Orbiter 🏳️‍🌈🐱 Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

[jollygoodfella]

https://kiwifarms.st/attachments/4efb006c-828b-424d-80e3-e3b880024794-jpeg.3384597/

Jadengang resembles Scatboy Kami here, that faggit has a typical type of man

 

[Meiwaku]

Josh looks like the Waluigi to Nick's Wario.

This guy is an absolute Nickleback calf (should I say Joey since he's Kangaroo Nick?) in rising. He is also Gunt Guarding internationally.

Look at this shit lolol.



I will say though that he actually isn't a pain to listen to even though I don't know shit about Australian politics just because he actually can manage to follow a script and not go on retarded alogging sessions on someone. He's boring but I feel this works in his favor.


He's only got 12 people in his Chat as of said video but is actually pounding pavement in his upcoming stream to talk to voters so I support that as opposed to sitting at home looking at screen. If he wasn't a Nick sucker this would be commendable. Joey, get out of Nick's pouch and disavow the groys.


Here's his deets. I have an Op in waiting incase he turns interesting. He seems to have optics of some sort despite being easy to track down because he didn't even post all the shit i found. I lost interest part way.

Gab | archive
Telegram (I don't use TG so I can't lurk)
Youtube | Archive
Twittard | Archive
Discord: JoshHowes#5583
Facebook | Archive

Anyways this dude actually seems somewhat promising but then again I'm an eternal optimist . It would be very funny if he actually ended up doing better than Nick.

This low effort dox was brought to you by the "Kiwifarms Proving Zoomers Can't Use the Internet Foundation", with your support of just 1 BAT a month, you too can help prove that Zoomers treat the entire internet like Linkedin.

 

[AltisticRight]

Look at this shit lolol.

This guy looks like a massive homosexual.
Also, "goyim" is fucking plural of "goy", dumb abo.

 

[Meiwaku]

L8 Show Recap 06/10/2022

firstly: LMAO HIS MOM WATCHES HIS SHOW :STORY:

Okay him power leveling on postmates and gays we need clips from this day the whole video and otherwise they're fucking hilarious. Please I beg you people who are better than me

Here's some highlights:

• "a guy and a guy cannot have sex but they can hump something the same way they can have sex with a watermelon or a Grapefruit or...." -The guy who doesn't watch porn and is totally asexual.
• "forget about attraction or if it's possible to love someone (of the same sex)...." GO ON NICK, PLEASE GO ON....
• "it's a demeaning act" you said you wanted to be put in a catboy crate for pissing on the floor, I'm pretty sure this is a turn on for you
• "(about gay guys fucking )even if they love each other this isn't an expression of love!" Nick... my guy.... I'm sorry you and Jaden broke up but...
• "It's not about being gay, it's about being a homosexual." We get it you're #notlikeothergays
• "haha that's a tough one to get through because it's so....gross..." is that why you spent an hour talking about gay sex and then keep going.
• "WE LIVE IN AN ANAL EMPIRE"

Spoiler: Recap from 06/10/2022

• 
  
• UGHH IM SO SICKKK my ear hasn't popped im congested boo hooooo. my tummy hurts, oh noooo
• InNOut is fave place
• IF I CANCELLED EVERYONE WOULD THUMBS DOWN ME ON TELEGRAM!!! resentfully doing this show.
• wearing shorts
• "pain doesn't matter to me, pain is in the mind"
• spent the first 20 minuets whining about him being sick and being in a bad mood
• Nick Martin guy who is interacting with Fuentes community, he's a blue check who interacts with zoom zooms.
• went over the porn thing, also Nick Martin supported that his porn thing was a hoax
• Nick Martin alogged him for his outfit and being a white nationalist and loving Kanye
• is a thinker just like God
• MOM STOP TEXTING ME
• Basically goes off that he idolizes a black person and likely isn't racist because of this. We know. You love black people
• "I think about him all the time" (nick on Kanye)
• YOU MAKE YOUR ASSUMPTIONS BASED ON THE FACTS (zzz... 20 minuets)
• MOM PLEASE STOP TEXTING ME IM DOING THE SHOW MOM STOP!!!! LMAO HIS MOM IS WATCHING HIS SHOW
• Leftists have no humility to entertain that something else is fundamentally right!
• Nick thinks people don't contradict one another, maybe they don't know what they mean.
• actually makes a few good points on not understanding what someone means when they say something and you can make a point of "not all x are x" while making generalizations
• Christianity doesn't believe in superior or inferiority other than holiness. (amazing for you to say this)
• Sick Nick for some reason makes way more sense than normal Nick, still a sped but better together.
• tl;dr- people attribute values of inferior or superior to facts.
• Nick is a member of the ~High IQ~ people
• Nick can accept that he's wrong
• ME BEING A GENIUS I CAN HOLD MANY CONTRADICTIONS IN MY MIND AT ONCE have you ever considered this isn't something that you do well and that you banhammer people who make theories on this.
• tl;dr- Nick doesn't hate black people and IS A GENIUS
• his besties were all Muslims or Black people. He's Mexican...la la la la
• anyone who watches me can see im a brilliant young man
• i have a childlike personality
• I HAVE SUFFERED ON TRYING TO GET IT RIGHT AND NOT LYING WHEN IT WOULD HAVE BENEFITTED ME
• nobody watches me because I'm an idiot
• spergging on same 14 points
• postmates article
• reee gays reee totally not gay reee
• bottom friendly menu (nick knows what this means)
• 
  
