Libs of TikTok: 'Mega drag thread' documents examples of drag lifestyle promotion to kids

https://www.rebelnews.com/libs_of_tiktok_mega_drag_thread_documents_examples_of_drag_lifestyle_promotion_to_kids

Libs of TikTok, the prolific conservative social media account that chronicles developments in woke culture, has produced a massive thread documenting numerous examples of drag queen events targeting children.

The new “mega thread” produced by Libs of TikTok chronicles examples of corporate-backed events and official school-sanctioned events promoting cross-dressing, better known as drag, to young audiences.

“~MEGA DRAG THREAD~ They say it’s innocent. They say it’s just about inclusion and acceptance. They say no one is trying to confuse, corrupt, or sexualize kids. They lie,” wrote Libs of TikTok in the first tweet.

“A gay nightclub in Minnesota held a drag show for children earlier this month. One of the performers said in an interview ‘I want to give the kids an opportunity to see what drag queen/king life is like on a day to day basis,’” reads the caption for the first video shared by the account.

Another venue promoted an event called “Drag the Kids To Pride” encouraging parents to bring their kids to come up on stage to dance with drag queens.

As detailed by Libs of TikTok, several libraries advertised “Drag Queen Story Hour” tours in the United Kingdom and the United States, including the Bristol Libraries in the U.K. and Alameda County Library in California, in Weston, Vermont, and in various cities in Massachusetts.

The thread further details how teachers have hosted drag events for students as part of their GSA clubs, or “Gay Sexuality Alliance,” clubs in schools.

Revelations that teachers hosted such events have prompted school districts to issue reprimands and suspensions for those involved.

The thread, which spans over a dozen examples, has been confirmed by many of the organizations involved.

As noted by Libs of TikTok, schools and libraries hosting drag events are publicly funded, meaning that local taxpayers have been forced to foot the bill to sponsor these events for their children — perhaps without their knowledge.

Speaking to Rebel News, Libs of TikTok stated, “My hope is that by exposing this filth in our school system, it encourages people to act. Run for school board, vote, show up to meetings and make your voices heard.”

 

[MrJokerRager]

Is "sex work" like a euphemism or political correct term for prostitution?

 

[Diana Moon Glampers]

People saying this stuff is just kids playing dressup and that there's something wrong with anyone noticing the sexual undercurrent is doing something we have a very good word for in [currentyear].

Gaslighting.

Gaslighting is telling someone something that's obviously not true, with specific intent not to deceive, but to make them doubt their own sanity and cognition.

Teachers twirling in thongs in front of an audience of students isn't kids playing dress-up. It'd be fucked up for a teacher of any sex or orientation to do that. That's happened multiple times in these incidents.

And while "transition closets" and drag shows are being promoted for children, there are huge archives full of written erotica, growing by leaps and bounds from all the enthusiasts, that features...children being feminized into slutty bimbos for sexual use by adults. So when someone says that adults promoting this shit couldn't possibly be a safeguarding risk and that there's nothing sexual about these shows is gaslighting other people. They are trying to make the other person say "gee, I must be crazy, I see sex everywhere, this is perfectly innocent, I should really check myself because I'm turning into a paranoid loon."

 

[JohnDoe]

So if boys wearing dresses and makeup is pedophilia, what does it make it when girls wear those things?

The motte and bailey bullshit isn't going to cut it. This isn't a story about boys messing around while playing dress up unprompted or girls wearing practical attire like pants.

This is about well entrenched, well connected organizations and people in authority encouraging and pressuring boys to dress up as girls and then dance and perform in a sexual and adult manner for full grown men. That is grooming behavior, full stop.

Was my mom engaging in pedophilia when she shoved me in shitty uncomfortable Christmas dresses and taking pics w/relatives instead of just letting me open my damn presents when we went to her parents on Xmas day?

If she knowingly denied you the antipsychotic medication you obviously need, then that might be some kind of child abuse but not pedophilia.

 

[byuu]

Gaslighting.

Gaslighting is telling someone something that's obviously not true, with specific intent not to deceive, but to make them doubt their own sanity and cognition.

So gaslighting now just means genuinely disagreeing with something that you're convinced is true?

 

[Diana Moon Glampers]

So gaslighting now just means genuinely disagreeing with something that you're convinced is true?

No, it means telling someone that when they trust the evidence of their senses and see something blindingly obvious, that they're not just incorrect about what they see, but that they're crazy for seeing it.

Calling this "kids doing dressup" when it's TEACHERS dressing in these getups isn't a disagreement, it's a lie. It's absolutely contrary to objective reality. Many of these events don't involve kids doing the dressup at all, it involves kids watching men who are in costumes that are too skimpy for a school dress code and that actual children would be removed from the building for wearing.

