Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Ok Groomer. Why do they want to talk to children about sex so fucking bad?

This makes zero sense. Children who grow up knowing about sex and believing that it is an appropriate activity are less likely to realize they are being groomed. They think it's all normal and safe, after all. There's also a good difference between knowing about reproductive organs, their uses, diseases, etc. and having every middle school class read the Kama Sutra.

Like imagine some creepy pedofork walking up to your child and saying "SEX IS A VERY HEALTHY AND GOOD THING TO DO AND KNOW ABOUT"

Yes, he’s mixing up basic safety education (which does actually tend to protect kids from being targeted by groomers) with actually “teaching them about sex.” There are dozens of good safety curriculums that teach preschool and young elementary school kids everything they need to know without scaring them or talking about anything explicit or inappropriate. My body belongs to me, my private parts are the parts of my body covered by my bathing suit and shouldn’t be touched by grown ups, if someone makes me uncomfortable or tells me to keep a secret go tell a trusted adult, etc. Done.

(Then again, as far as I know these curriculums are being replaced by “playing with dolls means you’re a girl” classes now, who knows.)

It’s gross that he is conflating actually helpful safety and educations programs with whatever weird shit he wants to do.
 
Well, almost a year later, we have a positive update. After several trips to the psych ward, being banned from Best Buy, and an arrest, Anthony "GaLmHD" Lazenby has pulled back from trooning out and is attempting to slowly pull his shit back together. Doing so offline with a regular job would be the smarter option but he's no longer believing that he can time travel by playing with random knobs in his room so there's progress, at least.

Update video (https://archive.ph/LOJBU)
Part 1:
View attachment 3192285
Part 2:
View attachment 3192326
Thumbnail:
View attachment 3192250
Going ahead and erasing my already very tenuous previous optimism on this one:
P1.jpg
After nearly going on a more spectacular end of life speedrun than Etika, you can either get off the Internet to sort out your mental issues or become a fox/dog "girl" V-Tuber.
P2.jpg
Can't wait for the next psychiatry arc.
 
Expectation
View attachment 3387025

The whole FaceApp is doing a real number with troons. The kick of dopamine seeing themselves as passable females really fucks with troons heads, emboldens them into believing their ideal version of themselves is the real one.

How can no one notice this? Is basic psychology!

FaceApp filters that jawline so aggressively it almost blends away into the neck. But if you outline it to defeat its camouflage, you see it's nearly a ringer for Gigachad's chin.

1655260647010.png 1655260665624.png
 
Me and tranny's stand together on one issue trans representation.

I want them in reality shows, YouTube videos, TV pundits, twitter anything where it's a real trans person. Yes it's temporarily unpleasant.

But they have the support they have from the normies because the normies are ignorant of what they really are and confused them with the gays.

This thread alone would black pill 80% of people against the trans people. And the trans know that they push laws in their favour by hiding along laws about other minorities.

At first they had people like buck angel who won people over.
But every average trans person with a twitter account is like poison to their cause.

Given the tiny % of the population it's near impossible that this thread about trans social media is full of paedophilia, misogyny, grooming. Grown men talking about how they want to violently use there "girldick" on middle age women.

When it was contrapoints in a new York times piece it was easy to lie and hide the truth from the normal people.


It's been what 5 yrs since they've been everywhere and we now have actually laws being enacted.
This is after the republicans generally accepted gay people so this isn't LGBT hate this is tranny's trying to destroy language itself as if men and women don't exist.

When you have feminists coming to the farms as a safe space away from tranny's you know trans have gone to far.

In the 60s the hippies thought they had culture and liberal colleges so they would win and living in a hut and rejecting capitalism was the future but those same hippies got bored and went to work on wall Street.

When the non-binary and xenogenders get bored the trannies lose their mass and the white woman who writes for the New Yorker drops she/they from their Twitter bio it's all over for them.

Then slowly come the lawsuits and everyone starts saying they knew it had all gone to far. That's when this thread becomes a public record against the people who pushed for kids to be put on puberty blockers.

You couldn't just wear dress could you no you had to try and destroy the fundamental building blocks of human society.
 
No, that is not true; the 1% was touted around as gospel after Alfred Kinsey sent out an anonymous survey where people could self-select their answers... in 1950's America. Which was not exactly the most accepting environment to admit you were same-sex attracted. Eventually the researchers caught on to the fact that people might not have been altogether honest and started carrying out tests including phallometry and eye-tracking... and the ratio of homosexual men shot up to 4%. The 1 in 20 has since been repeated across cultures and populations. Bisexual men were found to be actually much, much rarer than homosexual ones. The vast majority of men are aroused by either women or men, not both.

