Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

kcbbq said:
People severely misunderstand how infinite parallel and branching universes work. There's a threshold where the unlikely unlikelihood becomes statistically impossible in the math.

Even in sci-fi worlds where a universe possibly exists he's respected and not fat, say Roger Zelazny's Chronicles of Amber you'd be so far away from Earth in the direction of Chaos the streets would be paved with cheese, it would rain catfood, the entire atmosphere would spontaneously combust randomly throughout the day, and the value of being respected and thin would be inverted and hed still be considered a failure.
Click to expand...

You're right, of course.

Heidegger once said something that applies: “Every man is born as many men and dies as a single one.”

His point was that every man is born with a vast but finite set of potential outcomes. Take one path rather than the other, and you could end up a completely different person -- and not only in one's acquired skills and activities (e.g., imagine Fatrick Learned To Code™ rather than wasted his time writing shit-tier pulp SF,) but also in ways that get to the heart of what it means to be a man. Willpower, one's conception of honor, one's metaphysical outlook, and other such things, are acquired traits.

Fatrick, as he exists today, is utterly retarded and completely incompatible with any notion of success.

It is nevertheless possible, as a thought experiment, to propose a world such as ours where "Patrick" is a success. In this world, he grew up differently, was taught discipline, developed healthy eating and exercise habits, Learned To Code, and made something of himself...

No. Not really. It doesn't work that way. Because if everything above had taken place, that healthy version of Patrick is so far-removed from Fatrick that the two are not remotely the same person. They may share the same genome, but they have nothing else in common, they diverged in the distant past, and they would hate each other.

(This leads to a few interesting open questions in both behavioral genomics and philosophy. Is it possible that genetics govern behavior to such an extent that a "good Patrick" is actually impossible, or so unlikely as to only arise once in every 10^100 instances? The philosophical questions concern the nature of identity, and are primarily semantic.)

It is also effectively impossible to imagine a world unlike ours where Fatrick is a success, for precisely the reasons you outline.

The bottom line is this: Fatrick, as we know him, is a failure in every possible universe. In infinite time, in infinite space -- and I mean this absolutely literally -- Fatrick is always a laughingstock.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Not A Skinwalker, Roccosmoderndeath1, Next Task and 18 others
fatpedophile.png
 
  • Islamic Content
  • Horrifying
  • Lunacy
Reactions: semitooth, mrfresh, Billy Bong and 46 others
break these cuffs said:
What about the one he gets while making pepperoni?
Click to expand...
Oh, that's not from confusion.
Satan McAllister said:
The Special Olympics is filled with water head retards.

These people add no value, but take from society. They are better off catching the chink flu and dying.
Click to expand...
The retards who compete in the Special Olympics are some of the happiest, nicest people alive (and more cynically, living proof that ignorance is bliss.) While they may not add anything monetarily, they can certainly brighten your day if you let them.

Which is more than I can say for Patrick.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: semitooth, UncleTusky, Free the Pedos and 36 others
Neko GF said:
[Cow Crossover with Reddit tranny janny Anthony "Erin" Reed] Fatrick chimes in on Florida classifying troon metical treatments as being experimental:
View attachment 3349638
Tweet | Archive

LOL, how is fining the Special Olympics killing people?
View attachment 3349656
Tweet | Archive
Click to expand...
Do people like Fat intentionally desire to create a situation where when DeathSantis does start killing people nobody will believe it because Fat was already accusing him of killing people when he was killing nobody?

Fat definitely took the wrong lesson from The Boy Who Cried Wolf, it's never tell the same lie twice.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Political Sperging
Reactions: ConSluttant, REGENDarySumanai, Sexy Senior Citizen and 8 others
Hey Fatrick FUCK YOU said:
Why the fuck are you allowed to hide people's tweets? Jack Dorsey and the street shitter who took over really are fucking morons for not thinking it would be used to stifle debate
Click to expand...
Twitter was not designed (or intended) to facilitate debate. There's no threading, individual posts are constrained to 280 characters (it used to be 140), algorithms promote (or bury) individuals and topics at the whims of the ownership and the troons they employ and most of its "interaction" functionality is focused on hating, insulting, blocking, muting, hiding, silencing, dogpiling and banning people.

It's actually kinda depressing when you think about it -- the only unambiguously positive/friendly thing you can do on the platform is thumbs-up/like a post (and even that can provoke hostile reactions if you like the "wrong" thing). Everything else you can do can be potentially friendly or hostile (new posts, retweets, replies, etc.) or solely hostile (blocking, hiding, disliking, reporting, limiting replies, "protecting" an account).

You can say and retweet nice things (friendly) or you can piss and moan, retweet/quote posts you'd like your followers to dogpile, rally a hate mob and generally be a cunt (hostile) with the first set of actions, but the remaining ones are all exclusively hostile, serving only to stifle or prevent conversation, punish "wrong" opinions, hide inconvenient information and "receipts," turtle up to avoid direct confrontation and attack people while preventing them from responding directly (or even being aware of it at all).

That's not a platform for debate. It's a platform to facilitate never-ending "two minutes of hate" sessions.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: The Littlest Shitlord, ConSluttant, REGENDarySumanai and 24 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back