YouTube Historians/HistoryTube/PopHistory

https://www.youtube.com/c/StepBackHistoryChannel/videos no contest, this is the worst historytuber. From him being a fat neckbeard, to his retarded political views, to him justifying horrible people on the left (like Allende, not defending Pinochet but Pinochet wasnt helped by the CIA during the Coup with them not even knowing about the coup until 2 days after it happened and Allende also being sus in human rights), and demonizing everyone on the right. Slandering Kyle Rittenhouse, his stupid cryptocurrency video and not understanding the Anarchist influence behind it, and him defending Socialism/Socialist atrocities. Dudes literally the Soy boy meme and its not even funny.
Step Back is an absolute tremendous, insufferable neckbeard faggot. I discovered him previously when he did a collab with Cody from AlternateHistoryHub, and I visited his channel to discover his double-digit soyboy takes on topics he didn't understand. It's good to see he's still being insanely retarded and spewing off faggotry. When it comes to stereotypes, he checks off every box tenfold.

Oh, he defends Sharia Law, too...

 
Step Back is an absolute tremendous, insufferable neckbeard faggot. I discovered him previously when he did a collab with Cody from AlternateHistoryHub, and I visited his channel to discover his double-digit soyboy takes on topics he didn't understand. It's good to see he's still being insanely retarded and spewing off faggotry. When it comes to stereotypes, he checks off every box tenfold.

Oh, he defends Sharia Law, too...

Inshallah.
 
Step Back is an absolute tremendous, insufferable neckbeard faggot. I discovered him previously when he did a collab with Cody from AlternateHistoryHub, and I visited his channel to discover his double-digit soyboy takes on topics he didn't understand. It's good to see he's still being insanely retarded and spewing off faggotry. When it comes to stereotypes, he checks off every box tenfold.

Oh, he defends Sharia Law, too...

and commits slander against Kyle Rittenhouse, and Socialist Tyrants, and doesnt realize Oklahoma was a basically confirmed Fed bombing, and doesnt trust blatantly obvious false flags. Hes reddit embodied, and if he did a Katanga video, he would either change and realize Globalism isnt whats cracked up to be or shill for UN Imperialists/Communist over Natives defending their home. And then ignore the genocide that happened later.
 
Step Back is an absolute tremendous, insufferable neckbeard faggot. I discovered him previously when he did a collab with Cody from AlternateHistoryHub, and I visited his channel to discover his double-digit soyboy takes on topics he didn't understand. It's good to see he's still being insanely retarded and spewing off faggotry. When it comes to stereotypes, he checks off every box tenfold.

Oh, he defends Sharia Law, too...

>Be a retarded fat commie that shills for Sharia Law.
>Even though Sharia Law is incompatible with his ideology and communists in the past made it a point of pride that they ended sharia law in places like Central Asia, Azerbaijan, Chechnya, Bosnia, South Yemen, Somalia, and Albania to name a few.

Why is this xenophilia retard like this?
 
Last edited:
we literally ratio'd you guys 0.79. It was Europe and Mass Immigration that won it for you.
I wouldn't say Europe won Union the American Civil War due to the fact the UK and to an extent France was more in favor of the Confederacy, at least initially. The Union was going to win the war the longer it dragged out due to the Union having a bigger population, partially of immigration but also because the Union was more urbanized and industrialized compared to the more agrarian, rural Confederacy. This is why General Robert E. Lee was aiming for a decisive battle in the North that would end the war quickly.

Step Back is an absolute tremendous, insufferable neckbeard faggot. I discovered him previously when he did a collab with Cody from AlternateHistoryHub, and I visited his channel to discover his double-digit soyboy takes on topics he didn't understand. It's good to see he's still being insanely retarded and spewing off faggotry. When it comes to stereotypes, he checks off every box tenfold.

Oh, he defends Sharia Law, too...

"Hmm yes, I will shill for a justice system that is antithetical to my beliefs and have no good reason to support it other than for diversity's sake." -Step Back, probably
 
I wouldn't say Europe won Union the American Civil War due to the fact the UK and to an extent France was more in favor of the Confederacy, at least initially. The Union was going to win the war the longer it dragged out due to the Union having a bigger population, partially of immigration but also because the Union was more urbanized and industrialized compared to the more agrarian, rural Confederacy. This is why General Robert E. Lee was aiming for a decisive battle in the North that would end the war quickly.
Except Europe just gave the free handouts basically, while we had to trade cotton with them. Also Irish Immigrants were a massive part of a lot of northern armies and then complain about Imperialism while perpetrating it against us.
 