EDIT: I wanted to add that the "10% LGBT!" is obviously disingenuous, because it generally counts same-sex sexual contact anyone may have had prior to the age of 19 as proof of bisexuality, even though the individual displays exclusively heterosexual behavior in adulthood. Like if two middle-school boys engaged in one single session of mutual masturbation, they would be included in this statistic.
Kinsey's statistic was 10%, not 1%, and that was the stat used for years by the gay rights lobby. It helped break down opposition by force of numbers the same way the Born Gay thing did. It didn't matter if it was wrong, but it served its purpose.

Exclusive homosexuality hovers around 1%, bisexuality tends to be higher, especially in women. It's highest within the 18-24 demographic. That's where the queer explosion is coming in.
View attachment 3388519
Found this in his TL.
"I don't know how to counter the groomer narrative because I do actually want to groom children"
Keep away from kids you sick freak.
Shae is the one who posted about Trans priestesses many pages ago. He loves bragging about his girldick. Shocker he doesn't like being clocked.
View attachment 3388712
LIAR

View attachment 3388717
Every face pic is completely shopped.

View attachment 3388729
View attachment 3388734
He even posted on R/traps with full ass bush.

What's going on, an over-the-hill delusional Twink or AGP is being a perv.


Never mind, he seems to be a delusional faggot chronically jealous of other women like most troons. Soon, they're all going to start running around wearing Pamela Anderson printed out face masks.
View attachment 3388810
HIM IRL.
I now understand why gay men love waxing. That ass hair looks disgusting. I am half tempted to use a roll of duct tape on that Grand Canyon.
 
After the outrage from Moniz's prize, it began getting banned across Europe.
The biggest irony is that the Soviet Union banned it in 1950. The same Soviet Union that later had no problem with using psychiatric hospitals and incapacitating doses of haldol to punish dissidents. Apparently the ice picks were too much even for the professional "manicurists"*
*That's how we used to call the KGB officers extracting the victim's fingernails with pliers.
 
View attachment 3388979

Unironically agree with the statement. Also how I feel about all the queer revisionist history

It's ironic that the LGBTQ movement has made such things even more ridged and suffocating.

Many people still consider it a grave insult to be compared to faggots or troons in any way, so they are less likely to engage in behaviors that would make people think that they could be such, even a little bit. That's the result of faggotry and troonism becoming more commonplace, AND people making it out to think that certain behaviors, like deep platonic friendships, are "gay" or "queer."
 
Even in the current year, the military has little patience or sympathy for the mentally ill. Did he really think the Navy would allow a hysterical, suicidal tranny to keep serving on a submarine?
He waited THREE MONTHS for a life-threatening problem! Good Gracious! The only sad thing is that the Navy didn't just chop off his cock and then throw him out.

Still the armed forces has to screen their candidate better. To babysit a malingerer (which is every single troon) is to waste taxpayers' money. Everyone who gets triggered get the bullet.

Like imagine some creepy pedofork walking up to your child and saying "SEX IS A VERY HEALTHY AND GOOD THING TO DO AND KNOW ABOUT"
And then showing Bill Nye's ice cream cartoon: "Have a lick. You'll like it!"

The most telling part is "our current system where kids only learn about sex from parents or trusted adults is bad".
Parents should warn their kids that school teachers are no longer "trusted adults".
 
No, that is not true; the 1% was touted around as gospel after Alfred Kinsey sent out an anonymous survey where people could self-select their answers... in 1950's America. Which was not exactly the most accepting environment to admit you were same-sex attracted. Eventually the researchers caught on to the fact that people might not have been altogether honest and started carrying out tests including phallometry and eye-tracking... and the ratio of homosexual men shot up to 4%. The 1 in 20 has since been repeated across cultures and populations. Bisexual men were found to be actually much, much rarer than homosexual ones. The vast majority of men are aroused by either women or men, not both.

EDIT: I wanted to add that the "10% LGBT!" is obviously disingenuous, because it generally counts same-sex sexual contact anyone may have had prior to the age of 19 as proof of bisexuality, even though the individual displays exclusively heterosexual behavior in adulthood. Like if two middle-school boys engaged in one single session of mutual masturbation, they would be included in this statistic.
I agree that 10% is obliviously false but I think the actual number is lower than 4 %.