You literally call it a "genuine disagreement" when I explicitly called out the fact that this is teachers. Do you think there can be a legitimate disagreement on whether legally employed adults in positions of authority over children can be "kids playing dressup"?

Calling that "kids doing dressup" isn't some kind of legitimate difference of opinion. Calling it "kids doing dressup" and implying anyone is crazy who sees teachers in thongs as being adults doing something inappropriate (and not anywhere in the same galaxy as kids doing dressup) is gaslighting.

Here's a clue: if you have to spend minutes doing dick origami to prevent your bulge from being the star of the show, you're not just playing dressup. And if you're teaching kids, you're not a kid.

 

[Haramburger]

You're right, Mrs Doubtfire is a drag movie, not a drag show. My bad.

PG-13: Parents Strongly Cautioned, Some Material May Be Inappropriate for Children Under 13. This rating is a stronger caution for parents that content included may not be appropriate for children under 13 (pre-teen ages). This may include stronger language, extended violence or sexual situations and drug-use.

Also I would cover your pussy in mustard, sprinkle on some onions and lick it down like a 4th of July grill meat.

 

[Android raptor]

Also I would cover your pussy in mustard, sprinkle on some onions and lick it down like a 4th of July grill meat.

Gross, sounds like a way to get a nasty yeast infection

If she knowingly denied you the antipsychotic medication you obviously need, then that might be some kind of child abuse but not pedophilia.

I was actually on antipsychotics unnecessarily as a kid. One of many problem kids that was (drugging kids into compliance doesn't work on kids who are acting out due to bad home life, fun fact)

 

[gang weeder]

I understand why, but there's a huge difference between a drag queen and a troon, and similarly drag queens aren't necessarily adult entertainment. That's their history, but with the mainstreaming of drag they're basically modern clowns. A man dressing up in outlandish, colourful attire to entertain a crowd, with the same ability to change their act to appeal to their audience.

Most of the drag stuff - including Story Hour - is basically the same as if you had a clown doing it. Taking a kid to see an all-ages drag show is the same thing. That's very different to, say, taking them to a sex shop, or a performance where the drag queen doesn't change their act, or particularly the ones where the kids are 'encouraged' to take part and it becomes the newer version of the child beauty pageant.

But when there's no troons, no sex offenders (vet your clowns!) and it's not anything sexualised, it's just dressup. Of course, some people think all gays are pedos, but they're not the ones able to distinguish the differences between a troon and a drag queen anyway.

What a cope lmao. Drag queens are the precursors to troons. So it's technically true that they're "not as bad" in the sense that losing a finger is not as bad as losing your whole arm. Likewise drag culture is completely intertwined with fag culture and if you claim otherwise you're either ignorant or, much more likely, engaging in motivated reasoning.

 

[Montalbane]

PG-13: Parents Strongly Cautioned, Some Material May Be Inappropriate for Children Under 13. This rating is a stronger caution for parents that content included may not be appropriate for children under 13 (pre-teen ages). This may include stronger language, extended violence or sexual situations and drug-use.

Also I would cover your pussy in mustard, sprinkle on some onions and lick it down like a 4th of July grill meat.

Count me in mate.
I'll bring the relish.

 

[Android raptor]

Count me in mate.
I'll bring the relish.

Unfortunately for yall yeast infections are not one of my kinks, you're welcome to partake in those activities with each other tho

 

[byuu]

No, it means telling someone that when they trust the evidence of their senses and see something blindingly obvious, that they're not just incorrect about what they see, but that they're crazy for seeing it.

Are you that autistic that you don't even have a theory of mind?
That guy obviously doesn't see that evidence as obvious and hasn't even seen all the same evidence you have.

Calling that gaslighting is retarded. That's like saying it's gaslighting when I tell someone he's crazy for believing the moon landing is a fake even when he is completely convinced of it and finds the evidence blindingly obvious.

Why is everything "gaslighting" now? Stop gaslighting me about gaslighting already.

 

[Diana Moon Glampers]

The article above contains many examples of adults, not kids, being the people "dressed up." These are people who've participated in many of these threads and who, if I could be bothered, it could be shown had responded to threads about specific examples of adults doing suggestive dances in front of kids that were being excused "because drag."

 

[Unyielding Stupidity]

You know, there have been several examples of drag queens being interviewed about what they think about kids being involved with drag. A good chunk of them surprisingly viewed it with disgust and said kids shouldn't be involved - because they know and will readily admit that drag is inherently heavily sexual.
It isn't just "playing dress-up" - most drag performances are inherently filled with all sorts of sexual innuendoes, jokes and imagery. Anyone who's in favour of kids being involved with this is almost certainly either a brainwashed liberal that supports anything as long as it's endorsed by the current year, or an unironic pedophile. I hope for society's sake that most of the people advocating for this are the former.

