Lord of the Rings TV Series in Development - How could this POSSIBLY go wrong...

The first one I'd say is absolutely worth watching. The other two...not so much.
There are a number of fanedits of the Hobbit Trilogy that just edit the stuff from the book together and cut out most of the added in stuff. The Cardinal Cut, for example.

None of these edits are perfect, and the result is often like taking a molded jello that had peas in it, and removing all of the peas, leaving only the jello behind. You can still see the holes where the peas were, but you no longer have to eat any of them.
 
What Amazon is doing is akin to woke writers taking the foundation stories of Islam in the Koran, making Muhammad a bitch boy to his trader wife, the Angel Gabriel a Jewish woman, and then telling 1.2 billion Muslims they need to update their origin story for modern audiences.

Amazon should do that. Please Bezos, do it.
 
I actually liked the hobbit movies. Though disclaimer would be that I liked them more for the world building, visuals, and sense of adventure. The story wasn't superb and I imagine the books do that way better
>The story wasn't superb and I imagine the books do that way better
>superb and I imagine the books do that way
>I imagine the books do that
>the books do
>books

See, that's the problem. The Hobbit is only one book, maybe about the length of the "Fellowship of the Ring"-part in LOTR. There was simply not enough plot to fill up 3 movies without adding stuff.
And any addition hurts the flow of the story, since even The Hobbit is very meticulously crafted. Not as meticulously as LOTR, of course, but still.
 
Last edited:
>The story wasn't superb and I imagine the books do that way better
>superb and I imagine the books do that way
>I imagine the books do that
>the books do
>books

See, that's the problem. The Hobbit is only one book, maybe about the length of the "Fellowship of the Ring"-part in LOTR. There was simply not enough plot to fill up 3 movies without adding stuff.
And any addition hurts the flow of the story, since even The Hobbit is very meticulously crafted. Not as meticulously as LOTR, of course, but still.
To be fair there was a lot of Tolkien-mandated stuff that was going on at the same time as the Hobbit, but it's mostly explained in like a few sentences and outlines. The stuff at Dol Goldur is basically "canon" for example, just hugely elaborated upon.
 
To be fair there was a lot of Tolkien-mandated stuff that was going on at the same time as the Hobbit, but it's mostly explained in like a few sentences and outlines. The stuff at Dol Goldur is basically "canon" for example, just hugely elaborated upon.
Well, there's that... but they added a romance if I'm not mistaken, added Legolas (which could be neat if it was only as a cameo, but afaik, they gave him a rather significant part)... and then there's a lot of really pointless action scenes, like the barrel escape.

Worst of all, everything looks like CGI barf, which was the largest turn-off for me.
 
What Amazon is doing is akin to woke writers taking the foundation stories of Islam in the Koran, making Muhammad a bitch boy to his trader wife, the Angel Gabriel a Jewish woman, and then telling 1.2 billion Muslims they need to update their origin story for modern audiences.
Muhammad did cry a lot and went to his wives to hide and shit.
 
Just remembered Disney was closed to making a LOTR movie back in the 90s when they owned Miramax.

Disney making a LOTR movie. Now that’s horrifying.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Chester Rigby
Just remembered Disney was closed to making a LOTR movie back in the 90s when they owned Miramax.

Disney making a LOTR movie. Now that’s horrifying.
Even decades before, Walt Disney himself opted to buy the rights to the book to make an animated feature, which never happened, so we ended up with Bakshi's animated films and a couple Rankin-Bass specials. Yea, a Disney-LoTR is a bad idea.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chester Rigby
"I'm mister Ring Bearer, I'm mister Frodo"
They're actually better than that, since they were animated by Topcraft, the studio that later went on to become Studio Ghibli, although it's pretty surreal to hear the voice actors from Scooby Doo voicing characters from LOTR. I'd say the Rankin Bass Hobbit is a pretty decent adaptation of the book, since it's brisk and sticks very closely to the original work. It's more aimed at kids, though, than adult nerd fans.

If you find yourself complaining about subpar adaptations of Tolkien's work, just be glad that John Boorman's crackfic version of LOTR never got made. Yes, Boorman was the same mind behind Zardoz, and his version of LOTR had sex, drugs, and Aragorn and Boromir macking on each other. Many of Boorman's ideas later made it into Excalibur, his version of the King Arthur story, (where, arguably, they were more fitting.)
 
They're actually better than that, since they were animated by Topcraft, the studio that later went on to become Studio Ghibli, although it's pretty surreal to hear the voice actors from Scooby Doo voicing characters from LOTR. I'd say the Rankin Bass Hobbit is a pretty decent adaptation of the book, since it's brisk and sticks very closely to the original work. It's more aimed at kids, though, than adult nerd fans.
Rankin-Bass' cartoons are great. They are worth watching for the soundtrack and the weird but creative visual decisions alone.
 
Rankin-Bass' cartoons are great. They are worth watching for the soundtrack and the weird but creative visual decisions alone.
>men bullying inferior manlet races
You already know this is too dangerously based for todays audiences

Edit: clipped it because fuck me it was funny have fun

 
Last edited:
>men bullying inferior manlet races
One thing that most interpretations of Orcs in later fantasy settings including Tolkien adaptations seldom get correct is that Orcs are supposed to be smaller than men. I guess the exception is goblins in general, but goblins being small predates Tolkien.
Something that bothers me even more is that literally every adaption assumes that elves in Tolkien's works have pointed ears which has essentially no evidence supporting and a lot of evidence opposing it. Men and elves were the same biological "species" and were identical on a base physical level but were fundamentally different on a mystical/spiritual/mental level. It's essentially been memed into canon that Tolkien-style elves have pointy ears.
 
Last edited:
Worst of all, everything looks like CGI barf, which was the largest turn-off for me.
When your CGI looks dated when people are watching it in the theater then you have a problem. The extended versions of The Hobbit films feature arguably even worse CGI. The third film in particular has some gruelingly and agonizingly long CGI filled sequences that look truly awful.
 
When your CGI looks dated when people are watching it in the theater then you have a problem. The extended versions of The Hobbit films feature arguably even worse CGI. The third film in particular has some gruelingly and agonizingly long CGI filled sequences that look truly awful.
What, you didn't appreciate this totally awesome scene from the Hobbit?
 
Back