Unless I've missed something rather significant, the only thing conclusively tying Flam to underage content, and specifically loli or shota content, is the tags on Boy Soprano.
So, one more time for the retards in the back, who are cowards that won't even
smoke crack fact check the original claims:
1) Boy Soprano does not contain any loli content. None exists within the 4 corners of the document. Go check it right now. There are fully clothed children in non-sexual situations that are briefly depicted as part of explaining backstory, which takes place 10 years prior. I have speculated where the tag comes from before, as there are external factors that influence tagging behavior on the site it was pulled from,
but you won't substantiate a credible pedo accusation from that tag being on this particular story if there's nothing remotely loli-looking in the story.
2) It contains "shota" insomuch as the
main character who does all the fucking of and getting fucked by grown women is 15, a point which
only comes up if you do some mental math, because he's not depicted or drawn as a child in sexual situations.
So while the tag is technically accurate in an age sense, it is very tenuous to make much of it for the purposes of a credible pedo allegation.
It's entirely fair to claim Flam's a sexual degenerate, Boy Soprano is an S&M tome of mommy issues degeneracy. And whaddya know, there's other evidence Flam is into S&M stuff, it's almost like he made multiple whole-ass personal ads in S&M communities to back that up...
Look, I get that it's fun to jump on the pedo bandwagon, but that bandwagon makes people reeeaaaaally lazy about actually checking if any of the accusations are actually true or have any evidence, which we just saw bite PPP's ass on stream in real time.