• NICK PROCEEDS TO POWER LEVEL ON EXPLAINING GAY SEX SMILING THE WHOLE TIME LOOKING WILLFUL LMAO
• Nick power levels on dick shitting and all of this shit
• 
  
• He's a bottom
• "we're tired of vaginal sex being the main focus, especially a guy receiving a penis in his butt isn't talked about enough"- I'm pretty sure this is the AF slogan
• LGBT IS ALWAYS ABOUT MALE ON MALE ANAL SEX I'm 100% positive lesbians don't do that actually but
• "a guy and a guy cannot have sex but they can hump something the same way they can have sex with a watermelon or a...." Nick we need to talk....
• "forget about attraction or if it's possible to love someone of...." GO ON NICK, PLEASE GO ON....
• reee god cope reee
• "it's subversive for homosexuals to get married that's not what homosexuality is about..."
• (I think Nick associates gay with orgies and gay sex and not like, human relationships....)
• power levels on monkeypox
• rainbow flag= penis in butthole
• who wants to have a kid and think about them being sodomized as an adult? (I'm gonna assume no parent wants to think of their kids fucking)
• "it's a demeaning act" you said you wanted to be put in a catboy crate for pissing on the floor
• IT'S ALL ANAL SEX (once again, I can promise you in the L and part of B this is not true.)
• morality is sexuality tooooooo reeeee im coping and gayyy
• mand and woman is a loving act, they're experiencing pleasure it's compatible
• "you don't sodomize things you love, you don't use them to jerk off" bro, have you heard of the prostate?
• goes off on psychology of gays
• "(gay men are) often at a deficit of love from their parents" DO GO ON NICK
• "(about gay guys fucking )even if they love each other this isn't an expression of love!"Nick... my guy....
• "It's not about being gay, it's about being a homosexual." Nick. We get it you're #notlikeotherguys
  "haha that's a tough one to get through because it's so....gross..." is that why you spent an hour talking about gay sex???
• sorry to be soooo graphicccc
• one of the last things his grandmother said was "you would have liked the 1950s it was a much more innocent time"
• people have given up on moral reeee
• i don't like talking about itttttt
• reeeEEEEEEEeee gay spergging further until the end about poop
• WE LIVE IN AN ANAL EMPIRE
• somehow ties this into George Floyd and a children's book being written on it lol
• ANAL PRIDE MONTH
• george floyd spergging, homo spergging, women spergging... im an extremist reeeeee
• this is why I'm grumpy guy it's all wrong!!!
• "most problems are because of divorce" lmao okay
• thinks people get divorced because promiscuity and feminism?
• ARE YOU GONNA LEAD THE HUMAN DOGS?
• "people can like what they like but we can't do whatever we like...." project harder.
• only god is where you can get morality from!
• incoherent god spergging on angels and devils and soul killing and god
• tl;dr jesus god do the right thing even nick doesn't know how he got on this topic
• Makes sure eveyone knows how much he sacrifices for them to do this show while SICK

 

[gaystoner]

I have never heard of a straight man being able to talk so long about gay sex.

 

[Meiwaku]

I have never heard of a straight man being able to talk so long about gay sex.

He basically walked through how gay sex works and what a bottom is and how they have to ensure their anal cavity is clean in order to receive penis. He spends at least 10 minutes describing on multiple occasions how bottoming works and on poo or laxatives and why somebody would want the postmates menu.