Studies about homosexuality are quite likely to attract more homosexuals than heterosexuals. Most people are more intrested in a topic that affects their life than a topic that doesn't. Majority of people are straight and find sex in general a private topic that doesn't affect much. They have much less insentive to get involved over homosexuals who are different from the majority and have had multiple issues do their sexuality.

Add to that who is more likely to study something like this and what they are hoping to accomplish with it. I would wager that they are very prohomo and so want to get a large number because it supports their position better than homos are far and few between. They might even mean to be objective but still pick a demographic where homosexuals are over presented or ask questions that push undesirable people or anwers away. Reasoning being something like older generation are going to hide it so better stick with youths or smart university city folk are going to anwer better so I should use that vocabulary.

None this said to be anti homo or pro homo, more biases and limits of behavioral studies. I don't come from sexuality studies but I have done work with product designs and user interfaces. It's really hard to build a study that gives you honest feedback or useful data. It's so easy just find result you want, ignore information you don't or miss oblivious signs that study isn't reliable.
 
lol imagine being one of the other drivers and seeing this

"wow, i know this deranged tranny just sideswiped my car and almost ran me off a mountain i'm glad he feels valid and comfortable with his gender identity!"
Another future transcel rapist:

View attachment 3388739
1655273318742.png


he's got the whole sophia labelle face going on... ngmi
mpletely shopped.

Capture.JPG
 
Last edited:
I agree that 10% is obliviously false but I think the actual number is lower than 4 %.

Studies about homosexuality are quite likely to attract more homosexuals than heterosexuals. Most people are more intrested in a topic that affects their life than a topic that doesn't. Majority of people are straight and find sex in general a private topic that doesn't affect much. They have much less insentive to get involved over homosexuals who are different from the majority and have had multiple issues do their sexuality.

Add to that who is more likely to study something like this and what they are hoping to accomplish with it. I would wager that they are very prohomo and so want to get a large number because it supports their position better than homos are far and few between. They might even mean to be objective but still pick a demographic where homosexuals are over presented or ask questions that push undesirable people or anwers away. Reasoning being something like older generation are going to hide it so better stick with youths or smart university city folk are going to anwer better so I should use that vocabulary.

None this said to be anti homo or pro homo, more biases and limits of behavioral studies. I don't come from sexuality studies but I have done work with product designs and user interfaces. It's really hard to build a study that gives you honest feedback or useful data. It's so easy just find result you want, ignore information you don't or miss oblivious signs that study isn't reliable.
This is why most often behavior indicators like asking anonymously about MSM behavior on things like community health surveys that reach hundreds of thousands of people. The 4% is IIRC the 5 year rate of same sex contact among men. It actually varies a lot down to the county level, because gay men and lesbians tend to migrate to urban centers, so are overrepresented there and underrepresented in rural areas. The rates remain fairly consistent, but many of those men would not identify themselves as gay. Whether they even are is matter of debate. There is evidence that male sexuality is more bimodal than female sexuality, but even if a dude has strong same sex attraction he can still essentially live a heterosexual life (with maybe some downlow action on the side). 4% is likely an overestimate if you mean people who engage regularly in same sex contact or who are in same-sex relationships exclusively.

Regardless of that, the largest growth in "LGBTQ" identification has been trans and non-binary in the past decade, especially among young women. There's also a strong correlation between political identity and identifying as trans or non-binary, which isn't the case for surveys that focus purely on same sex behavior. That's one of the big indicators that the current queer wave is a social contagion emerging in one specific portion of the population that is already primed to accept the ideas.

E;

Clipboard Image (6).jpg


Hair plugs = gender care now. Weird, since male-pattern baldness is definitely a male feature


Clipboard Image (5).jpg

Best of luck, Beta!
 
Last edited:
View attachment 3388712
LIAR

View attachment 3388717
Every face pic is completely shopped.

View attachment 3388729
View attachment 3388734
He even posted on R/traps with full ass bush.

What's going on, an over-the-hill delusional Twink or AGP is being a perv.


Never mind, he seems to be a delusional faggot chronically jealous of other women like most troons. Soon, they're all going to start running around wearing Pamela Anderson printed out face masks.
View attachment 3388810
HIM IRL.
He does realize working on his shoulders is going to make them look  broader, right?
 
Broads gotta get broader.

Honey, you need to get acquainted with the world's oldest profession.
That's the thing about guys like him. They're desperate, yet only want virgins. Not even because they don't want diseases. Like, I get it, being the first is enticing, but beggars can't be fucking choosers.
 
Back