People who caught Covid during the first wave of the pandemic get no boost to their immune response if they subsequently catch Omicron, a study of triple vaccinated people reports.
The Devil's in the details
Writing in the journal Science, the researchers reported how they followed the vaccination and infection experiences of
731 triple vaccinated healthcare workers in the UK from March 2020 to January 2022. The team then used blood samples collected from participants in the weeks after their third dose of vaccine to explore their antibody and T-cell responses towards the Omicron variant, BA.1.
What they didn't do is study the immune response in the unvaccinated.
The UK vaccine surveillance report was showing the boosted catching Covid at 3 times the rate of the unvaxxed. Then a couple of months ago, for no reason whatsoever, they decided to stop publishing these numbers. What's the difference now that almost everyone has been exposed to Covid?
Do the math. If you're 3 times less likely to catch Covid but twice as likely to get sick from Covid what benefit do you accrue from getting the jab? Even better if you're unjabbed and get good natural immunity post infection and have near zero risk from re-infection over time what benefit accrues from getting a 'vaccine' that will expose you to constant reinfection? This isn't a conspiracy theory any more.
But he added the findings raised other concerns. “We’re not getting herd immunity, we’re not building up protective immunity to Omicron,” he said. “So we face not coming out the other end of infections and re-infections and breakthrough infections.”
Again the
boosted are not getting herd immunity, the question is why?
The study confirms that if you've had Covid prior to getting the jab you will lose your natural immune response when exposed again. This isn't good news. It had been assumed that the vaccines could not effect normal T-cell response in the previously infected. Wrong.
The study confirms that if you hadn't caught Covid before getting jabbed you won't get natural immunity.
These findings are easily explained by OAS, Original Antigenic Sin, a known and well researched side effect of leaky vaccines.
What we don't know is whether or not the vaccines effects wear off over time, and if they do how long it takes for the human immune system to start showing a normal response to Covid exposure post jab? The mRNA component of the vaccines (I believe that the UK used mRNA almost exclusively in it's booster campaign) is designed to be persistent in the body for up to 6 months. If/when their effects wear off will the change be permanent? Again we don't know. The vaccine surveillance report is showing that N-protein antibody prevalence is increasing in the population, but overwhelmingly among the unboosted younger age groups.
The UK relied heavily on the Astra Zeneca Adenovector vaccine in the first year of mass jabbings. The boosted are being injected with mRNA. We're likely comparing apples with bananas and research needs to be done comparing the boosted with an unvaccinated or AZ/J&J control group.
TLDR the vaccines seem designed to create dependency. I have no doubt that OAS, likely being caused by the immune system in the vaccinated treating natural Covid infection as a spike not a viral exposure, was known prior to the mass jabbings. You want to prevent serious illness from contracting Covid over and over again? Well you best roll up your sleeve and take the experimental prophylactic we're pretending is a vaccine. Luckily Omicron Covid has a case mortality rate around 10% of seasonal flu, perhaps even lower. So apart from the shittiness of getting a bad cold every 3-6 months most of the jabbed will be fine, for now.
And they won't have a second chance to redemption like Ebenezer Scrooge.
www.pbs.org