His entire thing was basically dancing around how anal sex and itself is wrong (also for some reason he seems to think that the bottom doesn't enjoy it I don't think he understands about the prostate but whatever...) . HOWEVER ,apparently according to him guys can love each other and they just choose to have anal sex and SIN.... but he didn't say that anything else was bad only Anal Sex.

So by Nick's own logic, two men can love each other and just do hands and mouth stuff and this is okay because it's not SODOMY.

 

[AltisticRight]

I have never heard of a straight man being able to talk so long about gay sex.

Makes sense since Nicky is a sodomite in denial.

 

[Meiwaku]

Makes sense since Nicky is a sodomite in denial.

Nooo you don't understaaaaannnnd he's a man lover who loves men but is NOT a butt sex haver! There's a distinct difference reeeee.

 

[BlackWaterSails]

He basically walked through how gay sex works and what a bottom is and how they have to ensure their anal cavity is clean in order to receive penis. He spends at least 10 minutes describing on multiple occasions how bottoming works and on poo or laxatives and why somebody would want the postmates menu.

No wonder he takes 2 hours to shower...

His entire thing was basically dancing around how anal sex and itself is wrong (also for some reason he seems to think that the bottom doesn't enjoy it I don't think he understands about the prostate but whatever...)

In all seriousness, the "not enjoying it" claim could be for three reasons:

1.) Let's say, hypothetically, he's actually had intercourse with a man as the bottom. He may have a had bad experience or felt ashamed from that interaction and, instead of considering it as an outlier or talking to the other person, took it as the average experience and that bottoming actually doesn't feel good.

2.) Even within the gay community, there's a lot of bottom shaming. Due to this, there is this ongoing joke that bottoms are just doing a service. Basically, bottoms are a glorified sex toy. He could have misread it as they actually take no pleasure in it at all.

3.) Again, due to shaming, it could be an unwillingness to admit it. Like, think about sodomizing throughout history. Being the bottom in a war situation or even within Greek schooling, it was the leader or the dominator topping. How, based on that history, is anyone going to take a leader that bottoms seriously? It is a sign of weakness in many cultures and people have always been more forgiving to tops because it is not too far away from what a man does with a woman. What a bottom does, though, is see as abnormal to a degree that takes away from your manhood. Even if we don't mean to, society does subconsciously show more disgust towards more flamboyant pockets of gay culture than we do more "nuclear" pockets.

 

[Catboy Slayer]

View attachment 3384629
Make it 110

Thuletide may be an idiot but at least his takes are original thoughts unlike nick who just steals talking points from /pol/ and trs and removes all the nuance

This guy is an absolute Nickleback calf (should I say Joey since he's Kangaroo Nick?) in rising. He is also Gunt Guarding internationally.

Look at this shit lolol.

View attachment 3384669

I will say though that he actually isn't a pain to listen to even though I don't know shit about Australian politics just because he actually can manage to follow a script and not go on retarded alogging sessions on someone. He's boring but I feel this works in his favor.
View attachment 3385076
View attachment 3385075
He's only got 12 people in his Chat as of said video but is actually pounding pavement in his upcoming stream to talk to voters so I support that as opposed to sitting at home looking at screen. If he wasn't a Nick sucker this would be commendable. Joey, get out of Nick's pouch and disavow the groys.

View attachment 3384688
Here's his deets. I have an Op in waiting incase he turns interesting. He seems to have optics of some sort despite being easy to track down because he didn't even post all the shit i found. I lost interest part way.

Gab | archive
Telegram (I don't use TG so I can't lurk)
Youtube | Archive
Twittard | Archive
Discord: JoshHowes#5583
Facebook | Archive

Anyways this dude actually seems somewhat promising but then again I'm an eternal optimist . It would be very funny if he actually ended up doing better than Nick.

This low effort dox was brought to you by the "Kiwifarms Proving Zoomers Can't Use the Internet Foundation", with your support of just 1 BAT a month, you too can help prove that Zoomers treat the entire internet like Linkedin.

There's also a Russian ripoff of AF run by some guy named Ilya Aristov

He's copied everything, from the shitty green screen down to the logo
Youtube | Archive (his videos are all unlisted but you can find links to them on his vk)
Gab | Archive
Telegram | Archive (you don't need to install telegram or make an account to lurk, just click preview channel)
VK | Archive

 

[░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓ด้้้้้็็็็็้้]

That's a rough 23.

