US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
"She will be the first black justice on the court."
I'm pretty sure there's you know Thomas? Jesus christ, erasing a nigga just because you don't like him?
They did it with Sotomayor too. First person of color on the court. They ignore the first woman on the court because she was Republican. This is nothing new.
Also Biden was right. He ain't black.
 
You would think Josh would have some self-awareness to realize trying to censor this part of the website is basically fighting a hydra. Either you leave it be, or you try to fight it resulting in a million smaller threads to try and moderate. It's like stepping on a spider only to see it burst and release a million tiny baby spiders.
It's his site. If he spite smites A&H tomorrow, it would be because of combative shit like this. He has far more patience for the entitled masses of spergs than I would have. The site was about laughing at the stupid shit people do on the internet long before it was some /pol/tards "last bastion of free speech." Some people sure like to piss in his sandbox, but it's still his sandbox, and if he decides to clean it up and wall it off from the drooling retards that can't help but piss everywhere, that's his call, and more power to him.
 
It's his site. If he spite smites A&H tomorrow, it would be because of combative shit like this. He has far more patience for the entitled masses of spergs than I would have. The site was about laughing at the stupid shit people do on the internet long before it was some /pol/tards "last bastion of free speech." Some people sure like to piss in his sandbox, but it's still his sandbox, and if he decides to clean it up and wall it off from the drooling retards that can't help but piss everywhere, that's his call, and more power to him.
  1. He brought this upon himself. He was the one that not only acts like a /pol/tard but invited them to the site to begin with. But rather than just deal with it, he insists on kicking the hornet's nest because a few people have their fee-fee's hurt.
  2. Josh can not take any kind of criticism that involves him. He will say things like "you can criticize me, I don't care" but then turn-on his bi-polar mode and snap back at you because he can't handle banter. Of course people are going to fuck with a guy that has such thin skin, that's fucking internet 101. If you ignore it, people are going to leave you alone, it's THAT FUCKING SIMPLE!!!
  3. Josh has created a cult of personality around him with the "True & Honest" members and the janny trannies. He acts like he's the guy with the biggest brain in the room when in reality his ramblings are retarded at best and schizophrenic at worst, but braindead people lap it up without question.
"It's his site, he can do what he wants" is like saying "_____ is a private company, they can do whatever they want", and look how well that fucking turned out with Elon Musk and Twitter.
 
He brought this upon himself. He was the one that not only acts like a /pol/tard but invited them to the site to begin with. But rather than just deal with it, he insists on kicking the hornet's nest because a few people have their fee-fee's hurt.
I wouldn't say he went out of his way to invite the pol/gab/stormfront crowd. They kinda flocked here after he told the Christchurch Police to go fuck themselves after they demanded to know who our Kiwi-based Kiwis were so they could question/arrest them for discussing an event that happened in their own country. That's why he had that word filter that changed "nigger" to "nigga" and "Jew" to "Trump's Chosen People."
 
The site was about laughing at the stupid shit people do on the internet long before it was some /pol/tards "last bastion of free speech."
One thing I do wish more of the so called old hats would wake up and see is that those two things are getting less and less mutually exclusive. Actually I'd say they're no longer mutually exclusive. These days the simple act of saying someone did something retarded using the phrase retarded is enough to be considered a political statement. For all the shit we get for being an echo chamber here I don't think a lot of the others realize they'd get harassed in the street by their own "side" if those people knew they even used this site and said the word "troon".
The world has become such that merely thinking freely and attaching expression to that has once more become one of the riskiest things you can do, and that is largely due to people left of center who will go scorched earth against anyone and everyone who expresses wrongthink, including their own.
 
"She will be the first black justice on the court."
I'm pretty sure there's you know Thomas? Jesus christ, erasing a nigga just because you don't like him?
Something something Uncle Tom yadda yadda Oreo etc. etc. internalized whiteness/self-hate. All insults thrown at the black people who dare to leave the Demonrats' plantation.
 
