US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
So they're really planning for a Category 5 chimpout? I wonder if the Nasty Girls will actually have their magazines loaded, or will they be walking around with just empty guns?
I'd bet on empties. The last thing you want is a chimpout to turn into a mass cas event against the people when you're trying to argue that the people shouldn't have guns, but the government should. It'd be easier to deal with the 1/6 comparisons of a mob assaulting the SC than to deal with the after effects of any of the NG being in a situation where they are both justified to pull the trigger, and capable of doing so.
 
National guard is being called up to defend the supreme court. this should get interesting. https://welovetrump.com/2022/06/08/breaking-national-guard-preparing-for-deployment/
So Roe v. Wade is still gonna be overturned?
36e8se.png

This gon be guuuuuud....
It'd be easier to deal with the 1/6 comparisons of a mob assaulting the SC than to deal with the after effects of any of the NG being in a situation where they are both justified to pull the trigger, and capable of doing so.
Except, like @HTTP Error 404 pointed out, they won't compare it to 1/6, even though the two situations couldn't be anymore similar if they tried. We will, just to rub it in their faces, but they'll just plug their ears and go "I'M NOT LISTENING LA LA LA LA".
 
Is there a case to be made that Senate Republicans should support removing the filibuster now? It's almost guaranteed they'll take back the Senate, so you're sacrificing half a year of Democrats only needing 50 votes in order to get at least two years with that advantage.

Let Schumer put it out there thinking it won't pass, have all the Rs vote in lockstep for it because "this tragedy is a turning point" then let Manchin and Sinena block everything for them. Or something does pass; overturn it in 2023, so what.
 
So Roe v. Wade is still gonna be overturned?
View attachment 3368428
This gon be guuuuuud....

Except, like @HTTP Error 404 pointed out, they won't compare it to 1/6, even though the two situations couldn't be anymore similar if they tried. We will, just to rub it in their faces, but they'll just plug their ears and go "I'M NOT LISTENING LA LA LA LA".
National guard is being called up to defend the supreme court. this should get interesting. https://welovetrump.com/2022/06/08/breaking-national-guard-preparing-for-deployment/
The Court needs to make the decision ASAP. Rip the bandaid off. My balls are so blue they're being counted as Democrat votes.
I'd bet on empties. The last thing you want is a chimpout to turn into a mass cas event against the people when you're trying to argue that the people shouldn't have guns, but the government should. It'd be easier to deal with the 1/6 comparisons of a mob assaulting the SC than to deal with the after effects of any of the NG being in a situation where they are both justified to pull the trigger, and capable of doing so.
Just yesterday, some sperg flew all the way from California to attempt to assassinate Kavanaugh in the name of abortion rights. They've lost all right to bitch about 1/6.

As far as the Nasty Girls go, I'm fine with them being used to suppress my political adversaries. Libs weaponized the state for their agenda; turnabout is fair play.
Is there a case to be made that Senate Republicans should support removing the filibuster now? It's almost guaranteed they'll take back the Senate, so you're sacrificing half a year of Democrats only needing 50 votes in order to get at least two years with that advantage.

Let Schumer put it out there thinking it won't pass, have all the Rs vote in lockstep for it because "this tragedy is a turning point" then let Manchin and Sinena block everything for them. Or something does pass; overturn it in 2023, so what.
If ever, do it *after* R's have retaken the Senate, just to piss 'em off.
 
I love Yahoo sometimes. It's more left than CNN.

"White Supremacist ... Afro-Cuban"

When Clayton Bigsby stops being a parody.

View attachment 3368440
I've often found myself wondering how journos' brains don't melt every time they publish goofy shit like this. I guess the grey matter mush is the only thing keeping them going.
 
I've often found myself wondering how journos' brains don't melt every time they publish goofy shit like this. I guess the grey matter mush is the only thing keeping them going.
Because they genuinely believe that black Republicans are either sellouts, too stupid to know better, or actual white supremacists. They believe this 100%.

I've seen/read black women on social media talk about how black men just for being black men are "white supremacists" because we oppress black women. How are black men in 2022 oppressing black women in 2022? Centuries of the patriarchy.
 
Except, like @HTTP Error 404 pointed out, they won't compare it to 1/6, even though the two situations couldn't be anymore similar if they tried. We will, just to rub it in their faces, but they'll just plug their ears and go "I'M NOT LISTENING LA LA LA LA".
There is an upper limit to their bullshit. Its not about the diehards, they'll always believe whatever they want to believe on both sides. Its the moderates and unaffiliated in the middle ground. The bog standard Americans, to whom the raiding of the supreme court is an unavoidable story of the day, no matter how they try to downplay it, and its impossible to avoid the people drawing a 1/6 comparison, especially since the Republicans will grab that news cycle and run with it, forcing the rest of the media to at least try and address it with fact checks - the exact kinds that tend to make the whole situation worse for them.
 
I love Yahoo sometimes. It's more left than CNN.

"White Supremacist ... Afro-Cuban"

When Clayton Bigsby stops being a parody.

View attachment 3368440
Yahoo News is just an aggregator. This story comes from The Root, a black supremacist online magazine which is somehow being treated as real news.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back