already tried in Canada, especially Quebec, this is my worse case scenario:

They'll try to force compliance with whatever comes next -- the digital id, a microchip, God knows what -- by gradually pushing people out of society for refusing. People who are dependent on a system that the WEF fully controls (i.e. the majority of people at this point) are at their mercy for medical care, housing, food, and water. Anyone who is non-compliant with whatever the WEF decrees will simply be denied their basic needs. Total collapse actually helps them because it forces people to become more dependent. Leftists fight for shit like UBI for a reason and it's not because they care.

However, the source of their power is also their Achilles heel -- they can only control the system they've created. If you don't depend on them for food, they can't threaten you with starving to death. If you stop caring about material wealth, they can't threaten to take your money away. Ironically, "you'll own nothing and be happy" might actually be the way to escape this nightmare. Of course, nothing is stopping them from showing up and destroying my garden, or poisoning my well, or attempting to violently seize my entire property. But I suspect that if we do reach this point, they'll allow isolated pre-industrial communities to exist like in Brave New World, because it ultimately benefits them to have someone to point at and say "you wouldn't want to end up like them would you?"

Schizo theories aside, I don't think any type of organized rebellion will ever work. There just aren't enough people who are willing to sacrifice convenience and comfort, not even for freedom, for it to succeed. By this point, anyone who's willing to accept what's happening already has and is already preparing.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

They'll try to force compliance with whatever comes next -- the digital id, a microchip, God knows what -- by gradually pushing people out of society for refusing.

I think this Clown World of the WEF, technocracy, wokeism, "The Great Reset", and "transhumanism" has roots in the Renaissance.

Back then, bankers and merchants gained power, and there was already the idea that the ideal is to part with all "carnal lusts of the flesh". There was the new idea that humanistic "progress" leads to godhood, which also led to propaganda that history is a single one-way path of linear "progress", or what @Syaoran Li calls "Whig history".

Furthermore, the individual potential was seen as a never-ending quest for being God-like, paving the way for a view of Man based on unlimited perfection and progress.[43]

 

[CAPTAIN HAPPY]

They'll try to force compliance with whatever comes next -- the digital id, a microchip, God knows what -- by gradually pushing people out of society for refusing. People who are dependent on a system that the WEF fully controls (i.e. the majority of people at this point) are at their mercy for medical care, housing, food, and water. Anyone who is non-compliant with whatever the WEF decrees will simply be denied their basic needs. Total collapse actually helps them because it forces people to become more dependent. Leftists fight for shit like UBI for a reason and it's not because they care.

They won't have to convince that hard. People gladly sacrifice some shit for convenience. Another matter is if you can sustain the convenience. That's why I don't buy the stuff about immediate control of all food supply and water for the sole purpose of forcing people to think the right way. That kind of shit has sailed a long time ago and even the most brainless retard will scream fascism if the government takes away the convenience he had to sacrifice for.
Total collapse doesn't help anyone, especially them. They have all the good shit, that's where the hoards of people will go first, to them.

However, the source of their power is also their Achilles heel -- they can only control the system they've created. If you don't depend on them for food, they can't threaten you with starving to death. If you stop caring about material wealth, they can't threaten to take your money away. Ironically, "you'll own nothing and be happy" might actually be the way to to escape this nightmare. Of course, nothing is stopping them from showing up and destroying my garden, or poisoning my well, or attempting to violently seize my entire property. But I suspect that if we do reach this point, they'll allow isolated pre-industrial communities to exist like in Brave New World, because it ultimately benefits them to have someone to point at and say "you wouldn't want to end up like them would you?"

They can't risk playing numbers against themselves. At the very fucking best they had kill off a bunch of homeless people, but only if they'll retain some kind of low tier laborer class to run everything. If they start fucking with the overwhelmingly sizeable laborer class and get caught trying some shit, they loose vital support and their whole bullshit will collapse. They know this shit.

Schizo theories aside, I don't think any type of organized rebellion will ever work. There just aren't enough people who are willing to sacrifice convenience and comfort, not even for freedom, for it to succeed. By this point, anyone who's willing to accept what's happening already has and is already preparing.

It's just like with the gay faggots today. You can't really beat them, kill them and rebuild some kind of aryan super fantasy reich. All you can really do is wait out for all this bullshit to pass. Problem is to not allow the corrupt cleptocrat communists to get away with total federalization again.

 

[Ser Prize]

They won't have to convince that hard. People gladly sacrifice some shit for convenience. Another matter is if you can sustain the convenience. That's why I don't buy the stuff about immediate control of all food supply and water for the sole purpose of forcing people to think the right way. That kind of shit has sailed a long time ago and even the most brainless retard will scream fascism if the government takes away the convenience he had to sacrifice for.
Total collapse doesn't help anyone, especially them. They have all the good shit, that's where the hoards of people will go first, to them.

They can't risk playing numbers against themselves. At the very fucking best they had kill off a bunch of homeless people, but only if they'll retain some kind of low tier laborer class to run everything. If they start fucking with the overwhelmingly sizeable laborer class and get caught trying some shit, they loose vital support and their whole bullshit will collapse. They know this shit.