They could buck all expectations and rule against the Democrats on both, but that would signal a pretty profound shift in SCOTUS.
I'm thinking that Monday will reveal just how livid Roberts is about the leak, and more importantly how infuriated he is at the tacit endorsement of the Justice harassment by the Biden administration.
My theory is different than that of Gehenna's on this one: Roberts is rather infamous for his do-nothing stance on basically everything, but I don't think that the powers that be truly understand how much they're forcing his hand. The Roe leak alone, and Roberts' response to it, may as well fundamentally be a declaration to the Supremes of "you'll do what we want, and you'll fucking like it, or we'll use intimidation to get our way."

I don't think Roberts is going to play ball. Not when a really obvious, really up-front way to bitch-slap this administration for its arrogance is being set in his lap for the easiest W possible. I could be wrong, of course: there is the possibility he caves on it, but I have a feeling he's seething behind the scenes, and won't turn down a chance to fuck them for it.
I feel like Roberts might drop the hammer on one of the decisions at the very least, but if he does it on multiple issues then the salt will flow. If he cucks all around, it might wake up NeverTrumpers that the Supreme Court has become a rubber stamp of the DNC entirely - if the harassment works once, it will be used again.
I got to imagine the Biden admin giving full public support to the leak and protests will have some effect. They must know once the dems know that tactic works it will be the go to.
At this point it's a question of if Kavanaugh or Barret cucks. It's out of Roberts' hands as he isn't the swing vote here.
Well… the fact that full leaks of briefs to the press is also a pretty profound shift itself.
The leaking as well as any lack of condemnation by the DNC thanks to it being a possible useful tool for them are the big things here. The discussions behind closed doors must be intense, and the liberal justices have to be leaning hard on Barret and Kavanaugh right now as they are the ones that can crack.
If I remembering correctly didn't Biden admit they basically have no idea where the weapons are and they're not tracking them? This is gonna turn into another fast and furious.
And oh look, we have the Taliban back in control after they humiliated the Unipatty Administration. Sure can't wait for the 9/11 2.0 right in time for the midterms!
 
  1. He brought this upon himself. He was the one that not only acts like a /pol/tard but invited them to the site to begin with. But rather than just deal with it, he insists on kicking the hornet's nest because a few people have their fee-fee's hurt.
  2. Josh can not take any kind of criticism that involves him. He will say things like "you can criticize me, I don't care" but then turn-on his bi-polar mode and snap back at you because he can't handle banter. Of course people are going to fuck with a guy that has such thin skin, that's fucking internet 101. If you ignore it, people are going to leave you alone, it's THAT FUCKING SIMPLE!!!
  3. Josh has created a cult of personality around him with the "True & Honest" members and the janny trannies. He acts like he's the guy with the biggest brain in the room when in reality his ramblings are retarded at best and schizophrenic at worst, but braindead people lap it up without question.
"It's his site, he can do what he wants" is like saying "_____ is a private company, they can do whatever they want", and look how well that fucking turned out with Elon Musk and Twitter.
lol calm down

You would think Josh would have some self-awareness to realize trying to censor this part of the website is basically fighting a hydra. Either you leave it be, or you try to fight it resulting in a million smaller threads to try and moderate. It's like stepping on a spider only to see it burst and release a million tiny baby spiders.
Blanket banning of politics is a bad idea on the pretense that some cows are inherently political. Ralph, Fuentes, Jacob Wohl, Brianna Wu, Keffels, MovieBob, Vaush and a lot more are doing political shit or speaking on political topics. If you do a blanket ban, you risk getting hammered if you comment on certain things being disgusting regarding their politics and it opens Pandora's box. It could become Resetera teir very quick, where certain phrases and opinions are verboten. It would be on both sides, but it would stifle conversation.
 