 

[Meiwaku]

Thuletide may be an idiot but at least his takes are original thoughts unlike nick who just steals talking points from /pol/ and trs and removes all the nuance


There's also a Russian ripoff of AF run by some guy named Ilya Aristov
View attachment 3385812View attachment 3385816
He's copied everything, from the shitty green screen down to the logo
Youtube | Archive (his videos are all unlisted but you can find links to them on his vk)
Gab | Archive
Telegram | Archive (you don't need to install telegram or make an account to lurk, just click preview channel)
VK | Archive

So does Vlad Nick shill for America as hard as he shills for mother Russia? Also lmao vladnick looks a bit like beardsoy

No wonder he takes 2 hours to shower...

In all seriousness, the "not enjoying it" claim could be for three reasons:

1.) Let's say, hypothetically, he's actually had intercourse with a man as the bottom. He may have a had bad experience or felt ashamed from that interaction and, instead of considering it as an outlier or talking to the other person, took it as the average experience and that bottoming actually doesn't feel good.

2.) Even within the gay community, there's a lot of bottom shaming. Due to this, there is this ongoing joke that bottoms are just doing a service. Basically, bottoms are a glorified sex toy. He could have misread it as they actually take no pleasure in it at all.

3.) Again, due to shaming, it could be an unwillingness to admit it. Like, think about sodomizing throughout history. Being the bottom in a war situation or even within Greek schooling, it was the leader or the dominator topping. How, based on that history, is anyone going to take a leader that bottoms seriously? It is a sign of weakness in many cultures and people have always been more forgiving to tops because it is not too far away from what a man does with a woman. What a bottom does, though, is see as abnormal to a degree that takes away from your manhood. Even if we don't mean to, society does subconsciously show more disgust towards more flamboyant pockets of gay culture than we do more "nuclear" pockets.

I suppose that's true historically. It was also usually the younger party who was the bottom in many cultures. I also think this could play into his hatred of women because being "penetrated" is seen as shame because its a "woman" thing. Nick is definitely a bratty bottom/submissive so being seen as a "woman" is the ultimate shame (and potential ultimate turn on). (Trannies have this logic too of trooning despite being woman haters and thinking a female role is shameful.)

Nick is a slight history sperg so I'm sure hes read on homosexuality and pederasty "for scientific purposes". For Vikings, "tops" could still get into Valhalla but not bottoms. In Japan, the cope was that "the anus was the center of power" and that bottoms were giving their strength to the top through their anus (yes, really) and the top was usually always usually the superior to the bottom rank wise. It's worth noting too all the male prostitutes were bottom gays. This is from a culture that doesn't give a shit if you're gay (as long as you follow the rules of society) and has openly gay historical figures. In cultures with Abrahamic religion guilt, It's likely even worse. Historical COPES of what it meant to be a top or bottom in gay men have always been insane. You can feel the SNEED emanating from the texts themselves even to this day.

My friend told me there's a lot of hostility in gays like on Grindr there was "no femmes, fats, or asians" that was blatant for a while. Fully flamboyant gays are also not even liked that well by gays themselves and not even faghags are always into them. This is also the gay that straight men seem the most grossed out by.

I think your logic of Nick associating all these things with SODOMY and ANAL SEX is spot on. I would love to hear more wisdom from our ANAL SEX knowers.

 

[Gay Mexican Child]

He basically walked through how gay sex works and what a bottom is and how they have to ensure their anal cavity is clean in order to receive penis. He spends at least 10 minutes describing on multiple occasions how bottoming works and on poo or laxatives and why somebody would want the postmates menu.

His entire thing was basically dancing around how anal sex and itself is wrong (also for some reason he seems to think that the bottom doesn't enjoy it I don't think he understands about the prostate but whatever...) . HOWEVER ,apparently according to him guys can love each other and they just choose to have anal sex and SIN.... but he didn't say that anything else was bad only Anal Sex.