It's just like with the gay faggots today. You can't really beat them, kill them and rebuild some kind of aryan super fantasy reich. All you can really do is wait out for all this bullshit to pass. Problem is to not allow the corrupt cleptocrat communists to get away with total federalization again.

The bigger the hand the looser it's grasp. They're undertaking an impossible task with sci fi delusions, thinking that they might finally be the ones to bring about this repeating dream amongst our species. The tech certainly isn't there now, and I have my doubts it ever will be.

What gives me hope is that they're ill-prepared for resistance they can't expect. I think the Canadian trucker convoy caught them completely by surprise, and whilst it was far from some glorious armed uprising it was a show of tooth and defiance. And if it can come from Canada, of all places, then I imagine they will truly never bring white civilization to heel.

 

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

Also I recall reading that someday, the technology of "quantum archeology" could somehow be used to resurrect people into a "virtual reality" simulation. If such could happen, can you imagine the horrors tyranny and evil could put resurrected "wrongthinkers" in?

It's precisely because of quantum effects you can't resurrect a decomposed corpse meaning if the WEFists ever control Roko's Basilisk (although I guess it would be Woke-O's Basilisk at that point) they can't actually torment you, they can only at best torment a being indistinguishable from you. Even operating under purely materialist assumptions it's impossible since it would be mathematically impossible to track the atoms that were your consciousness and put them back together, although if you only recently died and the damage wasn't too bad (like a shotgun to the head), then MAYBE you could be resurrected with nanomachines. Right now nobody knows for sure how to revive someone who is brain dead but if you could they'd probably make a stroke victim or Joe Biden look lucid.

There's the idea that a "matryoshka brain" could be built around the sun that could support a "virtual reality heaven" for eons.

The dream that human effort is going to bring about an amazing utopian future through technology seems to be just that: a dream.

WEFism is basically a retake of modernism. HG Wells is probably the most famous proponent of this "science cures all and will improve mankind so long as we let it" ideology, and unsurprisingly the reason Brave New World feels so prescient with the WEF's ideals is because it was meant to be a parody/subversion of modernist tropes. Orwell too, since he was an opponent of modernism and spent much of the second half of Road to Wigan Pier discussing how bad a "machine society" of the sort HG Wells wanted would be.

Modernism of various sorts dominated 1890s-1970s, but the reason it fell out of favor is because awful shit happened every single time. Modernist ideology created communism and fascism, reduced people to mere cogs (which in addition to helping make workers' lives hellish, also helped the industrial slaughter of WWI), created the Holocaust, and generally negatively impacted peoples' lives with shit like public housing projects which were supposed to be totally efficient and work but instead created crime and misery. What you see with the WEF's ideology is a "reconstruction" of modernism encompassing certain postmodernist tenets. Like modernism, it is destined to fail and in the process bring about untold misery.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

reduced people to mere cogs

Like so-called "scientific management" which was cooked up by Frederick Taylor?

Like modernism, it is destined to fail and in the process bring about untold misery.

Looks like Clown World is pointing in that direction.

I don't like how computerized the world seems to be going in Current Year. "Smartphone zombies", "smart cities", "social" media...

I've said it before - it feels like "real life is getting cancelled" by such tech over-saturation.

 

[SCSI]

Everything about transhumanism is insulting, disgusting, anti-Nature (or anti-God, if you prefer), and anti-human. Anyone who would willingly merge with a computer is a soulless reptile. No one wants -- or even thinks about -- immortality. Yet this detached, craven freak of nature casually assumes that we'd all be be fine with becoming eldritch abominations. In fact, he thinks it's something we'd covet. He naturally sees human beings as nothing more than empty biological machines. It's weird.

Depends on how you define "transhumanism". And "Nature" and "Human", I suppose. (And now we're firmly in my favorite genres of science fiction!) And I'd be game to give going full cyborg a shot, if the tech were finally there and mature, and it didn't require me to sign my ass over to these ghouls as property. I see no reason why it would be an empty or soulless existence -- I think it sounds intriguing and full of possibilities.

If you stop caring about material wealth, they can't threaten to take your money away. Ironically, "you'll own nothing and be happy" might actually be the way to escape this nightmare.

“The philosopher Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king. Said Aristippus, 'If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.'

Said Diogenes, 'Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king".”

I think this Clown World of the WEF, technocracy, wokeism, "The Great Reset", and "transhumanism" has roots in the Renaissance.

Back then, bankers and merchants gained power, and there was already the idea that the ideal is to part with all "carnal lusts of the flesh". There was the new idea that humanistic "progress" leads to godhood, which also led to propaganda that history is a single one-way path of linear "progress", or what @Syaoran Li calls "Whig history".

