Furry Convention Drama - Because you can't have a couple thousand dog fucking enthusiasts under the same roof without shit hitting the fan

I wish it was possible to have a sizable fandom of just appreciating anthropomorphism (something which humans have been doing since time immemorial) without all the faggotry attached to it. I know there are sub-communities within the fandom which basically operate as an underground example, but still it's a bummer that they have to be underground.
As a fan of anthropomorphic animals, I wish this too. I don't want to go through the effort of finding non-sexual furry groups because 1) I'm not dedicated to animal characters and 2) Chances are that non-sexual groups are infested with virtue signalling asexuals.

Such a shame that the creativity and self expression has been ruined by coomers, queers and politics. Those three on their own are enough to ruin groups but the furry fandom gets all three destructive forces.
 
Ripley's attempting to come back to BLFC for a round two. Quick recap: back in October he was the pedo diaper fetish tranny that got trespassed from BLFC's hotel for throwing multiple severe tantrums over "misgendering" in non-convention businesses. He kicked up a huge pity party and tried to claim that the convention booted him for "being trans" and no other reason.

Back on May 21st we finally got an explanation from the con directly: as everyone here expected, Ripley was officially trespassed from the hotel by hotel staff, and it was not a decision by con staff as Ripley tried to claim. Bonus pic of wheelchair for literally no reason other than trying to gain sympathy pats and remind you he's totally a cripple, too. Hilarious.

View attachment 3347440View attachment 3347441
(Tweet | Archive)

Naturally, he's still feigning ignorance, and claims he "doesn't know" why he's banned. He also still seems to think that BLFC has any power at all over the hotel (back in October, he repeatedly reported every instance of "misgendering" by hotel staff to convention security, expecting them to somehow do something). Plus, yet another "don't forget I'm disabled!" pic that adds nothing.
View attachment 3347443
(Tweet | Archive)

Of course, he ignored the advice of convention staff to cancel his booked room and get a full refund. Instead, he waits until today, 9 AM of the day the convention starts to e-mail the hotel to appeal his ban. Remember: he's had eight months to do this, and has waited until the literal last minute to do so. He is pretty clearly trying to kick up drama at the convention right as it starts. Thankfully, it's failing. As of now, the tweet has a mere 5 likes and nothing else now that more prominent trans furries have long since moved on from the drama.

Also yeah, real feminine facial stubble, Ripley. I can't imagine why people see you and think to use he/him pronouns.
View attachment 3347452
(Tweet | Archive)

I am absolutely praying he attends regardless. The meltdown as he's thrown into a police cruiser would be incredible.
1654243930355.png

Oh go die in a fire you fag on wheels
 
As a fan of anthropomorphic animals, I wish this too. I don't want to go through the effort of finding non-sexual furry groups because 1) I'm not dedicated to animal characters and 2) Chances are that non-sexual groups are infested with virtue signalling asexuals.

Such a shame that the creativity and self expression has been ruined by coomers, queers and politics. Those three on their own are enough to ruin groups but the furry fandom gets all three destructive forces.
Have you ever heard of the one, singular titanium rule for determining whether or not something is furry? They'll show you Harkness tests. They'll show you charts with different human-to-animal ratios. They'll talk about artstyles. None of that has anything to do with whether or not something is furry. Do you want to know the one reliable test? Just ask one simple question:

"Are they making it weird?"

If the answer is yes, it's furry. If not, it's just animal characters. If you're not making it weird, there's no reason to attach it to furries as a group at all. Mind you, "making it weird" doesn't necessarily have to be sexual. That's just a major way. It's true that furries aren't about sex. They're about making it weird.
 
As a fan of anthropomorphic animals, I wish this too. I don't want to go through the effort of finding non-sexual furry groups because 1) I'm not dedicated to animal characters and 2) Chances are that non-sexual groups are infested with virtue signalling asexuals.

Such a shame that the creativity and self expression has been ruined by coomers, queers and politics. Those three on their own are enough to ruin groups but the furry fandom gets all three destructive forces.
Hate to break it to you, but the creativity and self-expression had been ruined by coomers and queers since the start. Politics came in only slightly later. Furries have always been gay coomers, from the inception of the "fandom", it's just now (well, since around 2012) they're actively trying to push out everybody else.
 
Hate to break it to you, but the creativity and self-expression had been ruined by coomers and queers since the start. Politics came in only slightly later. Furries have always been gay coomers, from the inception of the "fandom", it's just now (well, since around 2012) they're actively trying to push out everybody else.
People forget that the origin of the furry art scene was undersexed grognards buying XXXenophile magazine at scifi conventions.
 
Have you ever heard of the one, singular titanium rule for determining whether or not something is furry? They'll show you Harkness tests. They'll show you charts with different human-to-animal ratios. They'll talk about artstyles. None of that has anything to do with whether or not something is furry. Do you want to know the one reliable test? Just ask one simple question:

"Are they making it weird?"

