Artcow Enrique Toro / ShirtBusters / KingCarousel / ToroTheKing - Chronically bitchless nutjob NSFW artist and internet tough guy who threatens people if they don't give him attention

Boingo'd Oingo'd said:
The way he types his messages out is bizarre, it's like he's trying to put himself above everyone else with every single word. I guess that's narcissism for you.
Click to expand...
It's especially funny how different he sounds in writing vs. in spoken conversation. Listening to him speak in that Discord conversation he sounded like a vulnerable adult, speaking in short sentences and so nervous you could practically hear him wobbling like jelly. I got serious EffinRawz vibes from him.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: sixuglymidgets, TerrorCorpCEO, make_it_so and 16 others
Jesus fucking Christ that slap fight with an indigent furry is fucking retard and hilarious.
Dog fucker calls someone a pedophile while being a dog fucker, as if that unholy union isn't a degenerate fruit medley.

Still I'll make this point, no snuff porn, fictional porn, and actual criminal acts are not the same thing, no none of that shit is moral, yes both are immoral degenerates endorsing disgusting shit. Claiming it makes a market for xyz garbage is stupid tho, for one child/animal abuse and trafficking existed far before online porn, that market exists because we have these types of people breathing, not because people get horny and seek sexual stimulus. That's as dumb as saying people having consentual sex eggs on people to have non-consentual sex, because loose connect I make and the shared desire for sex. I know it's asking too much for the fursuit to get it, but it's like part of him has to cope that he's not the same as degenerate disgusting pedo guy, and that dense motherfucker has to share that for street cred, as if it isn't just amusing/disturbing to someone that isn't a degenerate fetishist.

Poor pup doesn't realize it's just an argument over which of them is more wrong, and the same shit applies to animal abuse and him.
We should make them fight like dogs, and put the winner to sleep. That be a moral act, one less animal abuser and one less pedophile.
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Agree
Reactions: MarineN*423543, teeth fairy, KelpieSelkie and 19 others
Laughing Jackass said:
Poor pup doesn't realize it's just an argument over which of them is more wrong, and the same shit applies to animal abuse and him.
We should make them fight like dogs, and put the winner to sleep. That be a moral act, one less animal abuser and one less pedophile.
Click to expand...
No. Pedophiles are worse. There is no doubt about it.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Deviant
Reactions: 10 Sheep, UnsufficentBoobage, Emo Supremo and 18 others
Neurotypical Mantis said:
god this poor woman
then again, is she innocent or willingly stupid?
Click to expand...
1654685146422.png
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: fatass hamster, DungeonMaster, Anti pedo and 56 others
Laughing Jackass said:
Jesus fucking Christ that slap fight with an indigent furry is fucking retard and hilarious.
Dog fucker calls someone a pedophile while being a dog fucker, as if that unholy union isn't a degenerate fruit medley.

Still I'll make this point, no snuff porn, fictional porn, and actual criminal acts are not the same thing, no none of that shit is moral, yes both are immoral degenerates endorsing disgusting shit. Claiming it makes a market for xyz garbage is stupid tho, for one child/animal abuse and trafficking existed far before online porn, that market exists because we have these types of people breathing, not because people get horny and seek sexual stimulus. That's as dumb as saying people having consentual sex eggs on people to have non-consentual sex, because loose connect I make and the shared desire for sex. I know it's asking too much for the fursuit to get it, but it's like part of him has to cope that he's not the same as degenerate disgusting pedo guy, and that dense motherfucker has to share that for street cred, as if it isn't just amusing/disturbing to someone that isn't a degenerate fetishist.

Poor pup doesn't realize it's just an argument over which of them is more wrong, and the same shit applies to animal abuse and him.
We should make them fight like dogs, and put the winner to sleep. That be a moral act, one less animal abuser and one less pedophile.
Click to expand...
Huh? Furries are not even remotely in the same ballpark of morality as pedophiles, they're annoying but they aren't really hurting anyone. I think you might be confusing them with zoophiles, there's a bit of overlap between the two groups but I wouldn't infer someone was a zoophile just for being a furry. They at least don't tend to go after kids, which if nothing else makes them better than trannies.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Autistic
Reactions: Emo Supremo, AMHOLIO, Pina Colada and 17 others
Beautiful Border said:
Huh? Furries are not even remotely in the same ballpark of morality as pedophiles, they're annoying but they aren't really hurting anyone. I think you might be confusing them with zoophiles, there's a bit of overlap between the two groups but I wouldn't infer someone was a zoophile just for being a furry. They at least don't tend to go after kids, which if nothing else makes them better than trannies.
Click to expand...
If we can (and we should) criticize people into the Loli porn shit as pedophiles then what is the difference with furries and and being a zoophile?
Arguing a furry is different than a zoophile is semantics, just like lolicon vs pedophile degeneracy. Don't trust these fucks.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: sixuglymidgets, PumpkinSpiceBitchMeringue, UnsufficentBoobage and 12 others
Laughing Jackass said:
If we can (and we should) criticize people into the Loli porn shit as pedophiles then what is the difference with furries and and being a zoophile?
Arguing a furry is different than a zoophile is semantics, just like lolicon vs pedophile degeneracy. Don't trust these fucks.
Click to expand...
>inb4 thread derailment
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: 10 Sheep, Maggots on a Train v2, secret watcher and 25 others
Beautiful Border said:
Huh? Furries are not even remotely in the same ballpark of morality as pedophiles, they're annoying but they aren't really hurting anyone. I think you might be confusing them with zoophiles, there's a bit of overlap between the two groups but I wouldn't infer someone was a zoophile just for being a furry. They at least don't tend to go after kids, which if nothing else makes them better than trannies.
Click to expand...
I'm sure there's a distinction between furries and zoophiles, however there is a clearer line between the people who care to make said distinction and the people who actually have something worth posting.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: KelpieSelkie, LemonTits, UnsufficentBoobage and 25 others
CuntSnack said:
For racial caricatures they look similar to Steven Jewniverse characters, you'd think he'd just cater to the trannies who were into that instead if he wanted asspats.
Click to expand...
Wouldn't really change the fact that he draws porn of actual babies.

He'd probably come up with all of the different horrifying ways their body fluids would taste too, even if he went down the SJW route.
 
  • Horrifying
  • Agree
Reactions: TerrorCorpCEO, =just screams=, Maggots on a Train v2 and 18 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back