Sony hate thread

Who cares what was better on 360? Aren't PC versions usually better anyway if you want to start pointing to different ones? Skyrim was still fun as fuck on PS3, even as a slideshow with infinite loading times. Somehow I think you'd be jacking off PS5 even more (if that's possible) if it got a mainline FO & TES in the same time period.

Eternal Sonata was well received, that's all that matters, and who cares if it came to 360, I thought you didn't want to talk about exclusivity? PS5 looks deader if you do lol.
PC isn't really in the same arena. Like it's not considered an alternative like Xbox and PlayStation are.

Also PS5 already has a mainline TES game, two actually. TESO and Skyrim.
 
Oblivion on PS3 was a drastically inferior version to the xbox 360 one.
No? Eurogamer said it was pretty much on par with the 360 version, arguably better because it being on one disc: https://www.eurogamer.net/x360-v-ps3-multiformat-face-off-round-three-article?page=2
I don't have the PS5 on a pedestal, but at the same point in time it's better than the previous two predecessors.
If you were to include performance, then yes. But content wise? No. Until the PS5 has some form of backwards compatibility for the PS3 then I would agree.
 
Last edited:
EAF7105D-FBEB-40B6-B18F-CA2EAD3E4CE8.jpeg


Off topic, but I’m missing the days when you were unashamed of using the PS1 as a music album cover. So far, this already famous N.E.R.D album was the perfect example of using a PS1 the right way.

In current day, you will never find current albums that will do stuff like this. You have yet to find a rapper or singer pose with a PS5 controller/console on an album cover.
 
Who cares what was better on 360? Aren't PC versions usually better anyway if you want to start pointing to different ones? Skyrim was still fun as fuck on PS3, even as a slideshow with infinite loading times. Somehow I think you'd be jacking off PS5 even more (if that's possible) if it got a mainline FO & TES in the same time period.

Eternal Sonata was well received, that's all that matters, and who cares if it came to 360, I thought you didn't want to talk about exclusivity? PS5 looks deader if you do lol.
whoa whoa whoa what are you doing only @Marissa Moira is allowed to use non exclusive games to boost their console rep. No one else is allowed to do that.
 
No? Eurogamer said it was pretty much on par with the 360 version, arguably better because it being on one disc: https://www.eurogamer.net/x360-v-ps3-multiformat-face-off-round-three-article?page=2

If you were to include performance, then yes. But content wise? No. Until the PS5 has some form of backwards compatibility for the PS3 then I would agree.
The PS3 version of oblivion uses Vsync and has noticeable sound compression. Some places look better on the PS3 and some look worse. It's not a normally done port, it mostly had to do with how unconventional the PS3 hardware was.
 
I don't have the PS5 on a pedestal, but at the same point in time it's better than the previous two predecessors.
You do, and lol no. PS4 owners aren't missing out on many games yet by not upgrading, and that's a fact, not an opinion.

PS2 had RPGs from day 1 like Summoner. But try playing Summoner today and it is just fucking rough. At the time it was an exclusive and the enhanced edition that came to other systems didn't fix any of the glaring problems. There was also stuff like Orphan on there as well in the early days. But none of the major RPGs for the system didn't come until much later.
I'm sure lots of games from that generation are rough to go back to, I don't see what that has to do with PS5 not having many of its own games. You're kinda grasping at straws here, pointing all around to avoid that central fact.
 
The PS3 version of oblivion uses Vsync and has noticeable sound compression. Some places look better on the PS3 and some look worse. It's not a normally done port, it mostly had to do with how unconventional the PS3 hardware was.
As someone who owns all 3 copies of Oblivion. The 360 version also uses Vsync as well, here is a comparison video of it running on the 360 vs XB1:
It sounds pretty much the same as well, if my studio surround sound or my studio headsets didn't pick up any compression, then my ears are broken.
 
Last edited:
Maybe. It does hurt the PlayStation exclusives though when a title from a relatively consistent publisher suddenly takes 6 years seeing as their last title before 2020’s Ghost was Infamous in 2014.
That's the same timespan though that 343 spent between Halo 5 and Infinite. This is just how game development works now. It sucks, but considering how shit Infamous Second Son was compared to Ghost of Tsushima it was probably for the best
 
The best games they have, though.

Sony is trolling the PC community by giving only their garbage library to us.
The seething is absolute hilarious i will try to do a compilation of salt but the takes are between "REEEE FUCKING SONY STOP GIVING PCUNTS SHIT" and "WHY ANOTHER REMASTER????"

Edit: add "70 FUCKING DOLLARS!!!!"
 
Let us not forget that Sony also lost a lot of good will for cucking everyone into thinking we were getting a FFVII Remake for the PS3, only for them to be like "Psych! That was a just a tech demo to show you what a FFVII Remake would look like on the PS3...if we actually made it...which we're not"

Hell I would've bought a fucking PS3 just for that game... *sigh*
Thanks a lot, you just reminded me of that Zelda tech demo Nintendo showed off with the Wii U’s reveal that never became a full game… only to instead make a full game out of the “New Super Mario Bros. But Now It’s HD” demo.
 
The last of us re-remaster was leaked accidentally with the cherry on the top that is also coming for PC :story:

View attachment 3368844

Spit that ghost of tsushima and bloodborne sonyponies
And that's the big announcement of this year's E3 yearly collective of assorted video game unveilings that happens every June. That's really what they ended on before they moved onto Mr. Shitface's collection of hipster bullshit. A remake of a 2013 game, from a now-disgraced series, and it costs $70.

This is how the PS5 is concluding its second year on the market.
1654806816485.png
 
Back