>Be a retarded fat commie that shills for Sharia Law.
>Even though Sharia Law is incompatible with his ideology and communists in the past made it a point of pride that they ended sharia law in places like Central Asia, Azerbaijan, Chechnya, Bosnia, South Yemen, Somalia, and Bosnia to name a few.

Why is this xenophilia retard like this?
The unholy matrimony of neoliberalism/neoconservatism (neoism tbh) and new leftism has created quite the abomination
 
A made a similar thread about Reddit-tier pop science channels which are often riddled with misinformation. Some of the channels made decent background noise, but I stopped watching their content due to their sheer amount of misinformation masked as "I fucking love science!" as well as their hamfisted leftist agendas. Notably, there's that bald soyboy Simon Whistler who somehow manages to churn out dozens of videos daily across multiple channels, and then there's Weird History which is absolutely notorious for spreading lies and using false information in their videos. In fact, just look at the comments of some of their videos to see people timestamping errors in their "facts".
Not sure if this has been pointed out yet, but Simon Whistler doesn't write the scripts for the videos he's in, he simply reads out whatever is given to him. He's basically just a human puppet.
 
The unholy matrimony of neoliberalism/neoconservatism (neoism tbh) and new leftism has created quite the abomination
Is there really a difference between neoliberals and neoconservatives? They seem like different names for the same shit.

Except Europe just gave the free handouts basically, while we had to trade cotton with them. Also Irish Immigrants were a massive part of a lot of northern armies and then complain about Imperialism while perpetrating it against us.
I wouldn't call building warships "free handouts" more so a proto-lend lease, not to mention France took the Civil War as an opportunity to invade Mexico and install a Hapsburg which then would have unofficial contact with CSA seems a bit more than hand out-like. 150,000 Micks might seem like a lot but compared to the 2.1 million men that fought for the Union, it's not much relatively speaking, and they kinda have a right to complain about imperialism considering how the English/British treated them for the past few centuries.
 
Is there really a difference between neoliberals and neoconservatives? They seem like different names for the same shit.


I wouldn't call building warships "free handouts" more so a proto-lend lease, not to mention France took the Civil War as an opportunity to invade Mexico and install a Hapsburg which then would have unofficial contact with CSA seems a bit more than hand out-like. 150,000 Micks might seem like a lot but compared to the 2.1 million men that fought for the Union, it's not much relatively speaking, and they kinda have a right to complain about imperialism considering how the English/British treated them for the past few centuries.
Neoconservatism is conservatism + trotskyism

Neoliberalism is Chicago school of economics + globalism
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't call building warships "free handouts" more so a proto-lend lease, not to mention France took the Civil War as an opportunity to invade Mexico and install a Hapsburg which then would have unofficial contact with CSA seems a bit more than hand out-like. 150,000 Micks might seem like a lot but compared to the 2.1 million men that fought for the Union, it's not much relatively speaking, and they kinda have a right to complain about imperialism considering how the English/British treated them for the past few centuries.
they still gave them something, while they only made it harder for us and wouldnt buy from us. Also France was against us as well and prolly wouldve made it act as a buffer instead. Also its almost a 20th of the army, not to mention hypocritical. Thats Imperialism, along with the direct invasion of Katanga with the UN. Hard to feel bad for them if they do the same shit as well.
 
they still gave them something, while they only made it harder for us and wouldnt buy from us. Also France was against us as well and prolly wouldve made it act as a buffer instead. Also its almost a 20th of the army, not to mention hypocritical. Thats Imperialism, along with the direct invasion of Katanga with the UN. Hard to feel bad for them if they do the same shit as well.
There's a joke somewhere that if you complain about France being against you... can't win or something.

I dunno. I'm not a joke bot.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Mr. Confederate Man
they still gave them something, while they only made it harder for us and wouldnt buy from us. Also France was against us as well and prolly wouldve made it act as a buffer instead. Also its almost a 20th of the army, not to mention hypocritical. Thats Imperialism, along with the direct invasion of Katanga with the UN. Hard to feel bad for them if they do the same shit as well.
The CSS Alabama was built in Britain by British shipbuilders and then sold to the Confederates, if the British were so pro Union then they would have put a stop to it instead allowing a warship to be sold to the Confederacy.
 
one ship vs tons of funding and ships to the other side.
Ultimately, the British and French support is rooted in economics, the public face of the war, and failure of the Confederate diplomacy.

