Amber Heard v. Johnny Depp Legal Proceedings - "And on my side of the bed was human fecal matter."

Who is the real criminal in this trial?

  • Amber Heard

    Votes: 767 72.0%
  • Johnny Depp

    Votes: 43 4.0%
  • Both

    Votes: 256 24.0%

  • Total voters
    1,066
  • Poll closed .
Two words: media circus. I wouldn't be surprised if she gets an appeal because of that. Also the old "the mean Tweets online about my totally sane client who didn't poop in the bed affected the jury" defense the journoscum are no doubt writing articles to claim.
Nah. Judges wont care about that unless one of the jurors say thats why. And even then maybe not. The judge presiding played it super cautious with what was allowed in and Johnny Depp probably has more to play with appeal wise bases on Heards team refusing to over evidence despite orders to do so and an actual matter of law in the attorney client privilege part of tying Waldman to Depp
 
I find it off-putting that, even though Johnny was right, the only reason the media narrative was in his favour is because he was more popular in the acting sphere than Amber and the new SJW narrative is that “men can be abused too”.

Let’s face it, the case would probably have gone very differently had there not been millions of Johnny simps all over Tiktok and Twitter making Johnny “Stan” videos.

Personally, I don’t believe either of them were great to each other but the media played a huge part in this case and watching the same people who harp on about not being influenced by the media, assume Johnny was innocent (prior to a verdict) based off of centralised media narratives is hilarious.
It also helped that the case was in Virginia. About as far From Hollywood as you can possibly get in the USA. I imagine if she had written her bullshit in the LA times as opposed to the WaPo this would have turned out very different.
 
I find it off-putting that, even though Johnny was right, the only reason the media narrative was in his favour is because he was more popular in the acting sphere than Amber and the new SJW narrative is that “men can be abused too”.

What the fuck media are you reading? All the mainstream media is backing Heard. The narrative now is "abused women will be afraid to speak up in case they're sued". "Men can be abused too" would be a vast improvement.
 
How many bottles of wine are getting drank tonight
20220601_213355.jpg
 
Amber is going to get fucked, there's no way she'll pay the 15 Mill. Even if Depp has to pay her 2 Million, its not going to matter because she's gonna have to pay the rest back and there's no way she has the money OR can earn that much by the time it's due. :story:

If any of the rumors about actresses whoring themselves out as a side gig are true, then after a “recovery stay” at some beach, she’ll have the cash.
 
It also helped that the case was in Virginia. About as far From Hollywood as you can possibly get in the USA. I imagine if she had written her bullshit in the LA times as opposed to the WaPo this would have turned out very different.
What are you on about here? A significant part of Virginia is the burbs of DC. Its not as politically unaligned to Hollywood as you think. Honestly a mostly Hispanic court in California instead of a mostly Asian one probably wouldnt have played better for Heard.
 
If any of the rumors about actresses whoring themselves out as a side gig are true, then after a “recovery stay” at some beach, she’ll have the cash.
Heard has a reputation for getting other "stars" to do threesomes too. And a rep for having a good chunk of blackmail material on her phone. Funny she wouldnt give it up for evidence right?
 
Adding onto what I was saying about Anita earlier, if evidence of Amber faking her bruises and injuries with makeup wasn't enough to convince her that Amber's a lying piece of shit, she's too far gone and deep into her grift that she's actually started to believe the shit she's spewing. Same with every other journo seething that Amber got her just desserts.
LMAO at this bitch putting her narcissism on display yet again. "Me losing this case because I falsely accused my ex-boyfriend of abuse sets back all women!!" No it fucking doesn't, it just means your sham acting career is over and the next guy to get accused of something as egregious as abuse will have his case looked at more fairly.

I gleefully await Amber Heard joining the IP2 van sometime soon in the future alongside her fellow Hollywood alumni, Andy Dick, after her payout to Johnny + her lawyers fees and lack of career bankrupts her.
On the plus side, it's mighty nice of all of the usual suspect degenerates to out themselves like this, particularly when this trial has been a redpill moment for a lot of people. (Heck, for a bit there we even had ResetEra people wondering why the fuck the Approved Narrative and what they were seeing with their "dirty lying eyes" were so different.)

They're starting to push the bounds of incredulity too far. Rate me 🌈 (lol you can't though) but I think the normies are starting to wise up to the nonsense.
It's amazing. People like Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn were responsible for cultivating an online environment that lead to the suicides of people like Alec Holowka and the life ruinations of people like Johnny Depp and Vic Mignogna. No wonder they're so pissed people are taking the side of the falsely-accused. That means their #metoo grift is ending.

What's ironic is that Eron Gjoni's original post was him #metoo-ing Zoe for being a shit partner. Crazy how shit works out, right?
 
Last edited:
The irony is really, no one cares about domestic abuse survivors - period. For every awful male story, there's a female story that plays out nearly the same. And society reacts pretty much the same to both genders claiming any sort of abuse experience - you're weak, you deserved it, it didn't happen, etc.

So to me, the abusers almost always win.

But the media also knows the amount of victims and accused that exist in the world and this trial was merely a projection of an extremely prevalent issue that was exasperated due to lockdowns and the pandemics. Everyone can see themselves in the trial and the projection of their personal feelings regarding abuse will always give a certain bias to their opinion.

I do think, however, this has given both men and women an opportunity to show themselves to vehemently hate the opposite sex and wants to see a member of that sex suffer by proxy of what they've endured personally.

So once again, all the victims of abuse here have lost - male and female. The discourse has done its damage in the public mind, regardless of who you believed. If you legitimately think this somehow will help people believe male victims exist when there's been hundreds upon thousands of female victims that still fight to be believed then I suppose I will welcome you to the club - society is shit and no one cares about your fucked up abusive relationship except for you and your therapist and evidently, with enough money, some lawyers.

Cops don't deal with "domestics". They pick and choose on personal bias of how they woke up that day of whether or not to take you, male or female, seriously. Visit a shelter housing victims and hear the same story over and over again.

What has this changed? The news cycle. Finally.
 
What are you on about here? A significant part of Virginia is the burbs of DC. Its not as politically unaligned to Hollywood as you think. Honestly a mostly Hispanic court in California instead of a mostly Asian one probably wouldnt have played better for Heard.
It's not about political alignment, it's about cultural alignment. If we were to do a straw poll of that Jury I bet most od them would have been middle class tech/accountants/business/housewives.

The whole ordeal would be a massive inconvenience for them. In LA, the exact opposite. Every one would have been a lower income shift worker hoping for their 15 minutes of fame.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
Translation: "I'm pro abortion and I wish people would stop overreacting when we murder children".

Blow it out yer ass
nah even if it was unanimously more aligned with me than you i still think the tribal hooplah and red vs blue team stuff just kills anything and fucks it up. if every stage of child development in the womb was fully and clearly sentient im confident that introducing it and pushing it even more in everyday life would lead to the exact opposite conclusion and having laws passed to lynch and hang fetuses from the womb, it also pressures figures that would normally discuss things calmly to play to media or populist grandstanding.

case in point people like you immediately feeling the need to cry bloody murder like some mong to some retard online like itll save the fetuses, they wont im currently slurping fetal corpses like fucking daquiris as we speak
Hell, give me an iron-clad guarantee that she'll never find out my real name and the crazy is a selling point.
what if she gives you anal but shits on your dick?
 
Back