- Joined
- Apr 2, 2016
It is interesting that someone who looks like Chantal has the fupa balls to say anyone else looks inbred. Those wide-spaced eyes, deformed feet, messed up teeth, balding as an adolescent, severe psychiatric problems - none of that points to having a robust genetic mix. And while it's not a genetic trait, she's a literal mouth breather and it's destroying her palate and jaw and making her look even more like a product of a consanguineous union. She's going to look like the fattest Hapsburg if she lives much longer.If it weren't for the no touching the p.o.o. rule, at this point, since she brought up the topic of inbreeding, I would send her whole family genetic testing kits, free of charge
And not to drag her long-suffering family into it, but photos of her sister when she was a baby reminded me of a person with primordial dwarfism. Natalie straight up looked like Kenadie Jourdin Bromley, one of the more famous dwarfs, when Kenadie was still a child. Natalie is clearly not a dwarf or suffering from some genetic disorder - she's average in appearance and seems to be living a productive, normal life. I mean, a lot of us were ugly as babies and it just means some babies are ugly. I suspect that if you study any family long enough you'll see some weirdness in appearance but Chantal's family is... not the best example of positive eugenics.
In short, shut up Chantal. The only reason she's not a knuckle-dragger is because her T-tex arms don't reach.