If the answer is yes, it's furry. If not, it's just animal characters. If you're not making it weird, there's no reason to attach it to furries as a group at all. Mind you, "making it weird" doesn't necessarily have to be sexual. That's just a major way. It's true that furries aren't about sex. They're about making it weird.
Harkness test is actually a sexual consent test. It’s basically a way to determine wether or not something is acceptable to draw porn depicting. It asks if it’s intelligent enough to consent and if it’s old enough to consent. The issue is the “old enough” part is arbitrary and up to the creator, which means 300 year old loli wizards are ok to fuck. The test was basically made so weirdos could justify their gross fetish.
 
So both his brain and his body are crippled. Got it.
Just brain. The wheelchair only seems to come out when he wants to convince someone he's disabled because he's looking for pity or wants to become untouchable. For that matter, he's "trans" for the same reason. Zero effort into passing as female, but he will wear a "she/her" pin because that way if anyone does anything he doesn't like, he gets to call it "transphobic".

For example, last year he walked all of BLFC, including during all the "transphobic attacks" and using an escalator. It was only after he was trespassed that "I'm trans and disabled, please help" started being thrown around.
 
Hate to break it to you, but the creativity and self-expression had been ruined by coomers and queers since the start. Politics came in only slightly later. Furries have always been gay coomers, from the inception of the "fandom", it's just now (well, since around 2012) they're actively trying to push out everybody else.
I'm sure its no secret why half of the con organizers and original furries are either closet or open zoophiles
 
scrolling through the blfc twitter hashtag earlier, found some random stuff
idek what to say
Screen Shot 2022-06-04 at 10.23.04 PM.png


someone stole a collar thing and it was a minor kerfuffle
Screen Shot 2022-06-04 at 10.25.18 PM.png

Screen Shot 2022-06-04 at 10.26.36 PM.png


:tomgirl::tomgirl::tomgirl:
Screen Shot 2022-06-04 at 10.32.33 PM.png


predictable degeneracy...is this a child friendly con?
Screen Shot 2022-06-04 at 10.34.32 PM.png

 
scrolling through the blfc twitter hashtag earlier, found some random stuff
idek what to say
View attachment 3354299

someone stole a collar thing and it was a minor kerfuffle
View attachment 3354303
View attachment 3354305

:tomgirl::tomgirl::tomgirl:
View attachment 3354308

predictable degeneracy...is this a child friendly con?
View attachment 3354315

Holy horse-cock Batman.

They don’t pay the housekeeping staff enough for this.
 
scrolling through the blfc twitter hashtag earlier, found some random stuff
idek what to say
View attachment 3354299

someone stole a collar thing and it was a minor kerfuffle
View attachment 3354303
View attachment 3354305

:tomgirl::tomgirl::tomgirl:
View attachment 3354308

predictable degeneracy...is this a child friendly con?
View attachment 3354315

I know you can’t really expect full cognition from furries, but why do they buy these massive 14+ inch horsecock dildos? It’s literally not physically possible to take that. That’s how you rupture your fucking colon.
 
I know you can’t really expect full cognition from furries, but why do they buy these massive 14+ inch horsecock dildos? It’s literally not physically possible to take that. That’s how you rupture your fucking colon.
Casuals ITT-
Realistically they probably just buy them to show off in their circles, as weird as that sounds. Imagine having #23/500 officially licensed Dragonriders of Pern dragon dicks or what have you. Illustrious, I know.
 
I know you can’t really expect full cognition from furries, but why do they buy these massive 14+ inch horsecock dildos? It’s literally not physically possible to take that. That’s how you rupture your fucking colon.
Varka, one of the owners of BD, tests every model and size. His asshole is a fucking black hole. It's possible.
 
i just realized that some furries brought a bunch of dildos to a convention... imagine a suitcase FULL of huge animal dildos :c
either that or they bought them at the con, which is entirely possible
I have no love for TSA but I don't think even their agents deserve to inspect those creeps' suitcases.
 
I knew that furry cons were basically glorified orgies for many of the attendees, but damn, that's a lot of silicone dicks to pack for a three day trip. It's pretty obvious that that is just one guy's stash too.

I know you can’t really expect full cognition from furries, but why do they buy these massive 14+ inch horsecock dildos? It’s literally not physically possible to take that. That’s how you rupture your fucking colon.

You must have not seen the "in use" reviews of these things, then. I mentioned this in the general sex toy thread, but I once saw a guy post pictures of him fucking an XL BD dildo the length and width of a forearm down to the base. It was a knotted toy, too. I'm more wondering if these people can still hold their bowels or not.
 
Last edited:
I know you can’t really expect full cognition from furries, but why do they buy these massive 14+ inch horsecock dildos? It’s literally not physically possible to take that. That’s how you rupture your fucking colon.
I've seen photos of Varka taking an entire 2 liter pop bottle up his no-no hole with ease.
Unfortunately, it is not only possible, but something they probably do on a daily basis.
 
Back