So by Nick's own logic, two men can love each other and just do hands and mouth stuff and this is okay because it's not SODOMY.

nick loved jaden but never was sodomized by him. which is technically not gay as homosexuality is defined by actions. as the action of sodomy never happened, technically nick wasnt gay for jaden and technically nick is not gay. so technically nick is not gay. technically

That's a rough 23.

yeah why does nick look so old? maybe that was some of the love/hate/resentment that he had for jaden, who is a tiny bit younger but looks a decade younger. nick's face has really aged over the 4 years ive watched him. my face has barely aged in those 4 years but his has gone through the blender

 

[Meiwaku]

nick loved jaden but never was sodomized by him. which is technically not gay as homosexuality is defined by actions. as the action of sodomy never happened, technically nick wasnt gay for jaden and technically nick is not gay. so technically nick is not gay. technically

Nick is fat and gay and I would not have sex with him

He would likely be brought to tears around a pussy anyways

 

[AltisticRight]

Thuletide may be an idiot but at least his takes are original thoughts unlike nick who just steals talking points from /pol/ and trs and removes all the nuance


There's also a Russian ripoff of AF run by some guy named Ilya Aristov
View attachment 3385812View attachment 3385816
He's copied everything, from the shitty green screen down to the logo
Youtube | Archive (his videos are all unlisted but you can find links to them on his vk)
Gab | Archive
Telegram | Archive (you don't need to install telegram or make an account to lurk, just click preview channel)
VK | Archive

Why do they all resemble some kind of flaming homosexual? Every single one of them.

 

[Gay Mexican Child]

I don't know why I was surprised but in the latest Kino Casino episode, they played one of Nick's Twitter Spaces where he goes off about how white people don't bring enough food to parties, and he differentiates Italians from white people. In all of my years of listening to Nick, I've never heard him have so much malice in his voice in describing white people, to the point where he views whites as the "other". His Italian identity seems to supersede his White identity, even though he loves to larp as a white man. "Those fuckin' white families" he says with a clear sense of disdain. It was pretty wild.
I still believe Nick views himself as part of a "master race" of sorts but I've said in the past that I think he sees himself as Aryan. Maybe that's still true (or something adjacent to "Aryan" -- maybe Roman? Roman-Castizo?), but it's clear to me now that he obviously sees himself as distinct from the modern American White race (which he is distinct from, so I'm glad he recognizes that). And this goes hand in hand with his hatred of the working class, and Southerners. He feels no sense of camaraderie with the average White conservative. That leaves me to wonder: in his ideal "white ethnostate" America (which he claims he doesn't want, but he DOES want a "white supermajority" in his own words, which is essentially the same thing), what would the average person be like? He hates the white working class. Should everyone be like a Chicagoan libtard, then? Or a mixed race Italian Hispanic mutt like he is?

nick has said on his show that his audience is half/majority hispanic. If you see pictures of AFPAC attendees or groypers, there are alot of colored people there. He's really just playing to his base, his hatred of whites is snot uncomfortable for his audience because none of them are really white anyways.
Jaden mentioned how nick's house was in a 100% hispanic neighborhood and he seemed perfectly comfortable in there. Nick will publicly cope about being 25% italian, and we all know italians are the brown people of europe.

 

[Me262PrinceOfTurboJet]

nick has said on his show that his audience is half/majority hispanic. If you see pictures of AFPAC attendees or groypers, there are alot of colored people there. He's really just playing to his base, his hatred of whites is snot uncomfortable for his audience because none of them are really white anyways.
Jaden mentioned how nick's house was in a 100% hispanic neighborhood and he seemed perfectly comfortable in there. Nick will publicly cope about being 25% italian, and we all know italians are the brown people of europe.

Except Nick has nothing in common with actual Italians or Hispanics. He doesn't speak the languages. He can't cook the food. He doesn't give a fuck about the culture, customs, traditions, or holidays. He's also Irish and has nothing in common with them either. The only culture he seems to like is nigger culture, like Ethan Ralph. If I was Mexican, I'd be outraged to have Nick considered one of my people. He's just a deracinated mongrel faggot.

 

[Rosy Reptile]

He basically walked through how gay sex works and what a bottom is and how they have to ensure their anal cavity is clean in order to receive penis. He spends at least 10 minutes describing on multiple occasions how bottoming works and on poo or laxatives and why somebody would want the postmates menu.

His entire thing was basically dancing around how anal sex and itself is wrong (also for some reason he seems to think that the bottom doesn't enjoy it I don't think he understands about the prostate but whatever...) . HOWEVER ,apparently according to him guys can love each other and they just choose to have anal sex and SIN.... but he didn't say that anything else was bad only Anal Sex.