lol calm down


Blanket banning of politics is a bad idea on the pretense that some cows are inherently political. Ralph, Fuentes, Jacob Wohl, Brianna Wu, Keffels, MovieBob, Vaush and a lot more are doing political shit or speaking on political topics. If you do a blanket ban, you risk getting hammered if you comment on certain things being disgusting regarding their politics and it opens Pandora's box. It could become Resetera teir very quick, where certain phrases and opinions are verboten. It would be on both sides, but it would stifle conversation.
Blanket banning of politics would also fall to the Rule of Entryism: anything that isn't explicitly right wing will be made left wing over time. How many forums have fallen because the 'no politics' rule de facto became the 'no right wing politics outside one hated containment zone while left wing politics are fair game' rule?
 
Blanket banning of politics would also fall to the Rule of Entryism: anything that isn't explicitly right wing will be made left wing over time. How many forums have fallen because the 'no politics' rule de facto became the 'no right wing politics outside one hated containment zone while left wing politics are fair game' rule?
While I'm obviously coming at it from a slightly different direction, I agree with the core of this. The forum at large always tends toward a particular brand of left wing thought that is heavily biased toward the preoccupations of the sort of people who can afford to spend all their spare time on that forum. The containment zone also tends to become a monoculture pretty fast, either an extreme right-wing spergatory that eventually gets shut down, or a sort of petting zoo, where the forum regulars rock up to "own the nazi chuds" every so often, safe in the knowledge that the contained aren't going to be able to argue back without eating bans and other punishments. It creates a mentally corrosive superiority complex amongst the regulars, who lose the ability to effectively engage with opposition arguments and turn into the sort of lazy, screeching, slacktivist losers that populate Antifa, or moderate twitter, or run Joe Biden's press office. What I'm saying is, letting a forum "fall" to the left, as you put it, just leads to navel-gazing and intellectual laziness amongst the left who remain. That's a losing proposition in the long term, in terms of intellectual ability; look at the state of academia today, for example.
 
  1. He brought this upon himself. He was the one that not only acts like a /pol/tard but invited them to the site to begin with. But rather than just deal with it, he insists on kicking the hornet's nest because a few people have their fee-fee's hurt.
  2. Josh can not take any kind of criticism that involves him. He will say things like "you can criticize me, I don't care" but then turn-on his bi-polar mode and snap back at you because he can't handle banter. Of course people are going to fuck with a guy that has such thin skin, that's fucking internet 101. If you ignore it, people are going to leave you alone, it's THAT FUCKING SIMPLE!!!
  3. Josh has created a cult of personality around him with the "True & Honest" members and the janny trannies. He acts like he's the guy with the biggest brain in the room when in reality his ramblings are retarded at best and schizophrenic at worst, but braindead people lap it up without question.
"It's his site, he can do what he wants" is like saying "_____ is a private company, they can do whatever they want", and look how well that fucking turned out with Elon Musk and Twitter.
But it is his site. He can do w/e he wants with it. I won't agree with it but that's his right as owner.

I said my piece in the despot thread of what I think should be done with A&H. I think Null has a fundamental misunderstanding of what this part of his site is and wants it to be something it cannot ever be. This section is a containment zone for all the autism that comes from the devisiveness of politics. It's here to save the rest of the site. If you remove it, all of the tism spreads elsewhere. Because this site was build on making fun of Chris, Null, and other who have been here longer than I, wish for it to be that old site where you laughed at stupid people online and everyone would occasionally agree about the news of the day. That just isn't the world we live in anymore. And anything that isn't strictly 'right' leaning will sway 'left'.. right in this case meaning uncensored speech.

It's Null's decision. He can do w/e he wants with it. It'll be really, really, funny if after all this time of being on the internet Null decides to fall for the trap of "we just need to remove this little bit because it upsets us or people, but we swear it'll just be this part of it and nothing else."
 