You could trace the kernel of this idea (the achieve perfection by shedding the earthly bit) back further even, to some interpretations of Gnosticism. Or Buddhism, too. The Whig History aspect though, I can't really think of an earlier root, unless you consider it to be a sort of inverted Abrahamic history conception. In most religions I can think of, the view of history and progress is almost the opposite -- you frequently see a past Golden Age that's been lost, and history proceeds inexorably towards decay, at least until a supernatural reckoning flips the table and restores the Golden Age or restarts the cosmos anew, depending on whether its a linear history (Abrahamic religions) or a cyclical one (Vedic religions, many preChristian/Islamic pagan religions). Seems like man can't help but dream of utopias glittering on the horizon, the only disagreement is how to get there.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

"transhumanism"

I think nowadays the usual goal of "transhumanists" is to become "mind uploaded" into machine. I remember scifi used to portray "the ultimate level of evolution" as "becoming energy beings" of "pure thought" back in the '90s, but I don't know if that's a thing now. This "become robot" mentality can also be seen in the documentary "LIFE BEYOND II: The Museum of Alien Life (4K) - YouTube" (30:00).

You could trace the kernel of this idea (the achieve perfection by shedding the earthly bit) back further even, to some interpretations of Gnosticism.

And now in Clown World, there's the idea of having just one's mind uploaded into machine, and there's still the Gnostic idea that the pursuit of knowledge is the most important thing. And of course there's the idiotic woke ideas that "Love is for Souls, not Bodies", "gender is a social construct", and of course that (straight male) sexuality or "the male gaze" is "dehumanizing".

The Whig History aspect

The "Kardashev scale" seems to reflect "Whig History" thinking, and "become robot" could be a big part of it now.

There's not only the idea that tyrants want the "little people" to live in a miserable cybernetic hive of pod-dwelling serfs who own nothing and eat bugs, but also the idea that those tyrants want "little people" reduced to literal machines.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

Is it ok if I mention this blog post from Henry Makow who added his pinch of salt about the WEF and the Great Reset? https://www.henrymakow.com/2022/05/may-28-we-can-impose-our-will.html

I had a good interview with Kate Dalley on Friday.

https://soundcloud.com/katedalleyradio/052722-guest-henry-makow-who-really-runs-the-world-feminism-russia-etc

Klaus Schwab issues THREAT to Brazilian president for refusing to sign WHO pandemic treaty

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-05-27-schwab-threatens-bolsonaro-refusing-sign-pandemic-treaty.html

"Let's also be clear: The future is not just happening. The future is built by us, a powerful community - you, here in this room. We have the means to impose this state [of the future] on the world," Schwab said in a video posted on Twitter. So much for democracy.
--
Globalists have entered the kill phase of Great Reset; Remember the Deagel population forecast? It now makes total sense.

leohohmann.com/2022/05/26/globalists-have-entered-the-kill-phase-of-great-reset-remember-the-deagel-population-forecast-it-now-makes-total-sense

So the globalists have been meeting this week in Geneva at the World Health Assembly and they have been meeting in Davos at the World Economic Forum summit. The two cities, Geneva and Davos, are both located in Switzerland, about three hours apart by car. Between these two meetings, the globalist predator class will be getting their instructions on what to do and what to expect over the next 12 months. I am calling this 12-month window the opening salvo in the kill phase of the Great Reset.

Schwab opened the meeting at Davos by saying "the future is not just happening; the future is built by us, by a powerful community, as you here in this room." Schwab said "we must prepare for an angrier world," which I take as a bad sign that the globalists are getting anxious, feeling that if they don't take drastic action soon all their plans to erect an end-times global government could be wasted.

 

[Tinfoil]

Meanwhile on Reddit:
View attachment 3326041

When many of us were on the internet in the early days, we all thought the internet would bring people together and solve worldwide problems. 20 years later, we are arguing about whether Men can be Women, and giving troon drugs to kids. AI will just be another fuckup in Humanitys list of fuckups.

 

[XANA]

I still don't think this AI revolution is going to go the way the Tech-Fags think it will.

Every AI meant to be a highly sophisticated program that interacts with the public has either came back with racial biases or wrongthink data. It doesn't have to be Tay AI-levels of racial bias, it could be something as simple as noticing that some demographics tend to do X, Y, or Z vs the other racial demographics, and the researchers have to pull the plug or partially lobotomize it in order to get the results/responses they desire.

 

[Ser Prize]

Every AI meant to be a highly sophisticated program that interacts with the public has either came back with racial biases or wrongthink data. It doesn't have to be Tay AI-levels of racial bias, it could be something as simple as noticing that some demographics tend to do X, Y, or Z vs the other racial demographics, and the researchers have to pull the plug or partially lobotomize it in order to get the results/responses they desire.

The cops had AI do patrol routes and it heavily stacked patrols in black areas. They had to scrap the idea because of "racial biases".

 

[ToroidalBoat]

this blog post

How did Schwab get to be so influential?

Like around a decade ago I didn't know of him.

we all thought the internet would bring people together and solve worldwide problems

I think people thought the same thing about the Industrial Revolution.

The history of this wonderful age, so different from any preceding age, cannot yet be written, for no one can tell whether the epoch is just opening or is already well advanced. It may well be that we have already seen the greatest surprises of the age, and that the epoch is nearing its culmination [...] and that other than material development—let us hope intellectual and moral development—will characterize future epochs.