So by Nick's own logic, two men can love each other and just do hands and mouth stuff and this is okay because it's not SODOMY.

Nooo you don't understaaaaannnnd he's a man lover who loves men but is NOT a butt sex haver! There's a distinct difference reeeee.

If his position is that asexual homoromantic attraction is OK, he's actually wrong on that by early Christian patristic standards. The Fathers saw the marital relationship as a prefiguration of man's union with God in the eschaton, and the bringing forth of children as a prefiguration of the immortality that union with God produces (family rearing being the closest thing to immortality that we have in this world). Basically in the same way that the temple sacrifices were seen as an Old Testament prefiguration of the Eucharist, marriage was seen as an Old Testament prefiguration of monasticism and ultimately theosis. St. Paul makes it clear in his first Epistle to the Corinthians that marriage is mostly still allowed these days because not everyone has the self-restraint to handle celibacy. Because it's a prefiguration of the union with God, marriage isn't evil. I've attached Fr. Josiah Trenham's PhD thesis on the subject for anyone interested, which is it's own book now.

This attitude is a big part of why stuff like contraception isn't allowed, as by removing the potential for child-rearing they're actively violating the typology. Since marriage was basically humanity's training wheels for their relationship with God, messing with the training wheels is going to screw up the real deal. It's a lot like having a bad relationship with your father and how that effects your relationship with God. I forget which one but there was at least one saint who said that the problem with Sodom was that they had "devised a barren intercourse", rather than homosexuality explicitly. There's no context where the desire for an intimate union of being with another man (which is what romantic attraction is, sexually or otherwise) would be acceptable, since it's still a union that doesn't have the potential to produce life. It'd be a union destined to death.

It's a very different form of intimacy than friendship, which is a bond based on mutual cooperation towards a common goal rather than desire for inter-communion of being.

I didn't see the show but if he's trying to justify homoromantic attraction I wouldn't be surprised, since Catholics have a tendency to try and explain all morality through Thomistic natural law arguments and wind up with a bunch of incomprehensible autism.

 

[NetVet]

How's your riches doing Nick? I'm asking because you're the high IQ genius, so you probably cross margin traded 100x short last couple of days. Damn this shit is too easy for you...

 

[Tornado]

If his position is that asexual homoromantic attraction is OK, he's actually wrong on that by early Christian patristic standards. The Fathers saw the marital relationship as a prefiguration of man's union with God in the eschaton, and the bringing forth of children as a prefiguration of the immortality that union with God produces (family rearing being the closest thing to immortality that we have in this world). Basically in the same way that the temple sacrifices were seen as an Old Testament prefiguration of the Eucharist, marriage was seen as an Old Testament prefiguration of monasticism and ultimately theosis. St. Paul makes it clear in his first Epistle to the Corinthians that marriage is mostly still allowed these days because not everyone has the self-restraint to handle celibacy. Because it's a prefiguration of the union with God, marriage isn't evil. I've attached Fr. Josiah Trenham's PhD thesis on the subject for anyone interested, which is it's own book now.

This attitude is a big part of why stuff like contraception isn't allowed, as by removing the potential for child-rearing they're actively violating the typology. Since marriage was basically humanity's training wheels for their relationship with God, messing with the training wheels is going to screw up the real deal. It's a lot like having a bad relationship with your father and how that effects your relationship with God. I forget which one but there was at least one saint who said that the problem with Sodom was that they had "devised a barren intercourse", rather than homosexuality explicitly. There's no context where the desire for an intimate union of being with another man (which is what romantic attraction is, sexually or otherwise) would be acceptable, since it's still a union that doesn't have the potential to produce life. It'd be a union destined to death.

It's a very different form of intimacy than friendship, which is a bond based on mutual cooperation towards a common goal rather than desire for inter-communion of being.

I didn't see the show but if he's trying to justify homoromantic attraction I wouldn't be surprised, since Catholics have a tendency to try and explain all morality through Thomistic natural law arguments and wind up with a bunch of incomprehensible autism.

Marriage and reproduction reflect the divine unity of the beatific vision but they do not exist solely or primarily as preparation for it. It seems like you drew that terminology from Augustine but he saw it at most as typology because both are forms of friendship. The rearing of children does not correspond to immortality either.

I take it you're an online ortho since you're dropping 200 page dissertations from Fr. Josiah that you haven't fully or carefully read so take it easy on counter-signaling Aquinas, especially if you don't know what you're talking about.