While I'm obviously coming at it from a slightly different direction, I agree with the core of this. The forum at large always tends toward a particular brand of left wing thought that is heavily biased toward the preoccupations of the sort of people who can afford to spend all their spare time on that forum. The containment zone also tends to become a monoculture pretty fast, either an extreme right-wing spergatory that eventually gets shut down, or a sort of petting zoo, where the forum regulars rock up to "own the nazi chuds" every so often, safe in the knowledge that the contained aren't going to be able to argue back without eating bans and other punishments. It creates a mentally corrosive superiority complex amongst the regulars, who lose the ability to effectively engage with opposition arguments and turn into the sort of lazy, screeching, slacktivist losers that populate Antifa, or moderate twitter, or run Joe Biden's press office. What I'm saying is, letting a forum "fall" to the left, as you put it, just leads to navel-gazing and intellectual laziness amongst the left who remain. That's a losing proposition in the long term, in terms of intellectual ability; look at the state of academia today, for example.
The left doesn't care about intellectual laziness; all they care about is shutting up the right as they think that means the right doesn't exist. What I think we both might agree on is that the people shitting up threads just to shit them up should be equally banned, but that would hit some old-timers that have too many connections.

I know Null has to see it, and he thinks that purging AnH will cut that Gordian knot. I personally disagree but I don't have a perfect solution nor do I run this forum so any bitching I do won't really solve the issue
 
Blanket banning of politics would also fall to the Rule of Entryism: anything that isn't explicitly right wing will be made left wing over time. How many forums have fallen because the 'no politics' rule de facto became the 'no right wing politics outside one hated containment zone while left wing politics are fair game' rule?
I'mi honestly surprised the TDS thread has survived in the cults section this long. A&H is the evil right-wing cesspit. The rest of the site is "apolitical". Which means you either need to not take a politically charged stance, or you need to conform to leftist orthodoxy because it's "normal". If you don't, you're "bringing politics in".

How many times has a troon thread devolved into radfem oinking about how much "meeeeeen hate wimminmmm". That's not a decidedly lefty viewpoint? How productive are those BDS threads? Or are they just a massive circlejerk about "Schizoid Right-wing CHUDS"?

One of the intractable problems with politics on forums is that conservative opinions are Politics, and leftist opinions are Not Politics unless they explicitly allow you to call them Politics.
 
It's his site. If he spite smites A&H tomorrow, it would be because of combative shit like this. He has far more patience for the entitled masses of spergs than I would have. The site was about laughing at the stupid shit people do on the internet long before it was some /pol/tards "last bastion of free speech." Some people sure like to piss in his sandbox, but it's still his sandbox, and if he decides to clean it up and wall it off from the drooling retards that can't help but piss everywhere, that's his call, and more power to him.

At the same time it seems to me like the biggest actual headaches aren't actually things like stickers or /pol/ shit, or anything to do with A&H. I guess there was the Seig fedposting event, but it was a minor lolcow thread about Byuu (followed by him seemingly using it as an excuse to fake his death) that led to widespread media attention about the site. That in turn unexpectedly snowballed into months of troon DDOS attacks and the site being made a pariah that nobody would do business with, not /pol/ shit. Before that it was hosting the Christchurch shooting video while multiple governments and their media machines insisted it be removed, a hill that Null himself seemed eager and willing to die upon. He's also constantly being legally threatened for other minor shit, like the actual literal Russian government badgering him to remove that HO-HO-HOLOCAUST meme, so it seems weird that he's so worried about this place when the site seems to be under constant siege due to its nature

I also realize I don't have to mod this place so I guess there's a lot of bullshit I don't see behind the scenes, but it's clear to me that the people who flock to the thunderdome aren't gonna shut up and become good little neoliberals if it gets razed. They're gonna migrate to any other political thread they can find- lolcows like Wu or MovieBlob for example- and while the mods are busy playing wack-a-mole suppressing politics there another existential threat will emerge. Probably not from them, but from the unending lawfare and twitter kangaroo court that comes from running a site that points and laughs at thin-skinned terminally-online retards :(
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back