The British, like any self interested government, wanted a resolution to the conflict that would best help British subjects, more specifically the rich industrialists. The Union's industry and gigantic population relative to the South (a large population to sell and trade with) made the North a much more tantalizing state to proceed with trade than the underpopulated, largely agrarian South. The South's main economic draw, King Cotton, was supplanted and replaced by the European Cotton produced in Egypt and the East Indies which was a loss of influence the South couldn't recover from.

For the public image of the war, while Slavery wasn't the sole reason of the Civil War (it did play a part and it would be purposely obtuse to deny it) and it wasn't the modern day Free States vs Slave States that modern day historians like to push (plenty of slave states in the Union) it didn't give the Confederacy a good look to international European powers that they consisted solidly of all slave states especially as the Europeans had recently abolished and outlawed slavery themselves.

Finally, the Confederacy failed to employ diplomacy good enough to entice Europeans to support their cause without it seeming like a waste of investment and lives. The Confederates failed to win enough overwhelming victories at a consistent pace that the Union couldn't follow up with their own victories that made Europeans waffle on support or not before landing on official neutrality. It didn't help that the Confederates expelled all foreign diplomats in 1863 for advising their citizens not to get involved in the whole mess.
 
Ultimately, the British and French support is rooted in economics, the public face of the war, and failure of the Confederate diplomacy.

The British, like any self interested government, wanted a resolution to the conflict that would best help British subjects, more specifically the rich industrialists. The Union's industry and gigantic population relative to the South (a large population to sell and trade with) made the North a much more tantalizing state to proceed with trade than the underpopulated, largely agrarian South. The South's main economic draw, King Cotton, was supplanted and replaced by the European Cotton produced in Egypt and the East Indies which was a loss of influence the South couldn't recover from.

For the public image of the war, while Slavery wasn't the sole reason of the Civil War (it did play a part and it would be purposely obtuse to deny it) and it wasn't the modern day Free States vs Slave States that modern day historians like to push (plenty of slave states in the Union) it didn't give the Confederacy a good look to international European powers that they consisted solidly of all slave states especially as the Europeans had recently abolished and outlawed slavery themselves.

Finally, the Confederacy failed to employ diplomacy good enough to entice Europeans to support their cause without it seeming like a waste of investment and lives. The Confederates failed to win enough overwhelming victories at a consistent pace that the Union couldn't follow up with their own victories that made Europeans waffle on support or not before landing on official neutrality. It didn't help that the Confederates expelled all foreign diplomats in 1863 for advising their citizens not to get involved in the whole mess.
ultimately Europe did betray us and fought for the North, while we did partially fight for slavery, we werent Imperialist Tyrants and ultimately wanted independence.
 
ultimately Europe did betray us and fought for the North, while we did partially fight for slavery, we werent Imperialist Tyrants and ultimately wanted independence.
Would it be considered betrayal if many a European nation had no strong bonds with the Confederacy? The European powers of France and the United Kingdom did not care for y'all aside from ol' King Cotton. When others filled that void, the CSA lost that bargaining chip.

As for Imperial Tyrants, I think what the Knights of the Golden Circle had planned for the CSA definitely constitute as imperialism.
1654912903573.png
 
1654916644629.png


Hm...

Step Back is an absolute tremendous, insufferable neckbeard faggot. I discovered him previously when he did a collab with Cody from AlternateHistoryHub, and I visited his channel to discover his double-digit soyboy takes on topics he didn't understand. It's good to see he's still being insanely retarded and spewing off faggotry. When it comes to stereotypes, he checks off every box tenfold.

Oh, he defends Sharia Law, too...


"Muslims do not believe in killing apostates, only 3 countries actually have it enshrined in law"... yeah..
 
Step Back is an absolute tremendous, insufferable neckbeard faggot. I discovered him previously when he did a collab with Cody from AlternateHistoryHub, and I visited his channel to discover his double-digit soyboy takes on topics he didn't understand. It's good to see he's still being insanely retarded and spewing off faggotry. When it comes to stereotypes, he checks off every box tenfold.

Oh, he defends Sharia Law, too...

@Corpun looks like there's another potential name to put on the intro pile.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Michael Jacks0n
@Corpun looks like there's another potential name to put on the intro pile.
I was against adding him to the OP personally until I saw this democracy video he put out where he whines about small states having electoral power over California. It's all sperging against the EC and those poor city people who get their votes cancelled. This is even with the Rittenhouse stuff.

 
Back