 

[Otterly]

So if boys wearing dresses and makeup is pedophilia,

Goalposts are moving a bit here. A little lad dressed up in a dress at home becasue he’s three and doesn’t see why he can’t be a princess like his sister is no different to the sister putting on his Spider-Man outfit. It’s completely innocent, driven by the child and has zero sexual overtones.
A little boy like Desmond in a thong twerking for gay adult men in a nightclub is sexual, and you know it is. Drag as practised now is sexual, and kids should be nowhere near it. It’s an adult thing and if adults want to do it they can go right ahead, like they can with any other kind of mutually consenting behaviour. Kids are too young to consent, and by definition, exposing kids to age inappropriate sexual behaviour is abuse and grooming.
This isn’t panto, or mrs doubtfire, it’s adult behaviour that belongs in an adult club. Anyone who wants to push this on kids is pretty suspect. Leave the kids alone to be kids.

 

[Android raptor]

Goalposts are moving a bit here. A little lad dressed up in a dress at home becasue he’s three and doesn’t see why he can’t be a princess like his sister is no different to the sister putting on his Spider-Man outfit. It’s completely innocent, driven by the child and has zero sexual overtones.
A little boy like Desmond in a thong twerking for gay adult men in a nightclub is sexual, and you know it is.

It is, which is why it's a good thing outside of a few isolated incidents of legit creepy shit like Desmondisamazing, all the drag shit I've seen for kids seems to be pretty G-rated.

If a child is in a thong twerking in a nightclub, you need to call the police, not whine on a gossip forum.

 

[rotten apple]

Frequent exposure leads to desensitizing. They are aggressively going after kids because it will end up leading the kids to believing it is normal due to carefully cultivated first reactions. Combined with biased education they will not only act without animosity but likely champion it according to their given principles. If left alone to fester it will become the new normal while everyone who opposes it will be treated as mad. It is a convenient way to purge those who will not budge on the issue from polite society. This is the way liberalism has always attacked conservatism. The results will also end up the same so long as the reactionary defense to it remains the same.

 

[God's drunkest driver]

If you think drag is innocuous and it is right to expose children to it, you are lost. Drag is not innocent pretend play with harmless eccentric men. Drag queens are perverted men who have a fetish for cross dressing and doing it in public is similar to exhibitionism for them. Further, most of them are gay, so if you bring your kids to a drag event there is a good probability they are being ogled by multiple pedos while they are there and if they are encouraged to take part it is probably by a pedo. Drag is like furry light with much better PR.

 

[A Sentient Cloud]

I understand why, but there's a huge difference between a drag queen and a troon, and similarly drag queens aren't necessarily adult entertainment. That's their history, but with the mainstreaming of drag they're basically modern clowns. A man dressing up in outlandish, colourful attire to entertain a crowd, with the same ability to change their act to appeal to their audience.

Most of the drag stuff - including Story Hour - is basically the same as if you had a clown doing it. Taking a kid to see an all-ages drag show is the same thing. That's very different to, say, taking them to a sex shop, or a performance where the drag queen doesn't change their act, or particularly the ones where the kids are 'encouraged' to take part and it becomes the newer version of the child beauty pageant.

But when there's no troons, no sex offenders (vet your clowns!) and it's not anything sexualised, it's just dressup. Of course, some people think all gays are pedos, but they're not the ones able to distinguish the differences between a troon and a drag queen anyway.

I agree that drag has definitely become mainstream, but the basic beats of a drag show are still pretty sexualized and adult. Drag costumes usually show a lot of skin/leg/cleavage or are designed to give that illusion, and the dance styles often evoke strippers and the like. I agree it mostly comes down to the performers they pick, but from what I've seen they don't often go for a "conservative" (to the extent that drag can be thought of that way) look.

I think LoTT can be a bit Helen-Lovejoy-ish in what she chooses to have conniptions about, but it kinda feels like this phenomenon exploded out of the blue without much discussion about what drag is and to what degree it can be considered appropriate for younger kids.

 

[Next Task]

This isn’t panto

This is my point. Some of it  is panto. Conflating pantomime shows with the things that actually cross the line is a mistake. If you're OK with the Widow Twankey then you acknowledge that it's possible for someone to be in drag and still be appropriate for kids.

All I'm saying is that not every single example of a drag performance is grooming. Yes, there's been a number of examples that cross the line, but that doesn't mean they all do, or that it's inherent. That's black and white thinking.

 

[Narcotics]

Why are they so fixated with kids man wtf. I worked as an assistant in a kids daycare for a good while and kids should be learning skills like basic math, language, morals, etc instead of the concept of what a tranny or dragqueen is, so it infuriates me to a more personal level. It's demonic how they always say shit like "but don't tell your parents" or how they want to host these perverted events to get their brains used to think this shit is normal from an early age.
I fear how the next generation of kids that grew up in societies that allow this shit will turn out in the long run.